Patient preference for oral chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast and lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Although new therapies against metastatic cancer have been developed in recent decades, chemotherapy is still an important treatment option. Prolonged treatment and side-effects are often discouraging for patients, and in many cases, therapy is only palliative, not curative. This study explores patient preference for oral or intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast or lung cancer. METHODS: It is a descriptive, open label, multicentre, nation-wide study, in which a 16-item questionnaire consisting of single-choice questions scored on a 5-point Likert scale was administered to patients in a single visit, and another 11-item questionnaire was self-administered by the patient's oncologist. RESULTS: A total of 131 breast and lung cancer specialists at 64 hospitals enrolled 412 patients (lung cancer = 161; breast cancer = 251). To be eligible, patients must have already received IV therapy and at least 2 cycles of oral chemotherapy. Most (77%) patients expressed preference for oral therapy. Most considered their daily life was less disrupted with tablets (70.4%), had no trouble swallowing them (86.9%), and were not concerned about forgetting to take them (56.8%). Half (56.3%) were worried about problems related to drug infusion with IV therapy, 61.7% were concerned about nurses failing to find a suitable vein, and 63.1% were dissatisfied with hospital waiting times. A uniform response was obtained from both samples of patients. CONCLUSION: Convenience, ease of administration, fewer side effects and better quality of life tilt the balance towards oral drug administration.

NEOPLASM study: Real-life use of lacosamide in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: The choice of antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is complicated, and there are a lack of robust clinical trial data to date. METHODS: The NEOPLASM (Neuroncologic Patients treated with LAcoSaMide) study was a 6-month, multicenter, retrospective, observational study in patients with BTRE treated with lacosamide. Patients were started on lacosamide because of a lack of efficacy or adverse events (AEs) with prior AEDs or suitability versus other AEDs, according to clinical practice. The primary efficacy variable was the seizure-free rate at 6months. Safety variables included the proportion of patients with an AE and the proportion with an AE that led to discontinuation. RESULTS: Overall, 105 patients from 14 hospital centers were included in the analysis. Treatment with lacosamide for 6months resulted in a 30.8% seizure-free rate, and 66.3% of patients had a ≥50% seizure reduction (responders). In the subset of patients included because of a lack of efficacy with prior AEDs, seizure-free rates were 28.0%, and 66.7% of patients were responders. No statistically significant differences in efficacy were observed according to the mechanism of action or enzyme-inducing properties of concomitant AEDs. Adverse events were reported by 41.9% of patients at 6months, and 4.7% of them led to discontinuation. The most common AEs were somnolence/fatigue and dizziness. Notably, 57.1% of the patients who were switched to lacosamide because of AEs with their previous therapy did not report any AE at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this open-label, observational study, lacosamide appeared to be effective and well tolerated in a large population of patients with BTRE. Lacosamide may therefore be a promising option for the treatment of patients with BTRE.

Multicenter phase II study of fixed sequences of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin or irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of fixed sequences of capecitabine/oxaliplatin followed by capecitabine/irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with histologically confirmed, previously untreated, nonresectable, locally advanced or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled in the study. Patients were treated as follows: capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily) on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 2-hour intravenous infusion) on day 1, followed by capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily) on days 1-14 and irinotecan (240 mg/m2 1.5-hour intravenous infusion) on day 1. Each combination was administered every 21 days during 4 consecutive cycles followed by the alternating sequence to a maximum of 16 cycles. RESULTS: A total of 35 eligible patients have been included in this ongoing study. Response rate (complete responses plus partial responses) was 37.1%. With a median follow-up of 9.5 months, the median time to disease progression and overall survival were 7.4 months and 16.4 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with only 6% of the patients developing grade 3/4 neurotoxicity. However, the low number of patients treated beyond 4 cycles limits the interpretation of the data. CONCLUSION: The preliminary results from this ongoing study suggest the feasibility of this strategy, which resulted in promising antitumor activity with less neurotoxicity.

Activity and safety of oxaliplatin with weekly 5-fluorouracil bolus and low-dose leucovorin as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer.

This study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of oxaliplatin combined with weekly boluses of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and low doses of leucovorin (LV) and to determine objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival of patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer. Seventy-nine patients enrolled in an observational, multicenter, prospective, open-label phase II study received intravenous (I.V.) infusions of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 over the course of 2 hours on days 1 and 14 and LV 20 mg/m2 over the course of 2 hours and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 as a bolus on days 1, 7, and 14 every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Seventy-nine patients were evaluable for safety, and data from 70 patients were used for efficacy analysis. The objective response rate was 51.4%. Complete responses occurred in 7 patients (10%), and partial responses occurred in 29 patients (41.4%). Disease control, defined as response or stable disease, was obtained in 56 of 70 patients (80%). The median duration of response was 8.34 weeks (range, 7.3-11.5 weeks). The median time to progression was 7.13 months (range, 6.28-7.72 months), and median overall survival time was 15 months (range, 12.32-18.37 months). Acute dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3/4 diarrhea and neutropenia, which occurred in 10.5% and 3.9% of patients, respectively. Among the 70 patients who experienced neurosensory toxicity, it was estimated that only 1.3% had grade 3 symptoms. Preliminary data showed that the regimen is at least as active as other regimens combining oxaliplatin and infusional schedules of 5-FU and might be more convenient for patients because it avoids the need for I.V. catheter implantation.

HER2/neu testing for anti-HER2-based therapies in patients with unresectable and/or metastatic gastric cancer.

AIM: To study the HER2 gene amplification or overexpression in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) and their association with patient characteristics and patient survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumour tissue samples from 148 patients with advanced GC were studied for HER2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and dual colour silver enhanced in situ hybridisation (dc-SISH) methods. Clinicopathological data from all patients were collected. Progression free survival and overall survival were also analysed. RESULTS: Mean age was 67 (33-83) years; 75% were male subjects, and 51% had intestinal histological type. HER2+ rates were 10.1% (15/148) by IHC, 18.2% (27/148) by FISH+ or 21.6% (32/148) by dc-SISH+. There were significant differences in HER2+ rates according to histological type when FISH (intestinal, 23%; no intestinal, 4%; p<0.0001) or dc-SISH (intestinal, 26%; no intestinal, 6%; p<0.0001) amplification techniques were used. Median overall survival was significantly longer in HER2+ patients despite the determination technique used: IHC (21.4 vs 9.8 months, HR 0.42; p=0.005); FISH (19.6 vs 9.7 months, HR 0.49; p=0.007) or dc-SISH (19.6 vs 9.7 months, HR 0.53; p=0.009). Factors associated with favourable survival in the multivariate analysis were intestinal type and Her2+ determination by IHC, FISH or dc-SISH. CONCLUSION: HER2 gene amplification is significantly associated with patient survival. HER2 gene amplification approaches might be an optimal HER2/neu testing strategy for the selection of HER2+ GC patients who are candidates to be treated with anti-HER2 therapies.

An unusual metastatic renal cell carcinoma with maintained complete response to sunitinib treatment.

Recently, metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatment has changed dramatically with the onset of new therapies against molecular targets replacing immunotherapy as standard treatment. We report the case of a 49-year-old patient with a moderately differentiated renal clear cell carcinoma without extracapsular extension who underwent radical nephrectomy. Eight months after surgery, he developed a thyroid metastasis which was also treated surgically with a hemithyroidectomy. Seventy-five months after nephrectomy, the patient presented an upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to a duodenal metastasis that infiltrates the head of the pancreas. The treatment applied was surgery by duodenopancreatectomy, with positive surgical margins in the pathologic study. In addition to this, the extension study showed lung metastases requiring initiation of systemic treatment with sunitinib. The patient presented an excellent response to treatment, showing complete clinical and radiological response at 5 months of treatment (RECIST criteria) and a disease-free survival of 48 months until now, without evidence of toxicity. RCC has the potential to metastasize to almost any location, but thyroid and duodenal metastases in RCC are extremely rare. Moreover, this case also highlights the good responses that can be achieved in terms of disease-free survival, low toxicity and quality of life in this new era of therapies against molecular targets.