RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Coronary artery calcification (CorCa) identifies high cardiovascular risk in the general population. In this setting, aortic valve calcification (AoCa) showed contradictory results. Our goal has been to assess the prognostic power of CorCa and AoCa in patients with chest pain who underwent an ECG-gated cardiac multidetector CT (cardiac-MDCT). METHODS: A total of 528 patients without previous known coronary artery disease, with chest pain who underwent a cardiac-MDCT multidetector, were retrospectively recruited. The primary endpoint included death, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and heart failure. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients (11.6%) had an event during a mean follow-up of almost 6 years (5.95 ± 2.98). The most frequent event was acute coronary syndrome (6.4%). Total mortality was 4.5%. Patients with CorCa > 0 had more events than those without CorCa (17.3% versus 4.3%; p < 0.001). Likewise, when only patients without AoCa were considered (n = 118), clinical events were more frequent in those with CorCa (12.7% versus 3.6%; p = 0.004). After excluding patients with coronary artery disease, events were more frequent in those with CorCa (12.6% versus 4.3%; p = 0.004). The higher the Agatston score, the more frequent the events. Patients with AoCa > 0 had more events than those without (16.5% versus 7.3%; p < 0.001), but in patients without CorCa, no difference in events was seen (6.2% versus 3.6%; p = 0.471). A Cox regression analysis showed age, smoking, prior stroke, and CorCa but not AoCa to be independently related to events. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, CorCa, but not AoCa, is related to cardiovascular events in patients with chest pain who undergo a cardiac-MDCT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: We show that coronary artery calcification, but not aortic valve calcification, detected in a coronary CT scan is tightly related to cardiovascular events. Although this is a message already shown by other groups in the general population, we do believe that this work is unique because it is restricted to patients with chest pain sent to coronary CT. In other words, our work deals with what we face in our routine everyday practice. KEY POINTS: ⢠The presence and the amount of coronary artery calcification are associated with cardiovascular events in patients with chest pain. ⢠Aortic valve calcification is not associated with cardiovascular events in patients with chest pain.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Válvula Aórtica/patología , Calcinosis , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Calcificación Vascular , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcio , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Calcificación Vascular/complicaciones , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine the dose-response association of carotid arterial stiffness with vascular outcomes and overall mortality, and to assess their added predictive capacity. METHODS: Population-based cohort study including 6468 individuals, with a median follow-up of 6.5 years. Six carotid artery stiffness indices were assessed: strain, stiffness, Peterson elasticity coefficient, compliance coefficient, distensibility coefficient, and pulse wave velocity (PWV). Incident coronary, cerebrovascular, global vascular, and total fatal events were identified. RESULTS: Carotid compliance and distensibility coefficients were not associated with any of the outcomes. Carotid stiffness, Peterson elasticity coefficient, and PWV showed a direct linear relationship to cerebrovascular disease: the risk increased by 8% (95%CI, 1-16) per stiffness unit increase, by 7% (95%CI, 2-13) per 10-unit Peterson elasticity coefficient increase, and by 26% (95%CI, 8-48) per PWV unit increase. Carotid strain showed a nonlinear association with ischemic heart disease. When strain was ≤ 0.09 units, each 0.01-unit increase was associated with a 15% lower risk of coronary events (95%CI,-33 to 6); above 0.09 units, each 0.01 increase in strain was associated with a 16% higher risk of coronary events (95%CI, 6-27). The addition of the stiffness indices did not improve the predictive capacity of validated risk functions. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid stiffness, Peterson elasticity coefficient, and PWV have a direct linear association with cerebrovascular disease risk. Carotid strain is not linearly related to U-shaped ischemic heart disease risk. The inclusion of these indexes does not improve the predictive capacity of risk functions.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Cerebrovasculares , Isquemia Miocárdica , Rigidez Vascular , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis de la Onda del Pulso , Factores de Riesgo , Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Rigidez Vascular/fisiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Aortic self-expandable (SE) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) devices are particularly useful for patients with aortic stenosis and small/tortuous vessels, small aortic annuli, or low coronary ostia. However, it is unclear whether the growing range of SE devices shows comparable hemodynamic and clinical outcomes. We aimed to determine the differential hemodynamic (residual valve area and regurgitation) and clinical outcomes of these devices in comparable scenarios. METHODS: All patients were enrolled from 4 institutions and were managed with 4 different SE TAVI devices. Baseline and follow-up clinical data were collected and echocardiographic tests blindly and centrally analyzed. Patients were compared according to valve type and a 1:1 matched comparison was performed according to degree of calcification, aortic annulus dimensions, left ventricular ejection fraction, and body surface area. RESULTS: In total, 514 patients were included (Evolut R/PRO, 217; ACURATE neo, 107; ALLEGRA, 102; Portico, 88). Surgical risk scores were comparable in the unmatched population. No differences were observed in the post-TAVI regurgitation rate and in in-hospital mortality (2.7%). The rate of pacemaker implantation at discharge was significantly different among devices (P=.049), with Portico showing the highest rate (23%) and ACURATE neo the lowest (9.5%); Evolut R/PRO and ALLEGRA had rates of 15.9% and 21.2%, respectively. The adjusted comparison showed worse residual TAVI gradients and aortic valve area with ACURATE neo vs ALLEGRA (P=.001) but the latter had higher risk of valve embolization and a tendency for more cerebrovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: A matched comparison of 4 SE TAVI devices showed no differences regarding residual aortic regurgitation and in-hospital mortality.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Diseño de Prótesis , Volumen Sistólico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Función Ventricular IzquierdaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We tried to evaluate a putative negative effect on coronary atherosclerosis in patients receiving intracoronary infusion of unfractionated bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) following an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells or enriched CD133(+) BMMC have been associated with accelerated atherosclerosis of the distal segment of the infarct related artery (IRA). METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction from the TECAM pilot study underwent intracoronary infusion of autologous BMMC 9 +/- 3.1 days after onset of symptoms. We compared angiographic changes from baseline to 9 months of follow-up in the distal non-stented segment of the IRA, as well as in the contralateral coronary artery, with a matched control group. A subgroup of 15 treated patients underwent additional IVUS within the distal segment of the IRA. RESULTS: No difference between stem cell and control group were found regarding changes in minimum lumen diameter (0.006 +/- 0.42 vs 0.06 +/- 0.41 mm, P = ns) and the percentage of stenosis (-2.68 +/- 12.33% vs -1.78 +/- 8.75%, P = ns) at follow-up. Likewise, no differences were seen regarding changes in the contralateral artery (minimum lumen diameter -0.004 +/- 0.54 mm vs -0.06 +/- 0.35 mm, P = ns). In the intravascular ultrasound substudy, no changes were demonstrated comparing baseline versus follow-up in maximum area stenosis and plaque volume. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, analysis of a subgroup of patients found that intracoronary injection of unfractionated BMMC in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction was not associated with accelerated atherosclerosis progression at mid term. Prospective, randomised studies in large cohorts with long-term angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up are necessary to determine the safety of this therapy.
Asunto(s)
Aterosclerosis/cirugía , Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Macrófagos/trasplante , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Aterosclerosis/complicaciones , Aterosclerosis/diagnóstico , Transfusión de Sangre Autóloga , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Vasos Coronarios , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atrial septal defect (ASD) is one of the most common congenital heart diseases. Percutaneous closure is the preferred treatment, but certain complications remain a concern. The most common devices are AMPLATZER™ (ASO) (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) and Figulla Flex® septal occluders (FSO) (Occlutech GmbH, Jena, Germany). The present study aimed to assess main differences in outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search in Pubmed and Google scholarship was performed by two independent reviewers for any study comparing ASO and FSO. Searched terms were "Figulla", "Amplatzer", and "atrial septal defect". A random-effects model was used. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies including 1770 patients (897 ASO; 873 FSO) were gathered. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were comparable although septal aneurysm was more often reported in patients treated with ASO (32% vs. 25%; p = 0.061). Success rate (94% vs. 95%; OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.38-1.71; p = 0.58) and peri-procedural complications were comparable. Procedures were shorter, requiring less fluoroscopy time with an FSO device (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.20-0.97; p = 0.003). Although the global rate of complications in long-term was similar, the ASO device was associated with a higher rate of supraventricular arrhythmias (14.7% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous closure of ASD is a safe and effective, irrespective of the type of device. No differences exist regarding procedural success between the ASO and FSO devices but the last was associated to shorter procedure time, less radiation, and lower rate of supraventricular arrhythmias in follow-up. Late cardiac perforation did not occur and death in the follow-up was exceptional.
Asunto(s)
Defectos del Tabique Interatrial , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Ecocardiografía , Alemania , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the efficacy of the drug-coated balloon (DCB) ESSENTIAL for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: DCBs have proven a valid therapeutic option for the management of ISR in several clinical trials, yet no class effect can be claimed. Accordingly, every new DCB model has to be individually evaluated through clinical studies. METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter study including consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ISR with the ESSENTIAL DCB. A 6-month quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)/optical coherence tomography (OCT) follow-up was scheduled. The primary endpoint was OCT-derived in-segment maximal area stenosis. Secondary endpoints included QCA-derived in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) and target lesion failure (TLF) rates at 6, 12, and 24â¯months. TLF was defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were successfully treated with DCB, with 67% of ISR corresponding to drug-eluting stents (DES). At 6â¯months, 26 patients underwent the scheduled angiographic follow-up. The mean value for in-segment maximal area stenosis was 51.4⯱â¯13% and the median value was 53% (IQR 46.4-59.5). In the DES-ISR subgroup, these parameters were 52.6⯱â¯10% and 55.2% (IQR 49.3-58.5), respectively. In-segment LLL was 0.25⯱â¯0.43â¯mm with only 2 (7.7%) patients showing binary restenosis (>50%). The incidence of TLF was 10% at 6â¯months, 13.3% at 12â¯months, and 13.3% at 24â¯months. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the ESSENTIAL DCB showed sustained efficacy in the prevention of recurrent restenosis after treatment of ISR. SUMMARY: We sought to assess the efficacy of the drug-coated balloon ESSENTIAL for the treatment of in-stent restenosis through a prospective, multicenter study including QCA and OCT assessment at 6-month follow-up. The primary endpoint was in-segment maximal area stenosis. Among the 31 patients successfully treated with the ESSENTIAL DCB, an angiographic follow-up was conducted in 26. Mean in-segment maximal area stenosis was 51.4⯱â¯13% and the median value was 53% (IQR 46.4-59.5). In the DES-ISR subgroup, corresponding values were 52.6⯱â¯10% and 55.2% (IQR 49.3-58.5), respectively. The observed in-segment LLL was 0.25⯱â¯0.43â¯mm and binary restenosis rate was 7.7%. TLF was 10% at 6â¯months and 13.3% at 12 and 24â¯months.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Reestenosis Coronaria/terapia , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Stents , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/mortalidad , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Reestenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/mortalidad , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , España , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stroke recurrence despite optimal oral anticoagulation (OAC) might represent a novel indication for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). The heterogeneity of these patients is generally high, as the presence of valvular atrial fibrillation (VAF) is common. The aim of this study was to explore the role of LAAO as an adjunctive therapy to OAC in patients with recurrent stroke despite optimal OAC. METHODS: The study screened consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous LAAO at nine centers between 2009 and 2017. Patients with recurrent stroke despite optimal OAC were selected and those with an absolute or relative contraindication to OAC were not included in the study. RESULTS: Among 837 patients who underwent LAAO between the study period, a total of 22 (2.6%) met the inclusion criteria. There was a high percentage of VAF (38%) and 59% presented more than one cardioembolic event before LAAO. All patients underwent successful implantation of the device and no procedural major adverse events were reported. In all but 3 patients, anticoagulation was continued after LAAO. With a median clinical follow-up of 1.8 years (range, 0.7-2.8 years), only 1 stroke and 1 transient ischemic attack were reported, translating into a significant reduction of cerebrovascular events before and after LAAO (2.0 ± 1.0 events vs 0.1 ± 0.3 events; P<.01). Imaging follow-up revealed only 1 case of device thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: LAAO as an adjunctive therapy to OAC seems to be feasible and safe in patients with previous cardioembolic events despite optimal OAC. In our series, this strategy was associated with a low rate of cerebrovascular events after LAAO.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Administración Oral , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy and safety of intramyocardial autologous bone marrow mononuclear stem cells (BMMNC) grafting combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on ventricular remodeling and global and regional wall motion after acute transmural myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: Randomized controlled trial including 20 patients with non-revascularized transmural AMI, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) lower than 50% and surgical indication for CABG. The stem cell group was treated with BMMNC grafting by direct intramyocardial injection between the 10th and 15th days after AMI (subacute phase) combined with CABG under cardiopulmonary bypass; the control group was only treated with CABG. Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium and stress echocardiography were performed presurgery and 9 months postsurgery. RESULTS: Seventeen patients completed the follow-up. The baseline characteristics of both groups were homogeneous. No significant differences were found in the increase in LVEF (control: 6.99±4.60, cells: 7.47±6.61, P=0.876) or in the decrease in global (control: 0.28±0.39, cells: 0.22±0.28, P=0.759) or regional (control: 0.52±0.38, cells: 0.74±0.60, P=0.415) wall motion indices between the control and stem cell groups of AMI patients. No differences were found in the recovered non-viable segments (control: 1.29±1.11, cells: 2.50±1.41, P=0.091) or in the decrease in end-diastolic (control: 14.05±19.72, cells: 18.40±29.89, P=0.725) or end-systolic (control: 15.42±13.93, cells: 23.06±25.03, P=0.442) volumes. No complications from stem cell grafting were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results from our study reported herein suggest that intramyocardial BMMNC administration during CABG in patients with AMI causes no medium- to long-term improvement in ventricular remodeling.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Miocardio/patología , Regeneración , Trasplante de Células Madre , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Remodelación Ventricular , Anciano , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Método Doble Ciego , Ecocardiografía de Estrés , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Contracción Miocárdica , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/patología , Infarto del Miocardio/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , España , Trasplante de Células Madre/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is associated with early valvular dysfunction and proximal aorta dilation with high heterogeneity. This study aimed to assess the determinants of these complications. METHODS: Eight hundred and fifty-two consecutive adults diagnosed of BAV referred from cardiac outpatient clinics to eight echocardiographic laboratories of tertiary hospitals were prospectively recruited. Exclusion criteria were aortic coarctation, other congenital disorders or intervention. BAV morphotype, significant valve dysfunction and aorta dilation (≥2 Z-score) at sinuses and ascending aorta were established. RESULTS: Three BAV morphotypes were identified: right-left coronary cusp fusion (RL) in 72.9%, right-non-coronary (RN) in 24.1% and left-non-coronary (LN) in 3.0%. BAV without raphe was observed in 18.3%. Multivariate analysis showed aortic regurgitation (23%) to be related to male sex (OR: 2.80, p<0.0001) and valve prolapse (OR: 5.16, p<0.0001), and aortic stenosis (22%) to BAV-RN (OR: 2.09, p<0.001), the presence of raphe (OR: 2.75, p<0.001), age (OR: 1.03; p<0.001), dyslipidaemia (OR: 1.77, p<0.01) and smoking (OR: 1.63, p<0.05). Ascending aorta was dilated in 76% without differences among morphotypes and associated with significant valvular dysfunction. By contrast, aortic root was dilated in 34% and related to male sex and aortic regurgitation but was less frequent in aortic stenosis and BAV-RN. CONCLUSIONS: Normofunctional valves are more prevalent in BAV without raphe. Aortic stenosis is more frequent in BAV-RN and associated with some cardiovascular risk factors, whereas aortic regurgitation (AR) is associated with male sex and sigmoid prolapse. Although ascending aorta is the most commonly dilated segment, aortic root dilation is present in one-third of patients and associated with AR. Remarkably, BAV-RL increases the risk for dilation of the proximal aorta, whereas BAV-RN spares this area.
Asunto(s)
Aorta , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Válvula Aórtica/anomalías , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas , Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta/patología , Aorta/fisiopatología , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/etiología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/etiología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Válvula Aórtica Bicúspide , Dilatación Patológica/diagnóstico , Dilatación Patológica/etiología , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Femenino , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/complicaciones , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The SAPIEN 3 (S3) valve and the Medtronic Evolut R (EVR) are second-generation transcatheter valves, designed to further reduce the rate of paravalvular aortic regurgitation (AoR). The aim of this study was to compare the 2 devices in terms of valve performance in a case-matched study with independent echocardiographic analysis. METHODS: Of a population of 201 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation, 144 patients (S3, n = 80; EVR, n = 64) were matched according to aortic annulus diameter and aortic valve calcium score, as assessed by computed tomography. All echocardiographic examinations collected at baseline and at 1- and 6-month follow-up were centrally analyzed. RESULTS: The 2 groups were well balanced in baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics. The EVR valve showed a better hemodynamic profile as assessed by peak aortic gradient (EVR 13 ± 7 vs S3 20 ± 10mmHg; P<.001), mean aortic gradient (EVR 7 ± 3 vs S3 11 ± 6mmHg; P<.001), and Doppler velocity index (EVR 0.65±0.15 vs S3 0.51±0.16; P<.001). The rate of moderate-severe or any paravalvular (≥ mild) AoR was higher in the EVR group (11% and 50%) than in the S3 group (2.5% and 21%; P <.05, respectively), with a larger number of paravalvular jets (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a case-matched cohort of transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients, the S3 valve was associated with a lower rate of paravalvular AoR but also with a higher residual gradient than the EVR system.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Diseño de Prótesis , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) as a treatment in severe aortic stenosis (AS) is an excellent alternative to conventional surgical replacement. However, long-term outcomes are not benign. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade has shown benefit in terms of adverse remodelling in severe AS and after surgical replacement. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The RAS blockade after TAVI (RASTAVI) trial aims to detect if there is a benefit in clinical outcomes and ventricular remodelling with this therapeutic strategy following the TAVI procedure. The study has been designed as a randomised 1:1 open-label study that will be undertaken in 8 centres including 336 TAVI recipients. All patients will receive the standard treatment. The active treatment group will receive ramipril as well. Randomisation will be done before discharge, after signing informed consent. All patients will be followed up for 3 years. A cardiac magnetic resonance will be performed initially and at 1 year to assess ventricular remodelling, defined as ventricular dimensions, ejection fraction, ventricular mass and fibrosis. Recorded events will include cardiac death, admission due to heart failure and stroke. The RASTAVI Study will improve the management of patients after TAVI and may help to increase their quality of life, reduce readmissions and improve long-term survival in this scenario. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All authors and local ethics committees have approved the study design. All patients will provide informed consent. Results will be published irrespective of whether the findings are positive or negative. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03201185.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/administración & dosificación , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Ramipril/administración & dosificación , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Remodelación Ventricular/efectos de los fármacos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/efectos de los fármacos , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have the potential to restore vasomotion but the clinical implications are unknown. We sought to evaluate angina and ischemia in the long-term in patients treated with BVS and metallic drug-eluting stents (mDES). METHODS: Multicenter study including patients with 24 ± 6 months of uneventful follow-up, in which stress echocardiography was performed and functional status was assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). The primary endpoint was a positive result in stress echocardiography. RESULTS: The study included 102 patients treated with BVS and 106 with mDES. There were no differences in the patients' baseline characteristics. Recurrent angina was found in 18 patients (17.6%) in the BVS group vs 25 (23.5%) in the mDES group (P = .37), but SAQ results were significantly better in the BVS group (angina frequency 96.0 ± 8.0 vs 89.2 ± 29.7; P = .02). Stress echocardiography was positive in 11/92 (11.9%) of BVS patients vs 9/96 (9.4%) of mDES patients in the (P = .71) and angina was induced in 2/102 (1.9%) vs 7/106 (6.6%) (P = .18), respectively, but exercise performance was better in the BVS group even in those with positive tests (exercise duration 9.0 ± 2.0minutes vs 7.7 ± 1.8minutes; P = .02). A propensity score matching analysis yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The primary endpoint was similar in both groups. In addition, recurrent angina was similar in patients with BVS and mDES. The better functional status, assessed by means of SAQ and exercise performance, detected in patients receiving BVS should be confirmed in further studies.
Asunto(s)
Angina de Pecho/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Ecocardiografía de Estrés/métodos , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Andamios del Tejido , Implantes Absorbibles , Anciano , Angina de Pecho/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Everolimus/farmacología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Metales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Over the past 13 years bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) have been widely investigated for clinical efficacy in patients following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). These early phase II trials have used various surrogate markers to judge efficacy and, although promising, the results have been inconsistent. The phase III BAMI trial has therefore been designed to demonstrate that intracoronary infusion of BM-MNCs is safe and will significantly reduce the time to first occurrence of all-cause death in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction after successful reperfusion for ST-elevation AMI (powered with the aim of detecting a 25% reduction in all-cause mortality). This is a multinational, multicentre, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel-group phase III study aiming to enrol approximately 3000 patients in 11 European countries with at least 17 sites. Eligible patients who have impaired left ventricular ejection (≤45%) following successful reperfusion for AMI will be randomized to treatment or control group in a 1:1 ratio. The treatment group will receive intracoronary infusion of BM-MNCs 2-8 days after successful reperfusion for AMI added on top of optimal standard of care. The control group will receive optimal standard of care. The primary endpoint is time from randomization to all-cause death. The BAMI trial is pivotal and the largest trial to date of BM-MNCs in patients with impaired left ventricular function following AMI. The aim of the trial is to provide a definitive answer as to whether BM-MNCs reduce all-cause mortality in this group of patients.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Causas de Muerte/tendencias , Ecocardiografía , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of perioperative atorvastatin administration for prophylaxis of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after heart valve surgery. METHODS: Our study included 90 patients with heart valve disease who were scheduled to undergo elective cardiac surgery. Cases with previous AF or preoperative beta-blocker therapy were excluded. Patients were randomized into the atorvastatin group, which included 47 patients who received 40 mg/day of atorvastatin 7 days before and after the surgery and the control group, which included 43 patients. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of POAF. Secondary endpoints included modifications in the preoperative and postoperative levels of the markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP]), myocardial injury (ultrasensitive troponin T and creatinine phosphokinase MB [CPK-MB]), and cardiac dysfunction (pro-brain natriuretic peptide [proBNP]) related to POAF and changes in the echocardiographic parameters, such as atrial electromechanical interval, A wave, E/A ratio, and Doppler imaging systolic velocity wave amplitude, related to POAF. RESULTS: No relationship between atorvastatin administration and reduction in the incidence of POAF was observed (42.6% in the atorvastatin vs. 30.2% in the control group) (p=0.226). No difference in the levels of CPK-MB, ultrasensitive troponin T, CRP, or proBNP and in the analyzed echocardiographic parameter was detected between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin in the described dose, was not adequate for the prophylaxis of POAF after heart valve surgery. It was ineffective in controlling the inflammatory phenomena, myocardial injury, and echocardiographic predictors of POAF.
RESUMEN
We compared a conventional stent (Jostent Flex, Jomed GmbH, Rangendingen, Germany) with a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-membrane-covered stent (Jostent Stentgraft) in patients undergoing intervention of a stenosis in an obstructed vein graft. The use of stents improved results of percutaneous revascularization of obstructed vein grafts, but did not demonstrate the reduced elevated restenosis rate. In addition, long-term clinical event rate is still high compared with intervention in native vessels. Observational studies suggested that stents covered with a PTFE membrane might be associated with a low complication and restenosis rate in venous bypass grafts. This prospective multicenter study included a total of 211 patients who were randomly assigned to receive either a Flex stent or Stentgraft. The primary end point was binary restenosis rate at six months by core lab quantitative coronary angiography. Acute success and procedural events were comparable between the two groups. Restenosis rate was not significantly different between the Flex (20%) and the Stentgraft (29%) groups (p = 0.15), although there was a nonsignificant trend toward a higher late occlusion rate in the Stentgraft group (7% vs. 16%, p = 0.069) at follow-up. Likewise, after a mean observation period of 14 months, cumulative event rates (death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) were comparable in the two groups (31% vs. 31%, p = 0.93). This controlled trial does not indicate a superiority of the PTFE-membrane-covered Stentgraft compared with a conventional stent with respect to acute results, restenosis, or clinical event rates.
Asunto(s)
Prótesis Vascular , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Reestenosis Coronaria/terapia , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/terapia , Politetrafluoroetileno , Vena Safena/trasplante , Stents , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria , Reestenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Membranas Artificiales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have identified several genetic variants associated with coronary artery disease. Some of these genetic variants are not associated with classical cardiovascular risk factors and the mechanism of such associations is unclear. The aim of the study was to determine whether these genetic variants are related to subclinical atherosclerosis measured by carotid intima media thickness, carotid stiffness, and ankle brachial index. METHODS: A cross-sectional study nested in the follow-up of the REGICOR cohort was undertaken. The study included 2667 individuals. Subclinical atherosclerosis measurements were performed with standardized methods. Nine genetic variants were genotyped to assess associations with subclinical atherosclerosis, individually and in a weighted genetic risk score. A systematic review and meta-analysis of previous studies that analyzed these associations was undertaken. RESULTS: Neither the selected genetic variants nor the genetic risk score were significantly associated with subclinical atherosclerosis. In the meta-analysis, the rs1746048 (CXCL12; n = 10581) risk allele was directly associated with carotid intima-media thickness (ß = 0.008; 95% confidence interval, 0.001-0.015), whereas the rs6725887 (WDR12; n = 7801) risk allele was inversely associated with this thickness (ß = -0.013; 95% confidence interval, -0.024 to -0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The analyzed genetic variants seem to mediate their association with coronary artery disease through different mechanisms. Our results generate the hypothesis that the CXCL12 variant appears to influence coronary artery disease risk through arterial remodeling and thickening, whereas the WDR12 risk variant could be related to higher plaque vulnerability.
Asunto(s)
Aterosclerosis , Quimiocina CXCL12/genética , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Alelos , Aterosclerosis/complicaciones , Aterosclerosis/diagnóstico , Aterosclerosis/genética , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular , Quimiocina CXCL12/metabolismo , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/etiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/genética , Genotipo , Humanos , Proteínas Nucleares/metabolismo , Proteínas de Unión al ARN , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stem cell-based therapy has emerged as a potential therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although various approaches have been studied, intracoronary injection of bone marrow autologous mononuclear cells (BMMC) and the ability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize endogenous cells have attracted the most attention. OBJECTIVES: This study compares, for the first time, the efficacy of BMMC injection, G-CSF mobilization, and the combination of both with standard treatment. METHODS: On Day 1 after primary percutaneous coronary intervention, 120 patients were randomized to a 1) intracoronary BMMC injection; 2) mobilization with G-CSF; 3) both (BMMC injection plus G-CSF); or 4) conventional treatment (control group). G-CSF, 10 µg/kg/day subcutaneously, was started Day 1 and maintained for 5 days. BMMC injection was performed on Days 3 to 5. Our primary endpoint was absolute change in 12-month left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) relative to baseline measured by cardiac magnetic resonance. RESULTS: The mean change in LVEF between baseline and follow-up for all patients was 4 ± 6% (p = 0.006). Change in LVEF and LVESV over time did not differ significantly among the 4 groups. Patients actively treated with any stem cell approach showed similar changes in LVEF and LVESV versus control subjects, with a small but significant reduction in infarct area (p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, 3 different bone marrow-derived stem cell approaches in AMI did not result in improvement of LVEF or volumes compared with standard AMI care (Trial of Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Acute Myocardial Infarction [TECAM]; NCT00984178).
Asunto(s)
Células de la Médula Ósea/citología , Electrocardiografía , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre/métodos , Angiografía Coronaria , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Reperfusión , Volumen Sistólico , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its N-terminal fragment (NT-proBNP) are elevated in patients with acute coronary syndromes and are closely linked to prognosis. Because there is only a small amount of data available concerning NT-proBNP in patients with stable angina pectoris, we aimed to determine whether NT-proBNP is of additional diagnostic value in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-four patients with stable angina pectoris were prospectively included. All patients underwent exercise testing and coronary angiography, and 91 patients received thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial scintigraphy. NT-proBNP was analyzed at rest and after exercise testing. NT-proBNP was elevated in patients with inducible myocardial ischemia shown by single-photon emission computed tomography (396 +/- 80 pg/mL vs 160 +/- 101 pg/mL; P <.01) closely linked to the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) (no CAD, 148 +/- 29 pg/mL; 1- or 2-vessel disease, 269 +/- 50 pg/mL; 3-vessel disease 624 +/- 186 pg/mL; P <.01). In a multivariate analysis, NT-proBNP was an independent predictor for CAD. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.72 for NT-proBNP to predict CAD. Using an optimized cut off level of 214 pg/mL, CAD can be predicted with high accuracy. The total test efficiency of exercise testing can be improved from 1.46 to 1.52 when combined with NT-proBNP measurement. CONCLUSION: NT-proBNP is elevated in patients with stable angina pectoris and has a close correlation to disease severity. Combining the measurement of NT-proBNP with exercise testing, the test accuracy for predicting severe CAD can be improved. Our data show an incremental value of NT-proBNP in the diagnostic process of stable angina pectoris.
Asunto(s)
Angina de Pecho/sangre , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico/sangre , Anciano , Angina de Pecho/clasificación , Biomarcadores/sangre , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad Coronaria/sangre , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/sangre , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Radioisótopos de Talio , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón ÚnicoRESUMEN
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has been shown to be a reliable biochemical marker for left ventricular wall stress and is increased in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). We evaluated the role of NT pro-BNP as a biochemical marker in the diagnosis of AS and whether it contributes to the optimal timing for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Included in this study were 146 patients who had AS, 31 who underwent AVR, and 32 who had "normal valve function" (controls). Increased NT pro-BNP was closely linked to severity of AS (mild AS 612 +/- 151 pg/ml, moderate AS 1,441 +/- 32 pg/ml, severe AS 2,579 +/- 13 pg/ml, AVR 593 +/- 148 pg/ml, controls 140 +/- 27 pg/ml; p <0,01) and to New York Heart Association functional class (class I 601 +/- 116 pg/ml, class II 1,119 +/- 216 pg/ml, class III 1,998 +/- 459 pg/ml, class IV 5,107 +/- 1,512 pg/ml; p <0.01). Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for NT pro-BNP as a predictor for AVR was 0.73. Using an optimized cutoff of 550 pg/ml for NT-proBNP, the positive predictive value was 85%. Thus, NT pro-BNP is linked to severity of AS and New York Heart Association class and is an indication for AVR. Therefore, it is a useful biochemical marker to evaluate severity of AS, monitor disease progression at an early stage, and decide on the optimal time for AVR.