RESUMEN
Testicular prosthesis implantation is a valuable solution for the physical, cosmetic, and psychological challenges associated with testicular loss which may affect males of any age. We evaluated the safety and reliability of the new Rigicon Testi10TM testicular prosthesis in adults and adolescents by performing an IRB-approved retrospective study of data drawn from Patient Information Forms (PIFs). A total of 427 patients (382 adults and 45 adolescents) had at least one testicular prosthesis implanted. Only one adult patient required revision surgery due to rupture of the Rigicon Testi10 TM saline-filled prosthesis. A 40-year-old patient was found to have a leaking prosthesis approximately one week postoperatively, which was suspected to be due to inadvertently punctured by the surgeon during the sterile saline filling process. There were no post-implantation revisions required for adolescent patients. According to our results, Kaplan-Meier calculation of survival from removal or revision was 99.8% for all patients at 54 months (99.7% for adults and 100% for adolescents). The complication rates among patients in this study are lower than those reported in previous published studies. Our study underscores the generally safe nature of testicular prosthesis implantation, as well as the very rare incidence of revision surgery for this new device.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the surgical technique for prophylactic mesh placement in the sublay position during ileal conduit creation because literature suggests that prophylactic mesh placement at the time of cystectomy may reduce the risk of parastomal hernias with low risk of mesh-related complications. Parastomal hernias are one of the most common complications following ileal conduit construction and occur in 17-65% of patients undergoing cystectomy with urinary diversion. Review of our institutions data demonstrated a high incidence of hernias associated with ileal conduits, which have substantial burden to patients, surgeons, and the healthcare system. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of data from a single surgeon who performed cystectomy with ileal conduit for 12 patients with bladder cancer between January, 2021-March, 2022 at our institution. These dates were chosen based on the timing of availability of literature suggesting a benefit from prophylactic mesh placement. Preliminary data was analyzed determine the incidence of parastomal hernia and mesh-related complications. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients underwent cystectomy with ileal conduit between January, 2021-March, 2022 at our institution. Eleven patients (92%) had prophylactic mesh placed during their procedure. Median follow up was 5.4 months (0.8-8 months). Two patients (17%) developed a parastomal hernia which was detected clinically and/or radiographically. The hernias occurred in patients with mesh and within 6 months of cystectomy. One patient had stomal stenosis eventually requiring surgical revision. There were no mesh infections or mesh removals. CONCLUSION: Parastomal hernias are a common and morbid complication of ileal conduit urinary diversion. Our early experience demonstrates that the procedure is straightforward, adds little time to the surgical procedure, and is associated with a low complication rate. Our experience is too small and follow up too short to confirm that the results of the randomized trial can be matched at our center.
Asunto(s)
Hernia , Derivación Urinaria , Humanos , Cistectomía/métodos , Hernia/epidemiología , Hernia/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Derivación Urinaria/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the short-term burden associated with continent diversion relative to ileal conduit creation. METHODS: Bladder cancer patients who underwent radical cystectomy in 2019 and 2020 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Improvement Program database using current procedural terminology codes and pathology reports. Patients were grouped by urinary diversion performed: ileal conduit versus continent diversion (neobladder or cutaneous reservoir). Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the association between type of urinary diversion and 30-day outcomes, including postoperative complications, all-cause readmissions, and mortality, adjusting for baseline differences. RESULTS: Of 4,755 patients who underwent radical cystectomy, 677 underwent continent diversion (14.2%). These patients were significantly younger (median 62 vs 71 years, P <.01) and less likely to have diabetes (13.6% vs 20.1%, P <.01), COPD (3.7% vs 7.1%, P<0.01), and prior pelvic radiation (5.5% vs 13.1%, P <.01). A greater proportion of continent diversion patients experienced a postoperative complication (56.0% vs 48.9%, P <.01) and all-cause readmission (30.3% vs 20.4%, P <.0). After adjustment, continent diversion patients had 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1-1.7) and 1.7 (95% CI: 1.4-2.1) times the odds of experiencing a postoperative complication or all-cause readmission, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality (OR 1.2, 95% CI: 0.5-2.9). CONCLUSION: Compared to ileal conduit creation, continent urinary diversion is associated with increased odds of postoperative complications and readmission to the hospital within 30 days of surgery. Bladder cancer patients undergoing cystectomy and seeking continent diversion should be counseled on the increased short-term morbidity associated with this specific type of diversion.