Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
HPB (Oxford) ; 26(1): 109-116, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37805363

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multiple guidelines on the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) have been published over the past decade. However, practice data are lacking. This study aims to determine whether pancreatectomy procedures, IPMN pathology, or outcomes have changed. METHODS: ACS-NSQIP Procedure Targeted Pancreatectomy database was queried for patients with IPMN from 2014 to 2019. Cases were stratified by pathology, tumor stage/cyst size and procedure. Pancreatectomies for IPMN by year, 30-day morbidity, and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) were quantified. Mann-Kendall trend tests were performed to assess surgical trends and associated outcomes over time. RESULTS: 3912 patients underwent pancreatectomy for IPMN. 21% demonstrated malignancy and 79% were benign. Morbidity and mortality occurred in 29.7% and 1.5% of cases, respectively. Over time, no change was observed in use of pancreatectomy for IPMN (10%) or in benign/malignant pathology, or cyst size. Robotic approach increased from 9.1% to 16.5% with decreases in laparoscopic (19.5%-15.0%) and open interventions (71.5%-68.1%, p = 0.016). No change was observed over time in morbidity or mortality; however, rates of CR-POPF decreased (18.8%-13.8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Practice patterns in treatment of IPMN have not changed significantly in North America. More patients are undergoing robotic pancreatectomy, and postoperative pancreatic fistula rates are improving.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Quistes , Neoplasias Intraductales Pancreáticas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Neoplasias Intraductales Pancreáticas/cirugía , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Fístula Pancreática/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Quistes/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 30(2): 1145-1152, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36449206

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prior studies of older cancer patients undergoing large operations have reported similar rates of complications to the general population but higher rates of mortality, suggesting higher rates of failure-to-rescue (FTR) with advanced age. Whether age is a marker for frailty, or an independent predictor of FTR, is not clear. METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP database was queried from 2015-19 for patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy. Patients were divided into age-stratified cohorts: C1 (18-55), C2 (56-65), C3 (66-75), C4 (76-89). Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were computed to assess the relationship of the FTR rate and age, while controlling for potential confounders. A second analysis was specified with all covariates converted to Z-scores, which generated scaled adjusted odds ratios (saOR) to determine the strongest predictor of FTR. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis suggests that age is an independent predictor of FTR: C2:C1 aOR = 1.87 (p < 0.001); C3:C1 aOR = 3.33 (p < 0.001); C4:C1 aOR = 5.71 (p < 0.001). The scaled analysis demonstrated that age is the strongest predictor of FTR (saOR = 1.92, p < 0.001); a one standard deviation increase in age was associated with a 92% increased odds of FTR. The saOR for frailty (1.18, p < 0.001) and for number of comorbidities (1.10, p = 0.005) also were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Chronologic age was independently associated with increased FTR after surgery for GI malignancy and was the strongest predictor of FTR. These results suggest that chronologic age must be carefully considered when evaluating the fitness of a patient for GI cancer surgery.


Asunto(s)
Fracaso de Rescate en Atención a la Salud , Fragilidad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Humanos , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Surg Endosc ; 37(1): 266-273, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35927351

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: More complex cases are being performed robotically. This study aims to characterize trends in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) over time and assess opportunities for advanced trainees. METHODS: Using the ACS-NSQIP database from 2014 to 2019, PD cases were characterized by operative approach (open-OPN, laparoscopic-LAP, robotic-ROB). Proficiency and postoperative outcomes were described by approach over time. RESULTS: 24,268 PDs were identified, with the ROB approach increasing from 2.8% to 7.5%. Unplanned conversion increased over time for LAP (27.7-39.0%, p = 0.003) but was unchanged for ROB cases (14.8-14.7%, p = 0.257). Morbidity increased for OPN PD (35.5-36.8%, p = 0.041) and decreased for ROB PD (38.7-30.3%, p = 0.010). Mean LOS was lower in ROB than LAP/OPN (9.5 vs. 10.9 vs. 10.9 days, p < 0.00001). Approximately, 100 AHPBA, SSO, and ASTS fellows are being trained each year in North America; however, only about 5 RPDs are available per trainee per year which is far below that recommended to achieve proficiency. CONCLUSION: Over a 6-year period, a significant increase was observed in the use of RPD without a concomitant increase in conversion rates. RPD was associated with decreased morbidity and length of stay. Despite this shift, the number of cases being performed is not adequate for all fellows to achieve proficiency before graduation.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Humanos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Morbilidad , América del Norte , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
4.
Anesth Analg ; 128(5): 1005-1012, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29863607

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although racial/ethnic and sex disparities have been examined in health care generally and pain management more specifically, the combined influence of these sociodemographic factors together has not been well documented. The aim of this study was to examine the association between administration of opioid analgesics in the emergency department (ED) and interaction of race/ethnicity and sex. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using 2010-2014 Center for Disease Control-National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data for patients 12-55 years of age presenting to EDs with a primary diagnosis of appendicitis or gallbladder disease as defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. The primary outcome was the receipt of opioid analgesic medications. Secondary outcomes included: receipt of nonopioids, receipt of antiemetic medications, wait time to see a provider, and length of visit in the ED. The association between sex and analgesic receipt within Caucasian non-Hispanic and non-Caucasian groups was evaluated adjusting for pain score on presentation, patient age, emergent status, number of comorbidities, time of visit (month, day of the week, standard versus nonstandard working hours, year), and US region. RESULTS: After exclusions, a weighted sample of 553 ED visits was identified, representing 2,622,926 unique visits. The sample population was comprised of 1,858,035 (70.8%) females and 1,535,794 (58.6%) Caucasian non-Hispanics. No interaction was found in adjusted sampling-weighted model between sex and race/ethnicity on the odds of receiving opioids (P = .74). There was no difference in opioid administration to males as compared to females (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96, 95% CI, 0.87-1.06; P = .42) or to non-Caucasians as compared to Caucasians (OR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.89-1.10; P = .84). In adjusted weighted models, non-Caucasian males, 123,121/239,457 (51.4%) did not differ from Caucasian non-Hispanic males, 317,427/525,434 (60.4%), on odds of receiving opioids, aOR = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.39-1.99; P = .75. Non-Caucasian females, 547,709/847,675 (64.6%) also did not differ from Caucasian females, 621,638/1,010,360 (61.5%), on odds of receiving opioids, aOR = 1.01, 95% CI, 0.53-1.90; P = .98. Across both sexes, non-Caucasians did not differ from Caucasians on receipt of nonopioid analgesics or antiemetics. Neither wait time to see a provider nor the length of the hospital visit was significantly different between sexes or race/ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS: Based on National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data from 2010 to 2014, there is no statistically significant interaction between race/ethnicity and sex for administration of opioid analgesia to people presenting to the ED with appendicitis or gallbladder disease. These results suggest that the joint effect of patient race/ethnicity and sex may not manifest in disparities in opioid management.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Medicina de Emergencia/métodos , Etnicidad , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Factores Sexuales , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Apendicitis/cirugía , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Probabilidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Clase Social , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
7.
J Surg Res ; 200(1): 91-7, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26319974

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is associated with significant morbidity. Optimizing perioperative fluid administration is one potential strategy to mitigate morbidity. We sought to investigate the relationship of intraoperative fluid (IOF) administration to outcomes in patients undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy with particular attention to malnourished patients, who may be more susceptible to the effects of fluid overload. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy from 2000-2013 were identified from a retrospective database. IOF rates (mL/kg/hr) were determined and their relationship to outcomes compared. To examine the impact of malnutrition, we stratified patients based on median preoperative serum albumin and compared outcomes. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 211 patients comprised the cohort. 74% of patients underwent esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Linear regression analyses were performed comparing independent perioperative variables to four outcomes variables: length of stay, complications per patient, major complications, and Clavien-Dindo classification. IOF rate was significantly associated with three of four outcomes on univariate analysis. Significantly more patients with a preoperative albumin level ≤3.7 g/dL who received more than the median IOF rate experienced more severe complications. CONCLUSIONS: Increased intraoperative fluid administration is associated with perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy. Patients with lower preoperative albumin levels may be particularly sensitive to the effects of volume overload.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía , Fluidoterapia/efectos adversos , Desnutrición/complicaciones , Atención Perioperativa/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adenocarcinoma/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicaciones , Esofagectomía/métodos , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 22(11): 3681-6, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25707490

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postesophagectomy diaphragmatic hernia (DH) is an uncommon problem but an important one to recognize and treat because of the risk of significant complications such as incarceration and strangulation. Diaphragmatic hernia appears to occur more frequently following transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) than after transthoracic procedures, likely because of the enlargement of the diaphragmatic hiatus required to perform THE. METHODS: After 199 consecutive esophagectomies were performed at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital between January 2000 and June 2013, ten patients were identified with DH; all underwent diaphragmatic hernia repair (DHR). All patients who underwent esophagectomy during this time period were cataloged in a prospectively maintained database that was then retrospectively reviewed. All DH were repaired using a novel biologic plug mesh technique. RESULTS: Ten esophagectomy patients developed DH; nine post-THE and one post-McKeown esophagectomy. One patient was excluded from analysis because of atypical presentation. Demographic data were similar between esophagectomy patients who developed DH and those who did not. Administration of neoadjuvant chemoradiation correlated with development of DH, but did not reach statistical significance. Complications directly related to DHR were few and mostly infectious, including empyema and pneumonia, and were more likely to occur in those who presented with acute obstruction. One patient presented with dysphagia post repair. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragmatic hernia development post esophagectomy is an uncommon complication, but can have devastating results when there is bowel compromise. Repair by plugging the diaphragmatic hiatus with a biologic mesh is a safe and effective method for closing the defect and results in few complications.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Hernia Diafragmática/etiología , Hernia Diafragmática/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagectomía/métodos , Femenino , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mallas Quirúrgicas
9.
J Surg Oncol ; 111(4): 410-3, 2015 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25557924

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical management of colorectal cancer liver metastases continues to evolve to optimize oncologic outcomes while maximizing parenchymal preservation. Long-term data after intraoperative microwave ablation are limited. This study investigates outcomes and patterns of recurrence in patients who underwent intraoperative microwave ablation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 33 patients who underwent intraoperative microwave ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases from 2009 to 2013 at our institution was performed. Perioperative and long-term data were reviewed to determine outcomes and patterns of recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 49 tumors were treated, ranging 0.5-5.5 cm in size. Median Clavien-Dindo classification was one. Median follow-up was 531 days, with 13 (39.4%) patients presenting with a recurrence. Median time to first recurrence was 364 days. In those patients, 1 (7.8%) presented with an isolated local recurrence in the liver. Only 1 of 7 ablated tumors greater than 3 cm recurred (14.3%). Overall survival was 35.2% at 4 years, with a 19.3% disease-free survival at 3.5 years. No perioperative variables predicted systemic or local recurrence. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative microwave ablation is a safe and effective modality for use in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases in tumors as large as 5.5 cm in size.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Microondas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 25(2): 150-9, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24916144

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Electrical Cardiometry(™) (EC) estimates cardiac parameters by measuring changes in thoracic electrical bioimpedance during the cardiac cycle. The ICON(®), using four electrocardiogram electrodes (EKG), estimates the maximum rate of change of impedance to peak aortic blood acceleration (based on the premise that red blood cells change from random orientation during diastole (high impedance) to an aligned state during systole (low impedance)). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether continuous cardiac output (CO) data provide additional information to current anesthesia monitors that is useful to practitioners. METHODS: After IRB approval and verbal consent, 402 children were enrolled. Data were uploaded to our anesthesia record at one-minute intervals. Ten-second measurements (averaged over the previous 20 heart beats) were downloaded to separate files for later comparison with routine OR monitors. RESULTS: Data from 374 were in the final cohort (loss of signal or improper lead placement); 292,012 measurements during 58,049 min of anesthesia were made in these children (1 day to 19 years and 1 to 107 kg). Four events had a ≥25% reduction in cardiac index at least 1 min before a clinically important change in other monitored parameters; 18 events in 14 children confirmed manifestations of other hemodynamic measures; eight events may have represented artifacts because the observed measurements did not seem to fit the clinical parameters of the other monitors; three other events documented decreased stroke index with extreme tachycardia. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical cardiometry provides real-time cardiovascular information regarding developing hemodynamic events and successfully tracked the rapid response to interventions in children of all sizes. Intervention decisions must be based on the combined data from all monitors and the clinical situation. Our experience suggests that this type of monitor may be an important addition to real-time hemodynamic monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Gasto Cardíaco/fisiología , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/instrumentación , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Cardiografía de Impedancia , Niño , Preescolar , Electrocardiografía/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven
11.
J Med Pract Manage ; 30(6 Spec No): 8-12, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26062310

RESUMEN

When an unexpected perioperative crisis arises, simulation studies have suggested that the use of an emergency manual (EM) may offset the large cognitive load involved in crisis management, facilitating the efficient performance of key steps in treatment. However, little is known about how well EMs will translate into actual practice and what is required to use them optimally. While EMs are a promising tool in the management of perioperative critical events, more research is needed to define best practices and their limitations. In the interim, cautious use of these cognitive aids is recommended, especially when the diagnosis is not straightforward, falls "in between" sections of the EM, or falls outside of the EM itself. Further research should focus on the efficacy of EMs as measured by the percentage of critical steps correctly performed by their users in scenarios that do not closely mirror one of the listed EM scenarios from the beginning or as the situation evolves.


Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia/métodos , Manuales como Asunto , Atención Perioperativa , Humanos , Gestión de Riesgos
12.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 24(11): 1185-7, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25130947

RESUMEN

We report the effects of 88 µg·kg(-1) of epinephrine (1:10,000) injected into the caudal epidural space of a 42-week postconceptual age infant. No long-term neurological or cardiovascular sequelae occurred. Noninvasive cardiac output (CO) monitoring revealed increased CO, contractility, and stroke volume for about an hour, accompanied by a reduction in peripheral vascular resistance and a modest increase in pulse and blood pressure.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administración & dosificación , Anestesia Epidural/métodos , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Errores de Medicación , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Gasto Cardíaco/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Ventrículos Cardíacos/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Hipertensión/inducido químicamente , Lactante , Inyecciones Epidurales , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Taquicardia/inducido químicamente , Resistencia Vascular/efectos de los fármacos
13.
Cancer Med ; 13(1): e6884, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38186327

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several cytotoxic chemotherapies have demonstrated efficacy in improving recurrence-free survival (RFS) following resection of Stage II-IV colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the temporal dynamics of response to such adjuvant therapy have not been systematically quantified. METHODS: The Cochrane Central Register of Trials, Medline (PubMed) and Web of Science were queried from database inception to February 23, 2023 for Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where there was a significant difference in RFS between adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery only arms. Summary data were extracted from published Kaplan-Meier curves using DigitizeIT. Absolute differences in RFS event rates were compared at matched intervals using multiple paired t-tests. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 1469 manuscripts. After screening, 18 RCTs were eligible (14 Stage II/III; 4 Stage IV), inclusive of 16,682 patients. In the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy, the greatest rate of recurrence was observed in the first year (mean RFS event rate; 0-0.5 years: 0.22 ± 0.21; 0.5-1 years: 0.20 ± 0.09). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significant decreases in the RFS event rates for the intervals 0-0.5 years (0.09 ± 0.09 vs. 0.22 ± 0.21, p < 0.001) and 0.5-1 years (0.14 ± 0.11 vs. 0.20 ± 0.09, p = 0.001) after randomization, but not at later intervals (1-5 years). In Stage IV trials, RFS event rates significantly differed for the interval 0-0.5 years (p = 0.012), corresponding with adjuvant treatment durations of 6 months. In Stage II/III trials, which included therapies of 6-24 months duration, there were marked differences in the RFS event rates between surgery and chemotherapy arms for the intervals 0-0.5 years (p < 0.001) and 0.5-1 years (p < 0.001) with smaller differences in the RFS event rates for the intervals 1-2 years (p = 0.012) and 2-3 years (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: In a systematic review of positive RCTs comparing adjuvant chemotherapy to surgery alone for Stage II-IV CRC, observed RFS improvements were driven by early divergences that occurred primarily during active cytotoxic chemotherapy. Late recurrence dynamics were not influenced by adjuvant therapy use. Such observations may have implications for the use of chemotherapy for micrometastatic clones detectable by cell-free DNA-based methodologies.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto
14.
BMC Cancer ; 13: 519, 2013 Nov 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24180710

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Given their frequency of occurrence in the United States, cancer and heart disease often coexist. For patients requiring open-heart surgery, this raises concern that the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may cause a transient immunosuppression with the potential to promote the spread and growth of coexisting cancer cells. This study examined the association of cardiopulmonary bypass with cancer progression in a large population-based setting using linked data from several state-wide registries. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of cancer risk, stage, and mortality in 43,347 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with and without CPB in New Jersey between 1998-2004 was conducted. A competing risk analogue of the Cox proportional hazards model with propensity score adjustment and regression on the cause-specific hazard was used to compute relative risk ratios (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for patients undergoing CABG surgery with and without CPB. RESULTS: An increased risk for overall cancer incidence (17%) and cancer-specific mortality (16% overall, 12% case fatality) was observed; yet these results did not reach statistical significance. Of 11 tumor-specific analyses, an increased risk of skin melanoma (1.66 [95% CI, 1.08-2.55: p=0.02]) and lung cancer (1.36 [95% CI, 1.02-1.81: p=0.03]) was observed for patients with pump versus off-pump open-heart surgery. No association was found with cancer stage. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that there may be a relationship between CPB and cancer progression. However, if real, the effect is likely modest at most. Further research may still be warranted with particular focus on skin melanoma and lung cancer which had the strongest association with CPB.


Asunto(s)
Puente Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Cardiopatías/complicaciones , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Cardiopatías/cirugía , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo
15.
J Surg Oncol ; 108(4): 242-7, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23907788

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies on perioperative fluid administration in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery have suggested that increased fluid loads are associated with worse perioperative outcomes. However, results of retrospective analyses of the relationship between intraoperative fluid (IOF) administration and perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are conflicted. We sought to investigate this relationship in patients undergoing PD at our academic center. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 124 patients undergoing PD from 2007 to 2012 was performed. IOF administration rate (ml/kg/hr) was correlated with perioperative outcomes. Outcomes were also stratified by preoperative serum albumin level. RESULTS: Regression analyses were performed comparing independent perioperative variables, including IOF rate, to four outcomes variables: length of stay, severity of complications, number of complications per patient, and 30-day mortality. Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses showed IOF rate correlated with one or more perioperative outcomes. Patients with an albumin ≤ 3.0 g/dl who received more than the median IOF rate experienced more severe complications, while patients with an albumin >3.0 g/dl did not. CONCLUSION: Increased IOF administration is associated with worse perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing PD. Patients with low preoperative serum albumin levels (≤ 3.0 g/dl) may be a group particularly sensitive to volume overload.


Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Anciano , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Albúmina Sérica/análisis , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
HPB (Oxford) ; 15(10): 747-52, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23782268

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Over recent years, use of the LigaSure™ vessel sealing device has increased in major abdominal surgery to include pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). LigaSure™ use during PD has expanded to include all steps of the procedure, including the division of the uncinate margin. This introduces the potential for thermal major vascular injury or margin positivity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LigaSure™ usage in PD in comparison to established dissection techniques. METHODS: One hundred and forty-eight patients who underwent PD from 2007 to 2012 at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital were identified from a retrospective database. Two groups were recognized: those in which the LigaSure™ device was used (N = 114), and in those it was not (N = 34). Peri-operative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Vascular intra-operative complications directly caused by thermal injury from LigaSure™ use occurred in 1.8% of patients. Overall vascular intra-operative complications, uncinate margin positivity, blood loss, length of stay, and complication severity were not significantly different between groups. The mean operative time was 77 min less (P < 0.010) in the LigaSure™ group. Savings per case where the LigaSure™ was used amounted to $1776.73. CONCLUSION: LigaSure™ usage during PD is safe and effective. It is associated with decreased operative times, which may decrease operative costs in PD.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Hemostáticas/instrumentación , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/instrumentación , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Técnicas Hemostáticas/efectos adversos , Técnicas Hemostáticas/economía , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasia Residual , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/economía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/prevención & control , Adulto Joven
17.
Am Surg ; 89(11): 4780-4788, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36286615

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Post-operative pulmonary complications (POPC) are common in patients undergoing esophagectomy and neoadjuvant radiotherapy may exacerbate POPC. This study assessed whether neoadjuvant radiation increases the incidence of POPC in patients undergoing esophagectomy for malignancy. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database files from 2016 to 2018 were queried for patients undergoing esophagectomy for malignancy. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to create balanced cohorts in which the control group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and the treatment cohort received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). A subset analysis was performed on patients with pre-existing pulmonary disease (PEPD). Primary outcomes were POPC and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The all-patient analysis did not demonstrate a consistent association between neoadjuvant radiation and POPC. However, in patients with PEPD, POPC occurred more often in the nCRT cohort. Comparing nCRT to nCT and after IPTW adjustment for confounders, there was higher odds of pneumonia (aOR = 3.0, P = .002), unplanned intubation (aOR = 2.0, P = .03), and extended mechanical ventilation (aOR = 3.6, P = .002). DISCUSSION: In esophageal cancer patients with PEPD that undergo nCRT vs nCT prior to esophagectomy, the greater risk of POPCs must be weighed against the potential for improved oncologic outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Nutr Clin Pract ; 37(3): 536-554, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34608676

RESUMEN

Esophagectomy, a treatment modality for esophageal cancer, is associated with high rates of morbidity, the most common being anastomotic leaks and pulmonary complications. The current standard of care for nutrition support after esophagectomy includes a period of nothing by mouth with enteral nutrition support via jejunostomy tube owing to the concern of increasing the risk of anastomotic leak as a result of early postoperative oral intake. However, the optimal timing of oral diet initiation remains controversial. This narrative review presents a patient who incurred an anastomotic leak following esophagectomy after initiation of oral intake on postoperative day 5 and evaluates the current literature on the timing of oral diet initiation after esophagectomy. A systematic literature search was performed to assess current evidence evaluating early oral diet (EOD) initiation after esophagectomy. Over the past 5 years, 11 studies have evaluated the impact of EOD initiation after esophagectomy in comparison with a conventional feeding regimen, including a period of nothing by mouth with enteral or parenteral nutrition support. The available evidence suggests that EOD initiation does not increase rates of complications after esophagectomy. However, the evidence is limited by the lack of a standardized definition of what constitutes EOD initiation, patient selection bias, variations in nutrition support provided in the studies, and lack of statistical analyses evaluating the impact of potential confounding variables. Additional research with larger, high-quality randomized controlled trials is needed to determine the optimal timing of diet initiation after esophagectomy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomía , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Nutrición Enteral/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Surg Oncol ; 42: 101776, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35512544

RESUMEN

The use of propensity score methods in the surgical literature is increasing. Randomized, controlled clinical trials are the gold standard of medical research, allowing for accurate measurement and analysis of treatment effects. Use of propensity score methods allows researchers to mimic randomization when true randomization may not be possible. When used properly, these methods are a powerful tool for the medical researcher, allowing more rigorous conclusions to be drawn from retrospective data. With the increasing prevalence of propensity methods, it is important that these methods are used correctly, lest researchers be led to misleading conclusions based on poor statistical study design and analysis. The objective of this review is to analyze and evaluate the use of propensity score methods in the surgical oncology literature. We critique the current state of the use of propensity scores in the surgical oncology literature and offer recommendations to assure appropriate usage of propensity score methods.


Asunto(s)
Oncología Quirúrgica , Humanos , Puntaje de Propensión , Proyectos de Investigación , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 18(10): e1603-e1610, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35939774

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Many cancer centers engage in multidisciplinary tumor board meetings to determine the optimal approach to complex cancer care. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, many institutions changed the format of these meetings from in-person to virtual. The aim of this study was to determine if the change to a virtual meeting format had an impact on attendance and cases presented. METHODS: Tumor board records were analyzed to obtain attendance and case presentation information at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Twelve-month in-person tumor board data were compared with 12-month virtual tumor board data to assess for difference in attendance and case presentation patterns. RESULTS: Seven separate weekly tumor board meetings at the beginning of the study (breast, GI, gynecology, liver, lung, melanoma, and urology) were expanded to nine meetings on the virtual platform (+endocrine and pancreas). Overall attendance increased by 46% on the virtual platform compared with in-person meetings (4,030 virtual attendances v 2,753 in-person, P < .001). Increased attendance was present across all specialties on the virtual platform. In addition, the number of patient cases discussed increased from 2,127 in in-person meeting to 2,656 on the virtual platform (a 20% increase, P < .001). CONCLUSION: A significant increase was observed in overall tumor board attendance and in case presentations per meeting, requiring the expansion of additional weekly meetings. Furthermore, in a major cancer center with multiple community affiliates, virtual tumor boards may encourage increased participation from remote sites with the benefit of obtaining expert specialist advice as compared with geographically challenging in-person meetings.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/terapia , Pandemias
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA