Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Prostate ; 72(8): 825-33, 2012 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21919027

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ghrelin is a natural growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) that is co-expressed with its receptor GHSR in human prostate cancer (PCa) cells. Imaging probes that target receptors for ghrelin may delineate PCas from benign disease. The specificity of a novel ghrelin-imaging probe for PCa over normal tissue or benign disease was assessed. METHODS: A fluorescein-bearing ghrelin analogue was synthesized (fluorescein-ghrelin(1-18)), and its application for imaging was evaluated in a panel of PCa cell lines and human prostate tissue. Prostate core biopsy samples were collected from fresh surgery specimens of 13 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Ghrelin probe signal was detected and quantified in each sample using a hapten amplification technique and associated with pathological features. RESULTS: The ghrelin probe was taken up by GHSR-expressing LNCaP and PC-3 cells, and not in BPH cells that express low levels of GHSR. Binding was blocked by competition with excess unlabeled probe. The ghrelin probe signal was 4.7 times higher in PCa compared to benign hyperplasia tissue (P = 0.0027) and normal tissue (P = 0.0093). Furthermore, while the ghrelin probe signal was 1.9-fold higher in PIN compared to benign hyperplasia (P = 0.0022) and normal tissue (P = 0.0047), there was no significant difference in the signal of benign hyperplasia compared to normal tissue. CONCLUSION: The imaging probe fluorescein-ghrelin(1-18) is specific for PCa, and did not associate significantly with benign hyperplasia or normal prostate tissue. This data suggests that ghrelin analogues may be useful as molecular imaging probes for prostatic neoplasms in both localized and metastatic disease.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Receptores de Ghrelina/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Biopsia , Línea Celular , Línea Celular Tumoral , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Fluoresceína , Ghrelina/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata/metabolismo , Próstata/patología , Hiperplasia Prostática/metabolismo , Hiperplasia Prostática/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
Urol Int ; 80(2): 151-6, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18362484

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of an anterograde approach to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in terms of positive surgical margins (SM+). METHODS: 323 untreated patients underwent anterograde RRP for clinically localized prostate adenocarcinoma. Spearman coefficients, logistic univariate and multivariate analysis were used. RESULTS: The incidence of SM+ was 14.9% and, in particular, this was 4.5% for apical, 9.0% for lateral, 0.9% for other sites, and 2.8% for multiple SM+. Upon univariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA; r = 0.2073, p = 0.0002), pathological stage (r = 0.3777, p < 0.0001), and seminal vesicle invasion (r = 0.1453, p = 0.0089) were found to be significantly associated with SM+. Upon multivariate analysis, only PSA (p = 0.0090) and pathological stage (p < 0.0001) were significantly and independently associated with SM+ occurrence. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the anterograde approach to RRP is associated with low SM+ rates.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Urology ; 66(5): 1010-4, 2005 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16286114

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether a significant difference in chromogranin A (CgA) levels exist between patients with familial and sporadic cancer. METHODS: The study included 146 patients with clinically localized prostate adenocarcinoma (Stage T2N0M0), who underwent radical prostatectomy between June 1999 and June 2004. Patients were considered to have a positive family history for prostate cancer when the index patient confirmed the diagnosis of prostate cancer in a first-degree relative (brother or father). On the day of surgery, a blood sample for the determination of serum prostate-specific antigen and CgA levels (radioimmunoassay) was obtained from all patients. In a subgroup of 20 patients, CgA mRNA expression was also evaluated by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction at the prostatic tissue level. RESULTS: A positive familial history was found in 28 (19.2%) of the 146 patients. The mean patient age in the familial group was significantly (P < 0.0001) lower than that in the sporadic group. No significant difference between the familial and sporadic groups was found in terms of prostate-specific antigen level (P = 0.9625) or Gleason score distribution (P = 0.4891). The familial group had significantly (P = 0.0013) lower serum CgA levels (43.3 +/- 12.7 ng/mL, median 39.9) compared with the sporadic group (55.9 +/- 19.4 ng/mL, median 54.1). The familial group also had significantly (P = 0.0432) lower expression of tissue CgA mRNA compared with the sporadic group. CONCLUSIONS: The result of significantly lower CgA expression in familial compared with sporadic prostate cancer cases suggests that neuroendocrine activity is not increased in familial cases and also confirms that familial cancer is not a more aggressive disease.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Cromograninas/biosíntesis , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Anciano , Cromogranina A , Cromograninas/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , ARN Mensajero/biosíntesis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA