Paediatric-onset lymphomatoid papulosis: results of a multicentre retrospective cohort study on behalf of the EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Tumours Group (CLTG).

BACKGROUND: Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) is a rare cutaneous T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder. Comprehensive data on LyP in the paediatric population are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the epidemiological, clinical, histopathological and prognostic features of paediatric LyP. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicentre international cohort study that included 87 children and adolescents with LyP diagnosed between 1998 and 2022. Patients aged ≤ 18 years at disease onset were included. LyP diagnosis was made in each centre, based on clinicopathological correlation. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients from 12 centres were included. Mean age at disease onset was 7.0 years (range 3 months-18 years) with a male to female ratio of 2 : 1. Mean time between the onset of the first cutaneous lesions and diagnosis was 1.3 years (range 0-14). Initial misdiagnosis concerned 26% of patients. LyP was most often misdiagnosed as pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta, insect bites or mollusca contagiosa. Erythematous papules or papulonodules were the most frequent clinical presentation. Pruritus was specifically mentioned in 21% of patients. The main histological subtype was type A in 55% of cases. When analysed, monoclonal T-cell receptor rearrangement was found in 77% of skin biopsies. The overall survival rate was 100%, with follow-up at 5 years available for 33 patients and at 15 years for 8 patients. Associated haematological malignancy (HM) occurred in 10% of cases (n = 7/73), including four patients with mycosis fungoides, one with primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), one with systemic ALCL and one with acute myeloid leukaemia. If we compared incidence rates of cancer with the world population aged 0-19 years from 2001 to 2010, we estimated a significantly higher risk of associated malignancy in general, occurring before the age of 19 years (incidence rate ratio 87.49, 95% confidence interval 86.01-88.99). CONCLUSIONS: We report epidemiological data from a large international cohort of children and adolescents with LyP. Overall, the disease prognosis is good, with excellent survival rates for all patients. Owing to an increased risk of associated HM, long-term follow-up should be recommended for patients with LyP.

Lymphomatoid papulosis is a very rare skin condition caused by an abnormal increase in white blood cells (called 'lymphocytes') in the skin. The condition rarely affects children, so most of the scientific data published about this disease focuses on adults. This study involved 12 academic dermatology centres in Europe, the Middle East and North America, and gathered data from about 87 children who presented with symptoms of lymphomatoid papulosis before the age of 19 years. The aim of this study was to better describe this disease in the paediatric population and discuss its treatment options and evolution. We found that the presentation of the disease in children is roughly the same as in adults. Safe and effective treatment options exist. The disease is not life threatening, but it requires investigation by a dermatologist, both to make a careful diagnosis and to monitor it as sometimes associated cancers that originate from blood cells can occur, mostly on the skin.

Synchronous occurrence of primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma and cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease in distinct lesions: A unique association.

Rosai-Dorfman disease, also known as sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (SHML), is a rare subtype of reactive histiocytosis which is seldom associated with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. To date, the coexistence in the same patient of extra nodal SHML and primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (PCBCL) has been reported in the literature, as metachronous diagnosis in the anatomical area of the original PCBCL or synchronous occurrence in the same lesions. However, no data have been published as for synchronous occurrence of the two pathological entities in distinct anatomical sites. Herein, we report the first ever described synchronous occurrence of PCBCL and SHML, detected in distinct lesions, affecting the same patient. The complete resolution of the patient's PCBCL after rituximab treatment and the concomitant regression of SHML suggest that this clinically benign reactive histiocytic proliferation, potentially triggered by the lymphoma microenvironment itself, may take place not only in the site of the PCBCL lesion, but also in other distant areas not directly affected by the primary cutaneous lymphoma.

Paediatric cutaneous lymphomas including rare subtypes: A 40-year experience at a tertiary referral centre.

BACKGROUND: Primary cutaneous lymphomas are neoplasms of the immune system with a distinct tropism for the skin and an absence of extracutaneous manifestations at the time of diagnosis. Studies focusing on cutaneous lymphomas in children and adolescents remain scarce and often do not encompass the rare subtypes. OBJECTIVES: To address this knowledge gap by describing the clinical, histological and molecular characteristics of a large group of paediatric patients affected by primary cutaneous lymphoma. We also provided the Paediatric Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma Atlas that illustrates the clinicopathological spectrum of observed presentations, in the hope of supporting other physicians in the diagnostic process. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of paediatric patients diagnosed with primary cutaneous lymphomas between 1980 and 2022 at the Paediatric Dermatology Unit of Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients (58 males, 43 females) met the inclusion criteria. The most common subtypes were lymphomatoid papulosis (n = 48) and mycosis fungoides (n = 31). These were followed by primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (n = 7), primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphomas (n = 5), primary cutaneous marginal zone B-cell lymphomas (n = 3), primary cutaneous follicle centre lymphomas (n = 2), subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphomas (n = 2), primary cutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (n = 1), primary cutaneous precursor B-lymphoblastic lymphoma (n = 1) and Sézary syndrome (n = 1). Clinical follow-up data covering a median of 70.8 months (range 1-324) were available for 74 patients, of whom three died due to cutaneous lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings shed light on the peculiar aspects and long-term outcomes of paediatric cutaneous lymphomas, particularly emphasizing their distinctive features in comparison to their adult counterparts and exploring the less common subtypes. Further larger-scale studies are warranted to better characterize these entities and to achieve a more rapid and accurate diagnosis.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus observation in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients: An inverse probability of treatment weighting study.

BACKGROUND: The survival benefit of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether SLNB improves disease-specific survival (DSS) in high-risk cSCC. Secondary objectives were to analyse disease-free survival, nodal recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS). METHODS: Multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study comparing survival outcomes in immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients treated with SLNB or watchful waiting. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for possible confounding effects. RESULTS: We studied 638 tumours in immunocompetent patients (SLNB n = 42, observation n = 596) and 173 tumours in immunosuppressed patients (SLNB n = 28, observation n = 145). Overall, SLNB was positive in 15.7% of tumours. SLNB was associated with a reduced risk of nodal recurrence (NR) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.05 [95% CI, 0.01-0.43]; p = 0.006), disease specific mortality (HR, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.04-0.72]; p = 0.016) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.15-0.71]; p = 0.004) only in immunocompetent patients. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB was associated with improvements in NR, DSS and OS in immunocompetent but not in immunosuppressed patients with high-risk cSCC.

Association between maternal dupilumab exposure and pregnancy outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is limited epidemiological evidence on outcomes associated with dupilumab exposure during pregnancy; monitoring pregnancy outcomes in large populations is required. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential association between exposure to dupilumab in pregnant women with atopic dermatitis and any adverse pregnancy, neonatal, congenital and post-partum outcomes. METHODS: We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study across 19 Italian tertiary referral hospital. Childbearing women were eligible if aged 18-49 years and carried out the pregnancy between 1 October 2018 and 1 September 2022. RESULTS: We retrospectively screened records of 5062 patients receiving dupilumab regardless of age and gender, identifying 951 female atopic dermatitis patients of childbearing age, 29 of whom had been exposed to the drug during pregnancy (3%). The median duration of dupilumab treatment prior to conception was 22.5 weeks (range: 3-118). The median time of exposure to the drug during pregnancy was 6 weeks (range: 2-24). All the documented pregnancies were unplanned, and the drug was discontinued in all cases once pregnancy status was reported. The comparison of the study cohort and the control group found no significant drug-associated risk for adverse pregnancy, congenital, neonatal or post-partum outcomes. The absence of a statistically significant effect of exposure on the event was confirmed by bivariate analysis and multivariate analysis adjusted for other confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort of pregnant patients exposed to dupilumab adds to the existing evidence concerning the safety of biologic agents in pregnancy. No safety issues were identified regarding the primary outcome assessed. In clinical practice, these data provide reassurance in case of dupilumab exposure during the first trimester. However, the continuous use of dupilumab throughout pregnancy warrants further research.

Mpox: an updated review of dermatological manifestations in the current outbreak.

Mpox is a disease caused by a double-stranded DNA orthopoxvirus discovered in 1958. In 2022, an outbreak on an unprecedented scale marked its transition from neglected, zoonotic disease circulating almost exclusively within African borders to sexually transmitted infection (STI) of international concern. Although phylogenetic evidence suggests progressive evolution from the strain associated with the 2018 outbreak in Nigeria, epidemiological links with previous cases have still not been completely elucidated. Clinically, mpox presents with systemic symptoms, such as fever, headache, malaise and a characteristic cutaneous eruption, similar to that of cognate viruses (e.g. smallpox). Mpox pseudopustules evolve through several stages, including umbilication and crusting, and resolve in the span of 2-3 weeks. The hallmarks that set the 2022 outbreak apart from classic mpox were a disproportionate number of cases occurring in men who have sex with men, an often localized cutaneous picture and a significant burden in terms of concomitant STIs. Investigations into the disease pathogenesis, related immune response, clinical and dermoscopic features, in addition to studies aimed at defining novel management strategies, have advanced mpox knowledge considerably. Herein, recent findings on mpox are reviewed, with a keen focus on dermatological manifestations and their implications in the current diagnostic scenario, reinforcing the pivotal role of dermatologists in managing suspect cases and preventing further spread of the contagion.

BRAFV600 variant allele frequency predicts outcome in metastatic melanoma patients treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of variant allele frequency (VAF) on clinical outcome in BRAFV600 mutated metastatic melanoma patients (MMPs) receiving BRAF (BRAFi) and MEK inhibitors (MEKi) is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of MMPs receiving first line BRAFi and MEKi was identified by inspecting dedicated databases of three Italian Melanoma Intergroup centres. VAF was determined by next generation sequencing in pre-treatment baseline tissue samples. Correlation between VAF and BRAF copy number variation was analysed in an ancillary study by using a training and a validation cohort of melanoma tissue samples and cell lines. RESULTS: Overall, 107 MMPs were included in the study. The VAF cut-off determined by ROC curve was 41.3%. At multivariate analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter in patients with M1c/M1d [HR 2.25 (95% CI 1.41-3.6, p < 0.01)], in those with VAF >41.3% [HR 1.62 (95% CI 1.04-2.54, p < 0.05)] and in those with ECOG PS ≥1 [HR 1.82 (95% CI 1.15-2.88, p < 0.05)]. Overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in patients with M1c/M1d [HR 2.01 (95% CI 1.25-3.25, p < 0.01)]. Furthermore, OS was shorter in patients with VAF >41.3% [HR 1.46 (95% CI 0.93-2.29, p = 0.06)] and in patients with ECOG PS ≥1 [HR 1.52 (95% CI 0.94-2.87, p = 0.14)]. BRAF gene amplification was found in 11% and 7% of samples in the training and validation cohort, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High VAF is an independent poor prognostic factor in MMP receiving BRAFi and MEKi. High VAF and BRAF amplification coexist in 7%-11% of patients.

Guselkumab shows high efficacy and maintenance in the improvement of response until week 48, a real-life study.

Guselkumab is an IL-23 inhibitor that has been demonstrated to be effective and safe for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in clinical trials. The data pool relating to the use of guselkumab in a real-life setting is still lacking. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in a real-life setting, focusing on predictors of early clinical response, a single-center prospective study was conducted enrolling patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The clinical data relating to the efficacy and safety of the drug were acquired at initiation of treatment and at all subsequent clinical follow-ups: the primary endpoint was PASI90 and PASI100 response at week 12, 24, and 48. Out of the total cohort of 74 patients, 62 (83.8) reached a 48-week follow-up 64 (87.8%) reached a 24-week follow-up, while 72 (97.3%) a 12-week follow-up. Treatment with guselkumab reduced the mean PASI from the initial 11 ± 6.3 to 2.5 ± 3.1 at 12 weeks, to 1.2 ± 1.8 at 24 weeks, and to 0.8 ± 1.6 at 48 weeks. At week 12, a PASI 90 and PASI 100 response was achieved by 44.4% and 23.6% of patients, respectively. After 24 weeks, 63% of patients reported a PASI 90 while 46.1% achieved PASI 100. Previous treatment with one or more other biologics did not impact significantly on the achievement of the PASI 90 and 100 at any endpoints analyzed. We reported no difference between bio-naïve and non-naïve patients in the response to guselkumab, high safety, and efficacy was showed in both populations.

Risankizumab shows high efficacy and maintenance in improvement of response until week 52.

Risankizumab has been recently approved for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis; however, real-life studies are scarce. Analysis of possible predictor factors of treatment response are limited to body mass index (BMI) and previous biologic experience. Our objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Risankizumab and to investigate on possible predictor factors response. We retrospectively analyzed 166 patients from two centers in Italy who undergone Risankizumab for psoriasis. The proportion of patients achieving a 100%, 90%, 75% of improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and PASI <3 were collected at weeks 16, 28, 40, and 52. Study population was analyzed in subgroups to investigate possible predictors of response to Risankizumab since week 40. At the time of analysis 165, 103, 30, and 11 patients had completed 16, 28, 40, and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively. The mean PASI score decreased from 12.5 ± 5.1 at baseline to 1.9 ± 2.4 at week 16. Similar reductions were observed when considering PASI <3, PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100. Previous biologics failure, different smoking habits, obesity, and joint involvement resulted in a lower response to risankizumab. In particular, significant differences in mean PASI at any time-points was observed between psoriatic arthritis (PSA) and non-PSA patients: 2.7 versus 1.7 (p = 0.036), 1.9 versus 0.4 (p = 0.006), and 4.1 versus 0.5 (p = 0.016) at 16, 28, and 40 weeks, respectively. No difference in response to risankizumab occurred in the case of involvement of difficult-to-treat areas. In this population, Risankizumab was effective and safe. Smoking habits, joint involvement, obese status, and previous biologic experience may negatively affect treatment response, while difficult body sites involvement have minor impact.

Cutaneous side effects and types of dermatological reactions in metastatic melanoma patients treated by immunotherapies or targeted therapies: A retrospective single center study.

Immunotherapy and target therapy have revolutionized treatment of stage III/IV melanoma. Both treatments show a favorable toxicity profile even if cutaneous adverse events (AEs) are frequent (30%-40% of cases). This is a retrospective single center cohort study that included patients with stage IV or inoperable stage III metastatic melanoma (AJCC 8th) who received BRAFi + MEKi therapy or immunotherapy with Checkpoint inhibitors. All cutaneous AEs were ascertained by a dermatologist based on clinical and histological findings. The primary outcome was to provide a detailed clinical dermatological classification of cutaneous adverse events and an evaluation of the incidence of skin toxicity in the two arms of therapy (immunotherapy and target therapy). A total of 286 patients with stages III-IV metastatic melanoma were included: 146 received immunotherapy and 140 target therapy. In the immunotherapy cohort, 63 (43.1%) cutaneous reactions were observed while 33 skin reactions (23.6%) were identified in patients treated with target therapy. All the skin toxicities observed were grade I, excepted four cases: an erythema multiforme-like eruption, a grade III psoriasis and two grade III maculopapular rashes. Immunotherapy in older age resulted statistically related to skin toxicities (p = 0.011), meanly in metastatic setting (p = 0.011). Cumulative incidence of skin toxicities was 65.63% in immunotherapy cohort (p = 0.001). Also multivariate logistic regression shows a significant association between skin adverse events and immunotherapy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.85, p: 0.01) and between cutaneous AEs and metastatic setting (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.04-3.74, p: 0.04). We have also shown that as the age of initiation of therapy increases the probability of developing skin toxicity grows. However, stratifying by type of therapies the effect of age persists only in immunotherapy (OD: 1.04; CI: 1.01-1.06; p: 0.04) while for target therapy age does not affect the onset of skin toxicity (OD 1.01; CI 0.98-1.04; p = 0.42). No differences were shown between patients on target therapy and immunotherapy regarding gender. Patients were also evaluated regarding concomitant therapies and seems that Levotyroxine may be involved in AEs during immunotherapy treatment. More studies are needed to deepen this aspect, also considering the medical history and diverse drug associations. Cutaneous adverse events are characterized by heterogeneous manifestations, are more often seen in patients on immunotherapy and dermatologists can play a crucial role in multidisciplinary care.

Risk of Reactivation of Latent Tuberculosis in Psoriasis Patients on Biologic Therapies: A Retrospective Cohort from a Tertiary Care Centre in Northern Italy.

Psoriatic patients with latent tuberculosis infection and properly treated active tuberculosis need careful management when prescribing modern biological drugs. Although data and guidelines regarding tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors advise caution and initiation of prophylactic therapy in patients with latent tuberculosis infection, the same indications do not seem to find equal force for interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-17 inhibitors. In order to evaluate the risk of reactivation in patients with latent tuberculosis infection or properly treated active tuberculosis, an observational retrospective study was conducted on the population referred to our centre at Dermatologic Clinic of University of Turin, Italy. In the last 10 years at the clinic 19 psoriatic patients were found to be at risk of tuberculosis reactivation: 10 patients were QuantiFERON- TB-positive at baseline, 2 became positive during treatment, 6 reported prior tuberculous infection, and 1 was QuantiFERON-TB-negative at baseline and developed disseminated tuberculosis during treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor-α. Overall, 10.5% of this group of patients developed active tuberculosis; however, stratifying by biologic therapy, zero cases were observed among patients treated with anti-IL-17, -23, or -12/23 over a relatively long follow-up (48.1 months) A review of the available literature following our experience confirms the increased risk of tuberculosis reactivation with tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors. Concerning anti-IL-23 and IL-17 drugs, available data showed high safety in patients at risk of tuberculosis reactivation. Screening of patients who should be taking IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors is recommended for public health purposes. In case of a positive result with these therapies, consulting with an infectious diseases specialist is suggested in order to weigh up the risks and benefits of prophylactic treatment.

Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Stage III Melanoma: Current Insights and Clinical Implications.

Melanoma is one of the most aggressive skin cancers. The 5-year survival rate of stage III melanoma patients ranges from 93% (IIIA) to 32% (IIID) with a high risk of recurrence after complete surgery. The introduction of target and immune therapies has dramatically improved the overall survival, but the identification of patients with a high risk of relapse who will benefit from adjuvant therapy and the determination of the best treatment choice remain crucial. Currently, patient prognosis is based on clinico-pathological features, highlighting the urgent need of predictive and prognostic markers to improve patient management. In recent years, many groups have focused their attention on identifying molecular biomarkers with prognostic and predictive potential. In this review, we examined the main candidate biomarkers reported in the literature.

Dupilumab in HIV-positive patients with atopic dermatitis: a long-term follow-up patient and a literature review.

Dupilumab is an IgG4 human monoclonal antibody licensed for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Despite evidence suggesting that T helper type two cytokines can modulate HIV-1 replication and anti-HIV-specific immune responses, impacting on viral reservoirs, HIV-positive patients under immunomodulating therapy have been excluded from clinical trials. We report a 47-year-old HIV-positive man with late-onset severe atopic dermatitis, treated with dupilumab and followed up for 27 months. Improvements in skin lesions and quality of life were observed after four months. Blood tests showed normalization of IgE levels, with the clinical condition remaining stable at a 27- month follow-up. We gathered 16 other cases reported in the literature of HIV-positive patients treated with dupilumab, with no, or few adverse reactions, for which it is unclear if dupilumab should be held accountable. With our case and literature review, we aim to shed light on dupilumab efficacy, safety, and tolerability among HIV-positive patients suffering from atopic dermatitis. In this regard, future research should focus on the effective role, underlying mechanisms, and efficacy of dupilumab in HIV-positive patients and HIV-positivity could be questioned as a valid exclusion criterion for clinical trials.