RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Cabergoline (CAB) has shown to have benefic effects on the metabolism in different clinical settings but its metabolic role in acromegaly disease has not been studied yet. Aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of CAB on glucose metabolism and weight in patients with acromegaly. METHODS: All patients with acromegaly undergoing continuous treatment with CAB for at least 6 months were retrospectively screened. Exclusion criteria were discontinuation of CAB for more than one month, change of antidiabetic or other therapy for acromegaly, concomitant untreated hormonal deficiency, initiation of pregnancy and/or breastfeeding. All patients were evaluated in terms of biochemical disease control, glucose metabolism and weight at baseline (T0) and after the introduction of CAB therapy at 6 (T6) and 12 months (T12). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (15 females and 11 males) were evaluated at T0 and T6 and 19 patients (12 females and 7 males) were also evaluated at T12. Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and prolactin (PRL) levels were significantly lower at T6 and T12 compared to baseline (p < 0.001 for IGF-I, p < 0.05 for PRL) even if no further differences were observed between T12 and T6. Considering the entire cohort, no differences were appreciated regarding the metabolic parameters but a significant reduction in weight and body mass index (BMI) was observed at both T6 (p = 0.009 for weight, p = 0.021 for BMI) and T12 (p = 0.014 for weight, p = 0.017 for BMI) compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the efficacy of CAB in providing a significant improvement in the biochemical disease control but do not demonstrate a marked benefit on glucose metabolism of acromegaly patients. In such patients, CAB appears to have a rapid effect on weight and BMI, with significant changes noticeable as early as 6 months and persisting for at least 12 months.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The precise effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the neuroendocrine hydro-electrolytic regulation are not precisely understood. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate, in healthy subjects, the neuroendocrine response of the antidiuretic system to intravenous diclofenac infusion. METHODS: For this single-blinded, cross-over study, we recruited 12 healthy subjects (50% women). Test sessions were divided into three observation times (pre-test; test; 48 h post-test), which were repeated equally on two different occasions, with the administration of diclofenac (75 mg in saline solution 0.9% 100 cc) on 1 day, or placebo (saline solution 0.9% 100 cc) on another day. The night before the test the subjects were asked to collect a salivary cortisol and cortisone sample, which was repeated on the night of the procedure session. Serial urine and blood samples were collected on the test day (for osmolality, electrolytes, ACTH, cortisol, copeptin, MR-proADM, MR-proANP; the last three represent more stable and analytically reliable molecules than their respective active peptides). Moreover, the subjects were evaluated with the bioimpedance vector analysis (BIVA) before and after the test. Forty-eight hours after the end of the procedure urine sodium, urine potassium, urine osmolality, serum sodium and copeptin were revaluated together with BIVA. RESULTS: No significant changes in circulating hormone levels were observed; anyway, 48 h after diclofenac, BIVA showed a significant water retention (p < 0.00001), especially in extracellular fluid (ECF) (16.47 ± 1.65 vs 15.67 ± 1.84, p < 0.001). Salivary cortisol and cortisone tended to increase only the night after placebo administration (p = 0.054 cortisol; p = 0.021 cortisone). CONCLUSION: Diclofenac resulted in an increased ECF at 48 h, but this phenomenon seems to be associated with a greater renal sensibility to the action of vasopressin rather than with an increase in its secretion. Moreover, a partial inhibitory effect on cortisol secretion can be hypothesized.