The economic burden of inpatient diabetic foot ulcers in Toronto, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetic foot ulcer, which often leads to lower limb amputation, is a devastating complication of diabetes that is a major burden on patients and the healthcare system. The main objective of this study is to determine the economic burden of diabetic foot ulcer-related care. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter study of all diabetic foot ulcer patients admitted to general internal medicine wards at seven hospitals in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada from 2010 to 2015, using the GEMINI database. We compared the mean costs of care per patient for diabetic foot ulcer-related admissions, admissions for other diabetes-related complications, and admissions for the top five most costly general internal medicine conditions, using the Ontario Case Costing Initiative. Regression models were used to determine adjusted estimates of cost per patient. Propensity-score matched analyses were performed as sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Our study cohort comprised of 557 diabetic foot ulcer patients; 2939 non-diabetic foot ulcer diabetes patients; and 23,656 patients with the top 5 most costly general internal medicine conditions. Diabetic foot ulcer admissions incurred the highest mean cost per patient ($22,754) when compared to admissions with non-diabetic foot ulcer diabetes ($8,350) and the top five most costly conditions ($10,169). Using adjusted linear regression, diabetic foot ulcer admissions demonstrated a 49.6% greater mean cost of care than non-diabetic foot ulcer-related diabetes admissions (95% CI 1.14-1.58), and a 25.6% greater mean cost than the top five most costly conditions (95% CI 1.17-1.34). Propensity-scored matched analyses confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: Diabetic foot ulcer patients incur significantly higher costs of care when compared to admissions with non-diabetic foot ulcer-related diabetes patients, and the top five most costly general internal medicine conditions.

Are There Any Developments in the Attitudes and Practices of Oncologists Regarding Fertility Preservation in Saudi Arabia After 12 Years?

INTRODUCTION: The current practice of offering fertility preservation (FP) counseling and treatment has become one of the focal points in patient care throughout cancer treatment. The turning point was the approval of the Council of Senior Religious Scholars four years ago to freeze tissues from the ovarian membrane, the entire ovary, and the eggs for later use in reproduction to preserve the offspring. Thus, we aimed to assess any development in oncologists' knowledge, attitude, and referral practices regarding FP in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire. We assessed oncologists' opinions on the importance of FP, their perception of the patient's preferences, and factors to consider when discussing the subject. Then, we assessed the knowledge and referral practices, including the timing of referral before starting cancer treatment. RESULTS: Most oncologists showed good knowledge and positive attitudes toward FP; however, their referral practices could be better. Most were familiar with FP options. The most significant factors influencing the oncologist-patient FP discussion were the number of existing children, marital status, cost, and type of cancer (96.6%, 76.7%, 65.7%, and 58.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant improvement in the knowledge and attitude of oncologists toward FP. However, patients' counseling and referral to fertility services still need to be improved. There is a shortfall in the clinical practice guidelines for FP in cancer patients in Saudi Arabia. The implementation of clinical practice guidelines would enhance FP. However, patients' counseling and referral to fertility services still need to be improved. The lack of proper guidelines on FP is affecting oncologists' practice.