RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of prophylactic desmopressin versus placebo among patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). SETTING: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were screened from inception until 18 March 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing FESS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary efficacy endpoints comprised intraoperative blood loss, visual clarity, and operation time. Secondary endpoints comprised side effects. The efficacy endpoints were summarised as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Five RCTs comprising 380 patients (desmopressin = 191 patients and placebo = 189 patients) were included. Collectively, the included RCTs had an overall low risk of bias. The pooled results showed that the mean intraoperative blood loss (n = 5 RCTs, MD = -37.97 ml, 95% CI [-56.97, -18.96], p < .001), 5-point Boezaart scores (n = 2 RCTs, MD = -.97, 95% CI [-1.21, -.74], p < .001), and 10-point Boezaart scores (n = 2 RCTs, MD = -3.00, 95% CI [-3.61, -2.40], p < .001) were significantly reduced in favour of the desmopressin group compared with the placebo group. Operation time did not significantly differ between both groups (n = 5 RCTs, MD = -3.73 min, 95% CI [-14.65, 7.18], p = .50). No patient in both groups developed symptomatic hyponatremia (n = 3 RCTs, 194 patients) or thromboembolic events (n = 2 RCTs, 150 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing FESS, prophylactic administration of desmopressin does not correlate with significant clinical benefits. Data on safety is limited. Future research may explore the synergistic antihaemorrhagic efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) plus desmopressin versus TXA alone among patients undergoing FESS.