Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Infect Dis ; 227(4): 533-542, 2023 02 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36626187

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence is accumulating of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine effectiveness among persons with prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. METHODS: We evaluated the effect against incident SARS-CoV-2 infection of (1) prior infection without vaccination, (2) vaccination (2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine) without prior infection, and (3) vaccination after prior infection, all compared with unvaccinated persons without prior infection. We included long-term care facility staff in New York City aged <65 years with weekly SARS-CoV-2 testing from 21 January to 5 June 2021. Test results were obtained from state-mandated laboratory reporting. Vaccination status was obtained from the Citywide Immunization Registry. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for confounding with inverse probability of treatment weights. RESULTS: Compared with unvaccinated persons without prior infection, incident SARS-CoV-2 infection risk was lower in all groups: 54.6% (95% confidence interval, 38.0%-66.8%) lower among unvaccinated, previously infected persons; 80.0% (67.6%-87.7%) lower among fully vaccinated persons without prior infection; and 82.4% (70.8%-89.3%) lower among persons fully vaccinated after prior infection. CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection risk by ≥80% and, for those with prior infection, increased protection from prior infection alone. These findings support recommendations that all eligible persons, regardless of prior infection, be vaccinated against COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacuna BNT162 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Casas de Salud
3.
AIDS Patient Care STDS ; 34(6): 251-258, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32484745

RESUMEN

Despite being a promising prevention strategy for populations at risk for HIV acquisition, there has not been rapid uptake of HIV antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Yet, HIV clinics within the Mount Sinai Health System in New York City have successfully incorporated PrEP. HIV care providers (n = 18), who practice in these clinics and were early PrEP adopters, participated in a survey and semistructured interview. Qualitative thematic analysis revealed that barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake were identified on multiple levels from broader systemic to provider-and-patient-level concerns. The following themes were identified: (1) to reach a greater proportion of patients at risk for HIV and address racial/ethnic and gender disparities, PrEP should be available in a variety of settings and provided by different types of providers within proximity to affected populations; (2) financial support is needed beyond addressing medication cost; and (3) multidisciplinary teams and population-specific clinic protocols can assist providers in conducting high-quality visits and addressing these barriers to PrEP.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Personal de Salud/psicología , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/métodos , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Ciudad de Nueva York , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación Cualitativa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA