RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To highlight some important findings from osteoarthritis (OA) epidemiology and therapy research undertaken over the past year. METHODS: Search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases between April 1, 2022 to March 3, 2023 using "exp *Osteoarthritis/" as the preliminary search term. The search was limited to articles published in English and including human subjects. Final inclusions were based on perceived importance and results that may inform improved identification of risk factors or OA treatments, as well as OA subgroups of potential relevance to risk factors or treatment approaches. RESULTS: 3182 studies were screened, leaving 208 eligible for inclusion. This narrative review of thirty-three selected studies was arranged into: a) OA predictors - population-based studies, b) Specific predictors of OA and OA outcome; c) Intra-articular injections, and d) OA phenotypes. There was some suggestion of sex differences in predictors of incidence or outcomes. Body mass index changes appear largely to affect knee OA outcomes. Evidence points to a lack of benefit of viscosupplementation in knee OA; findings were variable for other injectables. Studies of OA phenotypes reveal potentially relevant clinical and pathophysiological differences. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying risk factors for the incidence/progression of OA represents an ongoing and important area of OA research. Sex may play a role in this understanding and bears consideration and further study. For knee injectables other than viscosupplementation, additional high-quality trials appear warranted. Continued investigation and application of phenotyping across the OA disease, illness and care spectrum may be key to developing disease-modifying agents and their appropriate selection for individuals.
Asunto(s)
Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Viscosuplementación , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Ácido Hialurónico , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/tratamiento farmacológico , Viscosuplementación/métodos , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Articulación de la RodillaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of OA risk factors with number of painful joint sites in a representative population sample. METHODS: Analysis of the 2009 Survey on Living with Chronic Diseases in Canada - Arthritis Component (n = 1614) for respondents reporting symptomatic OA. Variables: painful joints sites (hands, wrists, elbows, shoulders, hips, knees, ankles, feet, back, neck), joint symptom duration, sociodemographic characteristics, smoking, comorbidities and BMI. Zero-truncated negative binomial regressions were used to investigate the association between number of painful joint sites and the variables. Generalizability of findings was assessed by a similar analysis in a clinical hip/knee OA sample. RESULTS: The sample comprised 73% women and 56% were aged <65 years. The mean number of painful joint sites was 3.8: 84% reported pain at ≥2 sites, and 45% at ≥4 sites. Age, BMI, education and smoking were not associated with the number of joint sites. Significant associations were found with being female [rate ratio (RR) = 1.23, 95% CI 1.09, 1.39], having more comorbidities (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.07, 1.15) and longer symptom duration (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.09, 1.24), although the increase in joint sites with duration was small. Similar regression results were found with the clinical OA sample. CONCLUSION: The lack of an association of age and BMI (obesity) with number of painful joint sites in OA raises questions about the role of these risk factors and our understanding of OA as a multi-joint disease. Filling this knowledge gap is critical to making progress with defining OA phenotypes and identifying potential aetiological mechanisms.
Asunto(s)
Factores de Edad , Artralgia/etiología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Osteoartritis/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Artralgia/patología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Comorbilidad , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Fumar , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with rheumatologists' clinical work hours and patient volumes based on a national workforce survey in rheumatology. METHODS: Adult rheumatologists who participated in a 2015 workforce survey were included (n = 255). Univariate analysis evaluated the relationship between demographics (sex, age, academic vs. community practice, billing fee for service vs. other plan, years in practice, retirement plans) and workload (total hours and number of ½-day clinics per week) or patient volumes (number of new and follow-up consults per week). Multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between practice type, sex, age, and working hours or clinical volumes. RESULTS: Male rheumatologists had more ½-day clinics (p = 0.05) and saw more new patients per week (p = 0.001) compared with females. Community rheumatologists had more ½-day clinics and new and follow-up visits per week (all p < 0.01). Fee-for-service rheumatologists reported more ½-day clinics per week (p < 0.001) and follow-ups (p = 0.04). Workload did not vary by age, years in practice, or retirement plans. In multivariate analysis, community practice remained independently associated with higher patient volumes and more clinics per week. Female rheumatologists reported fewer clinics and fewer follow-up patients per week than males, but this did not affect the duration of working hours or new consultations. Age was not associated with work volumes or hours. CONCLUSIONS: Practice type and rheumatologist sex should be considered when evaluating rheumatologist workforce needs, as the proportion of female rheumatologists has increased over time and alternative billing practices have been introduced in many centers.
Asunto(s)
Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/organización & administración , Administración de Personal/métodos , Reumatólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Reumatología/organización & administración , Canadá , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Using longitudinal panel data, the aim of this study was to examine the contribution of age, period, and cohort effects on changes in physical activity over time in a population-based sample of Canadians. We focused on three domains of physical activities: leisure time, commuting (i.e. walking and cycling), and daily activities (i.e. sedentary behavior). We also examined whether changes in sedentary behavior related to changes in participation in leisure time and commuting activities. METHODS: We used data from the Longitudinal National Population Health Survey (1994-2011): 10050 participants born between 1935 and 1984 grouped in five 10-years birth cohorts. We examined three outcomes: moderate-to-vigorous leisure time physical activity, active commuting, and sedentary behavior. We also included education, income, and body mass index as covariates. We used hierarchical age-period-cohort analysis to examine the contribution of age, period, and cohort effects to changes over time for each outcome. RESULTS: We found that recent cohorts were more likely to report sedentary behavior and greater participation in leisure time physical activities and active commuting. We also found a significant trend of increasing participation in active leisure time physical activity and active commuting among Canadians from 1994/95 to 2010/11 and, at the same time, an increase in sedentary behavior. The greater participation in leisure time physical activities and active commuting in each succeeding recent cohort was partially related to the secular trend of increasing participation in physical activities over time in the population. Furthermore, those with sedentary behavior were less likely to report participation in physical activities. Overall, obese individuals were less likely to be physically active and more likely to be sedentary, while the effect of socio-economic status varied by outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The greater participation in physical activities (leisure time and commuting) in recent cohorts is encouraging and was substantially explained by period effects, which reflect broad social and environmental factors affecting the whole population. The large cohort effect of increasing sedentary behavior and the inverse relationship between sedentary behavior and physical activity is concerning, and identifies a target group for future interventions.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Cambio Social , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Ciclismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Canadá , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Actividades Recreativas/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conducta Sedentaria , Transportes/estadística & datos numéricos , Caminata/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To synthesise, quantify and compare risks for incident myocardial infarction (MI) across five major types of arthritis in population-based studies. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases with additional manual/hand searches for population-based cohort or case-control studies published in English of French between January 1980 and January 2015 with a measure of effect and variance for associations between incident MI and five major types of arthritis: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), gout or osteoarthritis (OA), adjusted for at least age and sex. All search screening, data abstraction quality appraisals were performed independently by two reviewers. Where appropriate, random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool results from studies with a minimum of 10 events. RESULTS: We identified a total of 4, 285 articles; 27 met review criteria and 25 criteria for meta-analyses. In studies adjusting for age and sex, MI risk was significantly increased in RA (pooled relative risk (RR): 1.69, 95% CI 1.50 to 1.90), gout (pooled RR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.73), PsA (pooled RR: 1.41, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.69), OA (pooled RR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.71) and tended towards increased risk in AS (pooled RR: 1.24, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.65). Traditional risk factors were more prevalent in all types of arthritis. MI risk was attenuated for each type of arthritis in studies adjusting for traditional risk factors and remained significantly increased in RA, PsA and gout. CONCLUSIONS: MI risk was consistently increased in multiple types of arthritis in population-based studies, and was partially explained by a higher prevalence of traditional risk factors in all types of arthritis. Findings support more integrated cardiovascular (CV) prevention strategies for arthritis populations that target both reducing inflammation and enhancing management of traditional CV risk factors.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica/epidemiología , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Gota/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Osteoartritis/epidemiología , Espondilitis Anquilosante/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Humanos , Incidencia , Análisis de Regresión , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Timely access to effective treatments for arthritis is a priority at national, provincial and regional levels in Canada due to population aging coupled with limited health human resources. Models of care for arthritis are being implemented across the country but mainly in local contexts, not from an evidence-informed policy or framework. The purpose of this study is to examine existing models of care for arthritis in Canada at the local level in order to identify commonalities and differences in their implementation that could point to important considerations for health policy and service delivery. METHODS: Semi-structured key informant interviews were conducted with 70 program managers and/or care providers in three Canadian provinces identified through purposive and snowball sampling followed by more detailed examination of 6 models of care (two per province). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically using a qualitative descriptive approach. RESULTS: Two broad models of care were identified for Total Joint Replacement and Inflammatory Arthritis. Commonalities included lack of complete and appropriate referrals from primary care physicians and lack of health human resources to meet local demands. Strategies included standardized referrals and centralized intake and triage using non-specialist health care professionals. Differences included the nature of the care and follow-up, the role of the specialist, and location of service delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Current models of care are mainly focused on Total Joint Replacement and Inflammatory Arthritis. Given the increasing prevalence of arthritis and that published data report only a small proportion of current service delivery is specialist care; provision of timely, appropriate care requires development, implementation and evaluation of models of care across the continuum of care.
Asunto(s)
Artritis/terapia , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Política de Salud , Artroplastia de Reemplazo , Canadá , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Modelos Teóricos , Derivación y Consulta , TriajeRESUMEN
Starch degradation in chloroplasts requires ß-amylase (BAM) activity, which is encoded by a multigene family. Of nine Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) BAM genes, six encode plastidic enzymes, but only four of these are catalytically active. In vegetative plants, BAM1 acts during the day in guard cells, whereas BAM3 is the dominant activity in mesophyll cells at night. Plastidic BAMs have been difficult to assay in leaf extracts, in part because of a cytosolic activity encoded by BAM5. We generated a series of double mutants lacking BAM5 and each of the active plastidic enzymes (BAM1, BAM2, BAM3, and BAM6) and found that most of the plastidic activity in 5-week-old plants was encoded by BAM1 and BAM3. Both of these activities were relatively constant during the day and the night. Analysis of leaf extracts from double mutants and purified BAM1 and BAM3 proteins revealed that these proteins have distinct properties. Using soluble starch as the substrate, BAM1 and BAM3 had optimum activity at pH 6.0 to 6.5, but at high pH, BAM1 was more active than BAM3, consistent with its known daytime role in the guard cell stroma. The optimum temperature for BAM1, which is transcriptionally induced by heat stress, was about 10°C higher than that of BAM3, which is transcriptionally induced by cold stress. The amino acid composition of BAM1 and BAM3 orthologs reflected differences that are consistent with known adaptations of proteins from heat- and cold-adapted organisms, suggesting that these day- and night-active enzymes have undergone thermal adaptation.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Arabidopsis/metabolismo , Arabidopsis/enzimología , Regulación Enzimológica de la Expresión Génica , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/metabolismo , Arabidopsis/genética , Arabidopsis/fisiología , Proteínas de Arabidopsis/genética , Cloroplastos/enzimología , Citosol/metabolismo , Regulación de la Expresión Génica de las Plantas , Calor , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Familia de Multigenes , Mutación , Hojas de la Planta/metabolismo , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/genética , Almidón/metabolismo , Estrés FisiológicoRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: POLICY POINTS: Despite beliefs that baby boomers are healthier than previous generations, we found no evidence that the health of baby boomers is substantially different from that of the previous or succeeding cohorts. The effects of increased education, higher income, and lower smoking rates on improving self-rated health were nearly counterbalanced by the adverse effect of increasing body mass index (BMI). Assumptions that baby boomers will require less health care as they age because of better education, more prosperity, and less propensity to smoke may not be realized because of increases in obesity. CONTEXT: Baby boomers are commonly believed to be healthier than the previous generation. Using self-rated health (SRH) as an indicator of health status, this study examines the effects of age, period, and birth cohort on the trajectory of health across 4 generations: World War II (born between 1935 and 1944), older baby boomers (born between 1945 and 1954), younger baby boomers (born between 1955 and 1964), and Generation X (born between 1965 and 1974). METHODS: We analyzed Canada's longitudinal National Population Health Survey 1994-2010 (n = 8,570 at baseline), using multilevel growth models to estimate the age trajectory of SRH by cohort, accounting for period and incorporating the influence of changes in education, household income, smoking status, and body mass index (BMI) on SRH over time. FINDINGS: SRH worsened with increasing age in all cohorts. Cohort differences in SRH were modest (p = 0.034), but there was a significant period effect (p = 0.002). We found marked cohort effects for increasing education, income, and BMI, and decreasing smoking from the youngest to the oldest cohorts, which were much reduced (education and smoking) or removed (income and BMI) once period was taken into account. At the population level, multivariable analysis showed the benefits of increasing education and income and declines in smoking on the trajectory of improving SRH were almost counterbalanced by the effects of increasing BMI (obesity). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support the expectation that baby boomers will age more or less healthily than previous cohorts did. We also found that increasing BMI has likely undermined improvements in health that might have otherwise occurred, with possible implications for the need for health care. Period effects had a more profound effect than birth cohort effects. This suggests that interventions to improve health, such as reducing obesity, can be targeted to the entire, or a major portion of the, population and need not single out particular birth cohorts.
Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Obesidad/complicaciones , Fumar/efectos adversos , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Envejecimiento , Índice de Masa Corporal , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Escolaridad , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Renta/tendencias , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multinivel , Obesidad/epidemiología , Autoinforme , Distribución por Sexo , Fumar/epidemiología , Cambio Social , Clase Social , Derechos de la Mujer/tendencias , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a perception that the impacts of arthritis are greatest among older adults. However, the effect of age on health-related outcomes in individuals with arthritis has not been explicitly studied. This study examined whether the physical and mental health impacts of arthritis are greater in older (75+ years) versus younger (20-44, 45-64 and 65-74 years) Canadian adults. METHODS: Data were from the arthritis component of the 2009 Survey on Living with Chronic Diseases in Canada. The responses were weighted to be representative of Canadians (≥20 years) with arthritis. Associations between age and the prevalence of severe/frequent joint pain, severe/frequent fatigue, sleep limitations, instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) limitations, high levels of stress, suboptimal general and suboptimal mental health, were examined descriptively prior to conducting multivariate log-binomial regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 4565 respondents completed the survey (78% response rate). Individuals with arthritis were mostly female (63%), of working age (57%) and overweight or obese (67%). Upon adjusting for covariates, younger (20-44 years) and/or middle aged (45-64 years) adults were more likely than those older (75+ years) to report severe/frequent joint pain, sleep limitations, high levels of stress and suboptimal mental health. After adjusting for covariates, age was not associated with IADL limitations, severe/frequent fatigue or suboptimal general health. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the belief that older adults with arthritis experience more severe physical and mental health outcomes, we found that older adults were less likely to report worse outcomes than younger adults. In light of these findings, public health messaging should stress that arthritis does not just affect the elderly and emphasize the importance of timely diagnosis and management at all ages in order to prevent or, minimize arthritis-related impairment.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Artritis/epidemiología , Artritis/psicología , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/métodos , Vigilancia de la Población , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Artritis/diagnóstico , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient predictors of good outcome following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: A population cohort with hip/knee arthritis (osteoarthritis [OA] or inflammatory arthritis) ages ≥55 years was recruited between 1996 and 1998 (baseline) and assessed annually for demographics, troublesome joints, health status, and overall hip/knee arthritis severity using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC). Survey data were linked with administrative databases to identify primary TJAs. Good outcome was defined as an improvement in WOMAC summary score greater than or equal to the minimal important difference (MID; 0.5 SD of the mean change). Logistic regression and Akaike's information criterion were used to determine the optimal number of predictors and the best model of that size. Log Poisson regression was used to determine the relative risk (RR) for a good outcome. RESULTS: Primary TJA was performed in 202 patients (mean age 71.0 years; 79.7% female; 82.7% with >1 troublesome hip/knee; 65.8% knee replacements). Mean improvement in WOMAC summary score was 10.2 points (SD 18.05; MID 9 points). Of these patients, 53.5% experienced a good outcome. Four predictors were optimal. The best 4-variable model included pre-TJA WOMAC, comorbidity, number of troublesome hips/knees, and arthritis type (C statistic 0.80). The probability of a good outcome was greater with worse (higher) pre-TJA WOMAC summary scores (adjusted RR 1.32 per 10-point increase; P < 0.0001), fewer troublesome hips/knees (adjusted RR 0.82 per joint; P = 0.002), OA (adjusted RR for rheumatoid arthritis versus OA 0.33; P = 0.009), and fewer comorbidities (adjusted RR per condition 0.88; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In an OA cohort with a high prevalence of multiple troublesome joints and comorbidity, only half achieved a good TJA outcome, defined as improved pain and disability. A more comprehensive assessment of the benefits and risks of TJA is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Anciano , Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Artritis Reumatoide/rehabilitación , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/rehabilitación , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/rehabilitación , Dolor/rehabilitación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Recuperación de la Función , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To examine men and women's perceptions of inter-role balance/imbalance in work, arthritis, and personal roles and its association with demographic, health and employment factors, including job stress, career satisfaction, job disruptions, absenteeism and perceived productivity losses. METHODS: Participants were employed, aged ≥40 years and diagnosed with osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis. They were recruited through community advertising and rheumatology clinics in two Canadian provinces. Respondents completed a 35-45 min telephone interview and a 20-min self-administered questionnaire assessing role perceptions [(arthritis negatively impacts work (A â W); work/personal life negatively impact arthritis (W/P â A); work as a positive role (W +))], demographic, health and work context information. Analyses included exploratory factor analysis and multivariate regressions. RESULTS: Findings revealed similarities between men (n = 104) and women (n = 248) in health, work and role perceptions, although women reported more benefits of working with arthritis (W+) than men. Some gender differences were found in factors associated with inter-role perceptions highlighting the importance of children, fatigue, unpredictable work hours, job control, and workplace activity limitations. Role perceptions were associated with work outcomes but only one perception, W/P â A, interacted with gender. Among men, greater perceptions that work and personal demands interfered with managing arthritis were associated with more job disruptions. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed negative and positive inter-role perceptions related to working with a chronic illness and associations with work outcomes. It highlights potentially modifiable factors that could assess risk and inform interventions to improve role balance and working experiences.
Asunto(s)
Artritis/epidemiología , Artritis/psicología , Empleo/psicología , Adulto , Colombia Británica/epidemiología , Conflicto Psicológico , Fatiga/epidemiología , Fatiga/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Control Interno-Externo , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario/epidemiología , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Rol , Factores Sexuales , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado/fisiología , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis (OA) is frequently perceived as a disease of the elderly and an inevitable result of aging. Because OA studies often are restricted to older adults, there is limited information on OA in younger adults. This study describes the burden of OA across a wide age range and compares younger and older adults. METHODS: Descriptive analysis of the Survey on Living with Chronic Diseases in Canada - Arthritis Component, a nationally representative survey of Canadians ≥20 years who reported an arthritis diagnosis in the Canadian Community Health Survey, a general health population survey. Analyses were restricted to those reporting OA and no other kind of arthritis (n = 1,749). RESULTS: In the representative group with OA, 55.4% were younger than 65 years. The mean age at diagnosis was 50 years, with 30.4% reporting being diagnosed before age 45 years. Younger adults reported similar symptom severity as their older counterparts with OA regarding the mean number of affected joint sites, severity of pain and fatigue, and activity limitations. In the youngest age group, those with OA were significantly more likely to report fair or poor overall and mental health and life dissatisfaction compared with their general counterparts; the same was not the case in the oldest age group. CONCLUSION: OA is not uncommon among younger and middle-aged adults, and they experience OA impacts comparable with those for older adults. These findings suggest that younger adults with OA will live many years with symptoms and disability and highlight a need for effective OA management across ages.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to examine the relationship between osteoarthritis (OA) and joint symptoms typical of OA and labor force participation. METHODS: Data are from the baseline questionnaire of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging for respondents aged 45 to 74 years at baseline (n = 24,427). Individuals were categorized into one of five mutually exclusive arthritis status groups: diagnosed OA, diagnosed other type of arthritis, two to three symptomatic joint sites and no diagnosed arthritis, one symptomatic joint site and no diagnosed arthritis, and no arthritis and no joint symptoms. Age-stratified robust log-Poisson regression analysis was used to examine the association between arthritis status and labor force participation. RESULTS: Overall, 39% of the analytic sample reported being out of the labor force. Those with OA aged 45 to 54 and 55 to 64 years were significantly more likely to be out of the labor force than those with no arthritis or no joint symptoms, with prevalence ratios (PRs) of 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.65) and 1.13 (95% CI 1.06-1.21), respectively, with similar results for those with two to three joint symptoms and no OA in the 45 to 54 years age group (PR 1.37 [95% CI 1.07-1.76]). There was no difference for those aged 65 to 74 years. Being an informal caregiver increased the likelihood of nonparticipation in the labor force for those aged 55 to 64 years (PR 1.09 [95% CI 1.04-1.15]). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that an exclusive reliance on an OA diagnosis to understand impact on labor force participation may miss a large segment of the middle-aged population, which may have undiagnosed OA or be at greater risk of OA because of joint problems.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In osteoarthritis (OA) research, disability is largely studied within the context of activities of daily living. Broader consequences for social participation are often overlooked. In prior work, instrumental supports received and their perceived availability were shown to play a role in the maintenance of social participation. Two indicators of social participation were identified, diversity and intensity. The current study extends the findings from this prior cross-sectional work by examining these relationships longitudinally. METHODS: Data are from the baseline and 3-year follow-up questionnaires of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, a population-based study of people ages 45-85 years at baseline. The sample was restricted to those who at baseline reported a doctor diagnosis of OA (n = 4104). Using structural equation modeling, latent variables were derived at each time point for activity limitations, instrumental supports perceived and received, and social participation diversity and intensity. Longitudinal factorial invariance was assessed. Model covariates included age, sex, education, income, marital status, smoking status, obesity, and number of chronic conditions. RESULTS: For all latent variables, strong factorial longitudinal invariance was found. Activity limitations increased over time. Greater baseline social participation intensity was associated with increases in later intensity and diversity. Increasing activity limitations were associated with decreases in social participation and with increasing receipt of instrumental supports; they were not associated with changes in perceived availability of supports. However, increasing perceived availability was positively associated with social participation intensity. CONCLUSIONS: With a goal of increasing social participation, findings suggest a focus on interventions to reduce activity limitations in OA is necessary. Findings additionally highlight an important role for perceived availability of instrumental supports in maintaining or improving social participation in OA, in addition to current social participation, particularly intensity, for future social participation status.
Asunto(s)
Osteoartritis , Participación Social , Humanos , Actividades Cotidianas , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Transversales , Canadá/epidemiología , Envejecimiento , Osteoartritis/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To develop a paper-and-pencil semi-adaptive test for 5 domains of health-related quality of life (PAT-5D-QOL) based on item response theory (IRT). METHODS: The questionnaire uses items from previously developed item banks for 5 domains: (1) walking, (2) handling objects, (3) daily activities, (4) pain or discomfort, and (5) feelings. For each domain, respondents are initially classified into 4 functional levels. Depending on the level, they are instructed to respond to a different set of 5 additional questions. IRT scores for each domain and overall health utility scores are obtained using a simple spreadsheet. The questions were selected using psychometric and conceptual criteria. The format of the questionnaire was developed through focus groups and cognitive interviews. Feasibility was tested in two population surveys. A simulation study was conducted to compare PAT-5D-QOL with a computerized adaptive test (CAT-5D-QOL) and a fixed questionnaire, developed from the same item banks, in terms of accuracy, bias, precision, and ceiling and floor effects. RESULTS: Close to 90 % of the participants in feasibility studies followed the skip instructions properly. In a simulation study, scores on PAT-5D-QOL for all domains tended to be more accurate, more precise, less biased, and less affected by a ceiling effect than scores on a fixed IRT-based questionnaire of the same length. PAT-5D-QOL was slightly inferior to a fully adaptive instrument. CONCLUSIONS: PAT-5D-QOL is a novel, semi-adaptive, IRT-based measure of health-related quality of life with a broad range of potential applications.
Asunto(s)
Indicadores de Salud , Psicometría/instrumentación , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Actividades Cotidianas , Afecto , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Back problems and arthritis are common chronic conditions, while having back problems is a frequent reason for lost work time. The objective of this study was to investigate employment status amongst individuals who report having both back problems and arthritis, compared to having either condition alone. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2007/2008 Canadian Community Health Survey (ages 25-64, n = 79,719). Respondents who reported neither having worked in the past 12 months nor the past week were coded as not currently employed. Those reported being permanently unable to work were considered to be out of the labor force. Log-Poisson regressions, adjusting for socio-demographic and lifestyle factors, were used to estimate risks for being not currently employed or being out of the labor force for 5 mutually exclusive groups of chronic conditions: arthritis and back problems, back problems, arthritis, any other chronic conditions, and no chronic conditions. RESULTS: 12.7% of respondents reported being not currently employed and 2.9% being out of the labor force. 5.8% of respondents reported both arthritis and back problems, while 16.1% reported back problems and 7.3% arthritis. The back problems and arthritis group had the highest risk of not being currently employed. The risk was higher for men (PR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.58, 2.29) than for women (PR = 1.31; 95% CI = 1.18, 1.46). Risks of being permanently unable to work were also the greatest for those with comorbid back problems and arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for a reappraisal of back problems as a cause of work disability to account for the possibility of co-occurring arthritis.
Asunto(s)
Artritis/epidemiología , Dolor de Espalda/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the profile of individuals with and without knee osteoarthritis (OA) who fell, and to identify factors contributing to an individual with knee OA experiencing 1 or multiple injurious falls. METHODS: Data are from the baseline and 3-year follow-up questionnaires of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, a population-based study of people ages 45-85 years at baseline. Analyses were limited to individuals either reporting knee OA or no arthritis at baseline (n = 21,710). Differences between falling patterns among those with and without knee OA were tested using chi-square tests and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models. An ordinal logistic regression model examined predictors of experiencing 1 or more injurious falls among individuals with knee OA. RESULTS: Among individuals reporting knee OA, 10% reported 1 or more injurious falls; 6% reported 1 fall, and 4% reported 2+ falls. Having knee OA significantly contributed to the risk of falling (odds ratio [OR] 1.33 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.14-1.56]), and individuals with knee OA were more likely to report having a fall indoors while standing or walking. Among individuals with knee OA, reporting a previous fall (OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.22-2.52]), previous fracture (OR 1.42 [95% CI 1.12-1.80]), and having urinary incontinence (OR 1.38 [95% CI 1.01-1.88]) were significant predictors of falling. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the idea that knee OA is an independent risk factor for falls. The circumstances in which falls occur differ from those for individuals without knee OA. The risk factors and environments that are associated with falling may provide opportunities for clinical intervention and fall prevention strategies.
Asunto(s)
Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Humanos , Anciano , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/complicaciones , Estudios Longitudinales , Canadá/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , EnvejecimientoRESUMEN
Purpose: In OA studies, the focus often is on an index-joint; other affected joint sites are often overlooked. In this thumb-base OA study, we documented the frequency of symptomatic non-hand joint sites and investigated whether their count was associated with thumb-specific functional and patient-reported outcome measures. Design: Patients seeking care for thumb-base OA (conservative or surgical) were included. A patient-completed questionnaire captured sociodemographic and health characteristics, symptomatic hand and non-hand joint sites, and outcome measures (thumb-base pain intensity, symptoms and disability (TASD) and upper-extremity disability/symptoms (quickDASH)). Grip and pinch strength were measured. Linear regressions examined the association between each outcome and symptomatic joint site count, adjusted for several covariates. Results: The mean age of the 145 patients was 62 years, 72% were female. Mean symptomatic non-hand joint site count was 3.6. Ten percent reported only their hands as symptomatic; 30% reported 2-3 other symptomatic sites, and 49% reported 4+. From cross-sectional multivariable analyses, a higher symptomatic non-hand joint site count was associated with worse scores for all patient-reported outcomes and grip strength. Every unit increase in joint site count (49% had a 4+ count) was associated with a 2.1-3.3 unit increase (worse) in patient-reported outcome scores (all p â< â0.02). Conclusions: In this sample, nearly 80% of patients had 2+ symptomatic non-hand joint sites. These symptoms were associated with worse thumb- and hand-specific outcomes, suggesting a need for awareness of whole body OA burden, with implications for outcome score interpretations, study designs, and provision of care in thumb-base OA.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate a profile of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors by sex among individuals with and without osteoarthritis (OA) and to consider single-site and multisite joint OA. METHODS: Data were sourced from Cycle 1, Comprehensive Cohort, Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, a national sample of individuals ages 45 to 85 years. Systemic inflammatory/metabolic CVD risk factors collected were high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, total cholesterol, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, and hemoglobin A1c. Smoking history was also collected. Respondents indicated doctor-diagnosed OA in the knees, hips, and/or hands and were characterized as yes/no OA and single site/multisite OA. Individuals with OA were age- and sex-matched to non-OA controls. Covariates were age, sex, education, income, physical activity, timed up and go test findings, and comorbidities. A latent CVD risk variable was derived in women and men; standardized scores were categorized as follows: lowest, mid-low, mid-high, and highest risk. Associations with OA were quantified using ordinal logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 6,098 respondents (3,049 with OA) had a median age of 63 years, and 55.8% were women. One-third of OA respondents were in the highest risk category versus one-fifth of non-OA respondents. Apart from BMI (the largest contributor in both sexes), hsCRP level (an inflammation marker) was predominant in women, and metabolic factors and smoking were predominant in men. Overall, OA was associated with worse CVD risk quartiles compared with non-OA. OA was increasingly associated with worse CVD risk quartiles with increasing risk thresholds among women with multisite OA, but not men. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest unique CVD risks by sex/multisite subgroups and point to a potentially important role for inflammation in OA over and above traditional CVD risk factors.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Osteoartritis , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Factores de Riesgo , Proteína C-Reactiva , Equilibrio Postural , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Tiempo y Movimiento , Osteoartritis/diagnóstico , Osteoartritis/epidemiología , Osteoartritis/complicaciones , Envejecimiento , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Inflamación/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine inter-relationships among arthritis (A), work (W) and personal life (P) roles and their reciprocal influences, especially experiences of role balance/imbalance among individuals with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and OA. METHODS: Eight focus groups were conducted with 24 women and 16 men (aged 29-72 years). A purposive sample was recruited from community advertising. Eligibility included current employment or having been employed within the previous year. Participants were asked about ways arthritis, work and personal life roles intersected and their impact. A standardized questionnaire collected demographic, symptom and employment data for descriptive purposes. RESULTS: Participants noted that having arthritis affected their identity and intersected with work and personal roles, creating role overload, role conflict, role strain and role facilitation. Role overload highlighted that arthritis both affected and was impacted by work and personal life (A â W; A â P; W â A; P â A). Role conflict focused on A â W and A â P difficulties, whereas role facilitation emphasized the positive impact of work and personal life roles on arthritis (W â A; P â A). Role strain was pervasive and arose from numerous sources. Personal strategies (e.g. positive framing) and contextual factors (e.g. support) were important in contributing to or ameliorating role balance/imbalance. CONCLUSIONS: By comprehensively examining multiple types of role balance/imbalance and the context within which it occurs, this study identifies gaps in patient-oriented measurement of the impact of arthritis and areas of need in the development of arthritis intervention.