Benefit of clinical pharmacists in neurology clinics at an academic medical center.

BACKGROUND: Patients with neurologic diseases have complex medical needs and may benefit from the addition of clinical pharmacists in their care. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe integration and benefit of clinical pharmacists in neuroimmunology and neuromuscular clinics at an academic medical center. METHODS: This retrospective chart review evaluated patients initiated on a neurology medication for a neuroimmunology or neuromuscular disease state before and after pharmacist integration in neurology clinics. The primary outcome measured access to an initially prescribed neuroimmunology or neuromuscular medication within 90 days of prescription. Secondary outcomes included access to an initially prescribed or alternative neurology medication owing to insurance requirements within 90 days, time from initial prescription to start, and description of pharmacist involvement. RESULTS: There were 101 patients in the pregroup and 101 patients in the postgroup. The percentage of patients with confirmed initially prescribed medication access at 90 days increased in the postgroup compared with the pregroup (87.1% vs. 72.5%, respectively, P = 0.014). For secondary outcomes, the percentage of patients who started on an initially prescribed or alternative neuroimmunology or neuromuscular medication within 90 days also increased in the postgroup compared with the pregroup (90.0% vs. 73.3%, respectively, P = 0.004). Additional pharmacist involvement occurred in 64 patients (63.4%) in the postgroup and included prior authorization approval assistance, drug information support, and medication liaison interventions, with an average of 4.7 pharmacist interventions at each pharmacy-led encounter. CONCLUSION: The addition of pharmacists into neuroimmunology and neuromuscular clinics improved operational access to medications for neuroimmunology and neuromuscular conditions. In addition, pharmacists were able to assist with multiple areas of patient care including medication education, monitoring, and serving as a medication liaison. This study supports continuing to offer clinical pharmacy services in neuroimmunology and neuromuscular departments and may support the addition of clinical pharmacists into neurology services at other institutions.

Cardio-Oncology Drug Interactions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

In the cardio-oncology population, drug interactions are of particular importance given the complex pharmacological profile, narrow therapeutic index, and inherent risk of therapies used to manage cardiovascular disease and cancer. Drug interactions may be beneficial or detrimental to the desired therapeutic effect. Clinicians in both cardiology and oncology should be cognizant of these potential drug-drug interactions that may reduce the efficacy or safety of either cardiovascular or cancer therapies. These risks can be mitigated through increased recognition of potential drug-drug interaction, use of alternative medications when possible, and careful monitoring. This scientific statement provides clinicians with an overview of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions in patients with cancer exposed to common cardiovascular and cancer medications.

Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Pathophysiology, Evaluation and Management Considerations: Review of Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock.

Despite increasing prevalence in critical care units, cardiogenic shock related to HF (HF-CS) is incompletely understood and distinct from acute myocardial infarction related CS. This review highlights the pathophysiology, evaluation, and contemporary management of HF-CS.

Incidence and prognostic significance of pleural effusions in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

It has been suggested pleural effusions may develop in right heart failure in the absence of left heart disease. The incidence and prognostic significance of pleural effusions in pulmonary arterial hypertension is uncertain. Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension followed at our tertiary care center were reviewed. Survival was examined based on the subsequent development of a pleural effusion. A total of 191 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of pleural effusions on initial assessment was 7.3%. Among patients without a pleural effusion on initial imaging and at least one follow-up computerized tomography (N = 142), pleural effusion developed in 27.5% (N = 39) of patients. No alternative etiology of the effusion was identified in 19 (48.7%) cases and effusions deemed related to pulmonary arterial hypertension occurred at an incident rate of 38.6 cases per 1000 person-years. Of these, 14 (73.7%) were bilateral, 3 (15.8%) were right-sided, and 2 (10.5%) were left-sided. Effusion size was trace or small in 18 patients (94.7%). Development of a new pleural effusion was associated with attenuated survival in unadjusted survival analysis (HR: 3.80; 95% CI: 1.55-9.31), multivariate analysis (HR: 5.13; 95% CI: 1.86-14.16), and after the multivariate model was adjusted for concomitant pericardial effusion (HR: 4.86; 95% CI: 1.51-15.71). Negative impact on survival remained unchanged when effusions more likely related to an alternative cause were removed from analysis. In conclusion, pleural effusions can complicate pulmonary arterial hypertension in the absence of left heart disease. These effusions are frequently small in size, bilateral in location, and their presence is associated with decreased survival. Attenuated survival appears independent of the risk associated with a new pericardial effusion.

COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and solutions from the cardiology pharmacist's perspective.

The recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) challenges pharmacists worldwide. Alongside other specialized pharmacists, we re-evaluated daily processes and therapies used to treat COVID-19 patients within our institutions from a cardiovascular perspective and share what we have learned. To develop a collaborative approach for cardiology issues and concerns in the care of confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients by drawing on the experiences of cardiology pharmacists across the country. On March 26, 2020, a conference call was convened composed of 24 cardiology residency-trained pharmacists (23 actively practicing in cardiology and 1 in critical care) from 16 institutions across the United States to discuss cardiology issues each have encountered with COVID-19 patients. Discussion centered around providing optimal pharmaceutical care while limiting staff exposure. The collaborative of pharmacists found for the ST-elevation myocardial infarction patient, many institutions were diverting COVID-19 rule-out patients to their Emergency Department (ED). Thrombolytics are an alternative to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) allowing for timely treatment of patients and decreased staff exposure. An emergency response grab and go kit includes initial drugs and airway equipment so the patient can be treated and the cart can be left outside the room. Cardiology pharmacists have developed policies and procedures to address monitoring of QT prolonging medications, the use of inhaled prostacyclins, and national drug shortages. Technology has allowed us to practice social distancing, while staying in close contact with our teams, patients, and colleagues and continuing to teach. Residents are engaged in unique decision-making processes with their preceptors and assist as pharmacist extenders. Cardiology pharmacists are in a unique position to work with other pharmacists and health care professionals to implement safe and effective practice changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ongoing monitoring and adjustments are necessary in rapidly changing times.