Evidence for decreased splanchnic glucose uptake after oral glucose administration in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

The role of splanchnic glucose uptake (SGU) after oral glucose administration as a potential factor contributing to postprandial hyperglycemia in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) has not been established conclusively. Therefore, we investigated SGU in six patients with NIDDM and six weight-matched control subjects by means of the hepatic vein catheterization (HVC) technique. In a second part, we examined the applicability of the recently developed OG-CLAMP technique in NIDDM by comparing SGU and first-pass SGU during HVC with SGU during the OG-CLAMP experiment. The OG-CLAMP method combines a euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp and an oral glucose tolerance test (75 g) during steady state glucose infusion (GINF). During HVC, SGU equals the splanchnic fractional extraction times the total (oral and arterial) glucose load presented to the liver. For OG-CLAMP, SGU was calculated as first-pass SGU by subtracting the integrated decrease in GINF over 180 min from 75 g. Cumulative splanchnic glucose output after oral glucose correlated significantly between both methods and was increased significantly in NIDDM patients (73.1+/-5.1 g for HVC, 76.5+/-5.5 for OG-CLAMP) compared with nondiabetic patients (46.7+/-4.4 g for HVC, 57.5+/-1.9 for OG-CLAMP). Thus, in NIDDM patients, SGU (7.4+/-2.1 vs. 37.8+/-5.9% in nondiabetic patients, P < 0.001) and first-pass SGU (4.7+/-1.7 vs. 26.5+/-5.1% in nondiabetic patients, P < 0.01) were decreased significantly during HVC, as was SGU during OG-CLAMP (3.9+/-1.7 vs. 23.4+/-2.5% in nondiabetic patients, P < 0.0001). SGU measured during OG-CLAMP correlated significantly with SGU (r = 0.87, P < 0.05 for NIDDM patients; r = 0.94, P < 0.01 for nondiabetic patients) and first-pass SGU (r = 0.87, P < 0.05 for NIDDM patients; r = 0.84, P < 0.05 for nondiabetic patients) during HVC. In conclusion, (a) SGU after oral glucose administration is decreased in NIDDM as measured by both methods, and (b) SGU during the OG-CLAMP is well-correlated to SGU and first-pass SGU during HVC in NIDDM. The decrease in SGU in NIDDM might contribute to postprandial hyperglycemia in diabetic subjects.

A noninvasive method to measure splanchnic glucose uptake after oral glucose administration.

We have developed a noninvasive method to estimate splanchnic glucose uptake (SGU) in humans (oral glucose clamp technique [OG-CLAMP]), which combines a hyperinsulinemic clamp with an oral glucose load (oral glucose tolerance test). We validated this method in 12 nondiabetic subjects using hepatic vein catheterization (HVC) during an oral glucose tolerance test. During HVC, splanchnic blood flow increased from 1,395 +/- 64 to 1,935 +/- 109 ml/min, returning to basal after 180 min and accounted for 45 +/- 7% of SGU in lean and 19 +/- 5% in obese subjects (P < 0.05). SGU estimated during the OG-CLAMP was 22 +/- 2% of the glucose load, and this was significantly correlated (r = 0.90, P < 0.0001) with SGU (35 +/- 4%) and with first pass SGU (24 +/- 3%; r = 0.83, P < 0.001) measured during HVC. SGU was higher in obese than in lean subjects during OG-CLAMP (27 +/- 1% vs 18 +/- 3%, P < 0.01) and HVC (44 +/- 4% vs 26 +/- 5%, P < 0.05). In conclusion, SGU during the OG-CLAMP is well correlated to SGU measured during HVC. An increase in splanchnic blood flow is a major contributor to SGU in lean subjects. SGU is increased in obese subjects as measured by both methods.

Mechanisms of the kinetic defect in insulin action in obesity and NIDDM.

To evaluate kinetic defects in insulin action, we performed time-course studies during hyperinsulinemic (120 mU x m(-2) x min(-1)) isoglycemic clamps in seven subjects with NIDDM (194 +/- 29 mg/dl) and in seven lean and seven obese nondiabetic subjects. The time course of whole-body glucose disposal rate (GDR), leg glucose uptake (LGU), hepatic glucose output (HGO), and muscle insulin receptor tyrosine kinase (IRTK) activation were measured. The obese and NIDDM subjects had marked delays in activation of GDR (T50 74 +/- 14 and 95 +/- 15 min, respectively, compared with 33 +/- 2 min in lean control subjects), arteriovenous glucose difference (T50 80 +/- 12 and 109 +/- 31 min compared with 30 +/- 3 min) and LGU (T50 89 +/- 25 and 98 +/- 27 min compared with 29 +/- 4 min). All three measurements reached normal levels in the NIDDM group after 4-5 h of insulin infusion. Although only a limited number of data points could be obtained from serial muscle biopsies, no delay in the rate of activation of IRTK was apparent in the obese and NIDDM groups. In conclusion, 1) in obese and NIDDM subjects, insulin-mediated GDR and LGU are delayed to a similar degree; 2) mass action normalizes GDR and LGU in NIDDM, but only after several hours of insulin infusion; and 3) The kinetic defect in NIDDM and obesity most likely involves intracellular loci distal to activation of the insulin receptor kinase.

Effect of obesity on insulin resistance in normal subjects and patients with NIDDM.

Insulin resistance (IR) is a characteristic feature of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) as well as obesity, and a majority of NIDDM patients are obese. To assess the effect of obesity independent of NIDDM on IR, we studied the relationship between IR and obesity in 65 normal and 58 NIDDM subjects; we used body mass index (BMI) as a measure of obesity and glucose infusion rate (GINF) during a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic (120 mU.m-2.min-1) glucose clamp as a measure of IR. In lean normal subjects, GINF was 57.7 +/- 2.2 mumol.kg-1.min-1 (10.4 +/- 0.4 mg.kg-1.min-1) and the lean NIDDM subjects were markedly insulin-resistant, with a GINF of 34.4 +/- 2.8 mumol.kg-1.min-1 (6.2 +/- 0.5 mg.kg-1.min-1). Obese normal subjects were also insulin-resistant compared with lean normal subjects, with a GINF of 36.1 +/- 2.2 mumol.kg-1.min-1 (6.5 +/- 0.4 mg.kg-1.min-1), and obesity caused an increase in IR in NIDDM, with a GINF of 21.1 +/- 1.4 mumol.kg-1.min-1 (3.8 +/- 0.25 mg.kg-1.min-1) in the obese NIDDM subjects. Therefore, approximately 61% of the IR in obese NIDDM subjects is due to NIDDM, with 39% due to obesity, demonstrating a greater impact of NIDDM than of obesity in causing IR. The correlation between GINF and BMI was much better in normal subjects (r = -0.75) than in NIDDM subjects (r = -0.50) as was the relationship between fasting insulin level and BMI (r = -0.59 in normal subjects, r = -0.48 in NIDDM subjects). As expected, the fasting insulin level was also strongly correlated to GINF in normal subjects (r = -0.61); however, this relationship was weaker in NIDDM subjects ( r = -0.46). In conclusion, 1) obesity has a major impact to cause insulin resistance in nondiabetic subjects, but the effect of obesity on IR in NIDDM is less; 2) NIDDM per se is the major contributor to IR in NIDDM; and 3) the fasting insulin level is a better surrogate marker of IR in nondiabetic subjects than in NIDDM patients.

Regulation of skeletal muscle hexokinase II by insulin in nondiabetic and NIDDM subjects.

Impaired muscle glucose phosphorylation to glucose-6-phosphate by hexokinases (HKs)-I and -II may contribute to insulin resistance in NIDDM and obesity. HK-II expression is regulated by insulin. We tested the hypothesis that basal and insulin-stimulated expression of HK-II is decreased in NIDDM and obese subjects. Skeletal muscle HK-I and HK-II activities were measured in seven lean and six obese normal subjects and eight patients with NIDDM before and at 3 and 5 h of a hyperinsulinemic (80 mU x m(-2) x min(-1)) euglycemic clamp. To assess whether changes in HK-II expression seen during a glucose clamp are likely to be physiologically relevant, we also measured HK-I and HK-II activity in 10 lean normal subjects before and after a high-carbohydrate meal. After an overnight fast, total HK, HK-I, and HK-II activities were similar in lean and obese control subjects; but HK-II was lower in NIDDM patients than in lean subjects (1.42 +/- 0.16 [SE] vs. 2.33 +/- 0.24 nmol x min(-1) x mg(-1) molecular weight, P < 0.05) and accounted for a lower proportion of total HK (33 +/- 3 vs. 47 +/- 3%, P < 0.025). HK-II (but not HK-I) activity increased during the clamp in lean and obese subjects by 34 and 36% after 3 h and by 14 and 22% after 5 h of hyperinsulinemia; no increase was found in the NIDDM patients. In the lean subjects, muscle HK-II activity also increased by 15% 4 h after the meal, from 2.47 +/- 0.19 basally to 2.86 +/- 0.28 nmol x min(-1) x mg(-1) protein (P < 0.05). During the clamps, muscle HK-II activity correlated with muscle citrate synthase activity in the normal subjects (r = 0.58, P < 0.05) but not in the NIDDM patients. A weak relationship was noted between muscle HK-II activity and glucose disposal rate at the end of the clamp when all three groups were combined (r = 0.49, P < 0.05). In summary, NIDDM patients have lower muscle HK-II activity basally and do not increase the activity of this enzyme in response to a 5-h insulin stimulus. This defect may contribute to their insulin resistance. In nondiabetic obese subjects, muscle HK-II expression and its regulation by insulin are normal.