The broad spectrum of COVID-like patients initially negative at RT-PCR testing: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients that arrive in the emergency department (ED) with COVID-19-like syndromes testing negative at the first RT-PCR represent a clinical challenge because of the lack of evidence about their management available in the literature. Our first aim was to quantify the proportion of patients testing negative at the first RT-PCR performed in our Emergency Department (ED) that were confirmed as having COVID-19 at the end of hospitalization by clinical judgment or by any subsequent microbiological testing. Secondly, we wanted to identify which variables that were available in the first assessment (ED variables) would have been useful in predicting patients, who at the end of the hospital stay were confirmed as having COVID-19 (false-negative at the first RT-PCR). METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of 115 negative patients from2020, March 1st to 2020, May 15th. Three experts revised patients' charts collecting information on the whole hospital stay and defining patients as COVID-19 or NOT-COVID-19. We compared ED variables in the two groups by univariate analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: We classified 66 patients as COVID-19 and identified the other 49 as having a differential diagnosis (NOT-COVID), with a concordance between the three experts of 0.77 (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.66- 0.73). Only 15% of patients tested positive to a subsequent RT-PCR test, accounting for 25% of the clinically suspected. Having fever (odds ratio (OR) 3.32, (95%CI 0.97-12.31), p = 0.06), showing a typical pattern at the first lung ultrasound (OR 6.09, (95%CI 0.87-54.65), p = 0.08) or computed tomography scan (OR 4.18, (95%CI 1.11-17.86), p = 0.04) were associated with a higher probability of having COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: In patients admitted to ED with COVID-19 symptoms and negative RT-PCR a comprehensive clinical evaluation integrated with lung ultrasound and computed tomography could help to detect COVID-19 patients with a false negative RT-PCR result.

A comparison of different diagnostic tests in the bedside evaluation of pleuritic pain in the ED.

PURPOSES: Bedside lung ultrasound (LUS) is useful in detecting radio-occult pleural-pulmonary lesions. The aim of our study is to compare the value of LUS with other conventional routine diagnostic tools in the emergency department (ED) evaluation of patients with pleuritic pain and silent chest radiography (CXR). METHODS: Ninety patients consecutively admitted to the ED with pleuritic pain and normal CXR were retrospectively (n = 49) and prospectively (n = 41) studied. All patients were blindly examined by LUS and submitted to clinical examination and blood samples. The ability of blood tests and symptoms to predict any radio-occult pleural-pulmonary condition confirmed by conclusive image techniques and follow-up was evaluated and compared with LUS. RESULTS: In 57 cases, the final diagnosis was chest wall pain. The other 33 patients were diagnosed with a pleural-pulmonary condition (22 pneumonia, 2 pleuritis, 7 pulmonary embolism, 1 lung cancer, 1 pneumothorax). Lung ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 96.97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.68%-99.46%) and a specificity of 96.49% (95% CI, 88.08%-99.03%) in predicting radio-occult pleural-pulmonary lesions and significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic analysis (AUC, 0.967; 95% CI, 0.929-1.00) than d-dimer (AUC, 0.815; 95% CI, 0.720-0.911) and white blood cell count (AUC, 0.778; 95% CI, 0.678-0.858). None of the other routine tests considered or a combination between them better predicted the final diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Chest radiography and blood tests may be inadequate in the diagnostic process of pleuritic pain. In case of silent CXR, LUS is critical for identifying patients with pleural-pulmonary radio-occult conditions at bedside and cannot be safely replaced by other conventional methods.

Bedside ultrasound of the lung for the monitoring of acute decompensated heart failure.

PURPOSES: Multiple artifacts B lines (B+) at transthoracic lung ultrasound have been proposed as a sonographic sign of pulmonary congestion. Our aim is to assess B+ clearance after medical treatment in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and to compare the usefulness of sonography with other traditional tools in monitoring resolution of pulmonary congestion. METHODS: Eighty-one patients with a diagnosis of ADHF were submitted to lung ultrasound and chest radiography at admission, and 70 of them underwent the same procedures as control group after 4.2 +/- 1.7 days of medical treatment. The ultrasound examination was performed with 11 scans on as many anterolateral thoracic areas (6 on the right side and 5 on the left side). Then, we calculated a sonographic score counting the B+ scans and compared it with radiologic score for extravascular lung water, clinical, and plasma brain natriuretic peptide improvement. MAIN RESULTS: All patients showed B+ pattern at admission and significant clearing after treatment, with median number of 8 positive scans (range, 3-9 scans) vs 0 (range, 0-7 scans) (P < .05). Our sonographic score showed positive linear correlation with radiologic score (r = 0.62; P < .05), clinical score (r = 0.87; P < .01), and brain natriuretic peptide levels (r = 0.44; P < .05). Delta Sonographic score correlated with Delta clinical (r = 0.55; P < .05) and radiologic (r = 0.28; P < .05) scores. CONCLUSIONS: B line pattern mostly clears after adequate medical treatment of ADHF and represents an easy-to-use alternative bedside diagnostic tool for clinically monitoring pulmonary congestion in patients with ADHF.

Lung Ultrasound-Implemented Diagnosis of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure in the ED: A SIMEU Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasonography (LUS) has emerged as a noninvasive tool for the differential diagnosis of pulmonary diseases. However, its use for the diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) still raises some concerns. We tested the hypothesis that an integrated approach implementing LUS with clinical assessment would have higher diagnostic accuracy than a standard workup in differentiating ADHF from noncardiogenic dyspnea in the ED. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective cohort study in seven Italian EDs. For patients presenting with acute dyspnea, the emergency physician was asked to categorize the diagnosis as ADHF or noncardiogenic dyspnea after (1) the initial clinical assessment and (2) after performing LUS ("LUS-implemented" diagnosis). All patients also underwent chest radiography. After discharge, the cause of each patient's dyspnea was determined by independent review of the entire medical record. The diagnostic accuracy of the different approaches was then compared. RESULTS: The study enrolled 1,005 patients. The LUS-implemented approach had a significantly higher accuracy (sensitivity, 97% [95% CI, 95%-98.3%]; specificity, 97.4% [95% CI, 95.7%-98.6%]) in differentiating ADHF from noncardiac causes of acute dyspnea than the initial clinical workup (sensitivity, 85.3% [95% CI, 81.8%-88.4%]; specificity, 90% [95% CI, 87.2%-92.4%]), chest radiography alone (sensitivity, 69.5% [95% CI, 65.1%-73.7%]; specificity, 82.1% [95% CI, 78.6%-85.2%]), and natriuretic peptides (sensitivity, 85% [95% CI, 80.3%-89%]; specificity, 61.7% [95% CI, 54.6%-68.3%]; n = 486). Net reclassification index of the LUS-implemented approach compared with standard workup was 19.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of LUS with the clinical evaluation may improve accuracy of ADHF diagnosis in patients presenting to the ED. TRIAL REGISTRY: Clinicaltrials.gov; No.: NCT01287429; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Detection of sonographic B-lines in patients with normal lung or radiographic alveolar consolidation.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse comet-tail B-line artifacts in lung ultrasound are a sign of alveolar-interstitial syndrome, but isolated transthoracic scans positive for B-lines (multiple B lines or B+) could be detected in other conditions. The aim was to assess the prevalence and distribution of this sonographic sign in patients with normal lung or isolated alveolar consolidation in chest radiography. MATERIAL/METHODS: Two hundred seventeen patients consecutively admitted to this emergency medicine unit with any diagnosis and without radiographic or clinical evidence of diffuse interstitial syndrome were analyzed. Each patient underwent chest radiography and lung sonographic examination with four anterolateral chest scans per side. RESULTS: Of the 1736 sonographic scans performed, 13.2% were positive for the B+ pattern. Positive scans significantly corresponded to laterobasal areas or radiographic opacities due to lung alveolar consolidations (p<0.005). Twenty percent of the laterobasal scans of 145 patients with radiologically normal lung were positive. The negative predictive value of B+ was 83.9% (95% confidence interval: 78.2-89.7%), with a specificity of 90.3% (95%CI: 85.5-95.1%) for predicting any localized radiographic pulmonary opacity. CONCLUSIONS: B+ scans can be detected in the chest areas surrounding an isolated alveolar consolidation and in the laterobasal scans of a radiographic normal lung. These features should always be considered when lung ultrasound is performed to rule out the alveolar-interstitial syndrome in an emergency setting. Moreover, B+ patterns have a satisfactory negative predictive value for radiographic lung opacities, which could have added diagnostic value in the ED evaluation of dyspneic patients.

Nitric oxide level profile in human liver transplantation.

The aim of this study was to monitor nitric oxide blood levels at various times intraoperatively and following liver transplantation in humans. Nitric oxide production was assessed directly as circulating nitrosyl-hemoglobin adducts by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy in 22 patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. Two significant peaks in nitrosylhemoglobin levels were detected at 5 and 60 min after reperfusion (5.02 +/- 3.33 arbitrary units and 5.75 +/- 4.19, respectively, vs 3.33 +/- 2.28 under basal state; P < 0.05 for both comparisons). Postoperative nitrosyl-hemoglobin levels remained elevated, up to 5.42 +/- 0.89 arbitrary units (P < 0.05 vs basal values). Neither soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 or soluble endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecule concentrations were altered intraoperatively. Only the former was significantly raised after transplantation. Neutrophil elastase levels showed an early increase and remained high throughout surgery, returning to basal values after transplantation. No correlations were found among studied parameters. These data suggest that nitric oxide may play a role in ischemia-reperfusion phases in human liver transplantation. Mechanisms other than leukocyte-endothelial adhesion and neutrophil activation seem to affect nitric oxide production under these conditions.