RESUMEN
High birth weight is an established risk factor for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), especially in children younger than 5 years of age at diagnosis. The goal of this study was to explore the association between being born large for gestational age and the risk for ALL by race/ethnicity to determine if the role of this risk factor differed by these characteristics. The authors compared birth certificate data of 575 children diagnosed with ALL who were younger than 5 years and included in the Texas Cancer Registry, Texas Department of Health, between the years 1995 and 2003 with 11,379 controls matched by birth year. Stratified odds ratios were calculated for risk of ALL by birth weight for gestational age, categorized in 3 groups, small, appropriate, and large for gestational age (SGA, AGA, and LGA, respectively), for each race/ethnicity group. The risk of developing ALL was higher among Hispanics who were LGA (odds ratio [OR] = 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-2.68) compared with LGA non-Hispanic whites (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.87-1.86) after adjusting for infant gender, year of birth, maternal age, birth order, and presence of Down syndrome. However, the difference was not statistically significant. These results suggest that there may be differences in the association between higher growth in utero and risk of childhood ALL among Hispanics versus non-Hispanic whites.
Asunto(s)
Peso al Nacer , Hispánicos o Latinos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Texas/epidemiología , Texas/etnologíaRESUMEN
We examined markers of completeness in healthcare-associated infection (HAI) data reported by California hospitals to the National Healthcare Safety Network for each half of 2020 compared with 2019. There were indications of decreased data completeness for both halves of 2020. California 2020 HAI data should be interpreted with caution.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infección Hospitalaria , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Hospitales , California/epidemiología , Atención a la SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding the differences in clinical presentation and outcome of liposarcomas between adult and pediatric patients. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of childhood liposarcoma is unclear. PROCEDURE: A multi-institutional retrospective analysis of medical records was performed for patients ≤ 21 years of age presenting with a verified histologic diagnosis of liposarcoma. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were evaluable for this study, 23 of whom were male. Median age was 17.2 years. Twenty-four cases were myxoid subtype and 7 were pleomorphic subtype. In myxoid cases, 17 (71%) presented with extremity tumors; none had metastases. Eleven of these patients with myxoid subtype were treated with surgery only, seven with surgery + radiation, three with surgery + radiation + chemotherapy. Median radiation therapy dose for patients with myxoid tumors was 60 Gy. At median follow-up of 4.2 years (range 0.1-32.2 years), two patients relapsed with one death from progressive disease. In seven pleomorphic cases, four patients had primary tumors at central axial sites. Six patients (86%) received multimodal therapy, but six patients experienced relapse of disease. Four patients died from progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric liposarcoma has a different spectrum of presentation compared to adult cases. Myxoid liposarcoma is the more common subtype, usually occurs in extremities, and has an excellent prognosis. Pleomorphic liposarcoma occurs in axial sites, and despite multimodal therapy, outcome is poor. Further study is needed to identify the optimal therapy for pediatric liposarcoma.
Asunto(s)
Liposarcoma/mortalidad , Liposarcoma/patología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia , Adolescente , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Liposarcoma/terapia , Masculino , Radioterapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/mortalidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: High birth weight (HBW) is an established risk factor for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if birth weight (BW) corrected-for-gestational age is a better predictor than BW alone for occurrence of ALL and other malignancies in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Birth certificate data of 2,254 children with cancer who were younger than 5 years old at diagnosis and registered at Texas Cancer Registry during 1995-2003 were compared to 11,734 age-matched controls. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare models with BW corrected-for-gestational age and BW alone. RESULTS: Compared to children who were appropriate for gestational age (AGA), children who were large for gestational age (LGA) at birth had a 1.66 times (95% CI 1.32-2.10) higher odds of ALL. Similarly, children with a BW > or =4,000 g had a 1.5 times (95% CI 1.18-1.89) higher odds for ALL, compared to children who weighed >2,500 and <4,000 g at birth. Using model diagnostics, the model containing BW corrected-for-gestational age was a better predictor than the model with BW alone [Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) 4,646 vs. 4,658, respectively]. Odds ratios (OR) were similar for LGA children who were <4,000 g and LGA children who were > or =4,000 g (OR = 1.5, 95% CI 0.97-2.5 and OR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.29-2.16, respectively). BW was not an independent risk factor for acute myeloid leukemia or brain tumors. CONCLUSION: BW corrected-for-gestational age is a better predictor than BW alone of risk for ALL. Future studies using BW variable should incorporate gestational age in their analyses.
Asunto(s)
Peso al Nacer , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/epidemiología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Preescolar , Femenino , Macrosomía Fetal , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Leucemia/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Factores de Riesgo , Texas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are polymorphic enzymes that catalyze the glutathione conjugation of alkylating agents, platinum compounds, and free radicals formed by radiation used to treat medulloblastoma. We hypothesized that GST polymorphisms may be responsible, in part, for individual differences in toxicity and responses in pediatric medulloblastoma. We investigated the relationship between GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and survival and toxicity in 42 children with medulloblastoma diagnosed and treated at the Texas Children's Cancer Center. We conducted Kaplan-Meier analyses to determine if the GST polymorphisms were related to progression-free survival (PFS) and performed logistic regression to explore associations between GST polymorphisms and occurrence of grade 3 or greater (> or =Gr 3) myelosuppression, ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and intellectual impairment. Patients with at least one null genotype had a 4.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-16.8), 3.7 (1-13.6), and 6.4 (1.2-34) times increased risk for any > or =Gr 3 toxicity, any > or =Gr 3 toxicity excluding peripheral neuropathy, and any > or =Gr 3 toxicity requiring omission or cessation of chemotherapy, respectively. Compared with all others, patients with at least one null genotype had, on average, 27.2 (p x= 0.0002), 29 (p = 0.0004), and 21.7 (p = 0.002) lower full-scale, performance, and verbal intelligence quotient (IQ) scores, respectively. GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms may predict adverse events, including cognitive impairment after therapy, in patients with medulloblastoma. A larger study to validate these findings is under way.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Cerebelosas/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Glutatión Transferasa/genética , Meduloblastoma/genética , Neoplasias Cerebelosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Preescolar , Trastornos del Conocimiento/inducido químicamente , Trastornos del Conocimiento/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Meduloblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Polimorfismo GenéticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The current US HIV treatment guidelines support initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for persons with HIV for personal health benefits and prevention of HIV transmission. However, high levels of adherence to ART are critical to maximize individual and public health benefits. We examined the nonclinical barriers to ART initiation for clinically eligible individuals and the provider- and patient-related factors associated with these barriers among HIV-infected patients in Houston/Harris County, Texas. METHODS: We analyzed data obtained from a probability sample of HIV medical care providers (HMCPs) in 13 outpatient facilities in Houston/Harris County, Texas surveyed between June and September 2009. We used an inductive thematic approach to code HMCP responses to an open-ended question that asked the main reasons why providers may delay initiating ART for clinically eligible patients. RESULTS: The reasons cited by providers for delaying ART for clinically eligible patients were adherence (42.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.5-57.8), acceptance (30%; 95% CI: 18.1-45.4), and structural concerns (27.5%; 95% CI: 16.1-42.8), with significant variations ( P < .0001) noted across patients' race/ethnicity and transmission category. HIV medical care providers with 6 to 10 years' experience in HIV care and those providing medical care for more than 100 patients monthly were about 4 times (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.80; 95% CI: 1.20-5.92; P = .039) and 10 times (aOR: 10.36; 95% CI: 1.42-22.70; P = .019) more likely to state adherence and acceptance concerns, respectively, as reasons for delaying ART for clinically eligible patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the fact that clinical guidelines are only a starting point for medical decision-making process and that patients themselves play an important role. HMCP access to referrals for other medical issues, support services, and treatment education may help improve adherence and patient readiness for ART, thereby avoiding systemic delays.