Asymptomatic Patients With Brugada ECG Pattern: Long-Term Prognosis From a Large Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome poses significant challenges in terms of risk stratification and management, particularly for asymptomatic patients who comprise the majority of individuals exhibiting Brugada ECG pattern (BrECG). The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term prognosis of a large cohort of asymptomatic patients with BrECG. METHODS: Asymptomatic patients with BrECG (1149) were consecutively collected from 2 Italian centers and followed-up at least annually for 2 to 22 years. For the 539 asymptomatic patients (men, 433 [80%]; mean age, 46±13 years) with spontaneous type 1 documented on baseline ECG (87%) or 12-lead 24-hour Holter monitoring (13%), an electrophysiologic study (EPS) was proposed; for the 610 patients with drug-induced-only type 1 (men, 420 [69%]; mean age, 44±14 years), multiple ECGs and 12-lead Holter were advised in order to detect the occurrence of a spontaneous type-1 BrECG. Arrhythmic events were defined as sudden death or documented ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 6 (4-9) years. Seventeen (1.5%) arrhythmic events occurred in the overall asymptomatic population (corresponding to an event-rate of 0.2% per year), including 16 of 539 (0.4% per year) in patients with spontaneous type-1 BrECG and 1 of 610 in those with drug-induced type-1 BrECG (0.03% per year; P<0.001). EPS was performed in 339 (63%) patients with spontaneous type-1 BrECG. Patients with spontaneous type-1 BrECG and positive EPS had significantly higher event rates than patients with negative EPS (7 of 103 [0.7% per year] versus 4 of 236 [0.2% per year]; P=0.025). Among 200 patients who declined EPS, 5 events (0.4% per year) occurred. There was 1 device-related death. CONCLUSIONS: The entire population of asymptomatic patients with BrECG exhibits a relatively low event rate per year, which is important in view of the long life expectancy of these young patients. The presence of spontaneous type-1 BrECG associated with positive EPS identifies a subgroup at higher risk. Asymptomatic patients with drug-induced-only BrECG have a minimal arrhythmic risk, but ongoing follow-up with 12-lead Holter monitoring is recommended to detect the appearance of spontaneous type-1 BrECG pattern.

Can specific ECG markers identify a pharmacologically induced type 1 Brugada pattern? Insights from a large, single-center cohort.

BACKGROUND: In patients with a type 2 or 3 Brugada pattern, the pharmacological (IC drugs) induction of a type 1 pattern confirms the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of various ECG markers in predicting IC drug test results. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 443 consecutive patients referred to our Center (from January 2010 to December 2019) to undergo Ajmaline/Flecainide testing; all had a type 2 or 3 Brugada pattern or were relatives with Brugada syndrome. Clinical parameters and ECG markers (r1V1 and SV6 duration and amplitude, QRSV1/QRSV6 duration, V1 and V2 ST amplitude) were independently evaluated for their association to pharmacological test positivity, and a logistic regression model was applied. RESULTS: The drug test was positive in 151 (34%) patients. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, age > 45 years, female gender, HR >60 bpm, QRSV1/QRSV6 duration >1 and non-isoelectric pattern in V2 were associated with a positive test. The percentage of patients who tested positive increased according to the presence of the above ECG markers (from 11.3% in the absence to 57.6% in the presence of both factors). During long-term follow-up, the clinical event rate was higher in patients with predictive ECG markers and very low in those without. CONCLUSIONS: In our population we confirmed the ability of QRSV1/QRSV6 duration >1 and of a non-isoelectric pattern in V2 to predict a pharmacologically induced type 1 Brugada pattern. Patients with neither of these ECG markers had a rather low event rate during follow-up.

Three-Dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping System-Enhanced Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Implantation: Results From a Multicenter Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation guided by an electroanatomic mapping system (EAMS) is an emerging technique that may reduce fluoroscopy and angiography use and provide information on coronary sinus (CS) electrical activation. We evaluated the outcome of the EAMS-guided CRT implantation technique in a multicenter registry. METHODS: During the period 2011-2014 we enrolled 125 patients (80% males, age 74 [71-77] years) who underwent CRT implantation by using the EnSite system to create geometric models of the patient's cardiac chambers, build activation mapping of the CS, and guide leads positioning. Two hundred and fifty patients undergoing traditional CRT implantation served as controls. Success and complication rates, fluoroscopy and total procedure times in the overall study population and according to center experience were collected. Centers that performed ≥10 were defined as highly experienced. RESULTS: Left ventricular lead implantation was successful in 122 (98%) cases and 242 (97%) controls (P = 0.76). Median fluoroscopy time was 4.1 (0.3-10.4) minutes in cases versus 16 (11-26) minutes in controls (P < 0.001). Coronary sinus angiography was performed in 33 (26%) cases and 208 (83%) controls (P < 0.001). Complications occurred in 5 (4%) cases and 17 (7%) controls (P = 0.28). Median fluoroscopy time (median 11 minutes vs. 3 minutes, P < 0.001) and CS angiography rate (55% vs. 21%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in low experienced centers, while success rate and complications rate were similar. CONCLUSIONS: EAMS-guided CRT implantation proved safe and effective in both high- and low-experienced centers and allowed to reduce fluoroscopy use by ≈75% and angiography rate by ≈70%.

Cardiac contractility modulation in left ventricular systolic dysfunction: one-year experience in a pilot study and design of a prospective registry.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a treatment option for patients suffering symptomatic chronic heart failure (CHF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who are not eligible for cardiac resynchronization. Data on mid-term follow-up are limited to small observational studies. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of CCM on quality of life, symptoms, exercise tolerance and left ventricular function in patients with CHF and moderate-to-severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. METHODS: Patients suffering CHF with LVEF <45% and NYHA class >II despite optimal medical therapy, underwent CCM implantation. Enrolled patients underwent baseline and 3, 6 and 12-months evaluation with ECG, echocardiogram, clinical assessment, 6-minute walking test and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ). RESULTS: Ten patients underwent CCM implantation. All patients were actively treated with the optimal pharmacological therapy as tolerated and had at least one hospitalization for worsening heart failure during the previous year. After a mean follow-up of 15 months, 9 patients were alive, while one patient died for worsening heart failure precipitated by pneumonia. Among the remaining 9 patients, LVEF improved non-significantly from 29.4±8% to 32.2±10% (P=0.092), 6-minute walking test distance improved from 179±73 m to 304±99 m (P<0.001), NYHA class reduced from 3.0±0.4 to 1.6±0.5 (P=0.003) and MLWHFQ score improved from 59.6±49 to 34.2±32 (P=0.037). Only 2 patients have been hospitalized during the 12 months. Overall, a net clinical benefit was detected in 6 out of 9 patients. CONCLUSIONS: CCM could be effective in improving quality of life, symptoms and exercise tolerance, and reduces hospitalizations in patients with symptomatic CHF on top of optimal medical and electrical therapy. A prospective registry has been designed to identify the subsets of patients gaining more benefit, and to assess the long-term effect of CCM on those clinical endpoints.

Ventricular conduction delay as marker of risk in Brugada Syndrome. Results from the analysis of clinical and electrocardiographic features of a large cohort of patients.

BACKGROUND: Brugada Syndrome is a genetic arrhythmogenic disease with a variable clinical spectrum. The role of clinical and ECG parameters in the risk stratification is still uncertain. AIMS: In a large cohort of Brugada patients we analysed clinical and ECG features to determine the variables with prognostic value for the occurrence of a first documented arrhythmic event and for recurrences. METHODS: We enrolled 614 patients, subdivided into 3 groups according to their clinical presentation: 531 (88%) asymptomatic, 69 (10%) with previous unexplained syncope and 14 (2%) with aborted sudden death. We also compared the ECG characteristics of patients with a single documented arrhythmic event (either at presentation or at follow-up, 17 patients), with those of patients with arrhythmic recurrences (13 patients). RESULTS: The event rate was 1.3% in the asymptomatic patients and 15% among patients with unexplained syncope (median follow-up 6 years), p < 0.0001. In both groups a QRS duration ≥110 ms in lead II and/or V6 and/or S wave duration ≥40 ms in lead I and/or II were significant risk factors for the occurrence and timing of events at follow-up. The same ECG risk factors were also significantly associated with arrhythmic recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: The arrhythmic risk of Brugada patients is related not only to the symptoms at presentation, but also to the presence of a ventricular conduction delay (QRS duration ≥ 110 ms and/or S wave duration ≥ 40 ms). The ECG conduction parameters also affect the timing of events and recurrences.

Etiological diagnosis, prognostic significance and role of electrophysiological study in patients with Brugada ECG and syncope.

BACKGROUND: Syncope is considered a risk factor for life-threatening arrhythmias in Brugada patients. Distinguishing a benign syncope from one due to ventricular arrhythmias is often difficult, unless an ECG is recorded during the episode. Aim of the study was to analyze the characteristics of syncopal episodes in a large population of Brugada patients and evaluate the role of electrophysiological study (EPS) and the prognosis in the different subgroups. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five Brugada patients with history of syncope were considered. Syncope were classified as neurally mediated (group 1, 61%) or unexplained (group 2, 39%) on the basis of personal and family history, clinical features, triggers, situations, associated signs, concomitant therapy. Most patients underwent EPS; they received ICD or implantable loop-recorder on the basis of the result of investigations and physician's judgment. At 62±45months of mean follow-up, group 1 showed a significantly lower incidence of arrhythmic events (2%) as compared to group 2 (9%, p<0.001). Group 2 patients with positive EPS showed the highest risk of arrhythmic events (27%). No ventricular events occurred in subjects with negative EPS. CONCLUSION: Etiological definition of syncope in Brugada patients is important, as it allows identifying two groups with different outcome. Patients with unexplained syncope and ventricular fibrillation induced at EPS have the highest risk of arrhythmic events. Patients presenting with neurally mediated syncope showed a prognosis similar to that of the asymptomatic and the role of EPS in this group is unproven.

Prevalence of type 1 brugada electrocardiographic pattern evaluated by twelve-lead twenty-four-hour holter monitoring.

Patients with drug-induced type 1 Brugada electrocardiograms (BrECGs) are considered to have good prognosis. Spontaneous type 1 is, instead, considered a risk factor; however, it is probably underestimated because of the BrECG fluctuations. The aim of this study was to analyze, in a large population of patients with Br, the real prevalence of type 1 BrECG using 12-lead 24-hour Holter monitoring (12L-Holter) and its correlation with the time of the day. We recorded 303 12L-Holter in 251 patients. Seventy-five (30%) patients exhibited spontaneous type 1 BrECG at 12-lead ECG (group 1) and 176 (70%) had only drug-induced type 1 (group 2). Type 1 BrECG was defined as "persistent" (>85% of the recording), "intermittent" (<85%), or "absent." In group 1, 12% showed persistent type 1 at 12L-Holter, 57% intermittent type 1%, and 31% never had type 1; in group 2, none had persistent type 1, 20% had intermittent type 1%, and 80% never showed type 1. To evaluate the circadian fluctuations of BrECG, 4 periods in the day were considered. Type 1 BrECG was more frequent between 12-noon and 6 p.m. (52%, p <0.001). In conclusion, in patients with drug-induced type 1, spontaneous type 1 BrECG can be detected more frequently with 12L-Holter than with conventional follow-up with periodic ECGs and this has important implications in the risk stratification. 12L-Holter recording might avoid 20% of the pharmacological challenges with sodium channel blockers, which are not without risks, and should thus be considered as the first screening test, particularly in children or in presence of borderline diagnostic basal ECG.

Atrial fibrillation in a large population with Brugada electrocardiographic pattern: prevalence, management, and correlation with prognosis.

BACKGROUND: A high prevalence of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFl) has been reported in small series of Brugada patients, with discordant data. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze, in a large population of Brugada patients, the prevalence of AF/AFl, its correlation with prognosis, and the efficacy of hydroquinidine (HQ) treatment. METHODS: Among 560 patients with Brugada type 1 ECG (BrECG), 48 (9%) had AF/AFl. Three groups were considered: 23 patients with BrECG pattern recognized before AF/AFl (group 1); 25 patients first diagnosed with AF/AFl in whom Class IC antiarrhythmic drugs administered for cardioversion/prophylaxis unmasked BrECG (group 2); and 512 patients without AF/AFl (group 3). Recurrence of AF/AFl and occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias were evaluated at follow-up. RESULTS: Mean age was 47 ± 15 years, 59 ± 11 years, and 44 ± 14 years in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Seven subjects (32%) in group 1 had syncope/aborted sudden death, 1 (4%) in group 2, and 122 (24%) in group 3. Ventricular arrhythmia occurred in three patients in group 1, none in group 2, and 10 in group 3 at median follow-up of 51, 68, and 41 months, respectively. Nine patients in group 1 and nine in group 2 received HQ for AF/AFl prophylaxis; on therapy, none had AF/AFl recurrence. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of AF/AFl in Brugada patients is higher than in the general population of the same age. Patients in group 1 are younger than those in group 2 and have a worse prognosis compared to both groups 2 and 3. HQ therapy has proved useful and safe in patients with AF/AFl and BrECG.

DDDR pacing driven by contractility versus DDI pacing in vasovagal syncope: a multicenter, randomized study.

Recent clinical trials have shown that selected patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope (VVS) may benefit from permanent cardiac pacing. In a previous study using head-up tilt testing (HUT) the authors demonstrated that the increase in sympathetic activity preceding syncope could be sensed by a microaccelerometer located in the tip of a ventricular pacing lead and used to drive a rate adaptive pacer. They compared in a single blind randomized crossover study, DDDR pacing driven by this system, with conventional DDI pacing in patients with recurrent VVS. Twenty-three patients (age 61.8 +/- 15.2 years, 19 men) with recurrent VVS were enrolled at seven European centers and underwent implantation of a "MiniLivingD/Best" pacing system. Inclusion criteria were (1) > 6 cumulative syncopal episodes or > or = 1 syncope within 6 months of a positive HUT, and (2) a positive HUT with bradycardia. Using a crossover study design, the pacemakers were randomly programmed for two successive periods of 6 months to DDDR or DDI mode. The numbers of episodes of syncope and presyncope, and quality-of-life (QOL), were assessed at the end of each period. During the 6 months before implant, the mean number of syncopal episodes per patient was 3.2 +/- 9. During pacing in the DDDR mode, 0.09 +/- 0.29 syncope/presyncope per patient was observed, while during the DDI period 0.48 +/- 0.73 episodes per patient were reported (P < 0.05). QOL scores were 77.40 +/- 11.32 in the DDDR mode versus 74.45 +/- 14.59 in the DDI mode (NS). In patients with recurrent VVS, symptomatic recurrences were less frequent during contractility-driven DDDR pacing, than during DDI pacing. QOL was similar in the two pacing modes.