RESUMEN
Malaria vaccine developers are concerned that antigenic escape will erode vaccine efficacy. Evolutionary theorists have raised the possibility that some types of vaccine could also create conditions favoring the evolution of more virulent pathogens. Such evolution would put unvaccinated people at greater risk of severe disease. Here we test the impact of vaccination with a single highly purified antigen on the malaria parasite Plasmodium chabaudi evolving in laboratory mice. The antigen we used, AMA-1, is a component of several candidate malaria vaccines currently in various stages of trials in humans. We first found that a more virulent clone was less readily controlled by AMA-1-induced immunity than its less virulent progenitor. Replicated parasites were then serially passaged through control or AMA-1 vaccinated mice and evaluated after 10 and 21 rounds of selection. We found no evidence of evolution at the ama-1 locus. Instead, virulence evolved; AMA-1-selected parasites induced greater anemia in naïve mice than both control and ancestral parasites. Our data suggest that recombinant blood stage malaria vaccines can drive the evolution of more virulent malaria parasites.
Asunto(s)
ADN Protozoario/genética , Evolución Molecular , Plasmodium chabaudi/genética , Vacunación , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Animales , Antígenos de Protozoos/genética , Antígenos de Protozoos/inmunología , Secuencia de Bases , ADN Protozoario/análisis , Epítopos/genética , Epítopos/inmunología , Malaria/inmunología , Malaria/parasitología , Malaria/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la Malaria/genética , Vacunas contra la Malaria/inmunología , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Proteínas de la Membrana/inmunología , Ratones , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Plasmodium chabaudi/inmunología , Plasmodium chabaudi/patogenicidad , Proteínas Protozoarias/genética , Proteínas Protozoarias/inmunología , Pase SeriadoRESUMEN
Host immunity plays an important role in the evolution of pathogen virulence and disease emergence. There is increasing theoretical and empirical evidence that enhanced immunity through vaccination may have the unfortunate side effect of selecting for more virulent parasites, but the effect of host immune suppression on pathogen evolution is less clear. Here, we use serial passage experiments in mice to test how immune-suppressed hosts may alter pathogen virulence evolution. We passaged Plasmodium chabaudi through CD4(+) T cell-depleted or control mice every 7 days for 20 weeks and then measured virulence differences during infection of immunologically normal mice. We found that those parasites that had been selected through CD4(+) T cell-depleted mice were more virulent than parasites selected through control mice. Virulence increases during serial passage are believed to be caused by pathogen adaptation to the passage host. These data suggest that immune-suppressed hosts could provide a within-host environment that lowers the barrier to parasite adaptation and promotes the evolution of virulence.
Asunto(s)
Evolución Biológica , Malaria/inmunología , Malaria/parasitología , Plasmodium chabaudi/patogenicidad , Animales , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/fisiología , Femenino , Interacciones Huésped-Parásitos , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Parásitos , VirulenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Contact surveys and diaries have conventionally been used to measure contact networks in different settings for elucidating infectious disease transmission dynamics of respiratory infections. More recently, technological advances have permitted the use of wireless sensor devices, which can be worn by individuals interacting in a particular social context to record high resolution mixing patterns. To date, a direct comparison of these two different methods for collecting contact data has not been performed. METHODS: We studied the contact network at a United States high school in the spring of 2012. All school members (i.e., students, teachers, and other staff) were invited to wear wireless sensor devices for a single school day, and asked to remember and report the name and duration of all of their close proximity conversational contacts for that day in an online contact survey. We compared the two methods in terms of the resulting network densities, nodal degrees, and degree distributions. We also assessed the correspondence between the methods at the dyadic and individual levels. RESULTS: We found limited congruence in recorded contact data between the online contact survey and wireless sensors. In particular, there was only negligible correlation between the two methods for nodal degree, and the degree distribution differed substantially between both methods. We found that survey underreporting was a significant source of the difference between the two methods, and that this difference could be improved by excluding individuals who reported only a few contact partners. Additionally, survey reporting was more accurate for contacts of longer duration, and very inaccurate for contacts of shorter duration. Finally, female participants tended to report more accurately than male participants. CONCLUSIONS: Online contact surveys and wireless sensor devices collected incongruent network data from an identical setting. This finding suggests that these two methods cannot be used interchangeably for informing models of infectious disease dynamics.
Asunto(s)
Trazado de Contacto/instrumentación , Trazado de Contacto/métodos , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Modelos Estadísticos , Conducta Social , Tecnología Inalámbrica , Recolección de Datos/instrumentación , Docentes , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/transmisión , Instituciones Académicas , Medio Social , Estudiantes , Telemetría , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Constant malaria monitoring and surveillance systems have been highlighted as critical for malaria elimination. The absence of robust monitoring and surveillance systems able to respond to outbreaks in a timely manner undeniably contributed to the failure of the last global attempt to eradicate malaria. Today, technological advances could allow for rapid detection of focal outbreaks and improved deployment of diagnostic and treatment supplies to areas needing support. However, optimizing diffusion activities (e.g., distributing vector controls and medicines, as well as deploying behaviour change campaigns) requires networks of diverse scholars to monitor, learn, and evaluate data and multiple organizations to coordinate their intervention activities. Surveillance systems that can gather, store and process information, from communities to national levels, in a centralized, widely accessible system will allow tailoring of surveillance and intervention efforts. Different systems and, thus reactions, will be effective in different endemic, geographical or socio-cultural contexts. Investing in carefully designed monitoring technologies, built for a multiple-acter, dynamic system, will help to improve malaria elimination efforts by improving the coordination, timing, coverage, and deployment of malaria technologies.
Asunto(s)
Erradicación de la Enfermedad/organización & administración , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Malaria/diagnóstico , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Brotes de Enfermedades , Salud Global , Humanos , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria/epidemiología , Control de Mosquitos/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is common practice to seek the opinions of future end-users during the development of innovations. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate latent classes of users in Mozambique based on their preferences for mosquito-control technology attributes and covariates of these classes, as well as to explore which current technologies meet these preferences. METHODS: Surveys were administered in five rural villages in Mozambique. The data were analysed with latent class analysis. RESULTS: This study showed that users' preferences for malaria technologies varied, and people could be categorized into four latent classes based on shared preferences. The largest class, constituting almost half of the respondents, would not avoid a mosquito-control technology because of its cost, heat, odour, potential to make other health issues worse, ease of keeping clean, or inadequate mosquito control. The other three groups are characterized by the attributes which would make them avoid a technology; these groups are labelled as the bites class, by-products class, and multiple-concerns class. Statistically significant covariates included literacy, self-efficacy, willingness to try new technologies, and perceived seriousness of malaria for the household. CONCLUSIONS: To become widely diffused, best practices suggest that end-users should be included in product development to ensure that preferred attributes or traits are considered. This study demonstrates that end-user preferences can be very different and that one malaria control technology will not satisfy everyone.
Asunto(s)
Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Animales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mozambique , Población Rural , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Despite considerable success elucidating important immunological and resource-based mechanisms that control the dynamics of infection in some diseases, little is known about how differences in these mechanisms result in strain differences in patterns of pathogenesis. Using a combination of data and theory, we disentangle the role of ecological factors (e.g., resource abundance) in the dynamics of pathogenesis for the malaria species Plasmodium chabaudi in CD4+ T cell-depleted mice. We build a series of nested models to systematically test a number of potential regulatory mechanisms and determine the "best" model using statistical techniques. The best-fit model is further tested using an independent data set from mixed-clone competition experiments. We find that parasites preferentially invade older red blood cells even when they are more fecund in younger reticulocytes and that inoculum size has a strong effect on burst size in reticulocytes. Importantly, the results suggest that strain-specific differences in virulence arise from differences in red blood cell age-specific invasion rates and burst sizes, since these are lower for the less virulent strain, as well as from differences in levels of erythropoesis induced by each strain. Our analyses highlight the importance of model selection and validation for revealing new biological insights.
Asunto(s)
Malaria/parasitología , Plasmodium chabaudi/clasificación , Plasmodium chabaudi/patogenicidad , Animales , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/fisiología , Femenino , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Modelos Biológicos , Modelos Estadísticos , VirulenciaRESUMEN
Ecological interactions between microparasite populations in the same host are an important source of selection on pathogen traits such as virulence and drug resistance. In the rodent malaria model Plasmodium chabaudi in laboratory mice, parasites that are more virulent can competitively suppress less virulent parasites in mixed infections. There is evidence that some of this suppression is due to immune-mediated apparent competition, where an immune response elicited by one parasite population suppress the population density of another. This raises the question whether enhanced immunity following vaccination would intensify competitive interactions, thus strengthening selection for virulence in Plasmodium populations. Using the P. chabaudi model, we studied mixed infections of virulent and avirulent genotypes in CD4+T cell-depleted mice. Enhanced efficacy of CD4+T cell-dependent responses is the aim of several candidate malaria vaccines. We hypothesized that if immune-mediated interactions were involved in competition, removal of the CD4+T cells would alleviate competitive suppression of the avirulent parasite. Instead, we found no alleviation of competition in the acute phase, and significant enhancement of competitive suppression after parasite densities had peaked. Thus, the host immune response may actually be alleviating other forms of competition, such as that over red blood cells. Our results suggest that the CD4+-dependent immune response, and mechanisms that act to enhance it such as vaccination, may not have the undesirable affect of exacerbating within-host competition and hence the strength of this source of selection for virulence.
Asunto(s)
Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/fisiología , Plasmodium chabaudi/genética , Animales , Anticuerpos Antiprotozoarios/sangre , Eritrocitos/parasitología , Femenino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Plasmodium chabaudi/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Schools are known to play a significant role in the spread of influenza. High vaccination coverage can reduce infectious disease spread within schools and the wider community through vaccine-induced immunity in vaccinated individuals and through the indirect effects afforded by herd immunity. In general, herd immunity is greatest when vaccination coverage is highest, but clusters of unvaccinated individuals can reduce herd immunity. Here, we empirically assess the extent of such clustering by measuring whether vaccinated individuals are randomly distributed or demonstrate positive assortativity across a United States high school contact network. Using computational models based on these empirical measurements, we further assess the impact of assortativity on influenza disease dynamics. We found that the contact network was positively assortative with respect to influenza vaccination: unvaccinated individuals tended to be in contact more often with other unvaccinated individuals than with vaccinated individuals, and these effects were most pronounced when we analyzed contact data collected over multiple days. Of note, unvaccinated males contributed substantially more than unvaccinated females towards the measured positive vaccination assortativity. Influenza simulation models using a positively assortative network resulted in larger average outbreak size, and outbreaks were more likely, compared to an otherwise identical network where vaccinated individuals were not clustered. These findings highlight the importance of understanding and addressing heterogeneities in seasonal influenza vaccine uptake for prevention of large, protracted school-based outbreaks of influenza, in addition to continued efforts to increase overall vaccine coverage.
Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Inmunidad Colectiva , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Modelos Biológicos , Red Social , Vacunación , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
Malaria parasites are frequently polymorphic at the antigenic targets of many candidate vaccines, presumably as a consequence of selection pressure from protective immune responses. Conventional wisdom is therefore that vaccines directed against a single variant could select for non-target variants, rendering the vaccine useless. Many people have argued that a solution is to develop vaccines containing the products of more than one variant of the target. However, we are unaware of any evidence that multi-allele vaccines better protect hosts against parasites or morbidity. Moreover, selection of antigen-variants is not the only evolution that could occur in response to vaccination. Increased virulence could also be favored if more aggressive strains are less well controlled by vaccine-induced immunity. Virulence and antigenic identity have been confounded in all studies so far, and so we do not know formally from any animal or human studies whether vaccine failure has been due to evasion of protective responses by variants at target epitopes, or whether vaccines are just less good at protecting against more aggressive strains. Using the rodent malaria model Plasmodium chabaudi and recombinant apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1), we tested whether a bi-allelic vaccine afforded greater protection from parasite infection and morbidity than did vaccination with the component alleles alone. We also tested the effect of mono- and bi-allelic vaccination on within-host selection of mixed P. chabaudi infections, and whether parasite virulence mediates pathogen titres in immunized hosts. We found that vaccination with the bi-allelic AMA-1 formulation did not afford the host greater protection from parasite infection or morbidity than did mono-allelic AMA-1 immunization. Mono-allelic immunization increased the frequency of heterologous clones in mixed clone infections. There was no evidence that any type of immunization regime favored virulence. A single AMA-1 variant is a component of candidate malaria vaccines current in human trials; our results suggest that adding extra AMA-1 alleles to these vaccines would not confer clinical benefits, but that that mono-allelic vaccines could alter AMA-1 allele frequencies in natural populations.