RESUMEN
Neuroblastoma is the most common, non-central nervous system tumor of childhood. It has the potential to synthesize catecholamines. However, the presences of hypertension are uncommon. We report the perioperative management of a 15-month-old infant with giant abdominal neuroblastoma who presented severe hypertension. The pathophysiological alterations of neuroblastoma are reviewed and perioperative management presented.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Abdominales/cirugía , Anestésicos/administración & dosificación , Hipertensión/etiología , Neuroblastoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Abdominales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Abdominales/patología , Humanos , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Lactante , Masculino , Neuroblastoma/complicaciones , Neuroblastoma/patología , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Neuroblastoma is the most common, non-central nervous system tumor of childhood. It has the potential to synthesize catecholamines. However, the presences of hypertension are uncommon. We report the perioperative management of a 15-month-old infant with giant abdominal neuroblastoma who presented severe hypertension. The pathophysiological alterations of neuroblastoma are reviewed and perioperative management presented.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Abdominales , Anestesia , Neuroblastoma , Neoplasias Abdominales/patología , Neoplasias Abdominales/cirugía , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Neuroblastoma/patología , Neuroblastoma/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Several devices can aid nasotracheal intubation when managing difficult airways. The McGrath MAC and Airtraq NT were compared with a Macintosh laryngoscope when studying the performance of anaesthetists with different levels of experience, in a manikin model of easy or difficult airway scenarios. METHODS: Sixty-three anaesthetists were recruited into a randomised trial in which each performed nasotracheal intubation with all laryngoscopes, in both scenarios. The main endpoint was intubation time. Additional endpoints included laryngoscopic view, intubation success, number of optimisation manoeuvres, audible dental clicks and the force applied to the upper airway. RESULTS: Intubation time was significantly shorter using the McGrath MAC in both scenarios and using the Airtraq in the difficult scenario, when compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Both devices gave more Cormack and Lehane grade 1 or 2 views than the Macintosh in the difficult scenario (p<0.001). The McGrath MAC had the best first-attempt success rate (98.4% vs. 96.8% and 95.8%, p<0.001 for the Airtraq NT and Macintosh laryngoscopes respectively). The number of optimisation manoeuvres, audible dental clicks and subjective assessment of the degree of force applied were significantly lower for indirect laryngoscopes versus the Macintosh laryngoscope (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In a manikin, the Airtraq and the McGrath laryngoscopes appeared superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope when dealing with simulated airway scenarios. Both devices were associated with better views, intubation times and rates of success, especially in a simulated "difficult airway". Overall satisfaction was highest with the McGrath laryngoscope. Similar clinical studies are needed.
Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Laringoscopios , Laringoscopía/instrumentación , Maniquíes , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Masculino , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Several devices can aid nasotracheal intubation when managing difficult airways. The McGrath MAC and Airtraq NT were compared with a Macintosh laryngoscope when studying the performance of anaesthetists with different levels of experience, in a manikin model of easy or difficult airway scenarios. METHODS: Sixty-three anaesthetists were recruited into a randomised trial in which each performed nasotracheal intubation with all laryngoscopes, in both scenarios. The main endpoint was intubation time. Additional endpoints included laryngoscopic view, intubation success, number of optimisation manoeuvres, audible dental clicks and the force applied to the upper airway. RESULTS: Intubation time was significantly shorter using the McGrath MAC in both scenarios and using the Airtraq in the difficult scenario, when compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Both devices gave more Cormack and Lehane grade 1 or 2 views than the Macintosh in the difficult scenario (p<0.001). The McGrath MAC had the best first-attempt success rate (98.4% vs. 96.8% and 95.8%, p<0.001 for the Airtraq NT and Macintosh laryngoscopes respectively). The number of optimisation manoeuvres, audible dental clicks and subjective assessment of the degree of force applied were significantly lower for indirect laryngoscopes versus the Macintosh laryngoscope (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In a manikin, the Airtraq and the McGrath laryngoscopes appeared superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope when dealing with simulated airway scenarios. Both devices were associated with better views, intubation times and rates of success, especially in a simulated "difficult airway". Overall satisfaction was highest with the McGrath laryngoscope. Similar clinical studies are needed.
RESUMEN
Abstract Neuroblastoma is the most common, non-central nervous system tumor of childhood. It has the potential to synthesize catecholamines. However, the presences of hypertension are uncommon. We report the perioperative management of a 15-month-old infant with giant abdominal neuroblastoma who presented severe hypertension. The pathophysiological alterations of neuroblastoma are reviewed and perioperative management presented.
Resumo Neuroblastoma é o tumor mais comum do sistema nervoso não central na infância. Esse tumor tem o potencial de sintetizar catecolaminas; entretanto, a presença de hipertensão é rara. Relatamos o manejo perioperatório de uma criança de cinco meses com neuroblastoma abdominal gigante que apresentou hipertensão grave. As alterações fisiopatológicas do neuroblastoma foram revistas e o manejo perioperatório é apresentado.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Lactante , Anestesia , Neoplasias Abdominales/cirugía , Neoplasias Abdominales/patología , Neuroblastoma/cirugía , Neuroblastoma/patologíaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: Several devices can aid nasotracheal intubation when managing difficult airways. The McGrath MAC and Airtraq NT were compared with a Macintosh laryngoscope when studying the performance of anaesthetists with different levels of experience, in a manikin model of easy or difficult airway scenarios. METHODS: Sixty-three anaesthetists were recruited into a randomised trial in which each performed nasotracheal intubation with all laryngoscopes, in both scenarios. The main endpoint was intubation time. Additional endpoints included laryngoscopic view, intubation success, number of optimisation manoeuvres, audible dental clicks and the force applied to the upper airway. RESULTS: Intubation time was significantly shorter using the McGrath MAC in both scenarios and using the Airtraq in the difficult scenario, when compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Both devices gave more Cormack and Lehane grade 1 or 2 views than the Macintosh in the difficult scenario (p < 0.001). The McGrath MAC had the best first-attempt success rate (98.4% vs. 96.8% and 95.8%, p < 0.001 for the Airtraq NT and Macintosh laryngoscopes respectively). The number of optimisation manoeuvres, audible dental clicks and subjective assessment of the degree of force applied were significantly lower for indirect laryngoscopes versus the Macintosh laryngoscope (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In a manikin, the Airtraq and the McGrath laryngoscopes appeared superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope when dealing with simulated airway scenarios. Both devices were associated with better views, intubation times and rates of success, especially in a simulated "difficult airway". Overall satisfaction was highest with the McGrath laryngoscope. Similar clinical studies are needed.
RESUMO OBJETIVO: Vários dispositivos podem ajudar a intubação nasotraqueal no manejo de via aérea difícil. Os laringoscópios McGrath MAC e Airtraq NT foram comparados com um laringoscópio Macintosh em estudo do desempenho de anestesistas com diferentes níveis de experiência, em manequim com cenário de via aérea fácil ou difícil. MÉTODOS: Foram recrutados 63 anestesistas para um estudo randômico, no qual cada um fez intubação nasotraqueal com todos os laringoscópios, em ambos os cenários. O desfecho primário foi o tempo de intubação. Desfechos adicionais incluíram vista laringoscópica, sucesso na intubação, número de manobras de aprimoramento, cliques dentais audíveis e força aplicada nas vias aéreas superiores. RESULTADOS: O tempo de intubação foi significativamente menor com o uso do laringoscópio McGrath MAC em ambos os cenários e com o uso do Airtraq no cenário difícil, em comparação com o laringoscópio Macintosh. Ambos os dispositivos obtiveram mais grau 1 ou 2 de Cormack e Lehane para visualização do que o Macintosh em cenário difícil (p < 0,001). O McGrath MAC teve a melhor taxa de sucesso na primeira tentativa (98,4% vs. 96,8% e 95,8%, p < 0,001, para os laringoscópios Airtraq NT e Macintosh, respectivamente). O número de manobras de aprimoramento, os cliques dentais audíveis e a avaliação subjetiva do grau de força aplicada foram significativamente menores para os laringoscópios indiretos versus o laringoscópio Macintosh (p < 0,001). CONCLUSÃO: Em um manequim, os laringoscópios Airtraq e McGrath pareceram superiores ao laringoscópio Macintosh para lidar com cenários das vias aéreas simuladas. Ambos os dispositivos foram associados a melhores visibilidades, tempos de intubação e taxas de sucesso, especialmente em simulação de "via aérea difícil". A satisfação geral foi maior com o laringoscópio McGrath. Estudos clínicos similares são necessários.