Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BMC Palliat Care ; 19(1): 31, 2020 Mar 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32164672

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Palliative care (PC) referral is recommended early in the course of advanced cancer. This study aims to describe, in an integrated onco-palliative care program (IOPC), patient's profile when first referred to this program, timing of this referral and its impact on the trajectory of care at end-of-life. METHODS: The IOPC combined the weekly onco-palliative meeting (OPM) dedicated to patients with incurable cancer, and/or the clinical evaluation by the PC team. Oncologists can refer to the multidisciplinary board of the OPM the patients for whom goals and organization of care need to be discussed. We analyzed all patients first referred at OPM in 2011-2013. We defined the index of precocity (IP), as the ratio of the time from first referral to death by the time from diagnosis of incurability to death, ranging from 0 (late referral) to 1 (early referral). RESULTS: Of the 416 patients included, 57% presented with lung, urothelial cancers, or sarcoma. At first referral to IOPC, 76% were receiving antitumoral treatment, 63% were outpatients, 56% had a performance status ≤2 and 46% had a serum albumin level > 35 g/l. The median [1st-3rd quartile] IP was 0.39 [0.16-0.72], ranging between 0.53 [0.20-0.79] (earliest referral, i.e. close to diagnosis of incurability, for lung cancer) to 0.16 [0.07-0.56] (latest referral, i.e. close to death relatively to length of metastatic disease, for prostate cancer). Among 367 decedents, 42 (13%) received antitumoral treatment within 14 days before death, and 157 (43%) died in PC units. CONCLUSIONS: The IOPC is an effective organization to enable early integration of PC and decrease aggressiveness of care near the end-of life. The IP is a useful tool to model the timing of referral to IOPC, while taking into account each cancer types and therapeutic advances.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital/normas , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/métodos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/clasificación , Neoplasias/terapia , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital/tendencias , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/tendencias , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cuidado Terminal/organización & administración , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Cuidado Terminal/tendencias
2.
Anticancer Drugs ; 27(4): 349-52, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26736136

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of vinorelbine as a single agent in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Patients were treated with oral or intravenous vinorelbine according to the pluridisciplinary tumor board's decision. Efficacy and safety outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Twenty-three patients were included in the study. Sixteen patients (69%) had received at least two previous lines of chemotherapy. The disease control rate was 19%. The median progression-free survival was 2.6 months and the median overall survival was 3.4 months. The rate of grade 3-4 side effects was low (13%). Only one patient discontinued treatment because of side effects. Vinorelbine seems to be a well-tolerated regimen in heavily pretreated patients. However, this regimen does not seem to be efficient enough to be recommended.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Vinblastina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vinblastina/uso terapéutico , Vinorelbina
3.
Bull Cancer ; 100(11): 1215-21, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24158596

RESUMEN

The development of bisphosphonates and anti-RANK/RANKL agents was associated with a better understanding of physiological and pathological processes of bone remodeling. New agents are now developed in this context targeting factors associated with osteoclastogenesis (TGFß, PTHrP), with signaling pathways activated during bone remodeling (Src, Cathepsin K) or with tumor cells homing into bone (chemokines). This review aims to present the underlying rationale for these developments as well as the clinical results. The emergence of new bone targeting therapies is discussed.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Resorción Ósea/tratamiento farmacológico , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , Familia-src Quinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Compuestos de Anilina/uso terapéutico , Benzodioxoles/uso terapéutico , Resorción Ósea/etiología , Catepsina K/antagonistas & inhibidores , Dasatinib , Humanos , Nitrilos/uso terapéutico , Proteína Relacionada con la Hormona Paratiroidea/antagonistas & inhibidores , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Quinazolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Ligando RANK/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Quimiocina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Familia-src Quinasas/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA