Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(8S1): S22-S26, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599526

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances are common after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite the rising popularity of wearables to track sleep, little evidence exists in the arthroplasty literature regarding their efficacy. We aimed to correlate validated wearable sleep metrics with patient-reported sleep quality following TKA. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary TKA were consecutively enrolled. Patients used a wearable device preoperatively and 90 days postoperatively to track five previously-validated measures of sleep. Each month, they rated their sleep quality. Wearable sleep data was correlated with patient-reported sleep quality using a point biserial correlation test. Categorical data were compared using Chi-square tests. A total of 110 patients were included. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 20.8% of patients reported "fairly bad" or "very bad" sleep; this increased to 44.4% 30 days postoperatively, then decreased to 26.5% 60 days postoperatively, and to 20.2% 90 days postoperatively. At 30 days postoperatively, time in bed, time asleep, and minutes of rapid eye movement sleep weakly correlated with patient-reported sleep quality (correlations 0.356, 0.345, and 0.345, respectively; P < .001). Sleep quality did not correlate with any wearable metric collected 60 or 90 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported sleep quality following TKA initially worsened postoperatively, then improved to preoperative levels by 90 days. Time in bed, time asleep, and rapid eye movement sleep minutes only weakly correlated with patient-reported sleep quality at 30 days; no other correlations were detected. Surgeons that utilize remote monitoring following TKA should be aware that surrogate measures generated from these devices may correlate weakly, if at all, with the patient-reported outcome of the parameter being studied.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distinciones y Premios , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad del Sueño , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
2.
BMJ Open ; 14(4): e082656, 2024 Apr 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38569683

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative anxiety and depression symptoms among older surgical patients are associated with poor postoperative outcomes, yet evidence-based interventions for anxiety and depression have not been applied within this setting. We present a protocol for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in three surgical cohorts: cardiac, oncological and orthopaedic, investigating whether a perioperative mental health intervention, with psychological and pharmacological components, reduces perioperative symptoms of depression and anxiety in older surgical patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Adults ≥60 years undergoing cardiac, orthopaedic or oncological surgery will be enrolled in one of three-linked type 1 hybrid effectiveness/implementation RCTs that will be conducted in tandem with similar methods. In each trial, 100 participants will be randomised to a remotely delivered perioperative behavioural treatment incorporating principles of behavioural activation, compassion and care coordination, and medication optimisation, or enhanced usual care with mental health-related resources for this population. The primary outcome is change in depression and anxiety symptoms assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire-Anxiety Depression Scale from baseline to 3 months post surgery. Other outcomes include quality of life, delirium, length of stay, falls, rehospitalisation, pain and implementation outcomes, including study and intervention reach, acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness, and patient experience with the intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trials have received ethics approval from the Washington University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board. Informed consent is required for participation in the trials. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals, presented at clinical research conferences and disseminated via the Center for Perioperative Mental Health website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT05575128, NCT05685511, NCT05697835, pre-results.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad , Depresión , Atención Perioperativa , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Ansiedad/terapia , Depresión/terapia , Anciano , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Femenino , Proyectos de Investigación , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA