Systemic gene expression profiles according to pain types in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury.

Pain affects most individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Major pain types after SCI are neuropathic or nociceptive, often experienced concurrently. Pain after SCI may be refractory to treatments and negatively affects quality of life. Previously, we analyzed whole blood gene expression in individuals with chronic SCI compared to able-bodied (AB) individuals. Most participants with SCI reported pain (N = 19/28). Here, we examined gene expression of participants with SCI by pain status. Compared to AB, participants with SCI with pain had 468 differentially expressed (DE) genes; participants without pain had 564 DE genes (FDR < 0.05). Among DE genes distinct to participants with SCI with pain, Gene Ontology Biological Process (GOBP) analysis showed upregulated genes were enriched in categories related to T cell activation or inflammation; downregulated genes were enriched in categories related to protein proteolysis and catabolism. Although most participants with pain reported multiple pain types concurrently, we performed a preliminary comparison of gene expression by worst pain problem type. Compared to AB, participants with SCI who ranked neuropathic (N = 9) as worst had one distinct DE gene (TMEM156); participants who ranked nociceptive (N = 10) as worst had 61 distinct DE genes (FDR < 0.05). In the nociceptive group, the GOBP category with the lowest P-value identified among upregulated genes was "positive regulation of T cell activation"; among downregulated genes it was "receptor tyrosine kinase binding". An exploratory comparison of pain groups by principal components analysis also showed that the nociceptive group was enriched in T-cell related genes. A correlation analysis identified genes significantly correlated with pain intensity in the neuropathic or nociceptive groups (N = 145, 65, respectively, Pearson's correlation r > 0.8). While this pilot study highlights challenges of identifying gene expression profiles that correlate with specific types of pain in individuals with SCI, it suggests that T-cell signaling should be further investigated in this context.

Epidemiology and trends of adult ice hockey injuries presenting to United States emergency departments: A ten-year analysis from 2007-2016.

PURPOSE: The adult population is under-represented in existing ice hockey injury studies, despite the number of United States (US) adult ice hockey players increasing from 103,533 in 2007 to 180,400 in 2016 (74%). This study establishes trends in demographics, injury location, and injury type for adult ice hockey players (≥19 years old) in the United States. METHODS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was queried for all ice hockey injuries from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2016. Cases under age 19 were excluded. Each injury's narrative text field was reviewed to determine mechanism of injury. RESULTS: A total of 1,653 patients, representing an estimated 68,786 ice-hockey related injuries, presented to NEISS-participating US EDs. The most commonly injured body parts were the face (n = 12,432, 18.1%), head (n = 10,201, 14.8%), shoulder (n = 9,654, 14.0%) and ankle (n = 5,389, 7.8%). The most common diagnoses made were laceration (n = 18,153, 26.4%), strain/sprain (n = 12,202, 17.7%), fracture (n = 10,079, 14.7%), contusion (n = 9,283, 13.5%) and concussion (n = 4,794, 7.0%). The most common mechanisms of injury were falling (n = 11,786, 18.7%), puck contact (n = 10,544, 15.3%) and player contact (n = 9,449, 13.7%). Concussions increased from 46 in 2007 to 928 in 2016 (R2 = 0.8, ß = 0.9, p < 0.001). Females (n = 1,852, 32%) had a higher proportion of head injuries than males (n = 8,349, 13.3%) (IPR = 2.4, p < 0.0001). The 50+ year old cohort showed a significant increase in injuries during the study period (n = 146 vs. 982, R2 = 0.75, ß = 0.87, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite changing trends in age and sex-related demographics, the majority of injuries in this population may be preventable with adequate enforcement of protective gear use. Increased education amongst players, coaches, trainers, orthopaedic surgeons and primary care physicians should be encouraged to minimize injuries.

Assessment of pain symptoms and quality of life using the International Spinal Cord Injury Data Sets in persons with chronic spinal cord injury.

Introduction: Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) triggers complex changes that can negatively impact health and quality of life. The International SCI Data Sets were developed to enable more comparable data collection on the complex sequelae of SCI across studies. This should facilitate progress in mechanistic understanding and improving treatments of SCI. Study design: Prospective observational pilot study. Objectives: To collect data on pain symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in adults living with chronic SCI. Setting: Academic medical center, New York, USA. Methods: The International SCI Basic Pain and Qol Data Sets were used to collect data from participants with chronic SCI (N = 31) at 2 study visits held 6 months apart. The QoL Data Set was also used to collect data from able-bodied persons of similar age and gender distribution (N = 28). Results: Most participants with SCI had multiple types and locations of pain problems at both study visits, despite reported being treated for pain. At both visits, the worst pain problem type was nociceptive, followed by neuropathic, which was typically rated of higher intensity. QoL scores were significantly lower across all domains of the data set in persons with SCI than able-bodied persons. Persons with pain tended to have lower QoL scores, although this trend was not significant. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the presence, complexity and stability of pain symptoms refractory to treatment and lower quality of life ratings in persons with chronic SCI. Sponsorship: Grants from the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, New York Empire Clinical Research Program, New York State Spinal Cord Injury Research Board.