Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Anaesthesist ; 65(4): 250-7, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27007777

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prone positioning of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been shown to significantly improve survival rates. Prone positioning reduces collapse of dorsal lung segments with subsequent reduction of alveolar overdistension of ventral lung segments, optimizes lung recruitment and enhances drainage. Patients with ARDS treated by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can also benefit from prone positioning; however, the procedure is associated with a possible higher risk of serious adverse events. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of prone positioning for patients with severe ARDS during ECMO therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study involved a retrospective analysis of all patients placed in a prone position while being treated by venovenous ECMO (vvECMO) for severe hypoxemia in ARDS as bridge to recovery in the interdisciplinary intensive care unit at the University Hospital Leipzig between January 2009 and August 2013. Baseline data, hospital mortality and serious adverse events were documented. Serious adverse events were defined as dislocation or obstruction of endotracheal tube or tracheal cannula, ECMO cannulas and cardiac arrest. Prone positioning was carried out by at least one doctor and three nurses according to a standardized protocol. Results are given as the median (1st and 3rd quartiles). RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were treated with vvECMO as bridge to recovery due to severe ARDS. Causes for ARDS were pneumonia (n = 20) and aspiration (n = 2) and four patients had different rare causes of ARDS. The median time on ECMO was 8 days (6;11) and during this period 134 turning events were documented. Patients were proned for a median of 5 (3;7) periods with a median duration of 12 h (8;12). No serious adverse events were recorded. The hospital mortality was 42% and mortality during the ECMO procedure was 35%. CONCLUSION: Prone positioning significantly reduces the mortality of patients with severe ARDS. In this series of 26 patients with severe ARDS during ECMO therapy no serious adverse events were found during the use of prone positioning.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Posición Prona , APACHE , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos Clínicos , Cuidados Críticos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Hipoxia/etiología , Hipoxia/mortalidad , Hipoxia/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/complicaciones , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Infection ; 42(2): 309-16, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24217959

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: From mid-2010 to early 2013 there was a large single-center (Leipzig University Hospital, Germany) outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) type 2 producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-2-KP) involving a total of 103 patients. The aim of this study was to compare KPC-positive liver transplant recipients (LTR) and KPC-negative controls to determine both the relative risk of infection following colonization with KPC-2-KP and the case fatality rate associated with KPC-2-KP. METHODS: The study cohort of this retrospective observational study comprised nine patients who had undergone orthotopic liver transplantation (LTx) (median age of 52 years, range 28-73 years) with confirmed evidence of colonization with KPC-2-KP. The data from these nine LTR were matched to 18 LTR (1:2) in whom carbapenem-resistant pathogens were not present and compared for clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of these nine cases, eight (89 %) progressed to infection due to KPC-2-KP, and five (56 %) were confirmed to have bloodstream infection with KPC-2-KP. Matched-pair analysis of KPC-positive LTR and KPC-negative controls revealed a substantially increased relative risk of 7.0 (95 % confidence interval 1.8-27.1) for fatal infection with KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae after transplantation with a mortality rate of 78 % (vs. 11 %, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Colonization with KPC-2-KP in LTR leads to high infection rates and excess mortality. Therefore, frequent screening for carbapenem-resistant bacteria in patients on LTx waiting lists appears to be mandatory in an outbreak setting. Patients with evidence of persistent colonization with KPC-producing pathogens should be evaluated with extreme caution for LTx.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones por Klebsiella , Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/mortalidad , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA