Impact of the Major BCR-ABL1 Transcript Type on Clinical and Biological Parameters and Molecular Response in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

AIM: In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the impact of MBCR-ABL1 major transcript type on disease phenotype and response to treatment still controversial to date. This work aims to study the influence of Mb3a2 and Mb2a2 transcripts on clinico-biological parameters and the molecular response in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) treated with Imatinib as frontline therapy. METHODS: This is six years prospective study started in March 1 st, 2013. 67 patients with newly CP-CML were treated by Imatinib as frontline therapy. Clinical and biological characteristics disease were collected for all patients. Molecular typing was performed by multiplex RT-PCR and quantification of transcripts by real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). The cumulative incidence of deep molecular response (DMR) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The comparison was made using the parametric Log-Rank test. A value of P ≤ 0.05 is considered significant. RESULTS: 61% of patients expressed b3a2, 35.82% b2a2 and 2.98% expressed a rare transcript of type e19a2. At diagnosis, the b2a2 type had a higher level of expression than that of b3a2 (67.92 vs 53.79%; P = 0.03). This insignificant difference between the two transcript subgroups was also observed for rates below 1% at 6 months (54 vs 39; P = 0.26) and below 0.1% (54 vs 44 %; P = 0.50), (77 vs 50%; P = 0.09) and (81 vs 78 %; P = 0.52) at 12, 18 and 24 months respectively. The two types of transcript had almost the same kinetics. Nevertheless, the absolute value of the BCR-ABL1/ABL ratio decrease was faster in the group of patients expressing b3a2, than in those expressing b2a2. At 18 months post IM therapy, patients with a b3a2 transcript have a trend of better MMR that those with b2a2 (77 vs 50%; P = 0.09). The DMR was not significantly different between two groups at 24 months (50 vs 32%; P = 0.20) and 36 months (75 vs 70%; P = 0.54) respectively. The cumulative probability of achieving MRD at 5 years was higher in patients with b3a2 type but not statistically significant; (85 vs. 68%; P = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Patients with b3a2 transcript may be associated with a better response to Imatinib therapy.

Physical therapy pathway and protocol for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Recommendations from The Eastern Mediterranean Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EMBMT) Group.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are often referred for physical therapy (PT) to help improve their quality of life. However, to our knowledge there is no clear PT pathway to guide therapists and patients before, during, and after HSCT. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was carried out exploring the role and benefits of PT in HSCT patients. The current evidence was comlimented with recommendations and opinions from the experts in the field, which included PT's and hematology consultants from PTAGVHD and the EMBMT group. RESULT: A clear pathway and protocol as a working guide for rehabilitation professionals working with the HSCT patient's was developed. CONCLUSION: This paper not only reviews the current evidence on safe PT practice but also puts forward a protocol and pathway for HSCT rehabilitation, highlights the importance of individualized exercise intervention for HSCT patients, and outlines safe practice guidelines for the physical therapists working in this field.