Longitudinal outcomes with intracapsular tonsillectomy, a single surgeon's experience.

PURPOSE: To assess the risk of tonsillar regrowth and post-operative complications associated with intracapsular tonsillectomy (IT) when performed by a single surgeon using a standardized technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current study was conducted as a retrospective chart review of all IT performed by a single surgeon between November 11, 2009 and July 22, 2020 at the Cleveland Clinic and the Cleveland Clinic Beachwood Family Health and Surgery Center . Data collection included patient demographics, surgical data, post operative results, complications, and available long-term follow-up data. RESULTS: There were 221 ITs performed between November 2009 and July 2020. The post operative bleeding rate was 3.5 %. A single adult patient required re-operation for bleeding. Rate of tonsillar regrowth was 3.9 % (n = 7) and 1.1 % (n = 2) required re-operation (total tonsillectomy). No patients in the current study developed post-operative dehydration or had excessive post-operative pain requiring an emergency department visit or hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated similar rates of post operative bleeding after IT when compared to established rates following TT. The current study's regrowth rate was 3.9 % with a low 1.1 % rate of re-operation. This study adds to a growing body of literature supporting the use of IT due to lower complication rates when compared to TT, including post-operative bleeding, dehydration, and pain, with minimal rate of re-operation for bleeding or regrowth.

Prevalence of self-reported voice and swallowing complaints in an outpatient geriatric population.

Background: Older adults suffer from increased rates of dysphagia and dysphonia, both of which have a profound effect on quality of life and are often underdiagnosed. We sought to better understand the prevalence of these complaints and the potential utility of a patient-reported screening program in a geriatrics clinic. Methods: Using an IRB-approved cross-sectional survey and retrospective cohort design, we recruited participants from a population of new patients seeking care at an academic geriatrics clinic. We used three validated questionnaires to assess self-reported dysphagia, dysphonia, and pill dysphagia: the Eating-Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10), the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10), and the PILL-5. Patients who screened positive on any questionnaire were offered referral to a laryngologist for additional evaluation. Patients who screened positive on the PILL-5 were also offered referral to our geriatric pharmacist. Results: Among our 300 patients surveyed, the mean age was 76 (SD 8.46). A total of 82 (27.3%) patients screened positive (73 on EAT-10, 10 on PILL-5, 13 on VHI-10) and were offered referral, of which 36 accepted. These positive screening patients took more prescription medications (p = .024) and had a higher GDS score (p < .001) when compared to the patients who screened negative. Conclusions: Many new patients seeking generalized care at our center screened positively for dysphagia and/or dysphonia on validated questionnaires. Geriatric patients may benefit from integrating screening for these disorders to identify the need of further evaluation. It is unknown if these survey tools are appropriate in a non-otolaryngology clinic. Level of evidence: III.

Primary Total Laryngectomy versus Organ Preservation for Locally Advanced T3/T4a Laryngeal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Organ preservation (OP) treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer has increased compared to primary total laryngectomy. Our study compares oncologic and functional outcomes between these approaches. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary care institution. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients receiving primary total laryngectomy or OP for laryngeal cancer between 1/1/2000 and 12/31/2018. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients received primary total laryngectomy and 119 received OP. Overall survival was similar between total laryngectomy and OP. When stratified by T stage, disease-free survival was worse among T3 patients receiving OP versus total laryngectomy. In T3 patients, 28 OP patients experienced local recurrence (28.9%) compared to 3 total laryngectomy patients (7.1%; p < 0.01). In total, 20 OP patients with local recurrence received salvage surgery. These patients had similar overall survival to patients who underwent initial total laryngectomy (TL). About 14 OP patients with local recurrence did not receive salvage surgery. About 89 (75.4%) TL patients achieved normal diet as compared to 64 (53.8%) OP patients (p < 0.001). In TL patients, 106 (89.8%) received primary or secondary tracheoesophageal-prosthesis, 82 (77.4%) of whom achieved completely understandable speech. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in survival by treatment in T4 patients, possibly because of strict patient selection. However, disease-free survival was worse in T3 patients receiving OP, likely due to a high local recurrence rate. Approximately 40% of patients with local recurrence were not eligible for salvage laryngectomy. TL patients had comparable swallowing and speech outcomes with OP patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:1122-1131, 2023.

Prognostic value of computed tomography scan detection of cartilage invasion in advanced laryngeal cancer treated with primary total laryngectomy.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether detection of cartilage invasion (CI) by computed tomography predicts oncologic outcomes after primary total laryngectomy. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study comparing oncologic outcomes between radiologic versus pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: Assessment of clear CI versus gestalt CI resulted in 84% versus 48% specificity, 90.9% versus 80.3% positive predictive value (PPV), 60.6% versus 80.3% sensitivity, 44.7% versus 48% negative predictive value (NPV), respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) was similar between cT4a and cT3/cT2 patients (p = 0.87). DFS trended towards superiority among pT3/pT2 versus pT4a patients (p = 0.18). DFS was similar among patients with CI on radiologist gestalt versus no CI (p = 0.94). Histologically confirmed CI was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.46 (p = 0.27), gestalt CI 1.13 (p = 0.70), and clear CI 1.61 (p = 0.10) for DFS. CONCLUSION: Gestalt determination of CI results in high sensitivity but low specificity, while clear determination of CI results in moderate sensitivity and high specificity.