Cost and quality of life in patients with severe chronic hand eczema refractory to standard therapy with topical potent corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the socio-economic burden of severe chronic hand eczema in patients refractory to treatment with potent corticosteroids. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the socio-economic burden of severe chronic hand eczema refractory to potent topical corticosteroids, and to establish an algorithm for the estimation of the health-related quality of life EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D) utility index from the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) summary score. METHODS: A multicentre cost of illness study was conducted, adopting the societal perspective. Adult patients with severe and refractory chronic hand eczema were enrolled. Direct (e.g. drug treatment and travel) and indirect (i.e. loss of productivity) mean costs/patient-month were estimated. Health-related quality of life was assessed with the EQ-5D and DLQI questionnaires. An ordinary least square regression model was used to investigate relationships between health-related quality of life scores. RESULTS: One hundred and four valid patients (mean age 44.5 years, 39.4% male) participated. Overall mean costs were €418.3/patient-month: loss of productivity contributed 43.7%, followed by hospitalization (16.1%) and travel (10.3%). Health-related quality of life scores were, on average, 0.50 (EQ-5D utility) and 11.3 (DLQI). Utility and DLQI summary were significantly related to each other. CONCLUSIONS: Wellbeing and loss of productivity are the most important consequences in these patients. Appropriate treatment is necessary to improve patient health and productivity, which will contribute to reducing societal costs.

Italian population-based values of EQ-5D health states.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate a value set for the calculation of Italian-specific quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), based on preferences elicited on EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire health states using the time trade-off technique. METHODS: The revised standard Measurement and Valuation of Health protocol was followed. Twenty-five health states, divided into three groups and given to 450 subjects, were selected to obtain 300 observations per state. Subjects aged 18 to 75 years were recruited to be representative of the Italian general adult population for age, sex, and geographical distribution. To improve efficiency, face-to-face interviews were conducted by using the Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing approach. Several random effects regression models were tested to predict the full set of EQ-5D questionnaire health states. Model selection was based on logical consistency of the estimates, sign and magnitude of the regression coefficients, goodness of fit, and parsimony. RESULTS: The model that satisfied the criteria of logical consistency and was more efficient includes 10 main effect dummy variables for the EQ-5D questionnaire domain levels and the D1 interaction term, which accounts for the number of dimensions at levels 2 or 3 beyond the first. This model has an R(2) of 0.389 and a mean absolute error of 0.03, which are comparable to or better than those of models used in other countries. The utility estimates after state 11111 range from 0.92 (21111) to -0.38 (33333). Italian utility estimates are higher than those estimated in the United Kingdom and Spain and used so far to assess QALYs and conduct cost-utility evaluations in Italy. CONCLUSIONS: A specific value set is now available to calculate QALYs for the conduction of health economic studies targeted at the Italian health care system.

Systematic literature review on economic implications and pharmacoeconomic issues of rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To provide a state of the art of economic analyses applied to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A systematic literature review on economic consequences and pharmacoeconomic issues of RA was performed. RESULTS: 127 valid articles were examined in this review. Generally, the financial impact of RA is substantial for health-care systems and society worldwide, although differences exist among national economies. Both direct and indirect (i.e. loss of productivity) costs contribute to economic burden of RA and must be taken into account when estimating overall impact to society. Disease severity, disease activity, age and socioeconomic status have been found to be the most relevant predictors of cost increase in RA. Moreover, introduction of biological anti-rheumatic agents has significantly raised direct medical costs in certain patients, but has also led to marked improvements in reducing disease activity, joint damage, and productivity loss in many of these patients. RA has also a significant impact on all aspects of quality of life; recent publications on health utility scores showed RA to be one of the diseases associated with poorest quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: RA represents a clinical and economic burden for healthcare systems. Although attributable RA costs have been extensively evaluated over the last decades, several issues, especially concerning the use of expensive therapies, must be addressed and frequently updated. Future research should also provide health economic evidence from usual practice settings, and on the economic impact of different therapeutic approaches to pursue specific clinical targets in individual patients.

Systematic literature review on economic implications and pharmacoeconomic issues of psoriatic arthritis.

The introduction of anti tumour necrosis factors-α (TNF-α) agents has greatly advanced the management of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Functional disability in patients with PsA may result in significant impairment of Quality of Life (QoL), psychosocial disability and productivity loss. Although many patients respond adequately to methotrexate and other therapies, in patients who have incomplete responses, anti TNF-α agents reduce inflammation and minimise joints damage, increasing functional capacity and QoL, and decreasing the progression rate of structural damage in peripheral joints. Because of the high costs associated to anti TNF-α agents therapy, an increasing number of economic evaluations have been performed over the last few years, and several cost-of-illness and cost-effectiveness studies have been published concerning use of anti TNF-α agents in management of PsA. We performed a systematic literature review to better understand the pharmacoeconomic perspective of PsA. The pharmacoeconomic studies analysed have demonstrated the high socioeconomic burden of PsA and that TNF-α blockers treatment options provide value for money in the musculoskeletal and cutaneous manifestations of psoriatic disease.