Ruxolitinib and methylprednisolone for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Although Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy for treating autoimmune disorders and myeloproliferative neoplasms, their efficacy in treating other types of cancer has not been clearly demonstrated. We evaluated oral ruxolitinib (15 mg twice daily) with oral methylprednisolone (40 mg every other day) for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with progressive disease who had received a proteasome inhibitor, lenalidomide, glucocorticosteroids and three or more prior regimens. All of the planned 29 patients had been enrolled with follow-up until 28 April 2022. Median lines of prior therapy were 6 (range 3-12). Cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization were evaluable in 28 patients; 9 (32%) and 17 (70%) patients showed high-risk cytogenetics and/or 1q+, respectively. The overall response rate was 31%. The median duration of response was 13.1 (range 2.8-22.0) months. Median progression-free survival rate was 3.4 (range 0.5-24.6) months, Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. The combination of ruxolitinib and methylprednisolone demonstrated significant clinical activity among previously heavily-treated MM patients, and responses were achieved among patients who had high-risk cytogenetics. This is the first clinical study to show activity of JAK inhibitors in combination with steroids for MM patients and expands the potential use of these drugs to those with cancers other than myeloproliferative neoplasms.

The JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib downregulates the immune checkpoint protein B7H3 in multiple myeloma.

We hypothesized that ruxolitinib may inhibit the immune checkpoint protein, B7H3; and, thus, investigated its effects on this immune inhibitor using multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines, bone marrow (BM) mononuclear cells from MM patients and human MM LAGλ -1A xenografts. Ruxolitinib reduced B7H3 gene and protein expression and increased IL-2 and CD8 gene expression. These results suggest that ruxolitinib inhibition of B7H3 may restore exhausted T-cell activity in the MM BM tumor microenvironment.

Efficacy of isatuximab in combination with steroids for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients exhibiting only biochemical progression-A single center retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Isatuximab is approved for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with dexamethasone and carfilzomib or pomalidomide. Patients receiving these three-drug regimens have exhibited more Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) compared to the two-drug class combination of isatuximab and steroids alone. Thus, this single-center retrospective study investigated the efficacy of isatuximab with dexamethasone and methylprednisolone (ISAdm) for RRMM patients showing only biochemical progression (BP) of their disease. METHODS: Twenty-four RRMM patients exhibiting only BP were administered isatuximab at 10 mg/kg with dexamethasone once weekly for cycle 1 of a 28-day cycle, followed by every other week for each cycle thereafter. Starting in cycle 2, oral methylprednisolone was added every other day stopping 48 h before and starting 48 h after each dexamethasone infusion. RESULTS: Overall response rate and clinical benefit rate were 63% and 79%, respectively. Progression free survival was 12.9 months. There were only 5 AEs of Grade ≥ 3 which included lymphocytopenia (13%), leukopenia (4%), and neutropenia (4%). No Grade ≥ 3 AE related to respiratory infection, anemia, or thrombocytopenia were reported. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the two-drug class combination of ISAdm is an effective and well tolerated treatment option for RRMM patients exhibiting only BP.

Predicting outcomes and monitoring disease in patients with multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a clonal plasma cell dyscrasia and the most common form of primary bone marrow cancer. Nearly 35,000 new cases of MM are diagnosed in the United States each year. MM is a slowly progressive illness that remains incurable. The median survival for patients with MM is approximately 7 years, during which these patients suffer substantial morbidity. Despite the introduction of new drugs and immune-based therapies, many patients unfortunately relapse and require further therapies. Therefore, it is becoming increasingly important to be able to accurately and quickly determine changes in a patient's clinical status. Assessments of monoclonal protein and serum free light chain levels are the most common tests now available for monitoring patients with MM; however, these assays have several drawbacks. Modern radiologic techniques such as positron emission tomography and computed tomography are better than standard radiographs but are costly and cumbersome. Serum B-cell maturation antigen is a new biomarker for both the diagnosis and prognosis of MM. Assessment of measurable residual disease is becoming an important endpoint. The creation of better ways to predict outcomes and promptly and accurately monitor changes for patients with MM should lead to improved quality of life and longer survival.

Use of serum B-cell maturation antigen levels to predict outcomes for myeloma patients treated with ruxolitinib, lenalidomide and methylprednisolone.

Previous retrospective studies have shown that serum B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) levels predict outcomes among patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing new treatments. Specifically, baseline levels and changes during treatment of this protein predict both progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival. However, prospective studies are lacking evaluating sBCMA for determining outcomes among MM patients undergoing new treatments. Thus, we evaluated whether its baseline levels and changes during treatment in the amount of this serum marker predict outcomes among 38 relapsed/refractory MM patients treated with ruxolitinib, lenalidomide and methylprednisolone in a phase 1 trial. Patients with baseline sBCMA levels in the lowest three quartiles had longer PFS (median PFS 136 vs. 28 days; p < 0.0001). This was also shown for patients with baseline levels below the median (median PFS 140 vs. 77 days; p = 0.0225). PFS was shorter for patients whose sBCMA levels increased ≥25% through their first cycle (median PFS: 50 vs. 134 days, p = 0.0022), second cycle (median PFS: 50 vs. 141 days, p = 0.0273), and during the first three cycles of study treatment (median PFS: 50 vs. 220 days, p < 0.0001). No patient whose sBCMA increased ≥25% during cycle 1 responded whereas the majority (58%) of patients whose level increased <25% responded. This is the first prospective study to determine whether sBCMA levels predict outcomes for MM patients undergoing a non-BCMA directed treatment regimen and demonstrates that baseline levels and its changes during treatment predict PFS and the likelihood of responding to their treatment. These results add to the growing literature suggesting that this serum marker will be useful for determining outcomes for patients undergoing treatment for MM.

A phase 1 study of ruxolitinib, steroids and lenalidomide for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients.

Ruxolitinib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone shows anti-myeloma effects in vitro and in vivo. MUC1 leads to lenalidomide resistance in multiple myeloma (MM) cells, and ruxolitinib blocks its expression. Thus, ruxolitinib may restore sensitivity to lenalidomide. A phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib with lenalidomide and methylprednisolone for patients with relapsed/refractory (RR)MM who had been treated with lenalidomide, steroids and a proteasome inhibitor and showed progressive disease at study entry. A traditional 3 + 3 dose escalation design was used to enroll subjects in four cohorts. Subjects received ruxolitinib twice daily, lenalidomide daily on days 1-21 of a 28 day cycle and methylprednisolone orally every other day. Primary endpoints were safety, clinical benefit rate (CBR) and overall response rate (ORR). Forty-nine patients were enrolled. The median age was 64 years and they had received a median of six prior treatments including lenalidomide and steroids to which 94% were refractory. No dose limiting toxicities occurred. The CBR and ORR were 49% and 36%, respectively. All responding patients were refractory to lenalidomide. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) included anemia (17%), decreased lymphocyte count (15%), and hypophosphatemia (10%). Most common serious AEs included sepsis (9.8%) and pneumonia (7.8%). This Phase I trial demonstrates that a JAK inhibitor, ruxolitinib, can overcome refractoriness to lenalidomide and steroids for patients with RRMM. These results represent a promising novel therapeutic approach for treating MM. NCT03110822.

Estimating a normal reference range for serum B-cell maturation antigen levels for multiple myeloma patients.

The serum B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) has been identified as a novel serum biomarker for patients with multiple myeloma. However, no study has yet established a reference range for sBCMA levels. Its levels were determined in 196 healthy subjects and showed a right-tailed distribution with a median value of 37·51 ng/ml with a standard deviation of 22·54 ng/ml (range 18·78-180·39 ng/ml). Partitioning of subgroup reference ranges was considered but determined to be irrelevant. A non-parametric method using the median ± 2 standard deviations suggests using a universal reference interval of <82·59 ng/ml.

Ruxolitinib reverses checkpoint inhibition by reducing programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and increases anti-tumour effects of T cells in multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) tumour cells evade host immunity through a variety of mechanisms, which may potentially include the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1):programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) axis. This interaction contributes to the immunosuppressive bone marrow (BM) microenvironment, ultimately leading to reduced effector cell function. PD-L1 is overexpressed in MMBM and is associated with the resistance to immune-based approaches for treating MM. Ruxolitinib (RUX), an inhibitor of the Janus kinase (JAK) family of protein tyrosine kinases, is approved for myeloproliferative diseases. We investigated the effects of RUX alone or in combination with anti-MM agents on the expression of PD-L1 and T-cell cytotoxicity in MM. We showed that the expression of the PD-L1 gene was markedly increased in BM mononuclear cells from patients with MM with progressive disease versus those in complete remission. Furthermore, RUX treatment resulted in a concentration-dependent reduction of PD-L1 gene expression in the MM tumour cells cultured alone or co-cultured with stromal cells compared with untreated cells. The results also demonstrated that RUX increased MM cell apoptosis in the presence of interleukin-2-stimulated T cells to a similar degree as the treatment with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies. In summary, these results indicate that RUX can block PD-L1 expression resulting in augmentation of anti-MM effects of T cells.

Normalization of serum B-cell maturation antigen levels predicts overall survival among multiple myeloma patients starting treatment.

Serum B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) is a novel biomarker for B-cell malignancies. A normal reference range (<82·59 ng/ml) has been recently established but the impact of achieving normal levels to outcomes for patients receiving treatment for B-cell malignancies has not been studied. We first found that among multiple myeloma (MM) patients starting a new treatment, those who begin treatment within normal sBCMA limits (<82·59 ng/ml) have improved progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0·0398) and overall survival (OS; P = 0·0217) than those who do not. Furthermore, among patients who begin treatment with elevated (≥82·59 ng/ml) sBCMA levels, we assessed the relationship of a decrease in sBCMA to the normal range to OS and found that those who normalize sBCMA demonstrated improved OS (P = 0·0078). Normalizing patients also experienced a markedly improved overall response rate (P < 0·0001). Moreover, all patients who achieved complete remission (CR) showed normalization of sBCMA, and time to normalization (median 0·9 months) was faster than time to CR (5·0 months; P = 0·0036) for these patients. These results suggest that normalization of sBCMA may be an accurate predictor of OS for MM patients during treatment and predict for a higher likelihood of response.

Frequent occurrence of hypophosphatemia among multiple myeloma patients treated with elotuzumab: a single clinic retrospective study.

The purpose of this single-center retrospective study was to determine the incidence of decreased blood phosphorus levels and hypophosphatemia among multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated with elotuzumab. Hypophosphatemia, which is defined as a serum phosphorus concentration < 2.5 mg/dL, leads to complications ranging from muscle weakness and disorientation to seizures and heart failure. A total of 23 MM patients receiving care in a clinic specializing in treatment of MM from July 2018 to March 2020 and treated with an elotuzumab-containing therapy were evaluated, and 9 were investigated for this study. Elotuzumab was given at 10 mg/kg weekly for the first two treatment cycles (28 days/cycle), followed by 10 mg/kg every other week for all subsequent cycles. Four different elotuzumab combination therapies were administered: 1) elotuzumab and dexamethasone 2) elotuzumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone 3) elotuzumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone and 4) elotuzumab, carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone. Phosphorous levels were determined at a median of every 13 days at intervals ranging from once weekly to once monthly until a phosphate supplement was prescribed to the patient or when elotuzumab treatment was discontinued. We found that regardless of elotuzumab combination therapy, all patients treated showed decreased phosphorus levels after initiating elotuzumab treatment with reductions ranging from 12.5% to 44.1% below baseline. Six participants (67%) demonstrated an average serum phosphorus at or below 2.5 mg/dL after starting elotuzumab therapy. This retrospective study suggests that hypophosphatemia commonly occurs among MM patients receiving elotuzumab-containing therapies.

Low dose venetoclax in combination with bortezomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients-a single-center retrospective study.

Venetoclax is a BCL-2 inhibitor currently indicated for use in treating hematologic malignancies with recommended doses ranging from 400 to 600 mg/day. Although currently not FDA-approved to treat multiple myeloma (MM) patients, there is a growing number of reports indicating its efficacy as a salvage therapy for these patients, especially for those with the t(11;14) chromosomal marker. These studies, however, have also indicated that venetoclax given at doses ≥ 400 mg/day can cause serious adverse events (SAEs) especially when administered with bortezomib, commonly related to infections. The purpose of this single-center retrospective study was to determine the efficacy of low dose venetoclax (defined as ≤ 250 mg/day) in combination with low dose bortezomib (defined as 1.0 mg/m2 per dose), daratumumab, and dexamethasone (Dvvd) as a salvage therapy for relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM) patients. Twenty-two RRMM patients were given venetoclax orally at doses ranging from 100 to 250 mg daily using this four-drug regimen. While the low doses resulted in reduced venetoclax efficacy among those lacking t(11;14) (overall response rate [ORR] = 31%), those harboring the t(11;14) marker exhibited an ORR of 80%. Notably, this response was without frequent infection-related SAEs as reported in previous studies. Together, the results of this study demonstrate that treatment of t(11;14) positive RRMM patients with Dvvd is both effective and well-tolerated.

Baseline serum B-cell maturation antigen levels predict time to disease progression for patients with smoldering multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) patients with smoldering (S) disease are defined by a lack of CRAB/SLiM criteria but may transform into disease requiring treatment. The International Myeloma Working Group risk stratification model for SMM uses serum M-protein, serum-free light chain ratio, and bone marrow plasma cell percentage. We investigated whether baseline serum B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) levels are predictive of disease progression among 65 patients with SMM. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to establish a definition for high-risk baseline sBCMA. Mantel Byar analysis was used to examine whether high-risk sBCMA was correlated with shorter time to transformation, and a time-dependent cox proportional hazard was used to determine whether it is independent of other risk factors. A z test for proportions was used to compare the percentage of patients that progressed among high-risk versus low-risk sBCMA patients. A baseline sBCMA level ≥137.5 mg/ml was found to be the optimal cutoff between high- and low-risk SMM patients. Patients with high-risk sBCMA levels had a shorter time to transformation (P = .000332). sBCMA was also higher at the time of transformation than baseline levels (P = .0116). sBCMA was the only variable found to be significantly predictive of time to transformation and additionally was found to be independent of other risk factors. In this study, we have shown for the first time that sBCMA levels predict transformation of SMM to active disease and that these levels increase at the time of transformation. These results are consistent with other studies showing that active MM patients undergoing therapy with higher baseline sBCMA levels are more likely to progress early and its levels increase at the time of disease progression.

JAK1/2 pathway inhibition suppresses M2 polarization and overcomes resistance of myeloma to lenalidomide by reducing TRIB1, MUC1, CD44, CXCL12, and CXCR4 expression.

Monocytes polarize into pro-inflammatory macrophage-1 (M1) or alternative macrophage-2 (M2) states with distinct phenotypes and physiological functions. M2 cells promote tumour growth and metastasis whereas M1 macrophages show anti-tumour effects. We found that M2 cells were increased whereas M1 cells were decreased in bone marrow (BM) from multiple myeloma (MM) patients with progressive disease (PD) compared to those in complete remission (CR). Gene expression of Tribbles homolog 1 (TRIB1) protein kinase, an inducer of M2 polarization, was increased in BM from MM patients with PD compared to those in CR. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is an inhibitor of the Janus kinase family of protein tyrosine kinases (JAKs) and is effective for treating patients with myeloproliferative disorders. RUX markedly reduces both M2 polarization and TRIB1 gene expression in MM both in vitro and in vivo in human MM xenografts in severe combined immunodeficient mice. RUX also downregulates the expression of CXCL12, CXCR4, MUC1, and CD44 in MM cells and monocytes co-cultured with MM tumour cells; overexpression of these genes is associated with resistance of MM cells to the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide. These results provide the rationale for evaluation of JAK inhibitors, including MM BM in combination with lenalidomide, for the treatment of MM patients.

The anti-myeloma effects of the selective JAK1 inhibitor (INCB052793) alone and in combination in vitro and in vivo.

The Janus kinase (JAK) pathway has been shown to play key roles in the growth and resistance to drugs that develop in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. The anti-MM effects of the selective JAK1 inhibitor INCB052793 (INCB) alone and in combination with anti-MM agents were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Significant inhibition of cell viability of primary MM cells obtained fresh from MM patients, and the MM cell lines RPMI8226 and U266, was observed with single agent INCB and was enhanced in combination with other anti-MM agents including proteasome inhibitors and glucocorticosteroids. Single-agent INCB resulted in decrease in tumor growth of the MM xenograft LAGκ-1A growing in severe combined immunodeficient mice. Mice dosed with INCB (30 mg/kg) showed significant reductions in tumor volume on days 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, and 63. Similarly, INCB at 10 mg/kg showed anti-tumor effects on days 56 and 63. Tumor-bearing mice receiving combinations of INCB with carfilzomib, bortezomib, dexamethasone, or lenalidomide showed significantly smaller tumors when compared to vehicle control and mice treated with single agents. These results provide further support for the clinical evaluation of INCB052793 alone and in combination treatment for MM patients.

The role of JAK inhibitors in multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the most common primary malignancy of the bone marrow. No established curative treatment is currently available for patients diagnosed with MM. In recent years, new and more effective drugs have become available for the treatment of MM. Many newer drugs have been evaluated together and in combination with older agents. However, even in combination with other active MM agents, the responses are transient, and; thus, therapeutic approaches to help overcome resistance to these drugs are necessary. Recently, the Janus kinase (JAK) family of tyrosine kinases, including JAK1 and JAK2, has been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of MM. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, reduces proliferation of the MM cell lines and primary tumor cells derived from MM patients, and this inhibition is greater when these drugs are combined than with single agents. Clinically, early results from the oral treatment regimen of ruxolitinib, corticosteroids (methylprednisolone), and lenalidomide for patients with relapsed/refractory disease are encouraging in terms of safety and efficacy, and additional studies will provide further support for this promising new therapeutic approach for patients with MM.

Once weekly versus twice weekly carfilzomib dosing in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (A.R.R.O.W.): interim analysis results of a randomised, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Twice a week carfilzomib at 27 mg/m2 is approved for treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Phase 1/2 CHAMPION-1, the first study exploring once-weekly carfilzomib dosing, established the maximum tolerated dose at 70 mg/m2 in combination with dexamethasone. We aimed to compare progression-free survival in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma given once weekly carfilzomib or twice weekly carfilzomib. METHODS: In this prespecified interim analysis of the randomised, open-label, phase 3 A.R.R.O.W. trial, we recruited patients (aged 18 years and older) with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with two or three treatments, including a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory agent, from hospital, clinic, oncology or medical centres. Key eligibility criteria were refractory to most recent therapy (including bortezomib or ixazomib) with measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive carfilzomib once a week (70 mg/m2) or twice a week (27 mg/m2). The randomisation sequence was generated using a validated randomisation software and implemented using an interactive response technology system that assigned patients to treatment sequentially based on the randomisation sequence as patients were enrolled at participating clinical sites. Patients were stratified by International Staging System stage at study entry or baseline, whether or not they were refractory to bortezomib treatment, and age (block size of 4). The once weekly group received carfilzomib (30 min intravenous infusion) on days 1, 8, and 15 of all cycles (20 mg/m2 day 1 [cycle 1]; 70 mg/m2 thereafter). The twice weekly group received carfilzomib (10 min intravenous infusion) on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 (20 mg/m2 days 1 and 2 during cycle 1; 27 mg/m2 thereafter). All patients received dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15 [all cycles] and 22 [cycles 1-9 only]). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival between groups in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analysis was done in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02412878, and is no longer enrolling patients. FINDINGS: Between September, 2015, and August, 2016, 578 patients were recruited from 118 sites. 478 patients were randomly assigned and included in the efficacy analyses (240 to receive once weekly carfilzomib; 238 to receive twice weekly carfilzomib). Median progression-free survival was higher in the once weekly group than the twice weekly group (11·2 months [95% CI 8·6-13·0] vs 7·6 months [5·8-9·2]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·69, 95% CI 0·54-0·83; p=0·0029). The incidence of grade 3 or worse adverse events was higher in the once weekly group than the twice weekly group (68% [n=161] vs 62% [n=145]); the most common events were anaemia, pneumonia, and thrombocytopenia (42 [18%] vs 42 [18%], 24 [10%] vs 16 [7%], and 17 [7%] vs 16 [7%], respectively for once weekly carfilzomib vs twice weekly carfilzomib). A lower proportion of patients had grade 3 or worse cardiac failure in the once weekly group (7 [3%]) than in the twice weekly group (10 [4%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in five (2%) of 238 patients in the once weekly group (sepsis [n=1], death [n=1], acute lung injury [n=1], acute respiratory distress syndrome [n=1], and tumour lysis syndrome [n=1]) and in two (1%) of 235 patients in the twice weekly group (plasma cell myeloma [n=1] and congestive heart failure [n=1]). There were 58 deaths in the once weekly group and 68 deaths in the twice weekly group at the time of data cutoff. INTERPRETATION: Once weekly carfilzomib at 70 mg/m2 significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus the twice weekly schedule. Overall safety was comparable between the groups. Once weekly carfilzomib appears safe and more effective with a convenient dosing regimen versus the twice weekly schedule for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. FUNDING: Amgen, Inc.

Safety and efficacy of pomalidomide, dexamethasone and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Immunomodulatory drugs including thalidomide, lenalidomide (LEN) and pomalidomide (POM), are effective for treating multiple myeloma (MM). POM has shown enhanced efficacy with dexamethasone (DEX). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with bortezomib is US Food and Drug Administration-approved for treating MM. PLD with LEN or thalidomide has shown efficacy for MM patients. LEN with DEX, PLD and bortezomib achieves high response rates. We evaluated the combination of POM with DEX 40 mg and PLD 5 mg/m2 with the latter two drugs administered on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 on a 28-day cycle for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM patients. During Phase 1, the maximum tolerated dose of POM was 4 mg, and was used in Phase 2, which also required patients to be refractory to LEN. However, neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed in 10/17 (59%) patients, and the dose was lowered to 3 mg. Median PFS was 5·4 months (range, 0·3-29·0 +  months). Overall response rates for patients in Phase 2 were 39% and 31% among subjects receiving POM at 3 mg and 4 mg, respectively, and clinical benefit rates were 51% and 44%, respectively. POM, PLD and DEX is a treatment option for relapsed/refractory MM patients including those who are refractory to LEN.

CHAMPION-1: a phase 1/2 study of once-weekly carfilzomib and dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Carfilzomib, a proteasome inhibitor, is approved in the United States as a single agent, and in combination with dexamethasone or lenalidomide/dexamethasone (KRd) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Under the single-agent and KRd approvals, carfilzomib is administered as a 10-minute IV infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of 28-day cycles (20 mg/m(2) [cycle 1, days 1-2]; 27 mg/m(2) thereafter). This multicenter, single-arm, phase 1/2 study, Community Harmonized Assessment of Myeloma Patients via an Integrated Oncology Network-1 (CHAMPION-1), evaluated once-weekly carfilzomib with dexamethasone in relapsed, or relapsed and refractory MM (1-3 prior therapies). Patients received carfilzomib (30-minute IV infusion) on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles. The phase 1 portion used a 3 + 3 dose-escalation scheme to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of carfilzomib. During phase 2, patients received carfilzomib on the same schedule at the MTD. Patients received dexamethasone (40 mg) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; dexamethasone was omitted on day 22 for cycles 9+. A total of 116 patients were enrolled. The MTD was 70 mg/m(2), and 104 patients (phase 1/2) received carfilzomib 70 mg/m(2) At 70 mg/m(2), the median number of prior regimens was 1; and 52% were bortezomib-refractory. At 70 mg/m(2), the most common grade ≥3 adverse events were fatigue (11%) and hypertension (7%). Overall response rate at 70 mg/m(2) was 77%. Median progression-free survival was 12.6 months. These findings merit additional evaluation of the once-weekly dosing regimen. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01677858.

Elotuzumab and dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of elotuzumab and dexamethasone (Ed) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients. METHOD: This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Ed treatment for 21 RRMM patients, 11 of whom were considered lenalidomide-refractory, and all of whom had progressed on at least 1 prior steroid-containing regimen. We also evaluated the efficacy of adding lenalidomide to a subset of patients following progression from Ed. RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) of Ed were 10% and 19%, respectively. An additional 52% of patients demonstrated stable disease as their best response. The median PFS was 1.8 months on Ed for all patients. Fifteen patients received ERd following progression on Ed, and 60% of these patients were lenalidomide-refractory. The ORR and CBR were 20% and 33%, respectively, and the median PFS was 3.4 months. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that some patients can benefit from Ed without an accompanying immunomodulatory agent and that efficacy can be achieved with the addition of lenalidomide at the time of progression. No new safety signals were detected, except for thrombocytopenia in 1 patient on Ed.