RESUMEN
Predicting bacteriophage infection of specific bacterial strains promises advancements in phage therapy and microbial ecology. Whether the dynamics of well-established phage-host model systems generalize to the wide diversity of microbes is currently unknown. Here we show that we could accurately predict the outcomes of phage-bacteria interactions at the strain level in natural isolates from the genus Escherichia using only genomic data (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 86%). We experimentally established a dataset of interactions between 403 diverse Escherichia strains and 96 phages. Most interactions are explained by adsorption factors as opposed to antiphage systems which play a marginal role. We trained predictive algorithms and pinpoint poorly predicted interactions to direct future research efforts. Finally, we established a pipeline to recommend tailored phage cocktails, demonstrating efficiency on 100 pathogenic E. coli isolates. This work provides quantitative insights into phage-host specificity and supports the use of predictive algorithms in phage therapy.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriófagos , Genómica , Especificidad del Huésped , Bacteriófagos/genética , Bacteriófagos/fisiología , Bacteriófagos/clasificación , Genómica/métodos , Algoritmos , Escherichia coli/virología , Escherichia coli/genética , Terapia de Fagos , Escherichia/genética , Escherichia/virología , Genoma Bacteriano/genética , Genoma Viral/genética , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Curva ROC , Interacciones Microbiota-HuespedRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment regimen for infections caused by wild-type AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales remains controversial. This study compared the outcomes of bloodstream infections (BSI) and pneumonia according to the type of definitive antibiotic therapy: third-generation cephalosporin (3GC), piperacillin ± tazobactam, cefepime or carbapenem. METHODS: All cases of BSI and pneumonia caused by wild-type AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales over 2 years in eight university hospitals were reviewed. Patients who received definitive therapy consisting of either a 3GC (3GC group), piperacillin ± tazobactam (piperacillin group), or cefepime or a carbapenem (reference group) were included in this study. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was treatment failure due to infection by emerging AmpC-overproducing strains. Propensity-score-based models were used to balance confounding factors between groups. RESULTS: In total, 575 patients were included in this study: 302 (52%) with pneumonia and 273 (48%) with BSI. Half (n=271, 47%) received cefepime or a carbapenem as definitive therapy, 120 (21%) received a 3GC, and 184 (32%) received piperacillin ± tazobactam. Compared with the reference group, 30-day mortality was similar in the 3GC [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.31)] and piperacillin (aHR 1.20, 95% CI 0.86-1.66) groups. The likelihood of treatment failure was higher in the 3GC (aHR 6.81, 95% CI 3.76-12.4) and piperacillin (aHR 3.13, 95% CI 1.69-5.80) groups. The results were similar when stratifying the analysis on pneumonia or BSI. CONCLUSION: Treatment of included BSI or pneumonia caused by wild-type AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales with 3GC or piperacillin ± tazobactam was not associated with higher mortality, but was associated with increased risk of AmpC overproduction leading to treatment failure compared with cefepime or a carbapenem.