Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: Evidence from a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of available randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to compare cardiovascular outcomes involving stenting techniques in coronary bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: Although provisional stenting of the main branch and balloon angioplasty of the side branch is considered the standard approach, the use of two stents is often pursued with a wide variety of bifurcation stenting techniques available. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to December 2018. We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis to estimate relative risks (RR) of death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stent thrombosis (ST) among different two stent bifurcation techniques. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies, yielding data on 4,285 patients. Double Kissing (DK) Crush and Mini-crush were associated with significant reductions in MACE, TVR, and TLR when compared with the Provisional stenting (RR 0.31-0.55 [all p < .01] and RR 0.42-0.45 [all p < .02], respectively) and with the remaining bifurcation techniques (RR 0.44-0.55 [all p < .05] for DK Crush and RR 0.37-0.45 [all p < .05] for Mini-crush). In addition, Culotte and Crush were associated with an increased risk for ST compared to Provisional stenting (RR 3.25-4.27 [both p < .05]) and to DK crush (RR 3.02-3.99 [both p < .05]). CONCLUSIONS: DK crush and mini-crush were found to be associated with fewer events and complications compared to the other techniques reviewed, including the Provisional approach. Further, Culotte and Crush were associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis when compared to the Provisional approach.

Galectin-1 as an Emerging Mediator of Cardiovascular Inflammation: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Galectin-1 (Gal-1), an evolutionarily conserved ß-galactoside-binding lectin, controls immune cell homeostasis and tempers acute and chronic inflammation by blunting proinflammatory cytokine synthesis, engaging T-cell apoptotic programs, promoting expansion of T regulatory (Treg) cells, and deactivating antigen-presenting cells. In addition, this lectin promotes angiogenesis by co-opting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 2 signaling pathway. Since a coordinated network of immunomodulatory and proangiogenic mediators controls cardiac homeostasis, this lectin has been proposed to play a key hierarchical role in cardiac pathophysiology via glycan-dependent regulation of inflammatory responses. Here, we discuss the emerging roles of Gal-1 in cardiovascular diseases including acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, Chagas cardiomyopathy, pulmonary hypertension, and ischemic stroke, highlighting underlying anti-inflammatory mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Whereas Gal-1 administration emerges as a potential novel treatment option in acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, Gal-1 blockade may contribute to attenuate pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Iatrogenic coronary dissection: state of the art management.

Iatrogenic coronary artery dissections (ICAD) are rare but potentially devastating complications during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Intima media complex separation may be produced either by the catheter tip or during PCI. Patient characteristics and procedure related risk factors are intimately linked to catheter induced ICAD over diagnostic angiography. Moreover, the increasing complexity of patients undergoing PCI, which frequently involves treatment of heavily calcified or occluded vessels, has increased the likelihood of dissections during PCI. A prompt recognition, along with a prompt management (either percutaneous, surgical or even careful watching), are key in preventing catastrophic consequences of ICAD, such as left ventricular dysfunction, cardiogenic shock, periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) or cardiac death. This review aims to summarize the main updates concerning the pathophysiology, highlight key risk factors and suggest recommendations in management and treatment of ICAD.

Heart Failure After ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Beyond Left Ventricular Adverse Remodeling.

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains a significant source of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite advances in treatment leading to a significant reduction in the early complications and in-hospital mortality, a significant proportion of STEMI survivors develop heart failure (HF) at follow-up. The classic paradigm of HF after STEMI is one characterized by left ventricular adverse remodeling (LVAR) and encompasses the process of regional and global structural and functional changes that occur in the heart as a consequence of loss of viable myocardium, increased wall stress and neurohormonal activation, and results in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). More recently, however, with further improvements in the treatment of STEMI the incidence and entity of LVAR appear to be largely reduced, yet the risk for HF following STEMI is not abolished and remains substantial, identifying a new paradigm by which patients with STEMI present with HF and preserved EF (HFpEF) characterized by reduction of diastolic or systolic reserve independent of LVAR.

Additive prognosis of clinical presentation in revascularized peripheral arterial disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality. It may present with diverse clinical presentations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of these clinical presentations. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study, in which symptomatic PAD patients were included from 2014 to 2020 at a university hospital in Argentina. We classified symptomatic PAD in intermittent claudication (IC), chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and acute ischemia (AI). Our primary endpoint was to compare the composite of all-cause mortality and major amputation events between the three groups. RESULTS: We included 309 patients, with a median follow up of 1.87 years (IQR 0.72-3.67). The primary endpoint was more prevalent in CLTI and AI patients (33% and 33.3%) compared to IC patients (8.1%), P<0.001. CLTI and AI were independently associated with the primary endpoint after adjusting for clinical variables of interest (OR 4.04 95%CI [1.86-9.07], P<0.001 and OR 5.40 95%CI [2.18-13.7], P<0.001, respectively). Mortality incidence rate (per 100 patients/year) was similar between AI and CLTI patients (14.2 95% CI [8.0-24.1] and 13.1 95%CI [8.8-19.7], respectively, P=0.67) but higher compared to IC (2.9 95%CI [1.6-5.1], P<0.01). Major amputation events were more prevalent in CLTI (16.5%) compared to AI (8.9%) and IC patients (1.2%), P<0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Those with CLTI and AI have a particular increased risk of all-cause death and major amputation events. Although mortality incidence was similar between AI and CLTI patients, the latter have an increased risk of major amputation events compared to AI and IC patients.

Clinical impact of the infrapatellar location in symptomatic peripheral arterial disease patients.

Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) frequently affects multiple segments of the limbs. Contradictory data have reported worse prognosis in aortoiliac lesions, nevertheless, diabetes and chronic limb ischemia frequently affects the infrapatellar territory. Our aim was to assess the impact of infrapatellar disease in cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study at a university hospital in Argentina. Electronic health records were retrospectively reviewed including symptomatic PAD patients requiring revascularization. A multivariable regression model was performed to account for confounders. The primary endpoint was a composite of hospitalizations due to chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) and major amputation events between infrapatellar and suprapatellar patients. Minor amputation events, all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major cardiovascular events (MACE) were secondary endpoints. Results: From January 2014 through July 2020, a total of 309 patients were included in the analysis. 151 patients had suprapatellar disease, and 158 had infrapatellar disease. The primary composite endpoint occurred in 35 patients (22.2%) in the infrapatellar patients and 18 patients (11.9%) in the suprapatellar patients (HR = 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]= [1.22-3.82]; p = 0.008). Both components of the primary outcomes occurred more frequently in infrapatellar patients.Minor amputation events were more prevalent in infrapatellar patients (HR = 5.09; 95% CI = [1.47-17.6]; p = 0.010). Death,MI, stroke, and MACE events were not different among groups (all p > 0.05). Conclusion: Infrapatellar disease was anindependent factor for increased hospitalization of CLTI, major and minor amputations events, compared to suprapatellardisease in symptomatic revascularized PAD patients.

Objetivo: La enfermedad vascular periférica (EVP) afecta generalmente múltiples segmentos de los miembros. Existe información contradictoria con respecto al pronóstico de pacientes con enfermedad aortoilíaca, sin embargo, la diabetes y la enfermedad critica de miembros inferiores habitualmente afecta el territorio infrapatelar. Nuestro objetivo es determinar el impacto de la afectación infrapatelar en eventos cardiovasculares. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional en un hospital universitario de Argentina. Se revisó la historia clínica electrónica de pacientes con EVP con requerimiento de revascularización. Se generó un modelo de regresión multivariado incluyendo variables clínicamente relevantes. El punto final primario fue un combinado de hospitalización por isquemia crítica y amputaciones mayores entre pacientes con afectación infrapatelar y suprapatelar. Amputaciones menores, muerte por todas las causas, infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM), accidente cerebrovascular (ACV) y un combinado de eventos cardiovasculares (MACE) fueron los puntos secundarios. Resultados: Se reclutó un total de 309 pacientes desde enero de 2014 hasta julio de 2020. 151 pacientes presentaron enfermedad suprapatelar y 158 infrapatelar. El punto final primario ocurrió en 35 pacientes (22.2%) en el grupo infrapatelar y en 18 pacientes (11.9%) en suprapatelares (HR 2.16; intervalo de confianza 95% [1.22-3.82]; p = 0.008). Ambos componentes ocurrieron con mayor frecuencia en pacientes con afectación infrapatelar. Los eventos de amputación menor fueron mas prevalentes en pacientes con afectación infrapatelar (HR 5.09; IC95% [1.47-17.6]; p = 0.010) La mortalidad por todas las causas, IAM, ACV y MACE no fueron diferentes entre los grupos (p > 0.05). Conclusión: La enfermedad infrapatelar fue un factor independiente para mayor riesgo de hospitalización por isquemia critica, amputación mayor y menor comparado con pacientes con afectación suprapatelar en EVP sintomática revascularizada.

Arrhythmic Recurrence and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With First Episode of Electrical Storm.

Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening condition that may lead to recurrent arrhythmias, need for ventricular mechanical support, and death. The study aimed to assess the burden of arrhythmia recurrence and in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted for ES in a large urban hospital. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients admitted with ventricular arrhythmias from January 2018 to June 2021 and identified 61 patients with ES, defined as 3 or more episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) within 24 hours. We reviewed the in-hospital outcomes and compared outcomes between patients who had no recurrence of VT/VF after the first 24 hours (34 [56%]), those with recurrence of 1 or 2 episodes of VT/VF within a 24-hour period (15 [24%]), and patients with 3 or more recurrent VT/VF events consistent with recurrent ES after the first 24 hours (12 [20%]). Patients with recurrent ES had significantly higher in-hospital mortality as compared with those with recurrent VT/VF not meeting criteria for ES or no recurrences of VT/VF (3 [25%] vs 0 [0%] vs 0 [0%]; p = 0.002). Moreover, patients with recurrent ES also had higher rates of the combined end points of ventricular mechanical support and death (7 [58%] vs 1 [6%] vs 1 [3%], p <0.001), invasive mechanical ventilation and death (10 [83%] vs 2 [13%] vs 2 [6%], p <0.001), catheter ablation or death (12 [100%] vs 7 [47%] vs 12 [35%], p <0.001) and heart transplantation and death (3 [25%] vs 2 [13%] vs 0 [0%], p = 0.018). In conclusion, patients admitted with ES have a high risk of in-hospital recurrence, associated with extremely poor outcomes.

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty through the novel transradial technique.

BACKGROUND: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has been typically performed through a femoral approach thus increasing the risk of bleeding and access site-related vascular complications. The aim of this study was to describe the safety and efficacy of transradial aortic valve valvuloplasty (TRBAV). METHODS: The present research is a retrospective, single-center study including patients undergoing TRBAV (October 2019-July 2020). BAV was performed using 18-25 mm balloons through an 8-10 French (F) radial sheath. Successful BAV was defined as ≥50% reduction in peak-to-peak gradient (efficacy endpoint). Procedural complications, including radial artery occlusion (RAO) at follow-up were evaluated (safety endpoint). RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent TRBAV were included, aged 81 (73-85) years, 70% males, EuroScoreII 3.1 (2.1-5.5). Aortic valve gradient was significantly reduced (pre-50±24 vs. 18.7±13 mmHg post, P<0.001), and 91% had successful BAV. Mean gradient drop was 31.4±16.8 mmHg. One patient (4%) required cross-over to femoral access for severe vasospasm and was excluded from the analysis. Most used sheaths were 8F (46%) and 9F (37%), mostly for 20 mm (50%) and 23 mm (38%) balloons. There were neither major procedural complications (neither balloon entrapment nor compartmental syndrome) nor minor complications (any access-site bleeding). RAO was observed in 2 patients (8%), both asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: TRBAV was safe, feasible, and efficacious with a small rate of conversion and RAO, suggesting reproducibility of this novel technique. TRBAV may represent an alternative to femoral access in selected patients although larger studies are warranted.

[Single center retrospective study of catheter directed thrombolysis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism]. / Estudio unicéntrico del tratamiento con trombolíticos dirigidos por catéter en el tromboembolismo pulmonar agudo.

We performed a single center retrospective study in patients wi th pulmonary embolism (PE) undergoing catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) from 2014 to 2020. Efficacy was defined by mean pulmonary pressure drop, and safety was assessed by intracranial and severe bleeding (defined by GUSTO). Forty-three patients were included, aged 64 (56-79) years old, 5 (12%) with shock, most with right ventricle dilation (95%) and bilateral PE (95%) or unilateral (5%) in patients with only one functional lung. CDT was used as first treatment (53%), upscale after anticoagulation alone (42%), or after failed systemic thrombolytics (5%). Median recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) dose was 30 (25-35) mg over 20 (20-20) hours, and rtPA bolus was used after catheter placement in 38 cases (89%), consisting of 5 mg (95%) or 1 mg (5%). Only one lung was treated for technical reasons, and 4 (9%) were repositioned in the same lung for continuation of infusion. A significant reduction in mean pulmonary pressure was observed (pre 35 [29-41] mmHg vs. post 24 [20-34] mmHg, p < 0.001) with no intracranial bleeding. One patient (2%) experienced severe bleeding, while 5 (12%) presented access site bleeding, and 3 (7%) required blood transfusions. In-hospital mortality was 12% but only one case (2%) due to PE. Our results are similar to previously reported studies.

Se realizó un estudio unicéntrico retrospectivo para evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de trombolisis dirigida por catéter (TDC) en pacientes con tromboembolismo pulmonar agudo (TEP) de 2014 a 2020. Se analizó la efectividad (mejoría de presión pulmonar), y seguridad (sangrado intracraneal y grave definido por compromiso hemodinámico). Se incluyeron 43 pacientes, de 67(56-79) años, 5 (12%) con shock, 41 (95%) con dilatación del ventrículo derecho y TEP bilateral. La decis ión de TDC fue: tratamiento inicial (53%), escalada de anticoagulación (42%) y rescate de trombolisis sistémica (5%). Se utilizó TDC facilitada por ultrasonido en 40 casos (93%), utilizándose 30 (25-35) mg de activador tisular del plasminógeno recombinante (rtPA) durante 20 h. Se administró un bolo de rtPA en 38 (89%) casos, que fue 5 mg (95%) o 1 mg (5%). Se utilizó un solo catéter por paciente. En 4 (9%) se decidió recolocación (mismo pulmón) para continuar infusión en otro sector. Se observó una disminución significativa de la presión media pulmonar (pre 35 [29-41] mmHg vs. post 24 [20-34] mmHg, p < 0.001). No se observó ningún caso de hemorragia intracr aneal, y un caso (2%) de sangrado grave. Se observó hematoma del sitio de punción en 5 (12%) (incluyendo el sangrado grave), y requirió transfusiones en 3 (7%). La mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue 12%, siendo un solo c aso (2%) atribuido al TEP. El tratamiento con TDC fue efectivo asociándose a una reducción significativa de la presión pulmonar, sin observarse ningún sangrado intracraneal y con un sangrado grave. Nuestros resultados se asemejan a lo publicado en otros estudios.

Pericarditis Recurrence After Initial Uncomplicated Clinical Course.

Acute pericarditis is an inflammatory disease associated with a non-negligible risk of acute complications and future recurrence. However, the exact incidence of pericarditis recurrence in patients with a first uncomplicated clinical course is unknown. We sought to evaluate the incidence and clinical predictors of recurrence after a first episode of acute uncomplicated pericarditis in a large urban hospital in the United States. We conducted a retrospective review, through electronic health records, to complete a database that includes patients admitted with a first episode of acute pericarditis and selected only those with an uncomplicated course (without in-hospital death, large pericardial effusion [>20 mm] or tamponade, constriction, or incessant pericarditis) at the VCU Medical Center (Richmond, Virginia) from 2009 to 2018. A total of 240 patients met acute pericarditis criteria: of the 240 patients, 164 patients (68%) had an uncomplicated course (median age [interquartile range] in years: 50 [32 to 62], 43% females). The median follow-up time was 186 (19 to 467) days. Pericarditis was idiopathic in 84 patients (51%). Fifteen patients (9%) had at least 1 episode of recurrent pericarditis. Compared with those without recurrence, patients with recurrent pericarditis were younger (37 [25 to 59] vs 51 [34 to 62] years, p = 0.034), had a higher prevalence of subacute/delayed presentation (2 [13%] vs 1 [1%], p = 0.023), and less frequently received colchicine (6 [40%] vs 100 [67%], p = 0.036). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, subacute presentation and younger age remained predictors of recurrence at follow-up. In conclusion, 9% of patients with acute pericarditis experienced a recurrence over a 6-month median follow-up despite an initial uncomplicated course. Younger age and subacute presentation were associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrence.

Prognosis of patients with acute pulmonary embolism and discordant right ventricle strain serum biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricle strain serum biomarkers, such as high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), are prognostic in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). Prognosis accuracy in patients with discordancy between serum biomarkers remains, however, unknown. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis in patients with intermediate or high risk PE and discordant serum biomarkers of RV strain as follows: high hs-cTnT and low NT-proBNP ('high troponin discordance'), compared to patients with low hs-cTnT and high NT-proBNP ('high NT-proBNP discordance'). Cut-off values for high hs-cTnT were ≥14 pg/mL in patients <75 years and ≥45 pg/mL in patients >75-year. Cut-off values for high NT-proBNP were ≥600 pg/mL. The primary end-point was a composite of death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilation, and inotrope use at one month. 'High troponin discordance', age, sex and body mass index (BMI) were included in a logistic regression model. Time to event analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier curves and Log-rank test. RESULTS: 73 patients were included. 'High troponin discordance' patients (n=41) were younger, presented with a higher heart rate, more frequent bilateral PE, and received more thrombolytics as treatment compared with 'high NT-proBNP discordance' patients (n = 32). Primary end-point was significantly higher in the 'high troponin discordance' patients (29.3% vs 9.4%, p=0.045). 'High troponin discordance' was independently associated with the primary end-point after adjusting for age, sex and BMI. Log rank test confirmed worse outcome in the high troponin discordance group (p=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: High troponin discordance' patients with intermediate/high risk PE, had worse outcomes than patients with high BNP discordance.

Long-term outcomes of percutaneous or surgical treatment in left main disease.

INTRODUCTION: Long-term efficacy and safety of either surgical or percutaneous treatment left main coronary artery disease treatment is lacking. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the most updated randomized clinical trials that compared the efficacy of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) disease. It was also conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, reference lists of relevant articles, and Medline. The search utilized the following terms: "left main PCI versus CABG," "drug-eluting stents," "bypass surgery" and "left main stenting." The search of articles compatible with our inclusion and exclusion criteria was performed from inception through April 2020 and returned a combined total of 304 articles. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 6 studies, providing data on 5812 patients. The mean follow-up was 6.7 years. PCI was associated with an increased risk of major vascular events (MACE) (IRR 1.24, 95% CI [1.03-1.67], P<0.01), and coronary revascularization (IRR 1.69, 95% CI [1.42-2.03], P<0.01) compared to CABG. Furthermore, all-cause death, MI and stroke events were not statistically different between the two therapeutic revascularization methodologies (IRR 1.06, 95% CI [0.90-1.24], P=0.47, IRR 1.35, 95% CI [0.84-2.16], P=0.03 and IRR 0.66, 95% CI [0.43-1.01], P=0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: LMCA PCI has an overall same survival compared to CABG in the long term follow-up. Nevertheless, MACE and revascularization events were more frequent in PCI compared to CABG.

Balloon rupture during aortic valvuloplasty with compliant balloon: predictors and outcomes.

Objectives of the study were the prevalence and clinical consequences of balloon rupture with compliant balloons in balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). Compliant low-profile balloons have been developed to reduce access site complications. Made by thinner materials, these balloons are more prone to rupture. This is a single-center retrospective analysis (2016-2018) of patients undergoing BAV with compliant balloons. Baseline echocardiography and computed tomography (CT) were analyzed. Best cutoff point for calcium score was assessed. Long-term mortality was analyzed with Kaplan-Maier. In vitro test was performed. Rupture occurred in 30/90 (33%) of BAVs independent of risk factors, surgical risk and frailty scores. Patients experiencing rupture had increased mean gradient [53.5 (44-64) vs 44 (35-49) mmHg, p < 0.05] and reduced aortic valve area [0.61 (0.46-0.76) vs 0.76 (0.64-0.83) mm2, p < 0.05]. Valve calcium score on CT > 2686 AU was more frequent in the rupture group (41% vs 10%, p < 0.05) and more patients in the third tertile of calcium score experienced rupture (75% vs 23% vs 41% for second and first tertile, p < 0.05). Median gradient reduction from baseline was similar among groups [30 (20-50) vs 30 (17-39) mmHg]. No patient with rupture had any complication. One-month and long-term mortality were similar (rupture 0% vs 3.5% no rupture from 1 month). In vitro test required more volume and strength to rupture the balloon than used in BAV. Balloon rupture is frequent in BAV using compliant balloons, occurs with more severe aortic stenosis, does not affect BAV efficacy and does not impair outcomes.

Prognostic impact of myocardial contraction fraction in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial contraction fraction (MCF), a volumetric measurement of myocardial shortening, may help to improve risk stratification in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) especially in those with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We investigated the association between MCF and 1-year all-cause mortality in patients with severe AS who underwent TAVR. METHODS: MCF was calculated as the ratio of stroke volume (SV) to myocardial volume. Patients referred for TAVR from 2011 to 2015 were eligible for inclusion and were divided into two groups according to the estimated MCF (MCF ≤30% vs. MCF >30%). The primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality. A Cox regression analysis was performed for independent risk factors of mortality. Receiver operating curve (ROC) was performed for assessing the best cut-off point of MCF for predicting the primary outcome [area under the curve (AUC) 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.453-0.725]. Baseline patient and echo characteristics were included for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 126 patients (mean age 82±5 years, 45.2% male), 44.4% showed MCF ≤30%. Patient with reduced MCF showed higher body mass index (28.1±5.8 vs. 26.0±4.5 kg/m2, P=0.031), higher surgical EuroScore II (6.2±4.5 vs. 4.7±3.2, P=0.032), lower LVEF (54.2%±11.9% vs. 58.5%±10.8%, P=0.042) and more severe AS (indexed aortic valve area 0.40±0.09 vs. 0.45±0.10 cm2/m2, P=0.030). The median follow-up was of 14 [3.5-33] months, and 16% of patients died. Patients with MCF ≤30% showed significantly increased all-cause mortality (Log-rank P=0.002). In a multivariate model adjusting for clinical and echo variables, MCF ≤30% was independently associated with increased risk for all-cause 1-year mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 2.76, 95% CI: 1.03-7.77, P=0.04]. CONCLUSIONS: In a population of patients undergoing TAVR, MCF ≤30% was independently associated with increased mortality.

Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Acute Pericarditis in a Large Urban Hospital in the United States of America.

BACKGROUND: Acute pericarditis is the most common presentation of pericardial diseases. Although generally benign, complications such as constrictive pericarditis, cardiac tamponade, and recurrence can occur. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the clinical factors associated with adverse outcomes in acute pericarditis? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We used an informatics-based search engine to search for International Classification of Diseases codes related to pericardial disease between January 1, 2009 and November 14, 2018 and then extracted clinical information, including only patients meeting the European Society of Cardiology criteria for acute pericarditis. We then evaluated the predictive value of clinical characteristics for adverse outcomes (cardiac tamponade, constrictive pericarditis, failure of therapy, recurrences, or death). RESULTS: We identified 240 patients with a first episode of pericarditis (51 [34-62] years, 56% males and 50% white). Pericarditis was determined to be idiopathic in 126 (53%) cases and related to cardiac injury in 79 (33%). During a median follow-up time of 179 (20-450) days, 82 (34%) patients experienced at least one adverse outcome. Subacute presentation was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes. Patients with postcardiac injury pericarditis had a lower incidence in the composite of failure of treatment and recurrence (13% vs 26%; P = .022) compared with patients with idiopathic pericarditis. Troponin I measurements were obtained in 167 patients (70%). Elevated troponin I levels were associated with lower incidence of recurrences (4% vs 17%; P = .024) and of the composite outcome (13% vs 36%; P = .004). INTERPRETATION: Acute pericarditis is associated with at least one adverse outcome in 34% of patients. Subacute presentation and idiopathic etiology are associated with higher incidence of adverse outcomes, whereas elevated troponin I levels identify a group with reduced risk of recurrences.

Economic benefits of fractional flow reserve utilization on intermediate lesions and its clinical impact after one year-follow up.

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a proven technology for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention, but it is not reimbursed despite the fact that it frequently allows to defer revascularization. Our goal was to determine the economic benefit of FFR on intermediate lesions, as well as the clinical endpoints at 1 year follow up. Methods: Observational prospective study that included consecutive patients with intermediate lesions evaluated with FFR between April 2013 and March 2016. For the economic analysis we evaluated the specific resources used during the procedure. Clinical endpoints including cardiovascular death, target lesion revascularization and acute myocardial infarction, were followed up over a one-year period. Results: FFR was performed on 222 lesions in 151 consecutive patients. FFR was positive in 26.1% of the assessed lesions. The estimated total cost using FFR was US$ 891,290.08 while cost estimate without FFR was US$ 1,557,352, meaning 43% in cost savings. There was one cardiovascular death and two readmissions during follow up in the positive FFR group. Conclusions: FFR guided revascularization on intermediate coronary lesions resulted in an economic benefit by reducing overall costs without harming clinical outcomes.

Antecedentes: La reserva de flujo fraccional (FFR) es una herramienta con evidencia demostrada para guiar las angioplastias coronarias. El reembolso por los sistemas de cobertura de salud es parcial o nulo a pesar de frecuentemente diferir la angioplastia. Nuestro objetivo fue determinar el beneficio económico de la utilización del FFR en la evaluación de lesiones intermedias, y evaluar asimismo puntos finales clínicos en el seguimiento a un año. Métodos: Estudio observacional prospectivo que incluyó una cohorte de pacientes consecutivos con lesiones coronarias intermedias, evaluadas con FFR, entre abril de 2013 y marzo de 2016. Para el análisis económico se evaluaron los recursos específicos utilizados para la realización del procedimiento. Se analizaron puntos finales clínicos (muerte cardiovascular, revascularización de la arteria objetivo e infarto agudo de miocardio) durante la internación y en el seguimiento a un año. Resultados: Se incluyeron 222 lesiones en 151 pacientes consecutivos. Se registró FFR positivo en el 26.1% de las lesiones evaluadas. Se estimó que sin la utilización de FFR, 126 pacientes hubieran sido tratados con angioplastia transluminal coronaria y 25 con cirugía de revascularización miocárdica. El costo estimado con la utilización de FFR fue US$ 891,290.08, mientras que sin el mismo hubiera sido de US$ 1,557,352. Esto implicó un ahorro del 43% de los gastos. Se observaron una muerte de origen cardiovascular y dos reinternaciones en el grupo FFR positivo en el seguimiento a un año. Conclusiones: La revascularización de lesiones intermedias guiada por FFR resultó en un beneficio económico al reducir los costos generales sin resultar clínicamente perjudicial.

Effects of overexpansion on stents' recoil, symmetry/asymmetry, and neointimal hyperplasia in aortas of hypercholesterolemic rabbits.

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether overexpansion modifies stent recoil, symmetric distribution of struts, and neointimal hyperplasia. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were (a) to evaluate whether stent overexpansion modifies the geometric configuration of the stent in the arterial wall, (b) to determine the relationship between overexpansion and stent recoil, and (c) to evaluate the relationship between the distribution of struts and neointimal hyperplasia. METHODS: Twenty tubular stainless steel 316L stents (3.0 and 3.5 mm in diameter) were implanted at 20 and 10 atm, respectively, in the abdominal aorta of New Zealand rabbits fed a hypercholesterolemic diet (1% cholesterol). Sham operations were also performed in seven animals. Eight weeks after implantation or sham operation, an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) study was performed to measure stent recoil and aid in stent classification (symmetric or asymmetric) according to strut distribution. The degree of injury and neointimal hyperplasia were also evaluated in hematoxylin-eosin stained sections. RESULTS: The symmetry/asymmetry of stents assessed by IVUS, as well as the neointimal hyperplasia, was similar in both groups. Stent recoil was significantly greater in the 3.0-mm stent (overexpanded) group (0.28+/-0.02 mm), as compared with stent recoil in the 3.5-mm stent group (0.10+/-0.01 mm, P<.05). The neointimal hyperplasia in histological slices, independent of the implant technique, was predominantly in zones with higher strut concentration as compared with zones with fewer struts. CONCLUSIONS: Stent overexpansion enhanced stent recoil and did not modify symmetric and asymmetric strut distribution. Neointimal hyperplasia was not modified by the implant technique. Interestingly, significant hyperplasia was observed in locations with greater strut concentration, independent of overexpansion.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as predictors of survival after heart transplantation.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) predict outcome in heart failure (HF) patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTX). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 111 HF patients undergoing HTX 2010-2015 were retrospectively reviewed. NLR and PLR were calculated before HTX, immediately after HTX, and at 6 and 24 hours. Primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, and secondary endpoints were 1 year mortality and renal replacement therapy (RRT). Prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis, and the predictive values of NLR and PLR for mortality were compared. The discriminatory performance for predicting in-hospital mortality was better for NLR [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.644, 95% confidence interval 0.492-0.797] than for PLR (AUC = 0.599, 95% confidence interval 0.423-0.776). Best cut-off value was 2.41 for NLR (sensitivity 86%, specificity 67%) and 92.5 for PLR (sensitivity 86%, specificity 68%). When divided according to best cut-off value, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the high NLR group (17.5% vs. 3.2%, P < 0.05), but not in the high PLR group (16.5% vs. 6.3%, P = ns). One year mortality was not significantly higher for either group (37.5% vs. 6.5% for NLR; 36.7% vs. 9.4% for PLR, P = ns for both), while RRT was significantly higher in both the NLR and PLR high groups (33.8% vs. 0%; 32.9% vs. 3.1%, respectively, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that only high NLR (hazard ratio = 3.403, P < 0.05) and pre-transplant diabetes (hazard ratio = 3.364, P < 0.05) were independent prognostic factors for 1 year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: High NLR was a predictor for in-hospital mortality, and an independent prognostic factor for 1 year mortality. Both high NLR and high PLR were predictors for RRT.

Clinical impact of the infrapatellar location in symptomatic peripheral arterial disease patients / Impacto clínico de la localización infrapatelar en pacientes con enfermedad arterial periférica sintomática

Abstract Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) frequently affects multiple segments of the limbs. Contradictory data have reported worse prognosis in aortoiliac lesions, nevertheless, diabetes and chronic limb ischemia frequently affects the infrapatellar territory. Our aim was to assess the impact of infrapatellar disease in cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study at a university hospital in Argentina. Electronic health records were retrospectively reviewed including symptomatic PAD patients requiring revascularization. A multivariable regression model was performed to account for confounders. The primary endpoint was a composite of hospitalizations due to chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) and major amputation events between infrapatellar and suprapatellar patients. Minor amputation events, all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major cardiovascular events (MACE) were secondary endpoints. Results: From January 2014 through July 2020, a total of 309 patients were included in the analysis. 151 patients had suprapatellar disease, and 158 had infrapatellar disease. The primary composite endpoint occurred in 35 patients (22.2%) in the infrapatellar patients and 18 patients (11.9%) in the suprapatellar patients (HR = 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.22-3.82]; p = 0.008). Both components of the primary outcomes occurred more frequently in infrapatellar patients. Minor amputation events were more prevalent in infrapatellar patients (HR = 5.09; 95% CI = [1.47-17.6]; p = 0.010). Death, MI, stroke, and MACE events were not different among groups (all p > 0.05). Conclusion: Infrapatellar disease was an independent factor for increased hospitalization of CLTI, major and minor amputations events, compared to suprapatellar disease in symptomatic revascularized PAD patients.

Resumen Objetivo: La enfermedad vascular periférica (EVP) afecta generalmente múltiples segmentos de los miembros. Existe información contradictoria con respecto al pronóstico de pacientes con enfermedad aortoilíaca, sin embargo, la diabetes y la enfermedad critica de miembros inferiores habitualmente afecta el territorio infrapatelar. Nuestro objetivo es determinar el impacto de la afectación infrapatelar en eventos cardiovasculares. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional en un hospital universitario de Argentina. Se revisó la historia clínica electrónica de pacientes con EVP con requerimiento de revascularización. Se generó un modelo de regresión multivariado incluyendo variables clínicamente relevantes. El punto final primario fue un combinado de hospitalización por isquemia crítica y amputaciones mayores entre pacientes con afectación infrapatelar y suprapatelar. Amputaciones menores, muerte por todas las causas, infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM), accidente cerebrovascular (ACV) y un combinado de eventos cardiovasculares (MACE) fueron los puntos secundarios. Resultados: Se reclutó un total de 309 pacientes desde enero de 2014 hasta julio de 2020. 151 pacientes presentaron enfermedad suprapatelar y 158 infrapatelar. El punto final primario ocurrió en 35 pacientes (22.2%) en el grupo infrapatelar y en 18 pacientes (11.9%) en suprapatelares (HR 2.16; intervalo de confianza 95% [1.22-3.82]; p = 0.008). Ambos componentes ocurrieron con mayor frecuencia en pacientes con afectación infrapatelar. Los eventos de amputación menor fueron mas prevalentes en pacientes con afectación infrapatelar (HR 5.09; IC95% [1.47-17.6]; p = 0.010) La mortalidad por todas las causas, IAM, ACV y MACE no fueron diferentes entre los grupos (p > 0.05). Conclusión: La enfermedad infrapatelar fue un factor independiente para mayor riesgo de hospitalización por isquemia critica, amputación mayor y menor comparado con pacientes con afectación suprapatelar en EVP sintomática revascularizada.

Prevalencia, predictores e impacto clínico de la rehospitalización en pacientes con estenosis valvular aórtica valorados por un Heart Team / Prevalence, Predictors and Clinical Impact of Readmission in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Evaluated by a Heart Team

RESUMEN Introducción: En nuestro medio existe escasa evidencia sobre la incidencia de rehospitalización, factores predictores y evolución clínica de los pacientes con estenosis aórtica (EAo) grave valorados por un Heart Team. Objetivos: Determinar la prevalencia, los predictores de rehospitalización y la evolución clínica de pacientes con EAo grave valorados por el Heart Team. Material y métodos: Estudio unicéntrico de cohorte retrospectivo, que incluyó pacientes con EAo grave valorados por el Heart Team. Se analizaron las características del total de la cohorte, y según la presencia o ausencia de rehospitalización, en un seguimiento de 2 años. Resultados: La edad promedio de la población (n = 275) fue de 83,3 ± 6,9 años, con 51,1% de sexo femenino y una incidencia de rehospitalización de 21,5%. Los pacientes rehospitalizados fueron más añosos (85,54 ± 6,66 vs. 82,62 ± 6,87 años; p = 0,003), más frágiles (97,4% vs. 89,3%; p = 0,035), con mayor riesgo quirúrgico (STS score 6,11 ± 4,79 vs. 4,72 ± 4,12; p = 0,033), y fibrilación auricular (FA) previa (40,7% vs. 23,6%; p = 0,009), en comparación con los no rehospitalizados. Se identificó la FA previa como factor de riesgo independiente de rehospitalización (OR 4,59; IC 95% 1,95-10,81, p<0,001). La incidencia de rehospitalización fue de 33,9% para el implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica (TAVI), 1,7% para la cirugía de reemplazo valvular (CRVAo), y 64,4% para el tratamiento conservador (p = 0,002). A 2 años, la rehospitalización se asoció a una mayor mortalidad (47,5% vs. 13,4%; p <0,001). Conclusiones: En pacientes con EAo grave valorados por un Heart Team se observó una significativa incidencia de rehospitalización a 2 años, que se asoció a mayor mortalidad. La FA fue un factor de riesgo independiente de rehospitalización.

ABSTRACT Background: There is scarce evidence in our setting regarding the prevalence of readmission, risk factors and clinical evolution of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) evaluated by a Heart Team. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, predictors and clinical evolution of readmission in patients with severe AS evaluated by a Heart Team. Methods: This was an observational, single-center, retrospective cohort study including patients with severe AS evaluated by a Heart Team. Total cohort characteristics were analyzed at baseline, and after stratification according to the presence or absence of readmission during a 2-year follow-up period. Results: Mean population age (n = 275) was 83.3 ± 6.9 years, and 51.1% were female patients. The prevalence of readmissions was 21.5%. Readmitted patients were older (85.54 ± 6.66 vs. 82.62 ± 6.87 years; p = 0.003) and had greater frailty (97,4% vs. 89.3%; p = 0.035), surgical risk (STS 6.11 ± 4.79 vs. 4.72 ± 4.12; p = 0.033), and previous history of atrial fibrillation (AF) (40.7% vs. 23.6%; p = 0.009), compared with non-readmitted patients. Prior AF was an independent risk factor of readmission (OR 4.59 [IC95% 1.95-10.81]; p <0.001). The prevalence of readmission was 33.9% for percutaneous aortic valve implantation (TAVI), 1.7% for valve replacement surgery (AVRS), and 64.4% for conservative treatment (p = 0.002). At 2 years, readmission was associated with lower survival (47.5% vs. 13.4%; p <0.001). Conclusions: In patients with severe AS evaluated by a Heart Team, a significant prevalence of readmission was observed at 2 years, and this was associated with higher mortality. Atrial fibrillation was an independent risk factor of readmissions.