Excellent survival in relapsed stage I testicular cancer.

BACKGROUND: Two thirds of patients with germ-cell cancer (GCC) present as clinical stage I (CSI). Following orchiectomy, active surveillance (AS) has become their standard management. However, 15-50% of patients eventually relapse with metastatic disease after AS. Relapses need to be detected early in order to achieve cure and avoid overtreatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive GCC patients treated at two Swiss academic centers between 2010 and 2020. Patients with stage IS and extragonadal primaries were excluded. We compared disease characteristics and survival outcomes of patients relapsed from initial CSI to patients with de novo metastatic disease. Primary endpoint was the IGCCCG category at the time of relapse. Main secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We identified 360 GCC patients with initial CSI and 245 de novo metastatic patients. After a median follow-up of 47 months, 81 of 360 (22.5%) CSI patients relapsed: 41 seminoma (Sem) and 40 non-seminoma (NSem) patients. All Sems relapsed in the IGCCCG good prognosis group. NSem relapsed with good 29/40 (72.5%) and intermediate 11/40 (27.5%) prognostic features; 95.1% of relapses occurred within five years post-orchiectomy. Only 3 relapsed NSem patients died from metastatic disease. Five-year OS for relapsed CSI patients was 100% for Sem and 87% (95% CI: 61-96%) for NSem patients; five-year PFS was 92% (95% CI: 77-97) and 78% (95% CI: 56-90) for Sem and NSem, respectively. When stratified by IGCCCG prognostic groups, good risk relapsed patients had a trend towards better OS and PFS as compared to de novo metastatic patients. CONCLUSIONS: GCC patients who relapse after initial CSI can be detected early by active surveillance and have an excellent survival.

Morphological spectrum and molecular features of somatic malignant transformation in germ cell tumours.

AIMS: Somatic malignant transformation (SMT) arising in germ cell tumours (GCTs) is an infrequent, but clinically relevant event. There is only limited knowledge on the morphological spectrum of SMT, and the therapeutic management of these patients is poorly defined. In this work we revisit two consecutive case series (n = 756) of GCTs. Clinicopathological data of SMTs arising in GCTs were determined, with a focus on the histopathological spectrum, and molecular aspects were obtained by Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty male patients (28 primary testicular, two primary extragonadal) were included. These patients represent 4% of GCT patients diagnosed at two institutes (University Hospital Zurich and IPO Porto). The most common SMTs were adenocarcinoma (n = 8), embryonic-type neuroectodermal tumours (ENETs, n = 8), and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 6), but a wide range of challenging morphologies were depicted, including low-grade neuroglial tumour, adenosquamous carcinoma, neuroblastoma, and neuroendocrine carcinoma. SMT was found in 15 primary tumour samples and in 27 metastatic samples of these 30 patients, the latter showing poorer overall survival. Adenocarcinoma occurred only in metastasis postchemotherapy and in one primary retroperitoneal GCT with SMT, but not in GCT of the testis. The 12p gains were identified by FISH in all cases. NGS results were available in six patients. Clinical trials and/or targeted treatments based on the molecular profile of SMT were recommended in four patients. CONCLUSIONS: SMT arising in GCTs represent a diagnostic challenge and should be confirmed by a specialized uropathologist. NGS-based treatment recommendations may improve the outcome of these patients.

HNF1ß is a sensitive and specific novel marker for yolk sac tumor: a tissue microarray analysis of 601 testicular germ cell tumors.

Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1 beta (HNF1ß) is a transcription factor which plays an important role during early organogenesis, especially of the pancreato-biliary and urogenital tract. Furthermore, HNF1ß is an established marker in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer and shows a distinct nuclear expression in the clear cell carcinoma subtype. Recently, it has been described in yolk sac tumor, which represents a common component in many non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. Due to its broad histologic diversity, the diagnosis may be challenging and additional tools are very helpful in the workup of germ cell tumors. Immunohistochemistry was used to study HNF1ß expression in a tissue microarray (TMA) of 601 testicular germ cell tumors including seminoma, embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac tumor, choriocarcinoma, teratoma, germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS), and normal tissue. The expression pattern was compared to glypican 3 (GPC3) and α-fetoprotein (AFP), two markers currently in use for the detection of yolk sac tumor. HNF1ß showed a distinct nuclear staining in comparison to the cytoplasmic pattern of GPC3 and AFP. The sensitivity and specificity of HNF1ß were 85.4% and 96.5%, of GPC3 83.3% and 90.7%, of AFP 62.5% and 97.7%. We conclude that HNF1ß allows a reliable distinction of yolk sac tumor from other germ cell tumor components. Therefore, we propose HNF1ß as a novel and robust marker in the immunohistochemical workup of testicular germ cell tumors.

High-dose chemotherapy as salvage treatment in germ-cell cancer: when, in whom and how.

Over the past two decades, the use of well-validated, guideline-based strategies resulted in high cure rates in patients with germ-cell cancer (GCC) often despite widespread metastatic disease at initial presentation. Yet, about 30 % of patients diagnosed with metastatic disease corresponding to about 5-10 % of GCC patients overall will experience disease progression or recurrence at some time point of their disease with the need for salvage treatment. Salvage treatment is more complex and less well validated than first-line treatment: Its rare patient cohorts are more heterogeneous and prognostic factors impact more compared to other treatment scenarios. In patients with metastatic GCC, there are several scenarios in which first-line treatment strategies can fail (Fig. 1). Prior to initiation of any salvage treatment, several considerations have to be made, which will be addressed in this review: verification that first-line treatment has indeed failed, estimation of the adequacy and the effectiveness of first-line treatment, search for metastatic sites and extent of disease recurrence, assessment of known prognostic factors and finally the choice of the optimal salvage strategy taking into account the aforementioned variables. High-dose chemotherapy will be a rational choice for many patients in need of salvage treatment, but careful patient selection will be required to avoid overtreatment and unnecessary long-term toxicity.

Emerging Therapeutic Targets for Male Germ Cell Tumors.

Male germ cell tumors (GCTs) are curable cancers, yet 10-15 % of patients with metastatic disease fail cisplatin-based first-line treatments. While therapeutic options have increased for various other cancers, little progress has been made in the management of GCT in the last decades. A better understanding of the molecular alterations underlying the disease and identification of new therapeutic targets are needed. Several phase I/II studies with promising new agents are ongoing or have been completed, but most of those trials have been small and have not included translational research. Therefore, molecular profiles predictive for response or new agents have not been identified in male GCT so far. The purpose of this review is to highlight emerging targets and therapies with the potential to improve systemic treatment of metastatic male GCT and to develop strategies for future clinical trials.

[No Differences in Testis Cancer Outcomes between urban and rural regions in the Canton of Berne].

INTRODUCTION: Testis cancer is highly curable. However, historical data point to differences between urban and rural areas with more advanced diseases at presentation and worse outcomes in the latter. In a cohort of 296 men with testis cancer diagnosed and treated at the Inselspital Berne between 2010 and 2020, we found no clinically relevant differences in presentation and outcomes depending on their residential area.

Impact of teratoma on survival probabilities of patients with metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell cancer: Results from the IGCCCG Update Consortium.

AIMS: To resolve the ongoing controversy surrounding the impact of teratoma (TER) in the primary among patients with metastatic testicular non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours (NSGCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) Update Consortium database, we compared the survival probabilities of patients with metastatic testicular GCT with TER (TER) or without TER (NTER) in their primaries corrected for known prognostic factors. Progression-free survival (5y-PFS) and overall survival at 5 years (5y-OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Among 6792 patients with metastatic testicular NSGCT, 3224 (47%) had TER in their primary, and 3568 (53%) did not. In the IGCCCG good prognosis group, the 5y-PFS was 87.8% in TER versus 92.0% in NTER patients (p = 0.0001), the respective 5y-OS were 94.5% versus 96.5% (p = 0.0032). The corresponding figures in the intermediate prognosis group were 5y-PFS 76.9% versus 81.6% (p = 0.0432) in TER and NTER and 5y-OS 90.4% versus 90.9% (p = 0.8514), respectively. In the poor prognosis group, there was no difference, neither in 5y-PFS [54.3% in TER patients versus 55.4% (p = 0.7472) in NTER], nor in 5y-OS [69.4% versus 67.7% (p = 0.3841)]. NSGCT patients with TER had more residual masses (65.3% versus 51.7%, p < 0.0001), and therefore received post-chemotherapy surgery more frequently than NTER patients (46.8% versus 32.0%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Teratoma in the primary tumour of patients with metastatic NSGCT negatively impacts on survival in the good and intermediate, but not in the poor IGCCCG prognostic groups.

No Survival Differences among Germ-Cell Cancer Patients from Urban and Rural Areas.

INTRODUCTION: Germ-cell cancer (GCC) is curable in the majority of men. However, previous reports have described inferior outcomes in men living in rural as compared to urban residential areas. METHODS: We identified all GCC patients treated at two large university hospitals in Zürich and Bern, both in Switzerland, between 2010 and 2020 by retrospective chart review. In 400 patients from Zürich and 274 patients from Bern, details on presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes were abstracted from medical records. For follow-up, we contacted referring centers or private physicians. Residential region was allocated according to the Federal Statistical Office of Switzerland. RESULTS: We found no differences in initial presentation (clinical stage I [CSI] versus de novo metastatic), relapse rate in CSI patients, response in metastatic patients (favorable vs. unfavorable), progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between patients from urban as compared to suburban or rural residential areas. PFS at 3 years for CSI patients was 78% (95% confidence interval 72-82%) and OS at 5 years was 98% (95% confidence interval 96-99%). PFS at 3 years for de novo metastatic patients was 74% (95% confidence interval 68-79%) and OS at 5 years was 86% (95% confidence interval 80-90%). CONCLUSION: Treatment outcomes in GCC patients were excellent and comparable to international standards at both centers irrespective of the residential area of patients documenting equal access to high-level oncological care at both centers.

Exceptional Response to Pembrolizumab in a Mismatch Repair-Deficient Aggressive Prostate Cancer with Somatic EPCAM, MSH2, and MSH6 Co-Deletion: A Case Report.

Mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) prostate cancer (PCa) is a rare (1-5%) but highly actionable molecular subgroup of PCa, vulnerable to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Our case of sporadic dMMR PCa due to large monoallelic co-deletion of EPCAM, MSH2, and MSH6 features a clinically aggressive disease presentation and a major response to pembrolizumab. We report a 65-year-old patient with primary metastatic PCa, Gleason score 5 + 5 = 10, with penile and lymph node metastases at diagnosis. Patient showed rapid progression on first-line ADT and enzalutamide. Tumor next-generation sequencing (NGS) revealed microsatellite instability and a tumor mutational burden of 40.8 mutations/megabase. Immunohistochemistry showed co-loss of MSH2 and MSH6. Review of NGS row data confirmed large monoallelic deletion in chromosome 2p, including EPCAM, MSH2, and MSH6. No germline alterations in mismatch repair genes were detected. Patient showed excellent response to pembrolizumab, which is still ongoing. We conclude that early molecular tumor profiling is essential to enable personalized management of advanced PCa, especially in patients with aggressive or atypical disease course.

Perioperative complications and oncological outcomes of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with germ cell cancer at two high-volume university centres in Switzerland - a retrospective chart review.

BACKGROUND: Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) is an integral part of the management of patients with metastatic non-seminoma and residual masses >1 cm after chemotherapy. AIMS: To assess perioperative complications and oncological outcomes at two major referral centres in Switzerland. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 136 patients with non-seminoma who underwent PC-RPLND between 2010 and 2020 at the university hospitals of Bern and Zürich. Patient, treatment and tumour characteristics as well as the types and frequencies of intra- and postoperative complications were registered and compared using the chi-square test. Oncological outcomes consisted of the time and location of relapses as well as progression-free and overall survival, which were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Overall, 70 patients from Bern and 66 patients from Zürich were included; 5 patients had a previous retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) (2 Bern, 3 Zürich). Vascular injuries were the most frequent intraoperative complication, occurring in 27/136 (19.9%) patients. Postoperative complications were observed in 42/136 (30.9%) patients, ileus being the most common. Perioperative mortality was 2.2%. A retroperitoneal mass ≥50 mm was significantly associated with intraoperative complications (p = 0.004) and increased resource demands (p = 0.021). Postoperative morbidity was higher according to age at post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection ≥40 years (p = 0.028) and retroperitoneal mass ≥20 mm (p = 0.005). The median follow-up time was 37 months (interquartile range [IQR] 18-64 months). The median progression-free survival at 5 years was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64-85%) in Bern and 69% (95% CI: 54-80%) in Zürich (p = 0.464). The median overall survival at 5 years was 88% (95% CI: 76-94%) in Bern and 77% (95% CI: 60-87%) in Zürich (p = 0.335). Patients with progressive disease or a tumour marker increase before retroperitoneal lymph node dissection had significantly inferior progression-free and overall survival compared to non-progressing patients. The presence of teratoma in resected specimens did not confer inferior survival probabilities compared to necrosis only, whereas the presence of vital undifferentiated tumour conferred inferior progression-free and overall survival. Patients with a previous retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and patients operated for late relapses >2 years after chemotherapy also had significantly inferior progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: We found a relevant rate of severe perioperative complications at PC-RPLND at even experienced high-volume centres. The oncological outcomes at two major university urological centres in Switzerland were similar and determined by preoperative risk factors and intraoperative histology.

Prechemotherapy Not Preorchiectomy Serum Tumor Markers Accurately Identify International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group Prognostic Groups in Nonseminoma.

Levels of the serum tumor markers (STMs) α-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase are used in staging classification for metastatic germ-cell cancers and support decisions on the intensity of first-line treatment for patients with nonseminoma. Use of preorchiectomy instead of prechemotherapy STM levels can lead to inadequate classification. We identified 744 men with metastatic gonadal nonseminoma in the International Germ-Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) Update Consortium database who had preorchiectomy and prechemotherapy STM levels available. Of these, 22% would have had inadequate IGCCCG prognostic group classification if preorchiectomy levels had been used, which would have resulted in overtreatment of 16% and undertreatment of 6% of men. These findings suggest that use of preorchiectomy instead of prechemotherapy STM results may lead to incorrect IGCCCG classification, which could compromise treatment success or expose patients to unnecessary toxicity. Patient summary: For men with testicular cancer, levels of tumor markers in their blood are used when making decisions on chemotherapy intensity. Use of test results for samples taken before removal of the cancer-bearing testicle instead of immediately before chemotherapy can lead to inadequate treatment recommendations.

Interdisciplinary Swiss consensus recommendations on staging and treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

The management of prostate cancer is undergoing rapid changes in all disease settings. Novel imaging tools for diagnosis have been introduced, and the treatment of high-risk localized, locally advanced and metastatic disease has changed considerably in recent years. From clinical and health-economic perspectives, a rational and optimal use of the available options is of the utmost importance. While international guidelines list relevant pivotal trials and give recommendations for a variety of clinical scenarios, there is much room for interpretation, and several important questions remain highly debated. The goal of developing a national consensus on the use of these novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in order to improve disease management and eventually patient outcomes has prompted a Swiss consensus meeting. Experts from several specialties, including urology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, pathology and nuclear medicine, discussed and voted on questions of the current most important areas of uncertainty, including the staging and treatment of high-risk localized disease, treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and use of new options to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

The role of residual tumor resection in the management of nonseminomatous germ cell cancer of testicular origin.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of patients with testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (TNSGCT) undergoing intrathoracic residual tumor resection (RTR) after previous chemotherapy (CT) at a single institution. METHODS: The office records of all patients who underwent intrathoracic RTR for TNSGCT after CT at a single institution from January 2000 through December 2006 were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 124 consecutive patients (age 33.1 ± 8.4 years) with residual masses who underwent 189 surgical procedures. Morbidity and mortality rates were 12.7 and 0.5%, respectively. Complete resections could be achieved in 121 patients (97.6%). In the resected lung masses, necrosis was the predominant histology, (44.4 vs. 29% in mediastinal masses p = 0.018). Mature teratoma was the leading histology in the mediastinum (62.1 vs. 39.5% in lung masses, p = 0.0006). Fifty-nine out of 124 patients (47.6%) required interventions at both lungs and had discordant histological results in 20.3% (12/59) of the cases. Mean survival was 86.6 ± 2.6 months. The overall 5-year-survival and 10-year survival rates were 87 and 85%, respectively. Viable cancer, incomplete resections, age ≥ 34 years, and major pulmonary resections were associated with inferior survival in a univariate Cox proportional hazards model. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, viable cancer, incomplete resections, and major pulmonary resections remained significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: In selected TNSGCT patients with residual masses, RTR can be performed safely after CT. RTR should be attempted at all sites because of possible discordant histological differentiation. Complete and parenchyma-sparing resections are associated with excellent long-term survival, which can be influenced by the surgeon.

[Diagnosis and Therapy of Anal Carcinoma]. / Diagnose und Therapie des Analkarzinoms.

Diagnosis and Therapy of Anal Carcinoma Summary. The squamous cell carcinoma of the anorectum is rare and subdivided into perianal, anal canal and combined carcinomas. Persistent infection with a high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is believed to be the main cause for the development of anal cancer. Therefore, the incidence in high-risk individuals (e.g. immuno-compromised patients or patients living with HIV) is much higher than in the general population. Nevertheless, a nearly three-fold overall increase was observed within the last three decades. The diagnosis is often made by chance as anal carcinoma presents with unspecific symptoms which could be attributed to many other proctological diseases, especially haemorrhoids. The diagnosis is confirmed by histology using biopsies or excisional biopsies. The subsequent staging requires a detailed documentation of the tumor's location and size as well as an overall examination focusing on palpation of the groin. Sphincter involvement in small lesions can be assessed by endoluminal ultrasound or alternatively by an angulated magnetic resonance imaging of the anal canal/pelvis. A computed tomography scan of the thorax and abdomen is usually performed to rule out a metastatic disease. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography is useful for detection of lymph node (LN) involvement and to accurately define the stage prior to treatment. The therapy of anal carcinoma requires a multidisciplinary approach. In most patients, primary treatment consists of chemoradiotherapy (CRT), which improved 5-year overall survival since its introduction in 1974. A surgical approach is reserved for small perianal lesions without sphincter infiltration, LN or distant metastasis. Furthermore, in recurrent or persistent carcinomas after CRT salvage surgical treatment is recommended. In some cases (obstruction, fistula formation) a deviation colostomy is required. Follow-up clinical and imaging evaluation should follow recommended guidelines and should involve primary physicians in addition to members of the multidisciplinary treatment team. Until now, the impact of HPV immunization on anal carcinoma is still unclear despite having been proven effective in preventing anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Impact of differing methodologies for serum miRNA-371a-3p assessment in stage I testicular germ cell cancer recurrence.

Introduction: Current evidence shows that serum miR-371a-3p can identify disease recurrence in testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) patients and correlates with tumour load. Despite convincing evidence showing the advantages of including miR-371a-3p testing to complement and overcome the classical serum tumour markers limitations, the successful introduction of a serum miRNA based test into clinical practice has been impeded by a lack of consensus regarding optimal methodologies and lack of a universal protocol and thresholds. Herein, we investigate two quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) based pipelines in detecting disease recurrence in stage I TGCT patients under active surveillance, and compare the sensitivity and specificity for each method. Methods: Sequential serum samples collected from 33 stage I TGCT patients undergoing active surveillance were analysed for miR-371a-3p via qRT-PCR with and without an amplification step included. Results: Using a pre-amplified protocol, all known recurrences were detected via elevated miR-371a-3p expression, while without pre-amplification, we failed to detect recurrence in 3/10 known recurrence patients. For pre-amplified analysis, sensitivity and specificity was 90% and 94.4% respectively. Without amplification, sensitivity dropped to 60%, but exhibited 100% specificity. Discussion: We conclude that incorporating pre-amplification increases sensitivity of miR-371a-3p detection, but produces more false positive results. The ideal protocol for quantification of miR-371a-3p still needs to be determined. TGCT patients undergoing active surveillance may benefit from serum miR-371a-3p quantification with earlier detection of recurrences compared to current standard methods. However, larger cross-institutional studies where samples are processed and data is analysed in a standardised manner are required prior to its routine clinical implementation.

Metastatic Potential of Small Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: Implications for Surveillance of Small Testicular Masses.

Incidental detection of urogenital tumors has increased in recent decades owing to the greater use of ultrasonography and cross-sectional imaging. For patients with low-risk prostate cancer or small renal masses, active surveillance represents a valid treatment option. Similarly, for men with small testicular masses <10 mm, active surveillance has been discussed as an alternative to surgery, although little is known regarding the behavior of small testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs). In the Swiss Austrian German Testicular Cancer Cohort Study we identified 849 patients (546 seminoma, 303 nonseminoma) treated with radical inguinal orchiectomy for GCT with a median tumor diameter of 35 mm. A tumor diameter <10 mm was observed in 25 patients (13 seminoma, 12 nonseminoma). Of these, five patients (20%) presented with primary metastatic disease, all of whom had elevated tumor markers and nonseminomatous GCTs. Two patients (8%) with initially localized disease (1 seminoma, 1 nonseminoma) and without elevated tumor markers experienced relapse at 4 mo (nonseminoma) and 14 mo (seminoma) after orchiectomy, despite the fact that the latter had received adjuvant chemotherapy. These findings highlight the metastatic potential of small testicular GCTs and raise the question of whether active surveillance for small testicular masses is safe. Patient summary: This study on testicular cancer assesses the metastatic potential of small testicular germ cell tumors. Men with small testicular masses should be counseled about the malignant potential of small testicular germ cell tumors.

Interdisciplinary evidence-based recommendations for the follow-up of early stage seminomatous testicular germ cell cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To provide guidance regarding follow-up procedures after initial treatment of early stage testicular seminoma (clinical stages (CS) I-II A/B) based on current published evidence complemented by expert opinion. METHODS AND MATERIAL: An interdisciplinary, multinational working group consisting of urologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists analyzed the published evidence regarding follow-up procedures in various stages of seminomatous and nonseminomatous testicular cancers. Focusing on radiooncological aspects, the recommendations contained herein are restricted to early stage seminoma (with radiotherapy being a standard treatment option). In particular, extent, frequency, and duration of imaging at follow-up were analyzed concerning relapse patterns, risk factors, and mode of relapse detection. RESULTS: Active surveillance, adjuvant carboplatin or radiotherapy are equally accepted options for CS I seminoma but they result in different relapse rates and patterns. Usually relapses occur within the first 2(-6) years. Routinely performed follow-up using computerized tomography (CT) after adjuvant treatment yield only low detection rates of recurrences. Therefore, there is no evidence to maintain routine examinations every 3-4 months. After treatment of stage IIA/B, detection rates of relapses or progression identified solely by routinely performed CT during follow-up are low. CONCLUSION: Considering lifelong cure rates of up to 99% for patients treated for seminoma CS I-IIA/B, the negative impact of unnecessary ionizing radiation exposure has to be considered. The presented recommendations for various follow-up scenarios for early stage seminoma strongly promote the restrictive use of imaging procedures that utilize ionizing radiation (especially CT), due to its potential to induce secondary malignancies.

Swiss germ-cell cancer consensus recommendations.

Approximately 420 men are diagnosed with germ-cell cancer (GCC) in Switzerland each year. Recent international guidelines outline management issues, but many aspects remain controversial in an area of highly individualised treatments. Even more than in other tumour types, in GCC the challenge is to choose exactly the correct treatment for an individual patient. Overtreatment in patients likely to be cured must be avoided to reduce long-term toxicities. On the other hand, treatment intensification is required in patients presenting with adverse prognostic factors. Therefore, referral to expert centres or consultations with an expert for a second opinion is strongly recommended. In 2020, Swiss experts discussed their strategies in a consensus meeting during the virtual Swiss Oncology and Haematology Congress (SOHC) in order to harmonise their concepts and to suggest optimal strategies for the management of GCC patients in Switzerland. Votes on controversial issues were obtained and are presented in this review wherever applicable.

Predicting Outcomes in Men With Metastatic Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors (NSGCT): Results From the IGCCCG Update Consortium.

PURPOSE: The classification of the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) plays a pivotal role in the management of metastatic germ cell tumors but relies on data of patients treated between 1975 and 1990. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 9,728 men with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors treated with cisplatin- and etoposide-based first-line chemotherapy between 1990 and 2013 were collected from 30 institutions or collaborative groups in Europe, North America, and Australia. Clinical trial and registry data were included. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The survival estimates were updated for the current era. Additionally, a novel prognostic model for PFS was developed in 3,543 patients with complete information on potentially relevant variables. The results were validated in an independent data set. RESULTS: Compared with the original IGCCCG publication, 5-year PFS remained similar in patients with good prognosis with 89% (87%-91%) versus 90% (95% CI, 89 to 91), but the 5-year OS increased from 92% (90%-94%) to 96% (95%-96%). In patients with intermediate prognosis, PFS remained similar with 75% (71%-79%) versus 78% (76%-80%) and the OS increased from 80% (76%-84%) to 89% (88%-91%). In patients with poor prognosis, the PFS increased from 41% (95% CI, 35 to 47) to 54% (95% CI, 52 to 56) and the OS from 48% (95% CI, 42 to 54) to 67% (95% CI, 65 to 69). A more granular prognostic model was developed and independently validated. This model identified a new cutoff of lactate dehydrogenase at a 2.5 upper limit of normal and increasing age and presence of lung metastases as additional adverse prognostic factors. An online calculator is provided (https://www.eortc.org/IGCCCG-Update). CONCLUSION: The IGCCCG Update model improves individual prognostication in metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Increasing age and lung metastases add granularity to the original IGCCCG classification as adverse prognostic factors.