Quantitative dose-response analysis of ethyl methanesulfonate genotoxicity in adult gpt-delta transgenic mice.

The assumption that mutagens have linear dose-responses recently has been challenged. In particular, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), a DNA-reactive mutagen and carcinogen, exhibited sublinear or thresholded dose-responses for LacZ mutation in transgenic Muta™Mouse and for micronucleus (MN) frequency in CD1 mice (Gocke E and Müller L [2009]: Mutat Res 678:101-107). In order to explore variables in establishing genotoxicity dose-responses, we characterized the genotoxicity of EMS using gene mutation assays anticipated to have lower spontaneous mutant frequencies (MFs) than Muta™Mouse. Male gpt-delta transgenic mice were treated daily for 28 days with 5 to 100 mg/kg EMS, and measurements were made on: (i) gpt MFs in liver, lung, bone marrow, kidney, small intestine, and spleen; and (ii) Pig-a MFs in peripheral blood reticulocytes (RETs) and total red blood cells. MN induction also was measured in peripheral blood RETs. These data were used to calculate Points of Departure (PoDs) for the dose responses, i.e., no-observed-genotoxic-effect-levels (NOGELs), lower confidence limits of threshold effect levels (Td-LCIs), and lower confidence limits of 10% benchmark response rates (BMDL10 s). Similar PoDs were calculated from the published EMS dose-responses for LacZ mutation and CD1 MN induction. Vehicle control gpt and Pig-a MFs were 13-40-fold lower than published vehicle control LacZ MFs. In general, the EMS genotoxicity dose-responses in gpt-delta mice had lower PoDs than those calculated from the Muta™Mouse and CD1 mouse data. Our results indicate that the magnitude and possibly the shape of mutagenicity dose responses differ between in vivo models, with lower PoDs generally detected by gene mutation assays with lower backgrounds.

Monitoring humans for somatic mutation in the endogenous PIG-a gene using red blood cells.

The endogenous X-linked PIG-A gene is involved in the synthesis of glycosyl phosphatidyl inositol (GPI) anchors that tether specific protein markers to the exterior of mammalian cell cytoplasmic membranes. Earlier studies in rodent models indicate that Pig-a mutant red blood cells (RBCs) can be induced in animals treated with genotoxic agents, and that flow cytometry can be used to identify rare RBCs deficient in the GPI-anchored protein, CD59, as a marker of Pig-a gene mutation. We investigated if a similar approach could be used for detecting gene mutation in humans. We first determined the frequency of spontaneous CD59-deficient RBCs (presumed PIG-A mutants) in 97 self-identified healthy volunteers. For most subjects, the frequency of CD59-deficient RBCs was low (average of 5.1 ± 4.9 × 10(-6) ; median of 3.8 × 10(-6) and mutant frequency less than 8 × 10(-6) for 75% of subjects), with a statistically significant difference in median mutant frequencies between males and females. PIG-A RBC mutant frequency displayed poor correlation with the age and no correlation with the smoking status of the subjects. Also, two individuals had markedly increased CD59-deficient RBC frequencies of ∼300 × 10(-6) and ∼100 × 10(-6) . We then monitored PIG-A mutation in 10 newly diagnosed cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with known genotoxic drugs. The frequency of CD59-deficient RBCs in the blood of the patients was measured before the start of chemotherapy and three times over a period of ∼6 months while on/after chemotherapy. Responses were generally weak, most observations being less than the median mutant frequency for both males and females; the greatest response was an approximate three-fold increase in the frequency of CD59-deficient RBCs in one patient treated with a combination of cisplatin and etoposide. These results suggest that the RBC PIG-A assay can be adopted to measuring somatic cell mutation in humans. Further research is necessary to determine the assay's sensitivity in detecting mutations induced by genotoxic agents acting via different mechanisms.

Current and future application of genetic toxicity assays: the role and value of in vitro mammalian assays.

With the advent of new technologies (e.g., genomics, automated analyses, and in vivo monitoring), new regulations (e.g., the reduction of animal tests by the European REACH), and new approaches to toxicology (e.g., Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century, National Research Council), the field of regulatory genetic toxicology is undergoing a serious re-examination. Within this context, Toxicological Sciences has published a series of articles in its Forum Section on the theme, "Genetic Toxicity Assessment: Employing the Best Science for Human Safety Evaluation" (beginning with Goodman et al.). As a contribution to the Forum discussions, we present current methods for evaluating mutagenic/genotoxic risk using standard genotoxicity test batteries, and suggest ways to address and incorporate new technologies. We recognize that the occurrence of positive results in relation to cancer prediction has led to criticism of in vitro mammalian cell genetic toxicity assays. We address criticism of test results related to weak positives, associated only with considerable toxicity, only seen at high concentrations, not accompanied by positive results in the other tests of standard test batteries, and/or not correlating well with rodent carcinogenicity tests. We suggest that the problems pointed out by others with these assays already have been resolved, to a large extent, by international groups working to update assay protocols, and by changes in data interpretation at regulatory agencies. New guidances at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration improve data evaluation and help refocus risk assessment. We discuss the results of international groups working together to integrate new technologies and evaluate new tests, including human monitoring. We suggest that strategies for identifying human health risks should naturally change to integrate new technologies; however, changes should be made only when justified by strong scientific evidence of improvement in the risk assessment paradigm.