Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Heart Surg Forum ; 24(2): E261-E266, 2021 03 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33798046

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid annuloplasty is the most common surgical approach to correct tricuspid regurgitation (TR). In some patients, however, anterior leaflet patch augmentation may be necessary to optimize tricuspid competence. We reviewed our center cohort over the midterm and long term. METHODS: From January 2013 to August 2018, 424 tricuspid valve procedures were performed, of which 420 were repairs and 4 were replacements. Indications were either isolated severe TR or moderate or greater TR, concomitant with other surgery. In the repair cohort, we identified those that had a patch augmentation, and the database was interrogated for preoperative characteristics. The resulting patients had outpatient assessment (clinical and echocardiography) at 6 weeks and at a later interval. Additionally, a comparison was made between those who had good and poor results (moderate or greater TR or cardiac death). RESULTS: In the repair cohort, 19 patients underwent complex tricuspid valve repair with CorMatrix anterior leaflet augmentation. Preoperative characteristics were as follows: age, 65.5 ± 13.5 years; New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, 3.5 ± 0.5; left ventricular ejection fraction, 48.3% ± 5.9%; tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, 17.1 ± 3.7 mm; right ventricle (good, mild, moderate, poor), 10, 5, 4, 0; annulus size, 40.9 ± 6.9 mm; mean tethering distance, 1.00 ± 0.3 cm; and mean tethering area, 1.53 ± 1.16 cm2. Mean follow-up was 2.1 ± 1.9 years, and survival at 2 years was 73.8%. There were 2 in-hospital deaths. Mean NYHA class was 1.0 ± 0.5 (6 weeks) and 1.5 ± 0.6 (later follow-up); mean residual TR grade was 0.5 ± 0.6 (6 weeks) and 1.3 ± 1.4 (follow-up). Ten of 13 survivors had a good result at last follow-up (TR 0 to 1). We compared the preoperative and operative data of this group versus those with poor results (TR >1 or cardiac mortality). Significant univariate predictors of poor results were larger preoperative tethering area (1.18 ± 0.43 versus 2.4 ± 1.5 cm2; P = .02), longer tethering distance (0.87 ± 0.21 versus 1.2 ± 0.19 cm; P = .007), or the presence of mild or greater TR at 6 weeks (0.2 ± 0.4 vs 1.25 ± 0.5; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: CorMatrix anterior leaflet augmentation produces successful, stable repair in the majority of this complex population. The presence of even mild TR at 6 weeks' follow-up predicts a poor result. When the tethering area or the tethering distance is significantly high, replacement is probably a better option.


Asunto(s)
Anuloplastia de la Válvula Cardíaca/métodos , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Anciano , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Válvula Tricúspide/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/fisiopatología
3.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann ; 24(5): 473-6, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25829458

RESUMEN

Antiphospholipid syndrome is an antiphospholipid antibody-mediated prothrombotic state leading to arterial and venous thrombosis. This condition alters routine in-vitro coagulation tests, making results unreliable. Antiphospholipid syndrome patients requiring cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass present a unique challenge in perioperative anticoagulation management. We describe 3 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome who had successful heart valve surgery at our institution. We have devised an institutional protocol for antiphospholipid syndrome patients, and all 3 patients were managed according to this protocol. An algorithm-based approach is recommended because it improves team work, optimizes treatment, and improves patient outcome.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/tratamiento farmacológico , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Cardíaca , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Heparina/administración & dosificación , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Algoritmos , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/sangre , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/complicaciones , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/diagnóstico , Pruebas de Coagulación Sanguínea , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Cardíaca/efectos adversos , Puente Cardiopulmonar , Femenino , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Heparina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Warfarina/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA