Risk prediction algorithms for prolonged postoperative ileus: A systematic review.

AIM: Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is common and is associated with a significant healthcare burden. Previous studies have attempted to predict PPOI clinically using risk prediction algorithms. The aim of this work was to systematically review and compare risk prediction algorithms for PPOI following colorectal surgery. METHOD: A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL Plus. Studies that developed and/or validated a risk prediction algorithm for PPOI in adults following colorectal surgery were included. Data were collected on study design, population and operative characteristics, the definition of PPOI used and risk prediction algorithm design and performance. Quality appraisal was assessed using the PROBAST tool. RESULTS: Eleven studies with 87 549 participants were included in our review. Most were retrospective, single-centre analyses (6/11, 55%) and rates of PPOI varied from 10% to 28%. The most commonly used variables were sex (8/11, 73%), age (6/11, 55%) and surgical approach (5/11, 45%). Area under the curve ranged from 0.68-0.78, and only three models were validated. However, there was significant variation in the definition of PPOI used. No study reported sensitivity, specificity or positive/negative predictive values. CONCLUSION: Currently available risk prediction algorithms for PPOI appear to discriminate moderately well, although there is a lack of validation data. Future studies should aim to use a standardized definition of PPOI, comprehensively report model performance and validate their findings using internal and external methodologies.

"Failure to Rescue" following Colorectal Cancer Resection: Variation and Improvements in a National Study of Postoperative Mortality.

OBJECTIVE: To examine variation in "failure to rescue" (FTR) as a driver of differences in mortality between centres and over time for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. BACKGROUND: Wide variation exists in postoperative mortality following colorectal cancer surgery. FTR has been identified as an important determinant of variation in postoperative outcomes. We hypothesized that differences in mortality both between hospitals and over time are driven by variation in FTR. METHODS: A national population-based study of patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection from 2010 to 2019 in Aotearoa New Zealand was conducted. Rates of 90-day FTR, mortality, and complications were calculated overall, and for surgical and nonoperative complications. Twenty District Health Boards (DHBs) were ranked into quartiles using risk- and reliability-adjusted 90-day mortality rates. Variation between DHBs and trends over the 10-year period were examined. RESULTS: Overall, 15,686 patients undergoing resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma were included. Increased postoperative mortality at high-mortality centers (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.8-3.3) was driven by higher rates of FTR (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.8), and postoperative complications (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.6). These trends were consistent across operative and nonoperative complications. Over the 2010 to 2019 period, postoperative mortality halved (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.4-0.6), associated with a greater improvement in FTR (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.4-0.7) than complications (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.8-0.9). Differences between centers and over time remained when only analyzing patients undergoing elective surgery. CONCLUSION: Mortality following colorectal cancer resection has halved over the past decade, predominantly driven by improvements in "rescue" from complications. Differences in FTR also drive hospital-level variation in mortality, highlighting the central importance of "rescue" as a target for surgical quality improvement.

Hyperactive Distal Colonic Motility and Recovery Patterns Following Right Colectomy: A High-Resolution Manometry Study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative ileus results in morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and increased health care expenditure. However, the underlying abnormalities in motility remain poorly understood. Recent high-resolution manometry studies demonstrated that the distal colon becomes hyperactive with a cyclic motor pattern postoperatively, but they did not track this activity beyond 16 hours after surgery. OBJECTIVE: This study used high-resolution manometry to evaluate distal colonic motility during the first 4 days after right-sided colectomy. DESIGN: An observational study of perioperative high-resolution colonic manometry using a 36-sensor catheter with 1-cm resolution. SETTING: A single tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic or open right-sided colonic resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of distal colonic motor patterns during the perioperative period, defined according to a published classification system. Clinical markers of gut recovery included time to first stool, oral diet, and prolonged postoperative ileus. RESULTS: Seven patients underwent perioperative manometry recordings. Hyperactive cyclic motor patterns emerged intraoperatively and peaked in the first 12 hours postoperatively, occupying 81.8% ± 3.9% of the recording. This gradually returned to normal during the first 4 days, reaching 19.0% ± 4.4% ( p = 0.002). No patient had a bowel movement before this hyperactivity resolved. High-amplitude propagating sequences were absent in early postoperative recordings, and their return temporally correlated with the passage of stool. Abnormal high-amplitude repetitive 0.5 to 1 cycle per minute activity was observed in the left colon of 1 patient with prolonged ileus. LIMITATIONS: The invasive nature of recordings limited this study to a small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclic motor patterns are markedly hyperactive in the distal colon after right-sided colectomy and resolve during the first 4 postoperative days. High-amplitude propagating sequences are inhibited by surgery and gradually recover. Bowel function may not return until these changes resolve. Other abnormal repetitive hyperactive patterns could contribute to the development of prolonged ileus. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B967 . MOTILIDAD HIPERACTIVA DEL COLON DISTAL Y PATRONES DE RECUPERACIN DESPUS DE COLECTOMA DERECHA UN ESTUDIO DE MANOMETRA DE ALTA RESOLUCIN: ANTECEDENTES:El íleo post-operatorio produce una morbilidad significativa, una hospitalización prolongada y un aumento del gasto sanitario. Sin embargo, las anomalías subyacentes en la motilidad siguen siendo poco conocidas. Estudios recientes de manometría de alta resolución demostraron que el colon distal se vuelve hiperactivo con un patrón motor cíclico en el post-operatorio, pero no registraron esta actividad más allá de las 16 horas posteriores a la cirugía.OBJETIVO:Utilizar la manometría de alta resolución para evaluar la motilidad del colon distal durante los primeros cuatro días después de la colectomía del lado derecho.DISEÑO:Estudio observacional de pacientes sometidos a manometría colónica perioperatoria de alta resolución mediante catéter de 36 sensores con 1 cm de resolución.AJUSTE:Un solo hospital terciario.PACIENTES:Pacientes adultos sometidos a resección laparoscópica o abierta de colon del lado derecho de forma electiva.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:AAparición de patrones motores del colon distal durante el período perioperatorio, definidos según un sistema de clasificación publicado. Los marcadores clínicos de recuperación intestinal incluyeron, tiempo hasta la primera evacuación, dieta oral e íleo posoperatorio prolongado.RESULTADOS:Siete pacientes fueron sometidos a registros de manometría perioperatoria. Los patrones motores cíclicos hiperactivos emergieron intraoperatoriamente y alcanzaron su punto máximo en las primeras 12 horas post-operatorias, ocupando 81,8 ± 3,9% del registro. Esto volvió gradualmente a la normalidad durante los primeros cuatro días, alcanzando el 19,0 ± 4,4% (p = 0,002). Ningún paciente tuvo una evacuación intestinal antes de que se resolviera esta hiperactividad. Las secuencias de propagación de alta amplitud estaban ausentes en las grabaciones post-operatorias tempranas y su retorno se correlacionó temporalmente con el paso de las heces. Se observó actividad anormal de alta amplitud repetitiva de 0,5-1 ciclo / minuto en el colon izquierdo de un paciente con íleo prolongado.LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza invasiva de las grabaciones limitó este estudio a un tamaño de muestra pequeño.CONCLUSIONES:Los patrones motores cíclicos son marcadamente hiperactivos en el colon distal después de la colectomía del lado derecho y se resuelven gradualmente durante los primeros cuatro días posoperatorios. Las secuencias de propagación de gran amplitud se inhiben mediante cirugía y se recuperan gradualmente. Es posible que la función intestinal no regrese hasta que estos cambios se resuelvan. Otros patrones hiperactivos repetitivos anormales podrían contribuir al desarrollo de íleo prolongado. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B967 . (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Seasonal variations in acute diverticular disease hospitalisations in New Zealand.

PURPOSE: Seasonal variation of acute diverticular disease is variably reported in observational studies. This study aimed to describe seasonal variation of acute diverticular disease hospital admissions in New Zealand. METHODS: A time series analysis of national diverticular disease hospitalisations from 2000 to 2015 was conducted among adults aged 30 years or over. Monthly counts of acute hospitalisations' primary diagnosis of diverticular disease were decomposed using Census X-11 times series methods. A combined test for the presence of identifiable seasonality was used to determine if overall seasonality was present; thereafter, annual seasonal amplitude was calculated. The mean seasonal amplitude of demographic groups was compared by analysis of variance. RESULTS: Over the 16-year period, 35,582 hospital admissions with acute diverticular disease were included. Seasonality in monthly acute diverticular disease admissions was identified. The mean monthly seasonal component of acute diverticular disease admissions peaked in early-autumn (March) and troughed in early-spring (September). The mean annual seasonal amplitude was 23%, suggesting on average 23% higher acute diverticular disease hospitalisations during early-autumn (March) than in early-spring (September). The results were similar in sensitivity analyses that employed different definitions of diverticular disease. Seasonal variation was less pronounced in patients aged over 80 (p = 0.002). Seasonal variation was significantly greater among Maori than Europeans (p < 0.001) and in more southern regions (p < 0.001). However, seasonal variations were not significantly different by gender. CONCLUSIONS: Acute diverticular disease admissions in New Zealand exhibit seasonal variation with a peak in Autumn (March) and a trough in Spring (September). Significant seasonal variations are associated with ethnicity, age, and region, but not with gender.

Characterising nationwide reasons for unplanned hospital readmission after colorectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Readmissions after colorectal cancer surgery are common, despite advancements in surgical care, and have a significant impact on both individual patients and overall healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to determine the 30-and 90 days readmission rate after colorectal cancer surgery, and to investigate the risk factors and clinical reasons for unplanned readmissions. METHOD: A multicenter, population-based study including all patients discharged after index colorectal cancer resection from 2010 to 2020 in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ) was completed. The Ministry of Health National Minimum Dataset was used. Rates of readmission at 30 days and 90 days were calculated. Mixed-effect logistic regression models were built to investigate factors associated with unplanned readmission. Reasons for readmission were described. RESULTS: Data were obtained on 16,885 patients. Unplanned 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission rates were 15.1% and 23.7% respectively. The main readmission risk factors were comorbidities, advanced disease, and postoperative complications. Hospital level variation was not present. Despite risk adjustment, R2 value of models was low (30 days: 4.3%, 90 days: 5.2%). The most common reasons for readmission were gastrointestinal causes (32.1%) and wound complications (14.4%). Rates of readmission did not improve over the 11 years study period (p = 0.876). CONCLUSION: Readmissions following colorectal resections in AoNZ are higher than other comparable healthcare systems and rates have remained constant over time. While patient comorbidities and postoperative complications are associated with readmission, the explanatory value of these variables is poor. To reduce unplanned readmissions, efforts should be focused on prevention and early detection of post-discharge complications.

Clinical utility of trans-sacral magnetic stimulation-evoked sphincter potentials and high-density electromyography in pelvic floor assessment: Technical evaluation.

AIM: Faecal incontinence is common and of multifactorial aetiologies, yet current diagnostic tools are unable to assess nerve and sphincter function objectively. We developed an anorectal high-density electromyography (HD-EMG) probe to evaluate motor-evoked potentials induced via trans-sacral magnetic stimulation (TSMS). METHOD: Anorectal probes with an 8 × 8 array of electrodes spaced 1 cm apart were developed for recording HD-EMG of the external anal sphincter. These HD-EMG probes were used to map MEP amplitudes and latencies evoked via TSMS delivered through the Magstim Rapid2 (MagStim Company). Patients undergoing pelvic floor investigations were recruited for this IDEAL Stage 2a pilot study. RESULTS: Eight participants (median age 49 years; five female) were recruited. Methodological viability, safety and diagnostic workflow were established. The test was well tolerated with median discomfort scores ≤2.5/10, median pain scores ≤1/10 and no adverse events. Higher Faecal Incontinence Severity Index scores correlated with longer MEP latencies (r = 0.58, p < 0.001) and lower MEP amplitudes (r = -0.32, p = 0.046), as did St. Mark's Incontinence Scores with both MEP latencies (r = 0.49, p = 0.001) and MEP amplitudes (r = -0.47, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This HD-EMG probe in conjunction with TSMS presents a novel diagnostic tool for anorectal function assessment. Spatiotemporal assessment of magnetically stimulated MEPs correlated well with symptoms and offers a feasible, safe and patient-tolerable method of evaluating pudendal nerve and external anal sphincter function. Further clinical development and evaluation of these techniques is justified.

The influence of defaecating proctograms on clinical decision-making in pelvic floor disorders.

AIM: Defaecating proctogram (DP) studies have become an integral part of the evaluation of patients with pelvic floor disorders. However, their impact on treatment decision-making remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance of decision-making by colorectal surgeons and the role of the DP in this process. METHOD: Four colorectal surgeons were presented with online surveys containing the complete history, examination and investigations of 106 de-identified pelvic floor patients who had received one of three treatment options: physiotherapy only, anterior Delorme's procedure or anterior mesh rectopexy. The survey assessed the management decisions made by each of the surgeons for the three treatments both before and after the addition of the DP to the diagnostic work-up. RESULTS: After the addition of the DP results; treatment choice changed in 219 (52%) of 424 surgical decisions and interrater agreement improved significantly from κ = 0.26 to κ = 0.39. Three of the four surgeons reported a significant increase in confidence. Agreement with the actual treatments patients received increased from κ = 0.21 to κ = 0.28. Intra-anal rectal prolapse on DP was a significant predictor of a decision to perform anterior mesh rectopexy. CONCLUSION: The DP improves interclinician agreement in the management of pelvic floor disorders and enhances the confidence in treatment decisions. Intra-anal rectal prolapse was the most influential DP parameter in treatment decision-making.

The Longitudinal Course of Low-anterior Resection Syndrome: An individual Patient Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to better understand the longitudinal course of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) to guide patient expectations and identify those at risk of persisting dysfunction. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: LARS describes disordered bowel function after rectal resection that significantly impacts quality of life. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases were systematically searched for studies that enrolled adults undergoing anterior resection for rectal cancer and used the LARS score to assess bowel function at ≥2 postoperative time points. Regression analyses were performed on deidentified patient-level data to identify predictors of change in LARS score from baseline (3-6months) to 12-months and 18-24 months. RESULTS: Eight studies with a total of 701 eligible patients were included. The mean LARS score improved over time, from 29.4 (95% confidence interval 28.6-30.1) at baseline to 16.6 at 36 months (95% confidence interval 14.2%-18.9%). On multivariable analysis, a greater improvement in mean LARS score between baseline and 12 months was associated with no ileostomy formation [mean difference (MD) -1.7 vs 1.7, P < 0.001], and presence of LARS (major vs minor vs no LARS) at baseline (MD -3.8 vs -1.7 vs 5.4, P < 0.001). Greater improvement in mean LARS score between baseline and 18-24 months was associated with partial mesorectal excision vs total mesorectal excision (MD-8.6 vs 1.5, P < 0.001) and presence of LARS (major vs minor vs no LARS) at baseline (MD -8.8 vs -5.3 vs 3.4, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LARS improves by 18 months postoperatively then remains stable for up to 3 years. Total mesorectal excision, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and ileostomy formation negatively impact upon bowel function recovery.

Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection Versus Open Resection of Rectal Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Trial.

BACKGROUND: Low anterior resection syndrome has a significant impact on the quality of life in rectal cancer survivors. Previous studies comparing laparoscopic to open rectal resection have neglected bowel function outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether there is a difference in the functional outcome between patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. DESIGN: Cross-sectional prevalence of low anterior resection syndrome was assessed in a secondary analysis of the multicenter phase 3 randomized clinical trial, Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Trial (ACTRN12609000663257). SETTING: There were 7 study subsites across New Zealand and Australia. PATIENTS: Participants were adults with rectal cancer who underwent anterior resection and had bowel continuity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative bowel function was evaluated using the validated low anterior resection syndrome score and Bowel Function Instrument. RESULTS: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Trial randomized 475 patients with T1-T3 rectal adenocarcinoma less than 15 cm from the anal verge. A total of 257 participants were eligible for, and invited to, participate in additional follow-up; 163 (63%) completed functional follow-up. Overall cross-sectional prevalence of major low anterior resection syndrome was 49% (minor low anterior resection syndrome 27%). There were no differences in median overall Bowel Function Instrument score nor low anterior resection syndrome score between participants undergoing laparoscopic versus open surgery (66 vs 67, p = 0.52; 31 vs 27, p = 0.24) at a median follow-up of 69 months. LIMITATIONS: The major limitations are a result of conducting a secondary analysis; the likelihood of an insufficient sample size to detect a difference in prevalence between the groups and the possibility of selection bias as a subset of the randomized population was analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel dysfunction affects a majority of rectal cancer patients for a significant time after the operation. In this secondary analysis of a randomized trial, surgical approach does not appear to influence the likelihood or severity of low anterior resection syndrome. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B794. RESULTADO FUNCIONAL DE LA RESECCIN ASISTIDA POR LAPAROSCOPIA VERSUS RESECCIN ABIERTA EN CNCER DE RECTO ANLISIS SECUNDARIO DEL ESTUDIO DE CNCER DE RECTO LAPAROSCPICO DE AUSTRALASIA: ANTECEDENTES:El síndrome de resección anterior baja tiene un impacto significativo en la calidad de vida de los supervivientes de cáncer de recto. Los estudios anteriores que compararon la resección rectal laparoscópica con la abierta no han presentado resultados de la función intestinal.OBJETIVO:Evaluar si existe una diferencia en el resultado funcional entre los pacientes sometidos a resección laparoscópica versus resección abierta por adenocarcinoma de recto.DISEÑO:La prevalencia transversal del síndrome de resección anterior baja se evaluó en un análisis secundario del ensayo clínico aleatorizado multicéntrico de fase 3, Estudio Sobre el Cáncer de Recto Laparoscópico de Australasia (Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Trial, ACTRN12609000663257).AJUSTE:Siete subsitios de estudio en Nueva Zelanda y Australia.PACIENTES:Los participantes eran adultos con cáncer de recto que se sometieron a resección anterior con anastomosis.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La función intestinal posoperatoria se evaluó utilizando el previamente validado puntaje LARS y el Instrumento de Función Intestinal.RESULTADOS:El Estudio Sobre el Cáncer de Recto Laparoscópico de Australasia asignó al azar a 475 pacientes con adenocarcinoma rectal T1-T3 a menos de 15 cm del borde anal. 257 participantes fueron elegibles e invitados a participar en un seguimiento adicional. 163 (63%) completaron el seguimiento funcional. La prevalencia transversal general de LARS mayor fue del 49% (LARS menor 27%). No hubo diferencias en la puntuación media general del Instrumento de Función Intestinal ni en la puntuación LARS entre los participantes sometidos a cirugía laparoscópica versus cirugía abierta (66 frente a 67, p = 0,52; 31 frente a 27, p = 0,24) en una mediana de seguimiento de 69 meses.LIMITACIONES:Las principales limitaciones son el resultado de realizar un análisis secundario; se analizó la probabilidad de un tamaño de muestra insuficiente para detectar una diferencia en la prevalencia entre los grupos y la posibilidad de sesgo de selección como un subconjunto de la población aleatorizada.CONCLUSIONES:La disfunción intestinal afecta a la mayoría de los pacientes con cáncer de recto durante un tiempo significativo después de la operación. En este análisis secundario de un ensayo aleatorizado, el abordaje quirúrgico no parece influir en la probabilidad o gravedad del síndrome de resección anterior baja. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B794. (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio).

Detection of Anastomotic Leakage Following Elective Colonic Surgery: Results of the Prospective Biomarkers and Anastomotic Leakage (BALL) Study.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is an infrequent but life-threatening surgical complication following colorectal surgery. Early diagnosis remains clinically difficult but is a necessity to reduce associated morbidity and mortality. Clinical review and radiological modalities for the diagnosis of leakage remain non-specific and often only detect AL once it is well developed. Inflammatory biomarkers however have shown promise in early pre-clinical detection of leakage following colorectal surgery. METHODS: A multi-center, prospective observational study was conducted across four public hospitals in Auckland and Christchurch, New Zealand. Consecutive adults undergoing elective colectomy were initially recruited over a 3-y period. Perioperative blood samples were collected to measure interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1ß, tumor necrosis factor α, IL-10, C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocyte and neutrophil counts. Statistical analysis was performed to compare patients with an uncomplicated recovery with patients with AL. RESULTS: Sixteen patients developed AL (5.7%), diagnosed at a median post-operative (POD) day 7. CRP and IL-6 were consistently elevated in the early post-operative period in patients with AL, and had the best diagnostic accuracy on POD 3 (area under the curve 0.70; P = 0.02) and POD 1 (area under the curve 0.69; P = 0.02), respectively. IL-10, once adjusted for body mass index and surgical approach, was the sole biomarker significantly elevated in patients with AL on POD 4. CONCLUSIONS: Early post-operative elevations of CRP and IL-6 provide utility for early detection of AL after elective colectomy. Application of these inflammatory biomarkers and their combinations in daily practice warrants further investigation.

Faecal incontinence is associated with an impaired rectosigmoid brake and improved by sacral neuromodulation.

BACKGROUND: The rectosigmoid brake, characterised by retrograde cyclic motor patterns on high-resolution colonic manometry, has been postulated as a contributor to the maintenance of bowel continence. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an effective therapy for faecal incontinence, but its mechanism of action is unclear. This study aims to investigate the colonic motility patterns in the distal colon of patients with faecal incontinence, and how these are modulated by SNM. METHODS: A high-resolution fibreoptic colonic manometry catheter, containing 36 sensors spaced at 1-cm intervals, was positioned in patients with faecal incontinence undergoing stage 1 SNM. One hour of pre- and post meal recordings were obtained followed by pre- and post meal recordings with suprasensory SNM. A 700-kcal meal was given. Data were analysed to identify propagating contractions. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with faecal incontinence were analysed. Patients had an abnormal meal response (fewer retrograde propagating contractions compared to controls; p = 0.027) and failed to show a post meal increase in propagating contractions (mean 17 ± 6/h premeal vs. 22 ± 9/h post meal, p = 0.438). Compared to baseline, SNM significantly increased the number of retrograde propagating contractions in the distal colon (8 ± 3/h premeal vs. 14 ± 3/h premeal with SNM, p = 0.028). Consuming a meal did not further increase the number of propagating contractions beyond the baseline upregulating effect of SNM. CONCLUSION: The rectosigmoid brake was suppressed in this cohort of patients with faecal incontinence. SNM may exert a therapeutic effect by modulating this rectosigmoid brake.

Patients Undergoing Ileoanal Pouch Surgery Experience a Constellation of Symptoms and Consequences Representing a Unique Syndrome: A Report from the Patient-Reported Outcomes After Pouch Surgery (PROPS) Delphi Consensus Study.

BACKGROUND: Functional outcomes after ileoanal pouch creation have been studied; however, there is great variability in how relevant outcomes are defined and reported. More importantly, the perspective of patients has not been represented in deciding which outcomes should be the focus of research. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to create a patient-centered definition of core symptoms that should be included in future studies of pouch function. DESIGN: This was a Delphi consensus study. SETTING: Three rounds of surveys were used to select high-priority items. Survey voting was followed by a series of online patient consultation meetings used to clarify voting trends. A final online consensus meeting with representation from all 3 expert panels was held to finalize a consensus statement. PATIENTS: Expert stakeholders were chosen to correlate with the clinical scenario of the multidisciplinary team that cares for pouch patients, including patients, colorectal surgeons, and gastroenterologists or other clinicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A consensus statement was the main outcome. RESULTS: patients, 62 colorectal surgeons, and 48 gastroenterologists or nurse specialists completed all 3 Delphi rounds. Fifty-three patients participated in online focus groups. One hundred sixty-one stakeholders participated in the final consensus meeting. On conclusion of the consensus meeting, 7 bowel symptoms and 7 consequences of undergoing ileoanal pouch surgery were included in the final consensus statement. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by online recruitment bias. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to identify key functional outcomes after pouch surgery with direct input from a large panel of ileoanal pouch patients. The inclusion of patients in all stages of the consensus process allowed for a true patient-centered approach in defining the core domains that should be focused on in future studies of pouch function. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B571. LOS PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A CIRUGA DE RESERVORIO ILEOANAL EXPERIMENTAN UNA CONSTELACIN DE SNTOMAS Y CONSECUENCIAS QUE REPRESENTAN UN SNDROME UNICO: Un Informe de los Resultados Reportados por los Pacientes Posterior a la Cirugía de Reservorio (PROPS) Estudio de Consenso DelphiANTECEDENTES:Los resultados funcionales después de la creación del reservorio ileoanal han sido estudiados; sin embargo, existe una gran variabilidad en la forma en que se definen y reportan los resultados relevantes. Más importante aún, la perspectiva de los pacientes no se ha representado a la hora de decidir qué resultados deberían ser el foco de investigación.OBJETIVO:El objetivo principal era crear en el paciente una definición centrada de los síntomas principales que debería incluirse en los estudios futuros de la función del reservorio.DISEÑO:Estudio de consenso Delphi.ENTORNO CLINICO:Se emplearon tres rondas de encuestas para seleccionar elementos de alta prioridad. La votación de la encuesta fue seguida por una serie de reuniones de consulta de pacientes en línea que se utilizan para aclarar las tendencias de votación. Se realizo una reunión de consenso final en línea con representación de los tres paneles de expertos para finalizar una declaración de consenso.PACIENTES:Se eligieron partes interesadas expertas para correlacionar con el escenario clínico del equipo multidisciplinario que atiende a los pacientes con reservorio: pacientes, cirujanos colorrectales, gastroenterólogos / otros médicos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Declaración de consenso.RESULTADOS:Ciento noventa y cinco pacientes, 62 cirujanos colorrectales y 48 gastroenterólogos / enfermeras especialistas completaron las tres rondas Delphi. 53 pacientes participaron en grupos focales en línea. 161 interesados participaron en la reunión de consenso final. Al concluir la reunión de consenso, siete síntomas intestinales y siete consecuencias de someterse a una cirugía de reservorio ileoanal se incluyeron en la declaración de consenso final.LIMITACIONES:Sesgo de reclutamiento en línea.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio es el primero en identificar resultados funcionales claves después de la cirugía de reservorio con información directa de un gran panel de pacientes con reservorio ileoanal. La inclusión de pacientes en todas las etapas del proceso de consenso permitió un verdadero enfoque centrado en el paciente para definir los dominios principales en los que debería centrarse los estudios futuros de la función del reservorio. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B571.

Intraoperative serosal extracellular mapping of the human distal colon: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Cyclic motor patterns (CMP) are the predominant motor pattern in the distal colon, and are important in both health and disease. Their origin, mechanism and relation to bioelectrical slow-waves remain incompletely understood. During abdominal surgery, an increase in the CMP occurs in the distal colon. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of detecting propagating slow waves and spike waves in the distal human colon through intraoperative, high-resolution (HR), serosal electrical mapping. METHODS: HR electrical recordings were obtained from the distal colon using validated flexible PCB arrays (6 × 16 electrodes; 4 mm inter-electrode spacing; 2.4 cm2, 0.3 mm diameter) for up to 15 min. Passive unipolar signals were obtained and analysed. RESULTS: Eleven patients (33-71 years; 6 females) undergoing colorectal surgery under general anaesthesia (4 with epidurals) were recruited. After artefact removal and comprehensive manual and automated analytics, events consistent with regular propagating activity between 2 and 6 cpm were not identified in any patient. Intermittent clusters of spike-like activities lasting 10-180 s with frequencies of each cluster ranging between 24 and 42 cpm, and an average amplitude of 0.54 ± 0.37 mV were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative colonic serosal mapping in humans is feasible, but unlike in the stomach and small bowel, revealed no regular propagating electrical activity. Although sporadic, synchronous spike-wave events were identifiable. Alternative techniques are required to characterise the mechanisms underlying the hyperactive CMP observed in the intra- and post-operative period. NEW FINDINGS: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of detecting propagating electrical activity that may correlate to the cyclic motor pattern in the distal human colon through intraoperative, high-resolution, serosal electrical mapping. High-resolution electrical mapping of the human colon revealed no regular propagating activity, but does reveal sporadic spike-wave events. These findings indicate that further research into appropriate techniques is required to identify the mechanism of hyperactive cyclic motor pattern observed in the intra- and post-operative period in humans.

Colonoscopy quality indicators in patients with and without prior colonic resection: A single-centre prospective comparative study.

AIM: Effective colonoscopy relies on meeting rigorous quality control thresholds. Some earlier studies evaluating colonoscopy key performance indicators (KPIs) have excluded patients who have previously undergone colonic resection (i.e., they have a nonintact colon); such patients also deserve high-quality colonoscopy. This study aimed to compare colonoscopy KPIs between patients with nonintact and intact colons. METHOD: Consecutive colonoscopies performed at Whanganui Hospital (New Zealand) between September 2016 and March 2020 were included. The primary outcome was the caecal or ileal intubation rate (CIIR). Secondary outcomes were the adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), colonoscope withdrawal time (CWT) and caecal or ileal intubation time (CIIT). RESULTS: In total, 3017 colonoscopies were performed: 322 in nonintact colons and 2695 in intact colons. CIIR was significantly higher in nonintact than in intact colons (98.4% vs. 95.0%; P = 0.0086). When all colonoscopies were included, the CIIR was 95.4%; this value decreased to 95.0% when nonintact colonoscopies were excluded. However, the ADR (39.9% vs. 38.8%; P = 0.77) and PDR (58.4% vs. 59.1%; P = 0.86) were similar for both nonintact and intact colons. CWT (P < 0.0001) and CIIT (P < 0.0001) were significantly shorter in participants with nonintact colons. CONCLUSION: The CIIR exceeded recommended targets and was 3.4% higher in patients with nonintact than intact colons. Patients with nonintact colons comprise a small proportion of the overall colonoscopy cohort and it is unlikely that this small difference is relevant for most endoscopists or endoscopy units. The ADR and PDR were similar among patients with nonintact and intact colons, despite nonintact colonoscopies being significantly quicker. Patients with nonintact colons deserve high-quality colonoscopy and therefore their KPIs should be included in colonoscopy performance reports.

Prolonged postoperative ileus following right- versus left-sided colectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is a common complication following colonic surgery, and is associated with longer hospital stay, greater risk of complications and substantial cost for patients and hospitals. Some reports have recently suggested that gastrointestinal (GI) recovery varies based on the side of resection (i.e., right-sided vs. left-sided colectomy). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare GI recovery by resection side. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and CENTRAL databases were systematically searched for articles reporting GI recovery outcomes in adults undergoing elective right- versus left-sided colectomy (excluding with ileostomy) of any surgical approach. The primary outcome was PPOI, and secondary outcomes included time to first passage of flatus, stool and tolerance of solid diet, and postoperative complications. Subgroup analyses of laparoscopic procedures and cohorts without inflammatory bowel disease and sensitivity analysis of adjusted multivariate results were also performed. RESULTS: Nine studies were identified, of which seven were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 29 068 colectomies (14 581 right-sided; 14 487 left-sided). PPOI was heterogeneously defined and was significantly more likely following right-sided compared to left-sided colectomy regardless of the surgical approach (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.32-2.39; P < 0.01; I2  = 51%), as well as on subgroup analyses and adjusted multivariate meta-analysis. Secondary outcomes were reported in only a few small studies; hence meta-analysis did not produce reliable results. CONCLUSION: Based on heterogeneous definitions, consistently higher rates of PPOI were observed following right- versus left-sided colectomy. These differences are currently unexplained and highlight the need for further research into the pathophysiology of ileus.

Patient-Administered Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Postoperative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Feasibility Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive analgesic neurostimulation modality. Difficulties in clinical trial blinding and therapy administration have limited conclusions of previous trials. The aims of this study were to first investigate the feasibility and acceptability of patient-administered TENS after surgery, and second, the feasibility of using sub-sensory TENS as a proxy sham group for patient-blinding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a four-month period, patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a single center were randomized to receive maximally tolerable high-intensity (HI) TENS or sub-sensory low-intensity (LI) TENS. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded. Primary outcomes were the feasibility, tolerability, and acceptability of patient self-administered TENS, measured by patient-reported outcomes, and the strength of patient-blinding, measured using the James Blinding Index (JBI). Secondary outcomes explored clinical recovery and analgesic efficacy. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were screened for inclusion; ten patients were randomized and completed the feasibility study. TENS therapy was variably utilized (median duration of TENS 5.3 hours/day [IQR: 4.1-6.9]). The JBI was 0.7, indicating a strong strength of blinding. Majority of patients found the TENS unit easy to use (90%) and were confident with self-administration (100%). No patients experienced adverse effects of TENS use. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-administered TENS is safe and acceptable. Future studies may use sub-sensory TENS as a proxy sham control to more reliably blind patients. A larger, double-blinded RCT employing these techniques is now needed to determine the analgesic efficacy of TENS in an enhanced recovery setting, and its potential to reduce opiate usage.

Placebo Response Rates in Electrical Nerve Stimulation Trials for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Successful treatments following electrical nerve stimulation have been commonly reported in patients with fecal incontinence and constipation. However, many of these nerve stimulation trials have not implemented sham controls, and are, therefore, unable to differentiate overall treatment responses from placebo. This systematic review aimed to quantify placebo effects and responses following sham electrical nerve stimulation in patients with fecal incontinence and constipation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted from inception to April 2017. Randomized sham-controlled trials investigating the effect of lower gastrointestinal electrical nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence and constipation were included. Pediatric and non-sham controlled trials were excluded. RESULTS: Ten randomized sham-controlled trials were included. Sham stimulation resulted in improvements in fecal incontinence episodes by 1.3 episodes per week (95% CI -2.53 to -0.01, p = 0.05), fecal urgency by 1.5 episodes per week (CI -3.32 to 0.25, p = 0.09), and Cleveland Clinic Severity scores by 2.2 points (CI 1.01 to 3.36, p = 0.0003). Sham also improved symptoms of constipation with improved stool frequency (1.3 episodes per week, CI 1.16 to 1.42, p < 0.00001), Wexner Constipation scores (5.0 points, CI -7.45 to -2.54 p < 0.0001), and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life scores (7.9 points, CI -0.46 to 16.18, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Sham stimulation is associated with clinical and statistically meaningful improvements in symptoms of fecal incontinence and constipation, as well as quality of life scores, highlighting the importance of sham controls in nerve stimulation trials. Noncontrolled studies should be interpreted with caution.

Diverticulosis and nine connective tissue disorders: epidemiological support for an association.

Purpose: An underlying connective tissue disorder (CTD) may predispose to formation of intestinal diverticula. We assess the association of diverticulosis with nine selected CTDs, to inform the pathophysiology of diverticula. Methods: A population-based period-prevalence study. Individuals (3.5 million New Zealand residents born 1901-1986) with a health system record 1999-2016 were grouped into those with a hospital diagnosis of diverticulosis or diverticulitis (ICD-10-AM K57), and those without. Also recorded were any hospital diagnoses of nine selected CTDs. The association of exposure to diverticulosis and each CTD was assessed using logistic regressions adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity and region. Results: In all, 85,958 (2.4%) people had a hospital diagnosis of diverticulosis. Hospitalisation with diverticulosis was highly significantly associated with rectal prolapse (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.9), polycystic kidney disease (OR = 3.8), heritable syndromes (Marfan or Ehlers-Danlos) (OR = 2.4), female genital prolapse (OR = 2.3), non-aortic aneurysm (OR = 2.3), aortic aneurysm (OR = 2.2), inguinal hernia (OR = 1.9) and dislocations of shoulder and other joints (OR = 1.7), but not subarachnoid haemorrhage (OR = 1.0). Conclusion: People with diverticulosis are more likely to have colonic extracellular matrix (ECM)/connective tissue alterations in anatomical areas other than the bowel, suggesting linked ECM/connective tissue pathology. Although biases may exist, the results indicate large-scale integrated studies are needed to investigate underlying genetic pathophysiology of colonic diverticula, together with fundamental biological studies to investigate cellular phenotypes and ECM changes.

Electrical Stimulation and Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function Following Surgery: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative ileus occurs in approximately 5-15% of patients following major abdominal surgery, and poses a substantial clinical and economic burden. Electrical stimulation has been proposed as a means to aid postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) recovery, but no methods have entered routine clinical practice. A systematic review was undertaken to assess electrical stimulation techniques and to evaluate their clinical efficacy in order to identify promising areas for future research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature was searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar and by assessing relevant clinical trial databases. Studies investigating the use of electrical stimulation for postoperative GI recovery were included, regardless of methods used or outcomes measured. A critical review was constructed encompassing all included studies and evaluating and synthesizing stimulation techniques, protocols, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A broad range of neuromodulation strategies and protocols were identified and assessed. Improved postoperative GI recovery following electrical stimulation was reported by 55% of studies (10/18), most commonly those assessing transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and electroacupuncture therapy (7/10). Several studies reported shorter time to first flatus and stool, shorter duration of hospital stay, and reduced postoperative pain. However, inconsistent reporting and limitations in trial design were common, compromising a definitive determination of electrical stimulation efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation appears to be a promising methodology to aid postoperative GI recovery, but greater attention to mechanisms of action and clinical trial quality is necessary for progress. Future research should also aim to apply validated and standardized gut recovery outcomes and consistent neuromodulation methodologies.

Emotional predictors of bowel screening: the avoidance-promoting role of fear, embarrassment, and disgust.

BACKGROUND: Despite considerable efforts to address practical barriers, colorectal cancer screening numbers are often low. People do not always act rationally, and investigating emotions may offer insight into the avoidance of screening. The current work assessed whether fear, embarrassment, and disgust predicted colorectal cancer screening avoidance. METHODS: A community sample (N = 306) aged 45+ completed a questionnaire assessing colorectal cancer screening history and the extent that perceptions of cancer risk, colorectal cancer knowledge, doctor discussions, and a specifically developed scale, the Emotional Barriers to Bowel Screening (EBBS), were associated with previous screening behaviours and anticipated bowel health decision-making. RESULTS: Step-wise logistic regression models revealed that a decision to delay seeking healthcare in the hypothetical presence of bowel symptoms was less likely in people who had discussed risk with their doctor, whereas greater colorectal cancer knowledge and greater fear of a negative outcome predicted greater likelihood of delay. Having previously provided a faecal sample was predicted by discussions about risk with a doctor, older age, and greater embarrassment, whereas perceptions of lower risk predicted a lower likelihood. Likewise, greater insertion disgust predicted a lower likelihood of having had an invasive bowel screening test in the previous 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Alongside medical and demographic factors, fear, embarrassment and disgust are worthy of consideration in colorectal cancer screening. Understanding how specific emotions impact screening decisions and behaviour is an important direction for future work and has potential to inform screening development and communications in bowel health.