Comparison of Catheterization Versus Echocardiographic-Based Gradients in Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

OBJECTIVES: In patients with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), accurate assessment of gradients is important to assess valve function and durability, which drives clinical decision-making. We sought to evaluate discrepancies in aortic valve mean gradients with balloon-expandable and self-expanding TAVI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 507 patients that underwent TAVI and compared mean gradients by catheterization to transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: Mean gradients by Doppler in balloon-expandable (11.0 ± 5.8 mm Hg) and self-expanding devices (8.7 ± 4.5 mm Hg) were significantly higher than catheterization (3.2 ± 4.0 mm Hg vs 3.5 ± 4.1 mm Hg, respectively; P<.001). In a subgroup analysis of skirted valves, Doppler gradients in balloon-expandable (9.8 ± 4.4 mm Hg) and self-expanding devices (8.6 ± 5.1 mm Hg) were significantly higher than catheterization (3.5 ± 4.1 mm Hg vs 4.2 ± 4.8 mm Hg, respectively; P<.001). When the effect of valve size on gradients was analyzed, Doppler gradients were significantly higher than catheterization for all comparisons. When indexed for valve size, patients with large aortas who received a balloon-expandable TAVI had greater pressure differential than those who received a self-expanding TAVI (8.24 ± 0.46 mm Hg vs 5.16 ± 0.66 mm Hg; P<.001). This trend was not seen in patients with a small aorta-to-valve index. CONCLUSION: Following TAVI, aortic valve mean gradients acquired by Doppler were higher than catheterization and the discrepancy was more pronounced in balloon-expandable than self-expanding prostheses. These differences persist in skirted valves and across valve sizes. These observations may reflect periprocedural hemodynamic changes, differences between prosthetic flow acceleration, and/or pressure recovery.

The Effects of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Mitral Valve Function.

The transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure provides a way to treat severe aortic stenosis in the large population of patients who are not candidates for surgical aortic valve replacement. Mitral regurgitation is often concomitant to aortic stenosis in these patients due to the high pressure of the left ventricle and long-term damage to the mitral valve. Due to the proximity of the aortic valve to the mitral valve, TAVR can impact the functional status of the mitral valve by affecting left ventricular outlet obstruction and the mitral valve annular shape. As TAVR becomes increasingly prevalent to treat aortic stenosis, consideration into the impact of TAVR on mitral valve function is important in order determine whether patients will be able to undergo mitral valve repair or replacement, whether surgically or percutaneously. In this review, we seek to explore the effect of TAVR on the mitral annular geometry, mitral valve flow, and the impact of TAVR on the mitral valve in the presence of mitral annular calcification.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: Procedural Planning, Utility, and Applicability.

Since the first native transcatheter mitral valve implantation in 2012, transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has expanded its use to degenerated bioprostheses, failed annuloplasty ring repair, and mitral annular calcification. However, high-screen failure rates in trials have persisted due to predicted left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and unfavorable anatomy. Preprocedural planning in this patient population with multidetector computed tomography and transesophageal echocardiography is paramount to intraprocedural success. In patients with favorable left ventricular outflow tract anatomy who are not surgical candidates, the transseptal approach is preferred. In those who are surgical candidates, TMVR can be performed via a transapical or transatrial approach. Currently, a plethora of TMVR devices targeting the native mitral pathologies are undergoing clinical trials. Data have consistently shown the greatest benefit of this procedure in native mitral regurgitation and failed bioprostheses rather than failed annuloplasty rings or mitral annular calcification. With technological advancement and careful patient selection, this therapy will serve as a complement to surgical and TMV repair and will continue to expand to address MV diseases in a broader patient population.

Newer hormonal pharmacotherapies for heart failure.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure (HF) is characterized by maladaptive neurohormonal activation of the cardiovascular and renal systems resulting in circulatory inadequacy and frequent acute exacerbations. The increasing burden of HF prompted investigation of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and the design of pharmacotherapeutics that would target these pathways. AREAS COVERED: A MEDLINE search for relevant original investigations and review articles of newer hormonal drugs for HF since the year 2005 till October 2017 provided us with necessary literature. Major trials and relevant clinical investigations were discussed. EXPERT COMMENTARY: A multitude of hormonal pathways central to HF were identified, including the natriuretic peptide system and neurohormones such as relaxin, arginine vasopressin, and endothelin. However, drugs targeting these novel pathways (aliskiren, tolvaptan, ularitide, serelaxin, bosentan, macitentan) failed to show mortality benefit. This emphasizes a tremendous unmet need in the pharmacotherapy for HF, especially for the subtypes of acute HF and HF with preserved ejection fraction. Sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated substantial mortality benefit in chronic systolic HF population and is endorsed by international HF guidelines. If proven to be efficacious in larger outcome trials, finerenone can be a valuable addition baseline HF therapy. More basic, translational, and phenotype specific clinical research is warranted to improve HF pharmacotherapy.

Profile of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of heart failure: patient selection and perspectives.

With an estimated prevalence of 5.8 million in the USA and over 23 million people worldwide, heart failure (HF) is growing in epidemic proportions. Despite the use of guideline-directed medical therapies such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenergic blockers, angiotensin receptor blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for chronic systolic HF for almost two decades, HF remains a leading cause of morbidity, mortality, and health care expenditures. The Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) trial provided compelling evidence for the cardiovascular and mortality benefit of sacubitril/valsartan when compared to enalapril in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Sacubitril/valsartan performed better than enalapril across various HFrEF patient characteristics and showed substantial benefit in patients with other common comorbidities. Following the trial, the US Food and Drug Administration approved this drug for the treatment of HF. Various international HF consensus guidelines endorse sacubitril/valsartan as a class I recommendation for the management of symptomatic HFrEF. Although this high-quality clinical study is the largest and the most globally represented trial in HFrEF patients, concerns have been raised regarding the generalizability of the trial results in real-world HF population. The gaps in US Food and Drug Administration labeling and guideline recommendations might lead to this medication being used in a larger population than it was studied in. In this review, we will discuss the current role of sacubitril/valsartan in the management of HF, concerns related to PARADIGM-HF and answers, shortcomings of this novel drug, effects on patient characteristics, real-world eligibility, and the role of ongoing and further investigations to clarify the profile of sacubitril/valsartan in the management of HF.