RESUMEN
Esophageal dilations in children are performed by several pediatric and adult professionals. We aim to summarize improvements in safety and new technology used for the treatment of complex and refractory strictures, including triamcinolone injection, endoscopic electro-incisional therapy, topical mitomycin-C application, stent placement, functional lumen imaging probe assisted dilation, and endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure in the pediatric population.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Esofágica , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Dilatación/métodos , Estenosis Esofágica/etiología , Estenosis Esofágica/terapia , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Pediatric chronic pancreatitis is increasingly diagnosed. Endoscopic methods [endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)] are useful tools to diagnose and manage chronic pancreatitis. Pediatric knowledge and use of these modalities is limited and warrants dissemination. METHODS: Literature review of publications relating to use of ERCP and EUS for diagnosis and/or management of chronic pancreatitis with special attention to studies involving 0--18 years old subjects was conducted with summaries generated. Recommendations were developed and voted upon by authors. RESULTS: Both EUS and ERCP can be used even in small children to assist in diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis in cases where cross-sectional imaging is not sufficient to diagnose or characterize the disease. Children under 15âkg for EUS and 10âkg for ERCP can be technically challenging. These procedures should be done optimally by appropriately trained endoscopists and adult gastroenterology providers with appropriate experience treating children. EUS and ERCP-related risks both include perforation, bleeding and pancreatitis. EUS is the preferred diagnostic modality over ERCP because of lower complication rates overall. Both modalities can be used for management of chronic pancreatitis -related fluid collections. ERCP has successfully been used to manage pancreatic duct stones. CONCLUSION: EUS and ERCP can be safely used to diagnose chronic pancreatitis in pediatric patients and assist in management of chronic pancreatitis-related complications. Procedure-related risks are similar to those seen in adults, with EUS having a safer risk profile overall. The recent increase in pediatric-trained specialists will improve access of these modalities for children.
Asunto(s)
Gastroenterología , Pancreatitis Crónica , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Endosonografía , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Páncreas/diagnóstico por imagen , Pancreatitis Crónica/diagnóstico por imagen , Pancreatitis Crónica/terapia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is understudied in the pediatric population despite increasing incidence. Although many cases are mild and resolve with supportive care, severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is a lack of pediatric-specific predictive tools to help stratify risk of SAP in children. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients with AP or recurrent AP at Cohen Children's Medical Center between 2011 and 2016 was performed. Lipase level and the presence of pediatric systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) on admission were examined as potential predictors of SAP and length of stay (LOS). A multivariate logistic regression or analysis of covariance was used to conduct the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-nine pediatric patients met inclusion criteria. Approximately 37% (29/79) had SIRS on admission, 22% (17/79) developed SAP, and there were no mortalities. In both the univariate and multivariate models, SIRS was a predictor of SAP. Mean (SD) LOS for patients with SIRS compared with without SIRS was 9.6â±â8.3 compared with 6.3â±â6.9 days (Pâ<â0.05). The mean LOS of patients with one or more comorbidity (48%, 38/79) was 10.0â±â9.5 compared with 5.2â±â4.0 days (Pâ<â0.01) for those patients without any comorbidities. Only the presence of comorbidities predicted length of time spent nil per os (NPO; Pâ=â0.0022). Patients with comorbidities stayed an average of 5.6â±â7.6 days NPO, whereas those without comorbidities spent 2.8â±â2.4 days NPO. Lipase was not predictive of SAP, LOS, or length of time spent NPO. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the use of SIRS as a simple screening tool on admission to identify children at risk for the development of SAP. The presence of any comorbidity was predictive of LOS and length of NPO in the multivariate model. This may reflect that comorbidities prolong pancreatitis or influence disposition planning.
Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Lipasa/sangre , Pancreatitis/epidemiología , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/epidemiología , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of acute pancreatitis (AP) in children is increasing, management recommendations rely on adult published guidelines. Pediatric-specific recommendations are needed. METHODS: The North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Pancreas committee performed a MEDLINE review using several preselected key terms relating to management considerations in adult and pediatric AP. The literature was summarized, quality of evidence reviewed, and statements of recommendations developed. The authorship met to discuss the evidence, statements, and voted on recommendations. A consensus of at least 75% was required to approve a recommendation. RESULTS: The diagnosis of pediatric AP should follow the published INternational Study Group of Pediatric Pancreatitis: In Search for a CuRE definitions (by meeting at least 2 out of 3 criteria: (1) abdominal pain compatible with AP, (2) serum amylase and/or lipase values ≥3 times upper limits of normal, (3) imaging findings consistent with AP). Adequate fluid resuscitation with crystalloid appears key especially within the first 24âhours. Analgesia may include opioid medications when opioid-sparing measures are inadequate. Pulmonary, cardiovascular, and renal status should be closely monitored particularly within the first 48âhours. Enteral nutrition should be started as early as tolerated, whether through oral, gastric, or jejunal route. Little evidence supports the use of prophylactic antibiotics, antioxidants, probiotics, and protease inhibitors. Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasonography have limited roles in diagnosis and management. Children should be carefully followed for development of early or late complications and recurrent attacks of AP. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical report represents the first English-language recommendations for the management of pediatric AP. Future aims should include prospective multicenter pediatric studies to further validate these recommendations and optimize care for children with AP.
Asunto(s)
Pancreatitis/diagnóstico , Pancreatitis/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Niño , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , PediatríaAsunto(s)
Absceso/cirugía , Páncreas/patología , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/cirugía , Stents , Absceso/complicaciones , Absceso/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Endosonografía , Humanos , Masculino , Necrosis , Páncreas/diagnóstico por imagen , Páncreas/cirugía , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
This article provides an overview of the evaluation and management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) in children. The common etiologies at different ages are reviewed. Conditions with endoscopic importance for diagnosis or therapy include solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, polyps, vascular lesions, and colonic inflammation and ulceration. Diagnostic modalities for identifying causes of LGIB in children include endoscopy and colonoscopy, cross-sectional and nuclear medicine imaging, video capsule endoscopy, and enteroscopy. Pre-endoscopic preparation and decision-making unique to pediatrics is highlighted. The authors conclude with a summary of current and emerging therapeutic hemostatic techniques that can be used in pediatric patients.