Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Respir Res ; 24(1): 162, 2023 Jun 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37330506

RESUMEN

Exposure to e-cigarette vapors alters important biologic processes including phagocytosis, lipid metabolism, and cytokine activity in the airways and alveolar spaces. Little is known about the biologic mechanisms underpinning the conversion to e-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) from normal e-cigarette use in otherwise healthy individuals. We compared cell populations and inflammatory immune populations from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in individuals with EVALI to e-cigarette users without respiratory disease and healthy controls and found that e-cigarette users with EVALI demonstrate a neutrophilic inflammation with alveolar macrophages skewed towards inflammatory (M1) phenotype and cytokine profile. Comparatively, e-cigarette users without EVALI demonstrate lower inflammatory cytokine production and express features associated with a reparative (M2) phenotype. These data indicate macrophage-specific changes are occurring in e-cigarette users who develop EVALI.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Lesión Pulmonar , Humanos , Macrófagos Alveolares , Fenotipo , Citocinas
2.
Lancet ; 394(10214): 2073-2083, 2019 12 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31711629

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An ongoing outbreak of lung injury associated with e-cigarettes or vaping (also known as E-VALI or VALI) started in March, 2019, in the USA. The cause, diagnosis, treatment, and course of this disease remains unknown. METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective, observational, cohort study, we collected data on all patients with lung injury associated with e-cigarettes or vaping seen in Intermountain Healthcare, an integrated health system based in Utah, USA, between June 27 and Oct 4, 2019. Telecritical care, based in Salt Lake City, UT, USA, was used as the central repository for case validation, public reporting, and system-wide dissemination of expertise, which included a proposed diagnosis and treatment guideline for lung injury associated with e-cigarettes or vaping. We extracted data on patient presentation, treatment, and short-term follow-up (2 weeks after discharge) from chart review and interviews with patients undertaken by the Utah Department of Health (Salt Lake City, UT, USA). FINDINGS: 60 patients presented with lung injury associated with e-cigarettes or vaping at 13 hospitals or outpatient clinics in the integrated health system. 33 (55%) of 60 were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). 53 (88%) of 60 patients presented with constitutional symptoms, 59 (98%) with respiratory symptoms, and 54 (90%) with gastrointestinal symptoms. 54 (90%) of 60 were given antibiotics and 57 (95%) were given steroids. Six (10%) of 60 patients were readmitted to an ICU or hospital within 2 weeks, three (50%) of whom had relapsed with vaping or e-cigarette use. Of 26 patients who were followed up within 2 weeks, despite clinical and radiographic improvement in all, many had residual abnormalities on chest radiographs (ten [67%] of 15) and pulmonary function tests (six [67%] of nine). Two patients died and lung injury associated with e-cigarettes or vaping was thought to be a contributing factor, but not the cause of death, for both. INTERPRETATION: Lung injury associated with e-cigarettes or vaping is an emerging illness associated with severe lung injury and constitutional and gastrointestinal symptoms. Increased awareness has led to identification of a broad spectrum of severity of illness in patients who were treated with antibiotics and steroids. Despite improvement, at short-term follow-up many patients had residual abnormalities. Lung injury associated with e-cigarettes or vaping remains a clinical diagnosis with symptoms that overlap infectious and other lung diseases. Maintaining a high index of suspicion for this disease is important as work continues in understanding the cause or causes, optimal therapy, and long-term outcomes of these patients. FUNDING: Intermountain Healthcare.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/etiología , Vapeo/efectos adversos , Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/epidemiología , Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Broncoscopía , Cannabidiol/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Brotes de Enfermedades , Dronabinol/administración & dosificación , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Nicotina/administración & dosificación , Ventilación no Invasiva , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración Artificial , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Utah/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
4.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 198(6): 759-766, 2018 09 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29652174

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Nearly 60% of U.S. children live in counties with particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 µm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) concentrations above air quality standards. Understanding the relationship between ambient air pollution exposure and health outcomes informs actions to reduce exposure and disease risk. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between ambient PM2.5 levels and healthcare encounters for acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI). METHODS: Using an observational case-crossover design, subjects (n = 146,397) were studied if they had an ALRI diagnosis and resided on Utah's Wasatch Front. PM2.5 air pollution concentrations were measured using community-based air quality monitors between 1999 and 2016. Odds ratios for ALRI healthcare encounters were calculated after stratification by ages 0-2, 3-17, and 18 or more years. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Approximately 77% (n = 112,467) of subjects were 0-2 years of age. The odds of ALRI encounter for these young children increased within 1 week of elevated PM2.5 and peaked after 3 weeks with a cumulative 28-day odds ratio of 1.15 per +10 µg/m3 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.19). ALRI encounters with diagnosed and laboratory-confirmed respiratory syncytial virus and influenza increased following elevated ambient PM2.5 levels. Similar elevated odds for ALRI were also observed for older children, although the number of events and precision of estimates were much lower. CONCLUSIONS: In this large sample of urban/suburban patients, short-term exposure to elevated PM2.5 air pollution was associated with greater healthcare use for ALRI in young children, older children, and adults. Further exploration is needed of causal interactions between PM2.5 and ALRI.


Asunto(s)
Exposición por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Material Particulado/efectos adversos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quinonas , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Tiempo (Meteorología) , Adulto Joven
5.
Eur Respir J ; 48(1): 133-41, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27288032

RESUMEN

The diagnosis and severity categorisation of obstructive lung disease is determined using reference values. The American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society in 2005 recommended the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III spirometry prediction equations for patients in USA aged 8-80 years. The Global Lung Initiative 2012 (GLI 12) provided spirometry prediction equations for patients aged 3-95 years. Comparison of the NHANES III and GLI 12 prediction equations for diagnosing and categorising airway obstruction in patients in USA has not been made.We aimed to quantify the differences between NHANES III and GLI 12 predicted values in Caucasians aged 18-95 years, using both mathematical simulation and clinical data. We compared predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and lower limit of normal (LLN) FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) % for NHANES III and GLI 12 prediction equations by applying both a simulation model and clinical spirometry data to quantify differences in the diagnosis and categorisation of airway obstruction.Mathematical simulation revealed significant similarities and differences between prediction equations for both LLN FEV1/FVC % and predicted FEV1 There are significant differences when using GLI 12 and NHANES III to diagnose airway obstruction and severity in Caucasian patients aged 18-95 years.Similarities and differences exist between NHANES III and GLI 12 for some age and height combinations. The differences in LLN FEV1/FVC % and predicted FEV1 are most prominent in older taller/shorter individuals. The magnitude of the differences can be large and may result in differences in clinical management.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares Obstructivas/clasificación , Enfermedades Pulmonares Obstructivas/diagnóstico , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Encuestas Nutricionales , Espirometría , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valores de Referencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca , Adulto Joven
8.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 186(10): 965-74, 2012 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22955319

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Changes in airway epithelial cell differentiation, driven in part by IL-13, are important in asthma. Micro-RNAs (miRNAs) regulate cell differentiation in many systems and could contribute to epithelial abnormalities in asthma. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether airway epithelial miRNA expression is altered in asthma and identify IL-13-regulated miRNAs. METHODS: We used miRNA microarrays to analyze bronchial epithelial brushings from 16 steroid-naive subjects with asthma before and after inhaled corticosteroids, 19 steroid-using subjects with asthma, and 12 healthy control subjects, and the effects of IL-13 and corticosteroids on cultured bronchial epithelial cells. We used quantitative polymerase chain reaction to confirm selected microarray results. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Most (12 of 16) steroid-naive subjects with asthma had a markedly abnormal pattern of bronchial epithelial miRNA expression by microarray analysis. Compared with control subjects, 217 miRNAs were differentially expressed in steroid-naive subjects with asthma and 200 in steroid-using subjects with asthma (false discovery rate < 0.05). Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids had modest effects on miRNA expression in steroid-naive asthma, inducing a statistically significant (false discovery rate < 0.05) change for only nine miRNAs. qPCR analysis confirmed differential expression of 22 miRNAs that were highly differentially expressed by microarrays. IL-13 stimulation recapitulated changes in many differentially expressed miRNAs, including four members of the miR-34/449 family, and these changes in miR-34/449 family members were resistant to corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: Dramatic alterations of airway epithelial cell miRNA levels are a common feature of asthma. These alterations are only modestly corrected by inhaled corticosteroids. IL-13 effects may account for some of these alterations, including repression of miR-34/449 family members that have established roles in airway epithelial cell differentiation. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00595153).


Asunto(s)
Asma/metabolismo , Bronquios/metabolismo , Células Epiteliales/metabolismo , MicroARNs/metabolismo , Administración por Inhalación , Adulto , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/genética , Bronquios/efectos de los fármacos , Budesonida/administración & dosificación , Células Cultivadas , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Células Epiteliales/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Interleucina-13/farmacología , Masculino , MicroARNs/genética , MicroARNs/fisiología , Análisis por Micromatrices , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa
9.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 26(4): 305-17, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22491960

RESUMEN

Unnecessary variation in clinical care and clinical research reduces our ability to determine what healthcare interventions are effective. Reducing this unnecessary variation could lead to further healthcare quality improvement and more effective clinical research. We have developed and used electronic decision support tools (eProtocols) to reduce unnecessary variation. Our eProtocols have progressed from a locally developed mainframe computer application in one clinical site (LDS Hospital) to web-based applications available in multiple languages and used internationally. We use eProtocol-insulin as an example to illustrate this evolution. We initially developed eProtocol-insulin as a local quality improvement effort to manage stress hyperglycemia in the adult intensive care unit (ICU). We extended eProtocol-insulin use to translate our quality improvement results into usual clinical care at Intermountain Healthcare ICUs. We exported eProtocol-insulin to support research in other US and international institutions, and extended our work to the pediatric ICU. We iteratively refined eProtocol-insulin throughout these transitions, and incorporated new knowledge about managing stress hyperglycemia in the ICU. Based on our experience in the development and clinical use of eProtocols, we outline remaining challenges to eProtocol development, widespread distribution and use, and suggest a process for eProtocol development. Technical and regulatory issues, as well as standardization of protocol development, validation and maintenance, need to be addressed. Resolution of these issues should facilitate general use of eProtocols to improve patient care.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Administrativas/organización & administración , Quimioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Hiperglucemia/diagnóstico , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Internet , Lenguajes de Programación , Adulto , Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estados Unidos
10.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 19(11): 1892-1899, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35533314

RESUMEN

Rationale: E-cigarette- or vaping-associated lung injury (EVALI) was first identified in 2019. The long-term respiratory, cognitive, mood disorder, and vaping behavior outcomes of patients with EVALI remain unknown. Objectives: To determine the long-term respiratory, cognitive, mood disorder, and vaping behavior outcomes of patients with EVALI. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with EVALI from two health systems. We assessed outcomes at 1 year after onset of EVALI using validated instruments measuring cognitive function, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, respiratory disability, coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection, pulmonary function, and vaping behaviors. We used multivariable regression to identify risk factors of post-EVALI vaping behaviors and to identify whether admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) was associated with cognitive, respiratory, or mood symptoms. Results: Seventy-three patients completed 12-month follow-up. Most patients were male (66.7%), young (mean age, 31 ± 11 yr), and White (85%) and did not need admission to the ICU (59%). At 12 months, 39% (25 of 64) had cognitive impairment, whereas 48% (30 of 62) reported respiratory limitations. Mood disorders were common, with 59% (38 of 64) reporting anxiety and/or depression and 62% (39 of 63) having post-traumatic stress. Four (6.4%) of 64 reported a history of COVID-19 infection. Despite the history of EVALI, many people continued to vape. Only 38% (24 of 64) reported quitting all vaping and smoking behaviors. Younger age was associated with reduced vaping behavior after EVALI (odds ratio, 0.93; P = 0.02). ICU admission was not associated with cognitive impairment, dyspnea, or mood symptoms. Conclusions: Patients with EVALI, despite their youth, commonly have significant long-term respiratory disability; cognitive impairment; symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress; and persistent vaping.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Lesión Pulmonar , Trastornos Respiratorios , Vapeo , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Femenino , Vapeo/efectos adversos , Lesión Pulmonar/etiología , Pulmón
11.
Chest ; 158(2): 820-827, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32092322

RESUMEN

A 23-year-old man arrives at the ED with a 3-week history of dyspnea, dry cough, fevers, and night sweats. Two weeks previously, he was evaluated in an outpatient clinic and given a course of azithromycin for presumed infectious pneumonia. His symptoms did not improve, and he was seen 1 week later in an urgent care center and given a prescription for doxycycline, which he has been taking without improvement. He states that he feels miserable, has severe nausea and vomiting, and has not eaten in several days. His only medical history is childhood asthma. He reports no surgeries and takes no medications. He has no risk factors for HIV, does not smoke combustible cigarettes or use IV drugs, and has not recently traveled. Examination shows a room air saturation of 89%, a temperature of 38.3°C, and a respiratory rate of 22 breaths/min. Results of his examination are normal, and there are no rales or wheezing heard in the lungs. Chest radiograph shows bilateral, consolidative opacities. WBC count is 14,000, with left shift. Results of biochemistries are normal. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate is 104, and procalcitonin is 0.08. Urine toxicology screen is positive for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Asked specifically about vaping and e-cigarette use, he reports that he recently began using THC "carts" that his friend gets from an unknown supplier. What is the diagnosis and what additional steps are necessary to confirm it? Is bronchoscopy indicated?


Asunto(s)
Broncoscopía , Lesión Pulmonar/inducido químicamente , Lesión Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Vapeo/efectos adversos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Radiografía Torácica
12.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis ; 15: 1741-1750, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32764918

RESUMEN

Introduction: Tobacco use and other cardiovascular risk factors often accompany chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study derived and validated the Summit Score to predict mortality in people with COPD and cardiovascular risks. Methods: SUMMIT trial subjects (N=16,485) ages 40-80 years with COPD were randomly assigned 50%/50% to derivation (N=8181) and internal validation (N=8304). Three external COPD validations from Intermountain Healthcare included outpatients with cardiovascular risks (N=9251), outpatients without cardiovascular risks (N=8551), and inpatients (N=26,170). Cox regression evaluated 40 predictors of all-cause mortality. SUMMIT treatments including combined fluticasone furoate (FF) 100µg/vilanterol 25µg (VI) were not included in the score. Results: Mortality predictors were FEV1, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, age, smoking pack-years, prior COPD hospitalizations, myocardial infarction, heart failure, diabetes, anti-thrombotics, anti-arrhythmics, and xanthines. Combined in the Summit Score (derivation: c=0.668), quartile 4 vs 1 had HR=4.43 in SUMMIT validation (p<0.001, 95% CI=3.27, 6.01, c=0.662) and HR=8.15 in Intermountain cardiovascular risk COPD outpatients (p<0.001, 95% CI=5.86, 11.34, c=0.736), and strongly predicted mortality in the other Intermountain COPD populations. Among all SUMMIT subjects with scores 14-19, FF 100µg/VI 25µg vs placebo had HR=0.76 (p=0.0158, 95% CI=0.61, 0.95), but FF 100µg/VI 25µg was not different from placebo for scores <14 or >19. Conclusion: In this post hoc analysis of SUMMIT trial data, the Summit Score was derived and validated in multiple Intermountain COPD populations. The score was used to identify a subpopulation in which mortality risk was lower for FF 100µg/VI 25µg treatment. Trial Registration: The SUMMIT trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as number NCT01313676.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Administración por Inhalación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Androstadienos/uso terapéutico , Clorobencenos/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico
13.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0236021, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32745082

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated that annual screening with low dose CT in high-risk population was associated with reduction in lung cancer mortality. Nonetheless, the leading cause of mortality in the study was from cardiovascular diseases. PURPOSE: To determine whether the used machine learning automatic algorithms assessing coronary calcium score (CCS), level of liver steatosis and emphysema percentage in the lungs are good predictors of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and incidence when applied on low dose CT scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three fully automated machine learning algorithms were used to assess CCS, level of liver steatosis and emphysema percentage in the lung. The algorithms were used on low-dose computed tomography scans acquired from 12,332 participants in NLST. RESULTS: In a multivariate analysis, association between the three algorithm scores and CVD mortality have shown an OR of 1.72 (p = 0.003), 2.62 (p < 0.0001) for CCS scores of 101-400 and above 400 respectively, and an OR of 1.12 (p = 0.044) for level of liver steatosis. Similar results were shown for the incidence of CVD, OR of 1.96 (p < 0.0001), 4.94 (p < 0.0001) for CCS scores of 101-400 and above 400 respectively. Also, emphysema percentage demonstrated an OR of 0.89 (p < 0.0001). Similar results are shown for univariate analyses of the algorithms. CONCLUSION: The three automated machine learning algorithms could help physicians to assess the incidence and risk of CVD mortality in this specific population. Application of these algorithms to existing LDCT scans can provide valuable health care information and assist in future research.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Aprendizaje Automático , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Fumar Cigarrillos/efectos adversos , Fumar Cigarrillos/epidemiología , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Enfisema/diagnóstico , Enfisema/epidemiología , Enfisema/etiología , Hígado Graso/diagnóstico , Hígado Graso/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis ; 15: 2629-2641, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33122901

RESUMEN

Purpose: This retrospective, observational cohort study investigated the association of blood eosinophil counts within 1 week of hospitalization for acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) with subsequent risk of all-cause and COPD-related readmission from a large integrated health system. Patients and Methods: Electronic medical records were extracted for index hospitalization for AECOPD at all Intermountain Healthcare hospitals. The primary outcome was the relationship of blood eosinophil count to 30-day all-cause readmission; secondary outcomes were 60-day, 90-day, and 12-month all-cause readmission, COPD-related readmission, and empiric derivation of the eosinophil count with the highest area under the curve (AUC) for predicting 30-day all-cause readmission. Results: Of 2445 included patients, 1935 (79%) had a blood eosinophil count <300 cells/µL and 510 (21%) had a count ≥300 cells/µL. Using a 300-cells/µL threshold, there was no significant difference between high and low eosinophil groups in 30-day (odds ratio [OR]=1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.75-1.47) or 60-day (OR=1.15, 95% CI=0.88-1.51) all-cause readmissions. However, patients with greater (versus lesser) eosinophil counts had increased 90-day and 12-month all-cause readmissions (OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.06-1.72, and OR=1.32, 95% CI=1.07-1.62). COPD-related readmission rates were significantly greater for patients with greater (versus lesser) eosinophil counts at 30, 60, and 90 days and 12 months (OR range=1.52-1.97). A total of 70 cells/µL had the most discriminatory power to predict 30-day all-cause readmission (highest AUC). Conclusion: Eosinophil counts in patients with COPD were not associated with a difference in 30-day all-cause readmissions. However, greater eosinophil counts were associated with increased risk of all-cause readmission at 90 days and 12 months and COPD-related readmission at 30, 60, and 90 days and 12 months. Patients with eosinophils <70 cells/µL had the lowest risk for 30-day all-cause readmission. Blood eosinophils in patients hospitalized with AECOPD may be a useful biomarker for the risk of hospital readmission.


Asunto(s)
Eosinófilos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Readmisión del Paciente , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 7(1)2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32060034

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Laboratory-based Intermountain Validated Exacerbation (LIVE) Score is associated with mortality and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation risk across multiple health systems. However, whether the LIVE Score and its associated risk is a stable patient characteristic is unknown. METHODS: We validated the LIVE Score in a fourth health system. Then we determined the LIVE Score stability in a retrospective cohort of 98 766 patients with COPD in four health systems where it was previously validated. We assessed whether LIVE Scores changed or remained the same over time. Stability was defined as a majority of surviving patients having the same LIVE Score 4 years later. RESULTS: The LIVE Score separated patients into three LIVE Score risk groups of low, medium, and high mortality and LIVE Score stability. Mortality ranged from 6.2% for low-risk LIVE to 45.8% for high-risk LIVE (p<0.001). We found that low-risk LIVE groups were stable and high-risk LIVE groups were unstable. Low-risk LIVE group patients remained low risk, but few high-risk LIVE group patients remained high risk (79.0% high vs 48.1% medium vs 8.8% low, p<0.001 for all pairwise comparisons). CONCLUSION: The LIVE Score identifies three major clinically actionable cohorts: a stable low-risk LIVE group, an unstable high-risk LIVE group with high mortality rates, and a medium-risk LIVE group. These observations further our understanding of how existing data used to calculate the LIVE Score may target interventions across risk cohorts of patients with COPD in a health system.


Asunto(s)
Progresión de la Enfermedad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis ; 5(3): 208-220, 2018 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30584584

RESUMEN

Rationale: Although chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation frequency is stable in research cohorts, whether severe COPD exacerbation frequency can be used to identify patients at high risk for future severe COPD exacerbations and/or mortality is unknown. Methods: Severe COPD exacerbation frequency stability was determined in 3 distinct clinical cohorts. A total of 17,450 patients with COPD in Intermountain Healthcare were categorized based on the number of severe COPD exacerbations per year. We determined whether exacerbation frequency was stable and whether it predicted mortality. These findings were validated in 83,134 patients from the U.S. Veterans Affairs (VA) nationwide health care system and 3326 patients from the University of Chicago Medicine health system. Results: In the Intermountain Healthcare cohort, the majority (84%, 14,706 patients) had no exacerbations in 2009 and were likely to remain non-exacerbators with a significantly lower 6-year mortality compared with frequent exacerbators (2 or more exacerbations per year) (25% versus 57%, p<0.001). Similar findings were noted in the VA health system and the University of Chicago Medicine health system. Non-exacerbators were likely to remain non-exacerbators with the lowest overall mortality. In all cohorts, frequent exacerbator was not a stable phenotype until patients had at least 2 consecutive years of frequent exacerbations. COPD exacerbation frequency predicted any cause mortality. Conclusions: In clinical datasets across different organizations, severe COPD exacerbation frequency was stable after at least 2 consecutive years of frequent exacerbations. Thus, severe COPD exacerbation frequency identifies patients across a health care system at high risk for future COPD-related health care utilization and overall mortality.

18.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 5: 173, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29942803

RESUMEN

Background: Identifying COPD patients at high risk for mortality or healthcare utilization remains a challenge. A robust system for identifying high-risk COPD patients using Electronic Health Record (EHR) data would empower targeting interventions aimed at ensuring guideline compliance and multimorbidity management. The purpose of this study was to empirically derive, validate, and characterize subgroups of COPD patients based on routinely collected clinical data widely available within the EHR. Methods: Cluster analysis was used in 5,006 patients with COPD at Intermountain to identify clusters based on a large collection of clinical variables. Recursive Partitioning (RP) was then used to determine a preferred tree that assigned patients to clusters based on a parsimonious variable subset. The mortality, COPD exacerbations, and comorbidity profile of the identified groups were examined. The findings were validated in an independent Intermountain cohort and in external cohorts from the United States Veterans Affairs (VA) and University of Chicago Medicine systems. Measurements and Main Results: The RP algorithm identified five LIVE Scores based on laboratory values: albumin, creatinine, chloride, potassium, and hemoglobin. The groups were characterized by increasing risk of mortality. The lowest risk, LIVE Score 5 had 8% 4-year mortality vs. 56% in the highest risk LIVE Score 1 (p < 0.001). These findings were validated in the VA cohort (n = 83,134), an expanded Intermountain cohort (n = 48,871) and in the University of Chicago system (n = 3,236). Higher mortality groups also had higher COPD exacerbation rates and comorbidity rates. Conclusions: In large clinical datasets across different organizations, the LIVE Score utilizes existing laboratory data for COPD patients, and may be used to stratify risk for mortality and COPD exacerbations.

19.
20.
Respir Care ; 61(11): 1523-1529, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27624631

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although the ratio of FEV1 to the vital capacity (VC) is universally accepted as the cornerstone of pulmonary function test (PFT) interpretation, FVC remains in common use. We sought to determine what the differences in PFT interpretation were when the largest measured vital capacity (VCmax) was used instead of the FVC. METHODS: We included 12,238 consecutive PFTs obtained for routine clinical care. We interpreted all PFTs first using FVC in the interpretation algorithm and then again using the VCmax, obtained either before or after administration of inhaled bronchodilator. RESULTS: Six percent of PFTs had an interpretive change when VCmax was used instead of FVC. The most common changes were: new diagnosis of obstruction and exclusion of restriction (previously suggested by low FVC without total lung capacity measured by body plethysmography). A nonspecific pattern occurred in 3% of all PFT interpretations with FVC. One fifth of these 3% produced a new diagnosis of obstruction with VCmax. The largest factors predicting a change in PFT interpretation with VCmax were a positive bronchodilator response and the administration of a bronchodilator. Larger FVCs decreased the odds of PFT interpretation change. Surprisingly, the increased numbers of PFT tests did not increase odds of PFT interpretation change. CONCLUSIONS: Six percent of PFTs have a different interpretation when VCmax is used instead of FVC. Evaluating borderline or ambiguous PFTs using the VCmax may be informative in diagnosing obstruction and excluding restriction.


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Pulmonares Obstructivas/diagnóstico , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria/métodos , Capacidad Vital/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA