Factors associated with loss to follow up after abnormal cervical cancer screening in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess risk factors associated with loss to follow up in patients referred for colposcopy after abnormal cervical cytology during pregnancy in a Southern safety net hospital population. METHODS: An urban colposcopy center was queried for patients referred for follow up of abnormal cervical cytology during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Patients were identified through a standardized referral code in the electronic medical record. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare patient characteristics between those who followed up for colposcopy and those lost to follow up. Independent risk factors assessed included age, parity, race, insurance, HIV status, history of mental illness, BMI, gestational age and trimester at screening, cytology at colposcopy referral, interval days until colposcopy, and biopsy histology. RESULTS: 1063 patients were identified, with 40.8% of patients who completed referred colposcopy. Patient characteristics predictive for colposcopy follow up included: maternal age at referral cervical cytology >30 years (1.67; 1.27-2.20; < 0.003), gestational age < 18 weeks at abnormal cervical cytology (1.57; 1.23-2.01; <0.0002), maternal race non-African American (2.20; 1.32-3.65; <0.0024) and with high grade cervical cytology (2.42; 1.81-3.24; <0.0001). CONCLUSION: In this population, inadequate follow up for abnormal cervical cytology during pregnancy is prominent, especially among those with younger maternal age, African American (AA) race, cervical cytology completed at later gestational ages of pregnancy, and low-grade initial cytology. Higher no-show rate among AA patients supports well-documented health disparities and need for further investigation and protocols to identify those at risk for loss to follow up.

An Alternative to Cytology in Triaging Cisgender Men and Transgender Women With HIV for High-Resolution Anoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate high-risk human papillomavirus testing (hrHPV) as an alternative for anal cytology in screening for high-grade anal neoplasia (AIN2-3) among males with HIV. To identify predictive risk factors for AIN2-3 and develop a clinical tool to triage males with HIV for high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) without cytology. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 199 adult cisgender men and transgender women with HIV referred to an anal neoplasia clinic in the Southeastern United States between January 2018 and March 2021. METHODS: Each subject underwent cytology, hrHPV, and HRA. Clinical and sociodemographic risk factors were collected for each subject. Significant risk factors for AIN2-3 were identified using logistic regression, and a triage tool incorporating these factors was developed. Screening test characteristics were calculated for cytology with and without adjunct hrHPV, hrHPV alone, and the triage tool. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, significant predictors of AIN2-3 were hrHPV positivity (odds ratio [OR] = 11.98, CI = 5.58-25.69) and low CD4 count (OR = 2.70, CI = 1.20-6.11). There was no significant difference in positive or negative predictive values among the tool, stand-alone hrHPV, and anal cytology with adjunct hrHPV. Sensitivity and specificity were not significantly different for stand-alone or adjunctive hrHPV testing. Compared with cytology, stand-alone hrHPV and the novel triage tool reduced unnecessary HRA referrals by 65% and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Stand-alone hrHPV would have missed 11 of 74 AIN2-3 and generated 74 fewer unnecessary HRAs than current cytology-based screening patterns, which led to 115 unnecessary HRAs in our cohort. We propose triaging those with low CD4 count, hrHPV positivity, and/or smoking history for HRA.

Truth or DARE (Digital Anal Rectal Examination): Gynecologist Viewpoints on Anal Cancer Screening.

METHODS: The authors conducted a survey for practicing gynecologists recruited through academic institutions, professional societies, and professional groups on social media resulting in 196 respondents. The survey, fielded between January and June 2022, included questions on knowledge, attitudes, training, and practices regarding anal cancer prevention (ACP). Descriptive statistics and χ 2 analysis were completed. RESULTS: In terms of knowledge regarding ACP, over 80% of respondents identified certain clinical indications for anal cancer screening. However, only 36% respondents selected the 3 correct ACP screening tools. Twenty-seven (13.9%) respondents reported receiving training on ACP in medical school, whereas 50 (25.9%) reported receiving training during residency. Only 21% of respondents reported that they perform anal cytology, and 32% reported that they perform digital anal rectal examinations. One hundred thirty-six respondents (75.56%) affirmed that they needed additional training on ACP to be able to provide this service to their patients, and 95 (53.1%) stated they were extremely likely to participate in ACP training if given the opportunity. CONCLUSION: Although a limited proportion of practicing gynecologists are trained in ACP, there is willingness to participate in training if it were made available and to incorporate ACP into their practices.

Criminal Justice Involvement and Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results Among Women in an Urban Safety Net Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to elucidate the risk factors underlying abnormal cytology-based cervical cancer screening (Pap testing) in justice-involved women (JIW) compared with non-JIW in an urban safety net hospital. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of women with a history of correctional involvement who received care at Grady Health System between 2010 and 2018 and had a Pap test was performed (n = 191). An age-matched cohort of women with no correctional involvement and had a Pap test at Grady served as the control (n = 394). Variables of interest were age, HIV, smoking, race, mental health history, and history of incarceration. Outcomes of interests were rate of abnormal Pap tests and follow-up. χ2 and logistic regression models evaluated associations between the variables of interest and outcomes. RESULTS: Rates of abnormal Pap tests were significantly higher in JIW (35.6%) than controls (18.5%, p < .0001). Compared with controls, JIW were significantly more likely to have high-grade cervical cytology (odds ratio [OR] = 3.89, p < .0005) and be lost to gynecologic follow-up (OR = 8.75, p < .0001) and a history of severe mental illness (29.5% vs 4.3%, p < .0001). Those with abnormal Pap tests were likely to be HIV-positive (OR = 20.7, p < .001) and have a history of incarceration (OR = 2.33, p < .001). Predictors of high-grade Pap test were smoking history (OR = 0.16, p = .014), HIV-positive (OR = 3.66, p = .025), and history of incarceration (OR = 3.96, p < .0005). CONCLUSIONS: Justice-involved women represent a high-risk subpopulation with significantly increased rates of high-grade cytology and lost to follow-up. This underscores the need for attention to screening programs and follow-up interventions for JIW.

De-Escalated Adjuvant Treatment for Advanced MMR Deficient Mixed Endometrioid/Clear Cell Endometrial Carcinoma with PD-1 Inhibition Alone: A Case Report.

Introduction: Advanced mixed epithelial endometrial carcinomas are rare high-grade cancers with a poor prognosis. A clear cell component infers relative chemotherapy insensitivity, likely further increased by p53 wild type status and MMR deficiency. PD-1 inhibition for MMR deficient endometrial cancers has been recently added to first-line adjuvant treatment in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. Information on de-escalation of adjuvant treatment to PD-1 inhibition alone without chemotherapy is sparse. Case Presentation: Here, we present a patient with advanced stage mixed epithelial endometrial carcinoma, a clear cell component and MMR deficiency who underwent de-escalated adjuvant treatment with PD-1 inhibition alone without simultaneous chemotherapy. Conclusion: Histotype-agnostic adjuvant monotherapy with checkpoint immune inhibitors alone appears to be a highly effective even in the rare mixed endometrial carcinomas if MMR protein deficient as described in this case report.

"That's Only for Women": The Importance of Educating HIV-Positive Sexual Minority Men on HPV and High Resolution Anoscopy (HRA).

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) experience disproportionately high burdens of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-associated anal cancers. Recent focus has shifted to anorectal cancer prevention through high-resolution anoscopy (HRA); however, little is known about sexual minority men's perceptions, attitudes, or beliefs regarding HRA. We conducted 4 qualitative Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) (n = 15) with sexual minority men, focusing on their beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions of undergoing HRA. Participants discussed their experiences of HPV/HRA as influenced by both their gender and sexuality, including unawareness of HPV disease as a male health issue, challenges relating to female-oriented HPV/HRA language, conception of HPV/HRA as related to prostate health, and connecting their sexual behavior identification as "bottoms" to their need for HRA. As efforts to improve HRA knowledge, access, and uptake among sexual and gender minority communities increase, special attention should be paid to language and messaging choices around HRA.