Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Am J Perinatol ; 36(S 02): S120-S125, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31238372

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lactoferrin is the major antimicrobial protein in human milk. In our randomized controlled trial (RCT) of bovine lactoferrin (BLF) supplementation in preterm neonates, BLF reduced late-onset sepsis (LOS). Mother's own milk (MM) contains higher concentrations of lactoferrin than donor milk or formula, but whether BLF is more effective in infants who receive formula or donor milk is uncertain. AIM: To evaluate the incidence of LOS in preterm infants fed MM and in those fed formula and/or donor milk. STUDY DESIGN: This is a (A) post hoc subgroup analysis, in our RCT of BLF, of its effects in preterm infants fed MM, with or without formula, versus those fed formula and/or donor milk (no-MM) and (B) post hoc meta-analysis, in our RCT of BLF and in the ELFIN (Enteral Lactoferrin in Neonates) RCT, of the effect of BLF in subgroups not exclusively fed MM. RESULTS: (A) Of 472 infants in our RCT, 168 were randomized to placebo and 304 were randomized to BLF. Among MM infants, LOS occurred in 22/133 (16.5%) infants randomized to placebo and in 14/250 (5.6%) randomized to BLF (relative risk or risk ratio (RR): 0.34; relative risk reduction (RRR): 0.66; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for RR: 0.18-0.64; p < 0.0008). Among no-MM infants, LOS occurred in 7/35 (20.0%) randomized to placebo and in 2/54 (3.7%) randomized to BLF (RR: 0.19; RRR: 0.81; 95% CI for RR: 0.16-0.96; p = 0.026). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, there was no interaction between BLF treatment effect and type of feeding (p = 0.628). (B) In 1,891 infants not exclusively fed MM in our RCT of BLF and in the ELFIN RCT, BLF reduced the RR of LOS by 18% (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71-0.96; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Adequately powered studies should address the hypothesis that BLF is more effective in infants fed formula or donor milk than those fed MM. Such studies should evaluate whether a specific threshold of total lactoferrin intake can be identified to protect such patients from LOS.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Fórmulas Infantiles/química , Enfermedades del Prematuro/prevención & control , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Lactoferrina/uso terapéutico , Leche Humana/química , Sepsis/prevención & control , Animales , Bovinos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
2.
Am J Perinatol ; 30(2): 81-8, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23292914

RESUMEN

Neonatal sepsis causes a huge burden of morbidity and mortality and includes bloodstream, urine, cerebrospinal, peritoneal, and lung infections as well as infections starting from burns and wounds, or from any other usually sterile sites. It is associated with cytokine - and biomediator-induced disorders of respiratory, hemodynamic, and metabolic processes. Neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit feature many specific risk factors for bacterial and fungal sepsis. Loss of gut commensals such as Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli spp., as occurs with prolonged antibiotic treatments, delayed enteral feeding, or nursing in incubators, translates into proliferation of pathogenic microflora and abnormal gut colonization. Prompt diagnosis and effective treatment do not protect septic neonates form the risk of late neurodevelopmental impairment in the survivors. Thus prevention of bacterial and fungal infection is crucial in these settings of unique patients. In this view, improving neonatal management is a key step, and this includes promotion of breast-feeding and hygiene measures, adoption of a cautious central venous catheter policy, enhancement of the enteric microbiota composition with the supplementation of probiotics, and medical stewardship concerning H2 blockers with restriction of their use. Additional measures may include the use of lactoferrin, fluconazole, and nystatin and specific measures to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Sepsis/prevención & control , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/normas , Contraindicaciones , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores H2 de la Histamina , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Lactoferrina/uso terapéutico , Leche Humana , Nistatina/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Probióticos/uso terapéutico
3.
Curr Drug Metab ; 14(2): 193-202, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22935068

RESUMEN

Invasive fungal infections in infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit are common and often fatal. The mainstay of therapy against invasive fungal infections is antifungal agents. Over the last two decades, the development and approval of these drugs evolved tremendously, and the azole class emerged as important agents in the treatment and prevention of invasive fungal infections. Among the azoles, fluconazole has been used extensively due to its favorable pharmacokinetics, excellent activity against Candida spp, and safety profile. This drug has been well studied in children, but data for its use in infants are largely limited to Candida prophylaxis studies. Voriconazole, a second generation triazole, has excellent activity against Candida and Aspergillus spp. However, data on its use in neonates are extremely limited. Posaconazole and ravuconazole are the newest agents of the triazole family. The antimicrobial spectrum of posaconazole is similar to voriconazole, but with additional activity against zygomycetes. Experience with posaconazole in children is very limited, and there are no reports of its use in infants. Ravuconazole is not approved for use by the FDA, but studies in animals and humans show that it is often fungicidal and has favorable pharmacokinetics. In conclusion, the management of invasive fungal infections has progressed greatly over the last two decades with the azole antifungals playing a significant role. Related to this class, future research is needed in order to better assess dosing, safety, schedules and areas of use of these agents in infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Triazoles/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Triazoles/farmacología
4.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 23 Suppl 3: 49-52, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20858036

RESUMEN

As the incidence rates of neonatal systemic fungal infections (SFI) have been increasing over the last years, research efforts have been addressed towards identifying both effective preventative strategies, and efficacious and well-tolerated antifungal drugs. Historically, the first options in treatment of neonatal SFI have been – and currently are – fluconazole and amphotericin B. However, these two drugs carry limitations both in efficacy and in putative toxicity. Recently, new therapeutic alternatives have drawn the neonatologists' attention. Echinocandins are a new class of antifungal drugs with characteristics that might better meet the needs of this particular population of patients. Caspofungin (CSP), micafungin (MICA), and anidulafungin have inherent good activities both against biofilms, and against natively fluconazole-resistant strains of Candida spp, thus overcoming two of the major weaknesses of the commonly used antifungal drugs in nurseries. CSP and MICA have been recently studied in neonatal populations. The kinetics and appropriate dosing of this agent in premature and term infants have been described, but ongoing further studies are needed to better address this area. Case-report series show clinical efficacy and tolerability in critical neonatal patients given CSP and MICA. In addition, extrapolation of data from randomized trials conducted in pediatric and adult patients showed through a subgroup analysis that both CSP and MICA are effective and well tolerated also in neonates. Further studies properly designed for neonatal populations will better address long-term safety and ecological issues related to echinocandin use in neonates.


Asunto(s)
Equinocandinas/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/tratamiento farmacológico , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Equinocandinas/farmacología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Micosis/congénito
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA