PLIP 2021: expanding the scope of the protein-ligand interaction profiler to DNA and RNA.

With the growth of protein structure data, the analysis of molecular interactions between ligands and their target molecules is gaining importance. PLIP, the protein-ligand interaction profiler, detects and visualises these interactions and provides data in formats suitable for further processing. PLIP has proven very successful in applications ranging from the characterisation of docking experiments to the assessment of novel ligand-protein complexes. Besides ligand-protein interactions, interactions with DNA and RNA play a vital role in many applications, such as drugs targeting DNA or RNA-binding proteins. To date, over 7% of all 3D structures in the Protein Data Bank include DNA or RNA. Therefore, we extended PLIP to encompass these important molecules. We demonstrate the power of this extension with examples of a cancer drug binding to a DNA target, and an RNA-protein complex central to a neurological disease. PLIP is available online at https://plip-tool.biotec.tu-dresden.de and as open source code. So far, the engine has served over a million queries and the source code has been downloaded several thousand times.

Toward an Understanding of Pan-Assay Interference Compounds and Promiscuity: A Structural Perspective on Binding Modes.

Pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS) are promiscuous compound classes that produce false positive hits in high-throughput screenings. Yet, the mechanisms of PAINS activity are poorly understood. Although PAINS are often associated with protein reactivity, several recent studies have shown that they also mediate noncovalent interactions. Aiming at a deep understanding of PAINS promiscuity, we performed an analysis of the Protein Data Bank to characterize the binding modes of PAINS. We explored the binding mode conservation of 34 PAINS classes present in 871 ligands and among 517 protein targets. The two major findings of this work are the following: First, different PAINS classes exhibit different levels of binding mode conservation. Our novel classification of PAINS based on binding mode similarity enables a rational assessment of PAINS from a structural perspective. Second, PAINS classes with variable binding modes can bind with high affinity. The evaluation of noncovalent binding modes of PAINS-like compounds sheds light on the mechanisms of promiscuous binding. Our findings could facilitate the decisions on how to deal with PAINS and help scientists to understand why PAINS produce hits in their screenings.

Repositioned Drugs for Chagas Disease Unveiled via Structure-Based Drug Repositioning.

Chagas disease, caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, affects millions of people in South America. The current treatments are limited, have severe side effects, and are only partially effective. Drug repositioning, defined as finding new indications for already approved drugs, has the potential to provide new therapeutic options for Chagas. In this work, we conducted a structure-based drug repositioning approach with over 130,000 3D protein structures to identify drugs that bind therapeutic Chagas targets and thus represent potential new Chagas treatments. The screening yielded over 500 molecules as hits, out of which 38 drugs were prioritized following a rigorous filtering process. About half of the latter were already known to have trypanocidal activity, while the others are novel to Chagas disease. Three of the new drug candidates-ciprofloxacin, naproxen, and folic acid-showed a growth inhibitory activity in the micromolar range when tested ex vivo on T. cruzi trypomastigotes, validating the prediction. We show that our drug repositioning approach is able to pinpoint relevant drug candidates at a fraction of the time and cost of a conventional screening. Furthermore, our results demonstrate the power and potential of structure-based drug repositioning in the context of neglected tropical diseases where the pharmaceutical industry has little financial interest in the development of new drugs.

Promiscuity in drug discovery on the verge of the structural revolution: recent advances and future chances.

INTRODUCTION: Promiscuity denotes the ability of ligands and targets to specifically interact with multiple binding partners. Despite negative aspects like side effects, promiscuity is receiving increasing attention in drug discovery as it can enhance drug efficacy and provides a molecular basis for drug repositioning. The three-dimensional structure of ligand-target complexes delivers exclusive insights into the molecular mechanisms of promiscuity and structure-based methods enable the identification of promiscuous interactions. With the recent breakthrough in protein structure prediction, novel possibilities open up to reveal unknown connections in ligand-target interaction networks. AREAS COVERED: This review highlights the significance of structure in the identification and characterization of promiscuity and evaluates the potential of protein structure prediction to advance our knowledge of drug-target interaction networks. It discusses the definition and relevance of promiscuity in drug discovery and explores different approaches to detecting promiscuous ligands and targets. EXPERT OPINION: Examination of structural data is essential for understanding and quantifying promiscuity. The recent advancements in structure prediction have resulted in an abundance of targets that are well-suited for structure-based methods like docking. In silico approaches may eventually completely transform our understanding of drug-target networks by complementing the millions of predicted protein structures with billions of predicted drug-target interactions.

Decomposing compounds enables reconstruction of interaction fingerprints for structure-based drug screening.

BACKGROUND: Structure-based drug repositioning has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional drug development. Regardless of the many success stories reported over the past years and the novel breakthroughs on the AI-based system AlphaFold for structure prediction, the availability of structural data for protein-drug complexes remains very limited. Whereas the chemical libraries contain millions of drug compounds, the vast majority of them do not have structures to crystallized targets,and it is, therefore, impossible to characterize their binding to targets from a structural view. However, the concept of building blocks offers a novel perspective on the structural problem. A drug compound is considered a complex of small chemical blocks or fragments, which confer the relevant properties to the drug and have a high proportion of functional groups involved in protein binding. Based on this, we propose a novel approach to expand the scope of structure-based repositioning approaches by transferring the structural knowledge from a fragment to a compound level. RESULTS: We fragmented over 100,000 compounds in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and characterized the structural binding mode of 153,000 fragments to their crystallized targets. Using the fragment's data, we were able to artificially reconstruct the binding mode of over 7,800 complexes between ChEMBL compounds and their known targets, for which no structural data is available. We proved that the conserved binding tendency of fragments, when binding to the same targets, highly influences the drug's binding specificity and carries the key information to reconstruct full drugs binding mode. Furthermore, our approach was able to reconstruct multiple compound-target pairs at optimal thresholds and high similarity to the actual binding mode. CONCLUSIONS: Such reconstructions are of great value and benefit structure-based drug repositioning since they automatically enlarge the technique's scope and allow exploring the so far 'unexplored compounds' from a structural perspective. In general, the transfer of structural information is a promising technique that could be applied to any chemical library, to any compound that has no crystal structure available in PDB, and even to transfer any other feature that may be relevant for the drug discovery process and that due to data limitations is not yet fully available. In that sense, the results of this work document the full potential of structure-based screening even beyond PDB.

Structural binding site comparisons reveal Crizotinib as a novel LRRK2 inhibitor.

Mutations in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) are a frequent cause of autosomal dominant Parkinson's disease (PD) and have been associated with familial and sporadic PD. Reducing the kinase activity of LRRK2 is a promising therapeutic strategy since pathogenic mutations increase the kinase activity. Several small-molecule LRRK2 inhibitors are currently under investigation for the treatment of PD. However, drug discovery and development are always accompanied by high costs and a risk of late failure. The use of already approved drugs for a new indication, which is known as drug repositioning, can reduce the cost and risk. In this study, we applied a structure-based drug repositioning approach to identify new LRRK2 inhibitors that are already approved for a different indication. In a large-scale structure-based screening, we compared the protein-ligand interaction patterns of known LRRK2 inhibitors with protein-ligand complexes in the PDB. The screening yielded 6 drug repositioning candidates. Two of these candidates, Sunitinib and Crizotinib, demonstrated an inhibition potency (IC50) and binding affinity (Kd) in the nanomolar to micromolar range. While Sunitinib has already been known to inhibit LRRK2, Crizotinib is a novel LRRK2 binder. Our results underscore the potential of structure-based methods for drug discovery and development. In light of the recent breakthroughs in cryo-electron microscopy and structure prediction, we believe that structure-based approaches like ours will grow in importance.

Deep Learning Improves Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis Using RNA-Based Variants.

For optimal pancreatic cancer treatment, early and accurate diagnosis is vital. Blood-derived biomarkers and genetic predispositions can contribute to early diagnosis, but they often have limited accuracy or applicability. Here, we seek to exploit the synergy between them by combining the biomarker CA19-9 with RNA-based variants. We use deep sequencing and deep learning to improve differentiating pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. We obtained samples of nucleated cells found in peripheral blood from 268 patients suffering from resectable, non-resectable pancreatic cancer, and chronic pancreatitis. We sequenced RNA with high coverage and obtained millions of variants. The high-quality variants served as input together with CA19-9 values to deep learning models. Our model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 96% in differentiating resectable cancer from pancreatitis using a test cohort. Moreover, we identified variants to estimate survival in resectable cancer. We show that the blood transcriptome harbours variants, which can substantially improve noninvasive clinical diagnosis.

Drug repositioning or target repositioning: A structural perspective of drug-target-indication relationship for available repurposed drugs.

Drug repositioning aims to find new indications for existing drugs in order to reduce drug development cost and time. Currently,there are numerous stories of successful drug repositioning that have been reported and many repurposed drugs are already available on the market. Although drug repositioning is often a product of serendipity, repositioning opportunities can be uncovered systematically. There are three systematic approaches to drug repositioning: disease-centric approach, target-centric and drug-centric. Disease-centric approaches identify close relationships between an old and a new indication. A target-centric approach links a known target and its established drug to a new indication. Lastly, a drug-centric approach connects a known drug to a new target and its associated indication. These three approaches differ in their potential and their limitations, but above all else, in the required start information and computing power. This raises the question of which approach prevails in current drug discovery and what that implies for future developments. To address this question, we systematically evaluated over 100 drugs, 200 target structures and over 300 indications from the Drug Repositioning Database. Each analyzed case was classified as one of the three repositioning approaches. For the majority of cases (more than 60%) the disease-centric definition was assigned. Almost 30% of the cases were classified as target-centric and less than 10% as drug-centric approaches. We concluded that, despite the use of umbrella term "drug" repositioning, disease- and target-centric approaches have dominated the field until now. We propose the use of drug-centric approaches while discussing reasons, such as structure-based repositioning techniques, to exploit the full potential of drug-target-disease connections.