Use of infliximab in particular clinical settings: management based on current evidence.

With the increasingly widespread use of the anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agent infliximab for the treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, there have been some concerns raised about the potential consequences of such therapy in particular clinical settings. In this review, we report the current strategies for optimizing treatment outcomes and minimizing the risks of some of the most serious events attributable to infliximab therapy. In particular, an up-to-date overview is provided on how to treat patients with inflammatory bowel disease using infliximab therapy, with regard to the diagnosis and management of latent tuberculosis infection and the risk of reactivation of hepatitis B and C infections. Furthermore, based on the available evidence, we evaluate the possibility of using infliximab during pregnancy. Finally, we evaluate whether patients with malignancies or pre-neoplastic lesions could be candidates for infliximab therapy. Overall, this review will provide physicians who use infliximab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with several practical recommendations for the management of some complex situations that may occur in daily clinical practice.

Vascular involvement in inflammatory bowel disease: pathogenesis and clinical aspects.

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), the two major forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are chronic inflammatory conditions, characterized by a microvascular and also macrovascular involvement. Chronically inflamed intestinal microvessels of IBD patients have demonstrated significant alterations in their physiology and function compared with vessels from healthy and uninvolved IBD intestine. Recently, some studies have revealed that the poor mucosal healing, refractory inflammatory ulcerations and damage in the IBD intestine could depend on microvascular dysfunction, resulting in diminished vasodilatory capacity and tissue hypoperfusion in the IBD gut. Furthermore, several data show that the activation of intestinal endothelium plays a critical role in the pathogenesis and/or in perpetuating and amplifying the inflammatory process in IBD and, consequently, it is now emerging as a potential use of anticoagulant or coagulation-related drugs in treating IBD. IBD is also associated with an increased risk of macrovascular venous and arterial thrombosis. Thrombotic events occur prevalently as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. They happen at an earlier age than in non-IBD patients. Prothrombotic risk factors in IBD patients could be distinguished as acquired, such as active inflammation, immobility, surgery, steroid therapy, and use of central venous catheters, and inherited. Furthermore, it has been found that IBD, per se, is an independent risk factor for thrombosis. The prevention of thromboembolic events in IBD patients includes the elimination of removable risk factors and, if thrombosis occurs, a pharmacological therapy similar to that used for thromboembolic events occurring in the general population.

Biological therapies for inflammatory bowel disease: controversies and future options.

Over the last few years, advances in understanding the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease, together with progress in biotechnology, have led to the availability of several biological drugs that have dramatically changed the therapeutic approach to these disorders. Indeed, several molecules targeting crucial inflammatory cytokines, blocking T-cell activation/proliferation or the recruitment of inflammatory cells into the inflamed bowel, have been discovered and commercialized. However, the increasing use of biological agents has raised some concerns regarding their short- and long-term safety. This review offers a critical evaluation of the efficacy and safety of biological agents in the management of both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. In addition, promising therapeutic options are discussed.