RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is associated with increased risk of aortopathy. In addition to current intervention guidelines, BAV mediated changes in aortic 3D hemodynamics have been considered as risk stratification measures. We aimed to evaluate the association of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived voxel-wise aortic reverse flow with aortic dilation and to investigate the role of aortic valve regurgitation (AR) and stenosis (AS) on reverse flow in systole and diastole. METHODS: 510 patients with BAV (52 ± 14 years) and 120 patients with trileaflet aortic valve (TAV) (61 ± 11 years) and mid-ascending aorta diameter (MAAD) > 35 mm who underwent CMR including 4D flow CMR were retrospectively included. An age and sex-matched healthy control cohort (n = 25, 49 ± 12 years) was selected. Voxel-wise reverse flow was calculated in the aorta and quantified by the mean reverse flow in the ascending aorta (AAo) during systole and diastole. RESULTS: BAV patients without AS and AR demonstrated significantly increased systolic and diastolic reverse flow (222% and 13% increases respectively, p < 0.01) compared to healthy controls and also had significantly increased systolic reverse flow compared to TAV patients with aortic dilation (79% increase, p < 0.01). In patients with isolated AR, systolic and diastolic AAo reverse flow increased significantly with AR severity (c = - 83.2 and c = - 205.6, p < 0.001). In patients with isolated AS, AS severity was associated with an increase in both systolic (c = - 253.1, p < 0.001) and diastolic (c = - 87.0, p = 0.02) AAo reverse flow. Right and left/right and non-coronary fusion phenotype showed elevated systolic reverse flow (> 17% increase, p < 0.01). Right and non-coronary fusion phenotype showed decreased diastolic reverse flow (> 27% decrease, p < 0.01). MAAD was an independent predictor of systolic (p < 0.001), but not diastolic, reverse flow (p > 0.1). CONCLUSION: 4D flow CMR derived reverse flow associated with BAV was successfully captured even in the absence of AR or AS and in comparison to TAV patients with aortic dilation. Diastolic AAo reverse flow increased with AR severity while AS severity strongly correlated with increased systolic reverse flow in the AAo. Additionally, increasing MAAD was independently associated with increasing systolic AAo reverse flow. Thus, systolic AAo reverse flow may be a valuable metric for evaluating disease severity in future longitudinal outcome studies.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Aorta , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Enfermedad de la Válvula Aórtica Bicúspide , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/complicaciones , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagen , Dilatación , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/patología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/patología , Enfermedades de la Aorta/complicaciones , Hemodinámica , Espectroscopía de Resonancia MagnéticaRESUMEN
This review discusses the contemporary clinical evaluation and management of patients with comorbid aortic regurgitation (AR) and heart failure (HF) (AR-HF). Importantly, as clinical HF exists along the spectrum of AR severity, the present review also details novel strategies to detect early signs of HF before the clinical syndrome ensues. Indeed, there may be a vulnerable cohort of AR patients who benefit from early detection and management of HF. Additionally, while the mainstay of operative management for AR has historically been surgical aortic valve replacement, this review discusses alternate procedures that may be beneficial in high-risk cohorts.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Humanos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIM: This executive summary of the valvular heart disease guideline provides recommendations for clinicians to diagnose and manage valvular heart disease as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to March 1, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Reports, and other selected database relevant to this guideline. Structure: Many recommendations from the earlier valvular heart disease guidelines have been updated with new evidence and provides newer options for diagnosis and treatment of valvular heart disease. This summary includes only the recommendations from the full guideline which focus on diagnostic work-up, the timing and choice of surgical and catheter interventions, and recommendations for medical therapy. The reader is referred to the full guideline for graphical flow charts, text, and tables with additional details about the rationale for and implementation of each recommendation, and the evidence tables detailing the data considered in developing these guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas , Humanos , American Heart Association , Cardiología/organización & administración , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/terapia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The role of assessment of myocardial viability in identifying patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who might benefit from surgical revascularization remains controversial. Furthermore, although improvement in left ventricular function is one of the goals of revascularization, its relationship to subsequent outcomes is unclear. METHODS: Among 601 patients who had coronary artery disease that was amenable to coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) and who had a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or lower, we prospectively assessed myocardial viability using single-photon-emission computed tomography, dobutamine echocardiography, or both. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo CABG and receive medical therapy or to receive medical therapy alone. Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured at baseline and after 4 months of follow-up in 318 patients. The primary end point was death from any cause. The median duration of follow-up was 10.4 years. RESULTS: CABG plus medical therapy was associated with a lower incidence of death from any cause than medical therapy alone (182 deaths among 298 patients in the CABG group vs. 209 deaths among 303 patients in the medical-therapy group; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.90). However, no significant interaction was observed between the presence or absence of myocardial viability and the beneficial effect of CABG plus medical therapy over medical therapy alone (P = 0.34 for interaction). An increase in left ventricular ejection fraction was observed only among patients with myocardial viability, irrespective of treatment assignment. There was no association between changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and subsequent death. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study do not support the concept that myocardial viability is associated with a long-term benefit of CABG in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The presence of viable myocardium was associated with improvement in left ventricular systolic function, irrespective of treatment, but such improvement was not related to long-term survival. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; STICH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00023595.).
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Corazón/fisiología , Isquemia Miocárdica/cirugía , Volumen Sistólico , Anciano , Ecocardiografía de Estrés , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Corazón/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Incidencia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/mortalidad , Isquemia Miocárdica/fisiopatología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único , Resultado del Tratamiento , Función Ventricular IzquierdaRESUMEN
Systemic vascular inflammation plays multiple maladaptive roles which contribute to the progression and destabilization of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). These roles include: (i) driving atheroprogression in the clinically stable phase of disease; (ii) inciting atheroma destabilization and precipitating acute coronary syndromes (ACS); and (iii) responding to cardiomyocyte necrosis in myocardial infarction (MI). Despite an evolving understanding of these biologic processes, successful clinical translation into effective therapies has proven challenging. Realizing the promise of targeting inflammation in the prevention and treatment of ASCVD will likely require more individualized approaches, as the degree of inflammation differs among cardiovascular patients. A large body of evidence has accumulated supporting the use of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as a clinical measure of inflammation. Appreciating the mechanistic diversity of ACS triggers and the kinetics of hsCRP in MI may resolve purported inconsistencies from prior observational studies. Future clinical trial designs incorporating hsCRP may hold promise to enable individualized approaches. The aim of this Clinical Review is to summarize the current understanding of how inflammation contributes to ASCVD progression, destabilization, and adverse clinical outcomes. We offer forward-looking perspective on what next steps may enable successful clinical translation into effective therapeutic approaches-enabling targeting the right patients with the right therapy at the right time-on the road to more individualized ASCVD care.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Aterosclerosis , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Infarto del Miocardio , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Humanos , InflamaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Quantitative evaluation of mitral regurgitation (MR) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) relies on an indirect volumetric calculation. The aim of this study was to directly assess and quantify MR jets in patients with HCM using 4D flow CMR jet tracking in comparison to standard-of-care CMR indirect volumetric method. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with HCM undergoing 4D flow CMR. By the indirect volumetric method from CMR, MR volume was quantified as left ventricular stroke volume minus forward aortic volume. By 4D flow CMR direct jet tracking, multiplanar reformatted planes were positioned in the peak velocity of the MR jet during systole to calculate through-plane regurgitant flow. MR severity was collected for agreement analysis from a clinical echocardiograms performed within 1 month of CMR. Inter-method and inter-observer agreement were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with HCM were included. Direct jet tracking demonstrated good inter-method agreement of MR volume compared to the indirect volumetric method (ICC = 0.80, p = 0.004) and fair agreement of MR severity (kappa = 0.27, p = 0.03). Direct jet tracking showed higher agreement with echocardiography (kappa = 0.35, p = 0.04) than indirect volumetric method (kappa = 0.16, p = 0.35). Inter-observer reproducibility of indirect volumetric method components revealed the lowest reproducibility in end-systolic volume (ICC = 0.69, p = 0.15). Indirect volumetric method showed good agreement of MR volume (ICC = 0.80, p = 0.003) and fair agreement of MR severity (kappa = 0.38, p < 0.001). Direct jet tracking demonstrated (1) excellent inter-observer reproducibility of MR volume (ICC = 0.97, p < 0.001) and MR severity (kappa = 0.84, p < 0.001) and (2) excellent intra-observer reproducibility of MR volume (ICC = 0.98, p < 0.001) and MR severity (kappa = 0.88, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying MR and assessing MR severity by indirect volumetric method in HCM patients has limited inter-observer reproducibility. 4D flow CMR jet tracking is a potential alternative technique to directly quantify and assess MR severity with excellent inter- and intra-observer reproducibility and higher agreement with echocardiography in this population.
Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and an identified sarcomere mutation have worse outcomes than those without though the underlying mechanism is incompletely understood. The presence of replacement fibrosis measured by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and diffuse fibrosis measured by extracellular volume (ECV) using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are associated with ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac mortality. We aimed to associate these two forms of fibrosis with identified sarcomere mutations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-six (336) patients with HCM underwent CMR at a single quaternary referral centre between January 2012 and February 2017. Genetic testing was performed in 73 of these patients, yielding an identified sarcomeric mutation in 29 (G+), no mutation in 39 (G-), and a variant of unknown significance (VUS) in five. LGE was more prevalent in G+ compared to G- patients (86 vs. 56%, OR 4.3, p=0.01) and was more extensive (7.5±5.5% of left ventricular [LV] mass vs. 3.0±3.0%, p<0.001). Global ECV from myocardial segments excluding LGE was similar among both groups (26.9±2.9 vs. 25.6±2.8%, p=0.46). However, in G+ patients ECV was greater in the hypertrophied regions of the basal anteroseptum (30.2±7.0 vs. 26.8±3.6%, p=0.004) and basal inferoseptum (28.1±4.3 vs. 26.2±2.9%, p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Genotyped HCM patients with an identified sarcomere mutation have greater LGE and greater regional, but not global, ECV than HCM patients without an identified mutation. This difference in fibrosis may contribute to worse outcomes in patients with an identified HCM mutation.
Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica , Sarcómeros , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/diagnóstico por imagen , Medios de Contraste , Fibrosis , Gadolinio , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética , Mutación , Miocardio/patología , Sarcómeros/genéticaRESUMEN
Right heart and pulmonary circulation disorders are generally caused by right ventricle (RV) pressure overload, volume overload, and cardiomyopathy, and they are associated with distinct clinical courses and therapeutic approaches, although they often may coexist. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provides a noninvasive accurate and reproducible multiplanar anatomic and functional assessment, tissue characterization, and blood flow evaluation of the right heart and pulmonary circulation. This article reviews the current status of the CMR, the most recent techniques, the new parameters and their clinical utility in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic management in the right heart and pulmonary circulation disorders.
Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatías/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética/métodos , Circulación Pulmonar/fisiología , Función Ventricular Derecha/fisiología , Cardiomiopatías/etiología , Cardiomiopatías/fisiopatología , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/complicaciones , Hipertensión Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Espectroscopía de Resonancia MagnéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) may affect survival but data are conflicting. It is assessed by relating effective orifice area (EOA) to body surface area (EOAi). EOA is patient-specific as the result of flow-velocity times area at the individual patient's outflow tract levels (LVOTA) divided by trans-prosthetic flow velocity. However, some studies use projected EOAs (i.e., valve size associated EOAs from other patient populations) to assess how PPM affects outcome. METHODS: We analyzed 76 studies addressing hemodynamic outcome and/or mortality after bioprosthetic AVR. RESULTS: In 48 studies, projected or measured EOA for calculation of EOAi and PPM assessment was used (of which 25 demonstrated an effect on survival). We identified 28 additional studies providing measured EOA values and the corresponding Bernoulli's pressure gradients after AVR. Despite EOA being a patient-specific parameter, 77% of studies assessing a PPM impact on survival used projected EOAs. The 28 studies are providing measured EOA values and the corresponding Bernoulli's pressure gradients in patients after AVR showed a highly significant, linear relationship between EOA and Bernoulli's gradient. Considering this relationship, it is surprising that relating EOA to body surface area (BSA) (EOAi) is standard but relating pressure gradients to BSA is not. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the majority of studies assessing PPM have used false assumptions because EOA is a patient-specific parameter and cannot be transferred to other patients. In addition, the use of EOAi to assess PPM may not be appropriate and could explain the inconsistent relation between PPM and survival in previous studies.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Bioprótesis , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Hemodinámica , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Superficie Corporal , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Randomized clinical trials initially used heart failure (HF) patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to select study populations with high risk to enhance statistical power. However, this use of LVEF in clinical trials has led to oversimplification of the scientific view of a complex syndrome. Descriptive terms such as 'HFrEF' (HF with reduced LVEF), 'HFpEF' (HF with preserved LVEF), and more recently 'HFmrEF' (HF with mid-range LVEF), assigned on arbitrary LVEF cut-off points, have gradually arisen as separate diseases, implying distinct pathophysiologies. In this article, based on pathophysiological reasoning, we challenge the paradigm of classifying HF according to LVEF. Instead, we propose that HF is a heterogeneous syndrome in which disease progression is associated with a dynamic evolution of functional and structural changes leading to unique disease trajectories creating a spectrum of phenotypes with overlapping and distinct characteristics. Moreover, we argue that by recognizing the spectral nature of the disease a novel stratification will arise from new technologies and scientific insights that will shape the design of future trials based on deeper understanding beyond the LVEF construct alone.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/clasificación , Volumen Sistólico , Comorbilidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Endotelio Vascular/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/patología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Miocitos Cardíacos/fisiología , Valores de Referencia , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Remodelación VentricularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The survival benefit of a strategy of coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) added to guideline-directed medical therapy, as compared with medical therapy alone, in patients with coronary artery disease, heart failure, and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction remains unclear. METHODS: From July 2002 to May 2007, a total of 1212 patients with an ejection fraction of 35% or less and coronary artery disease amenable to CABG were randomly assigned to undergo CABG plus medical therapy (CABG group, 610 patients) or medical therapy alone (medical-therapy group, 602 patients). The primary outcome was death from any cause. Major secondary outcomes included death from cardiovascular causes and death from any cause or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes. The median duration of follow-up, including the current extended-follow-up study, was 9.8 years. RESULTS: A primary outcome event occurred in 359 patients (58.9%) in the CABG group and in 398 patients (66.1%) in the medical-therapy group (hazard ratio with CABG vs. medical therapy, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.97; P=0.02 by log-rank test). A total of 247 patients (40.5%) in the CABG group and 297 patients (49.3%) in the medical-therapy group died from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P=0.006 by log-rank test). Death from any cause or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes occurred in 467 patients (76.6%) in the CABG group and in 524 patients (87.0%) in the medical-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.82; P<0.001 by log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, the rates of death from any cause, death from cardiovascular causes, and death from any cause or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes were significantly lower over 10 years among patients who underwent CABG in addition to receiving medical therapy than among those who received medical therapy alone. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; STICH [and STICHES] ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00023595.).
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Isquemia Miocárdica/tratamiento farmacológico , Isquemia Miocárdica/cirugía , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Causas de Muerte , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Volumen Sistólico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/cirugíaRESUMEN
Background Four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI enables the evaluation of blood flow alterations in patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). However, current analysis methods are cumbersome and lack the use of the volumetric data from 4D MRI. Purpose To investigate the feasibility and reproducibility of a technique that uses a catheter-like mathematical model (virtual catheter) to assess volumetric intra-aortic hemodynamics from 4D flow MRI in patients with BAV. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, data were collected from adult patients with BAV and healthy participants who underwent aortic 4D flow MRI from November 2011 through August 2014. Reproducibility was tested in healthy study participants who underwent test-retest examinations within 2 weeks. Patients were grouped on the basis of the severity of aortic valve regurgitation (AVR) and aortic valve stenosis (AVS). A 4D virtual catheter mathematical model for probing intra-aortic hemodynamic flow was constructed as a tube with an automatically derived radius along the entire thoracic aorta centerline. Volumetric intra-aortic hemodynamics were computed from 4D flow MRI only within the virtual catheter, and the following volume-normalized systolic peaks were derived: kinetic energy (KE), viscous energy loss rate (VELR), and vorticity. Hemodynamic data were presented as medians with interquartile ranges and compared by using Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Results The study included 91 participants (57 patients [mean age, 46 years ± 12], 18 women; 34 healthy participants [mean age: 44 years ± 14], 12 women; 15 healthy participants underwent test-retest examinations). Patients showed higher VELR values compared with healthy participants (median, 31 W/m3 [interquartile range, 21-72] vs 23 W/m3 [interquartile range, 17-30], respectively; P < .001) and vorticity (69 sec-1 [interquartile range, 59-87] vs 60 sec-1 [interquartile range, 50-67], respectively; P < .001). Four-dimensional virtual catheter showed differences among different AVS and AVR grades with the highest VELR (120 W/m3; interquartile range, 99-166; P < .001) and vorticity (108 sec-1; interquartile range, 84-151; P < .001) found in severe AVS. High test-retest reproducibility was found for all virtual catheter-derived metrics (intraclass correlation, 0.80 ± 0.07; coefficient of variation, 9% ± 3). Conclusion The proposed four-dimensional (4D) virtual catheter technique enabled reproducible automated evaluation of volumetric intra-aortic hemodynamics alterations from 4D flow MRI in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Mitsouras and Hope in this issue.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Válvula Aórtica/anomalías , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Hemodinámica , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Adulto , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Válvula Aórtica Bicúspide , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Interfaz Usuario-Computador , ViscosidadRESUMEN
Aortic stenosis is 1 of the most common heart valve diseases among adults. When symptoms develop, prognosis is poor, and current guidelines recommend prompt aortic valve replacement. Depending of the severity of the aortic stenosis and the presence of concomitant heart disease and medical comorbidities, stress testing represents a reasonable strategy to help better risk stratify asymptomatic patients. The present report provides a comprehensive review of the current available data on stress testing in aortic stenosis and subsequently summarizes its potential for guiding the optimal timing of aortic valve replacement.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Prueba de Esfuerzo/métodos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Enfermedades Asintomáticas/terapia , HumanosRESUMEN
Two guidelines from the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and collaborating societies address the risk of aortic dissection in patients with bicuspid aortic valves and severe aortic enlargement: the "2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Thoracic Aortic Disease" (Circulation. 2010;121:e266-e369) and the "2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease" (Circulation. 2014;129:e521-e643). However, the 2 guidelines differ with regard to the recommended threshold of aortic root or ascending aortic dilatation that would justify surgical intervention in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. The ACC and AHA therefore convened a subcommittee representing members of the 2 guideline writing committees to review the evidence, reach consensus, and draft a statement of clarification for both guidelines. This statement of clarification uses the ACC/AHA revised structure for delineating the Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence to provide recommendations that replace those contained in Section 9.2.2.1 of the thoracic aortic disease guideline and Section 5.1.3 of the valvular heart disease guideline.
Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos/normas , American Heart Association , Válvula Aórtica/anomalías , Cardiología/normas , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Enfermedades de la Aorta/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Aorta/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Enfermedad de la Válvula Aórtica Bicúspide , Cardiología/métodos , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The management of aortic valve disease has been improved by accurate diagnosis and assessment of severity by echocardiography and advanced imaging techniques, efforts to elicit symptoms or objective markers of disease severity and progression, and consideration of optimum timing of aortic valve replacement, even in elderly patients. Prevalence of calcific aortic stenosis is growing in ageing populations. Conventional surgery remains the most appropriate option for most patients who require aortic valve replacement, but the transcatheter approach is established for high-risk patients or poor candidates for surgery. The rapid growth of transcatheter aortic valve replacement has been fuelled by improved technology, evidence-based clinical research, and setting up of multidisciplinary heart teams. Aortic regurgitation can be difficult to diagnose and quantify. Left ventricular dysfunction often precedes symptoms, needing active surveillance by echocardiography to determine the optimum time for aortic valve replacement. Development of transcatheter approaches for aortic regurgitation is challenging, owing to the absence of valvular calcification and distortion of aortic root anatomy in many patients.
Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Enfermedad de la Válvula Aórtica Bicúspide , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Predicción , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Humanos , Diseño de PrótesisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome in need of improved phenotypic classification. We sought to evaluate whether unbiased clustering analysis using dense phenotypic data (phenomapping) could identify phenotypically distinct HFpEF categories. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied 397 patients with HFpEF and performed detailed clinical, laboratory, ECG, and echocardiographic phenotyping of the study participants. We used several statistical learning algorithms, including unbiased hierarchical cluster analysis of phenotypic data (67 continuous variables) and penalized model-based clustering, to define and characterize mutually exclusive groups making up a novel classification of HFpEF. All phenomapping analyses were performed by investigators blinded to clinical outcomes, and Cox regression was used to demonstrate the clinical validity of phenomapping. The mean age was 65±12 years; 62% were female; 39% were black; and comorbidities were common. Although all patients met published criteria for the diagnosis of HFpEF, phenomapping analysis classified study participants into 3 distinct groups that differed markedly in clinical characteristics, cardiac structure/function, invasive hemodynamics, and outcomes (eg, phenogroup 3 had an increased risk of HF hospitalization [hazard ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-9.1] even after adjustment for traditional risk factors [P<0.001]). The HFpEF phenogroup classification, including its ability to stratify risk, was successfully replicated in a prospective validation cohort (n=107). CONCLUSIONS: Phenomapping results in a novel classification of HFpEF. Statistical learning algorithms applied to dense phenotypic data may allow improved classification of heterogeneous clinical syndromes, with the ultimate goal of defining therapeutically homogeneous patient subclasses.