RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Differentiating synostotic and nonsynostotic plagiocephaly can be challenging, and many providers routinely obtain screening skull radiographs when evaluating an infant with plagiocephaly. However, the diagnostic yield of radiographs has not been studied in this clinical setting. DESIGN: This study was a retrospective chart review. SETTING: The study took place in a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients referred to Children's Medical Center (Dallas, TX) between the years 2010 to 2012 with a diagnosis of plagiocephaly. After an initial evaluation, skull radiographs were obtained to rule out craniosynostosis. We reviewed clinical and demographic data and radiographic findings to determine the diagnostic yield of routine screening radiographs in infants presenting with plagiocephaly. RESULTS: There were 1219 patients in total, and 1213 of these patients received screening four-view conventional skull radiographs. Six had computed tomography without prior radiographs. Of the patients in the skull radiograph group, 24% (289 of 1213) had abnormal radiographic findings, and 7.6% of this group (22 of 289) had findings that were indicative of craniosynostosis. Of these 22 patients, 12 obtained follow-up studies, and only three patients (0.2% of skull group) had true craniosynostosis. In comparison, 50% (three of six) in the group of patients who underwent computed tomography without prior conventional screening radiographs had true craniosynostosis. CONCLUSIONS: Routine screening skull radiographs have a low diagnostic yield in differentiating between synostotic and nonsynostotic plagiocephaly in patients presenting to a tertiary care deformational plagiocephaly clinic. Considering the costs and radiation exposure, the benefit of the routine use of skull radiographs in patients with deformational plagiocephaly is questionable.
Asunto(s)
Plagiocefalia/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Plagiocefalia no Sinostótica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: When evaluating infants with deformational plagiocephaly, cervical spine radiographs are often acquired along with skull radiographs to exclude segmentation and fusion anomalies as the cause of associated torticollis. The diagnostic yield of cervical spine radiographs has not been evaluated in this clinical setting. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who were referred to the University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine, Children's Medical Center (Dallas, Texas) with deformational plagiocephaly and torticollis and underwent cervical radiography (anteroposterior and lateral views) from 2010 to 2012. The authors reviewed the radiology reports, and a single experienced pediatric neuroradiologist again reviewed all radiographic studies in which the interpreting radiologist had suggested any bony or soft-tissue abnormality. Patient demographics, perinatal data, and physical examination findings were collected, and descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: There were 730 patients with deformational plagiocephaly and torticollis; 49 of 730 reports (6.7 percent) described an abnormality. Of those with abnormal radiologic reports that were abnormal, 23 (47 percent) described osseous abnormalities, 20 (41 percent) described nonosseous deformities, and six (12 percent) described both. Follow-up studies (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and repeated radiography) of those with abnormalities showed three infants with true upper cervical spine anomalies that might lead to instability of the cervical spine. CONCLUSIONS: There is a low diagnostic yield in ordering cervical radiographs in most patients with deformational plagiocephaly. Although the radiation exposure is low, cervical radiographs add additional cost and may not be warranted as a routine practice in this clinical setting. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, IV.