The Influence of Diagnoses of Specific Viral Infections on In-Hospital Mortality, Length of Stay and Cost in Patients Admitted to Hospital with a Diagnosis of Myocarditis: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

Background: The influence of different viral infections in patients with myocarditis is unknown. Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of heart muscle that is commonly caused by viruses. The impact of different viral infections in patients with myocarditis is unknown. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data between 2016-2020 in the National Inpatient Sample in the USA to evaluate admissions with myocarditis and concomitant viral infection. The outcomes of in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LoS), and cost, among patients hospitalized for myocarditis was evaluated. Results: A total of 27,050 hospital admissions for myocarditis were included and 6750 (25.0%) had a co-diagnosis of viral infection. Patients with myocarditis and viral infection had significantly higher mortality compared to those without viral infection (23.6% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001). Viral infection was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) 2.03, 95% CI 1.51 to 2.73, p < 0.001), greater median LoS (7 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001) and median hospitalization cost ($21,445 vs. $11,596, p < 0.001), compared to patients without viral infection. The rate of death was greatest for patients with a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), viral pneumonia and herpes zoster, respiratory syncytial virus, chronic hepatitis, and influenza which was 36.0%, 34.3%, 27.3%, 21.4%, 20.0%, and 14.5%, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, the diagnosis of viral infection is present in one in four patients hospitalized with myocarditis and is correlated with greater mortality, LoS, and in-hospital cost.

Emerging Therapies for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: From Bench to Bedside.

Primarily a consequence of sedentary lifestyle, atherosclerosis has already reached pandemic proportions, and with every year the burden of it is only increasing. As low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) represents a crucial factor in atherosclerosis formation and progression, stringent lipid-lowering therapy could conceivably be the key to preventing the unfavorable outcomes that arise as a consequence of atherosclerosis. The use of statins in lipid-lowering is often burdened by adverse events or is insufficient to prevent cardiovascular events as a monotherapy. Therefore, in the present review, the authors aimed to discuss the underlying mechanisms of dyslipidemia and associated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and preclinical and clinical trials of novel therapeutic approaches to its treatment, some of which are still in the early stages of development. Apart from novel therapies, a novel change in perspective is needed. Specifically, the critical objective in the future management of ASCVD is to embrace emerging evidence in the field of atherosclerosis, because clinicians are often burden by common practice and personal experience, both of which have so far been shown to be futile in the setting of atherosclerosis.

Efficacy of high-dose atorvastatin or rosuvastatin loading in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with GRADE qualification of available evidence.

PURPOSE: We aimed to summarize current evidence regarding the impact of a high-dose statin loading before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on short-term outcomes in patients presenting with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: This meta-analysis was based on a search of the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Journals, and SCOPUS for randomized controlled trials that compared high-dose atorvastatin or rosuvastatin with no or low-dose statin administered before planned PCI in statin-naive patients with ACS. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality at 30 days. Prespecified subanalyses were performed with respect to statin and ACS type. RESULTS: A total of eleven trials enrolling 6291 patients were included, of which 75.4% received PCI. High-dose statin loading was associated with an overall 43% relative risk (RR) reduction in MACCE at 30 days (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41-0.77) in whole ACS population. This effect was primarily driven by the 39% reduction in the occurrence of MI (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46-0.80). No significant effect on all-cause mortality reduction was observed (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.67-1.26). In the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), atorvastatin loading was associated with a 33% reduction in MACCE (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.94), while in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction ACS (NSTE-ACS), rosuvastatin loading was associated with 52% reduction in MACCE at 30 days (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.66). The level of evidence as qualified with GRADE was low to high, depending on the outcome. CONCLUSION: A high-dose loading of statins before PCI in patients with ACS reduces MACCE and reduces the risk of MI with no impact on mortality at 30 days. Atorvastatin reduces MACCE in STEMI while rosuvastatin reduces MACCE in NSTE-ACS at 30 days.

Misdiagnosis of aortic dissection: A systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Aortic dissection is a rare but potentially catastrophic condition. Misdiagnosis of aortic dissection is not uncommon as symptoms can overlap with other diagnoses. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review to better understand the factors contributing to incorrect diagnosis of this condition. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies that evaluated the misdiagnosis of aortic dissection. The rate of misdiagnosis was pooled and results were narratively synthesized. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies with were included with 1663 patients. The overall rate of misdiagnosis of aortic dissection was 33.8%. The proportion of patients presenting with chest pain, back pain and syncope were 67.5%, 24.8% and 6.8% respectively. The proportion of patients with pre-existing hypertension was 55.4%, 30.5% were smokers while the proportion of patients with coronary artery disease, previous cardiovascular surgery or surgical trauma and Marfan syndrome was 14.7%, 5.8%, and 3.7%, respectively. Factors related to misdiagnosis included the presence of symptoms and features associated with other diseases (such as acute coronary syndrome, stroke and pulmonary embolism), the absence of typical features (such as widened mediastinum on chest X-ray) or concurrent conditions such congestive heart failure. Factors associated with more accurate diagnosis included more comprehensive history taking and increased use of imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Misdiagnosis in patients with an eventual diagnosis of aortic dissection affects 1 in 3 patients. Clinicians should consider aortic dissection as differential diagnosis in patients with chest pain, back pain and syncope. Imaging should be used early to make the diagnosis when aortic dissection is suspected.

Thrombotic Complications in Patients with COVID-19: Pathophysiological Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Emerging evidence points to an association between severe clinical presentation of COVID-19 and increased risk of thromboembolism. One-third of patients hospitalized due to severe COVID-19 develops macrovascular thrombotic complications, including venous thromboembolism, myocardial injury/infarction and stroke. Concurrently, the autopsy series indicate multiorgan damage pattern consistent with microvascular injury. PROPHYLAXIS, DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT: COVID-19 associated coagulopathy has distinct features, including markedly elevated D-dimers concentration with nearly normal activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time and platelet count. The diagnosis may be challenging due to overlapping features between pulmonary embolism and severe COVID-19 disease, such as dyspnoea, high concentration of D-dimers, right ventricle with dysfunction or enlargement, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Both macro- and microvascular complications are associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Therefore, early recognition of coagulation abnormalities among hospitalized COVID-19 patients are critical measures to identify patients with poor prognosis, guide antithrombotic prophylaxis or treatment, and improve patients' clinical outcomes. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICIANS: Most of the guidelines and consensus documents published on behalf of professional societies focused on thrombosis and hemostasis advocate the use of anticoagulants in all patients hospitalized with COVID-19, as well as 2-6 weeks post hospital discharge in the absence of contraindications. However, since there is no guidance for deciding the intensity and duration of anticoagulation, the decision-making process should be made in individual-case basis. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we review the mechanistic relationships between inflammation and thrombosis, discuss the macrovascular and microvascular complications and summarize the prophylaxis, diagnosis and treatment of thromboembolism in patients affected by COVID-19.

The use of Smith-modified Sgarbossa criteria to diagnose an extensive anterior acute myocardial infarction in a patient presenting with a left bundle branch block.

Patients with LBBB of unknown onset presenting with chest pain can pose a diagnostic challenge in the ED while Smith-Modified-Sgarbossa (SMS) ECG criteria might facilitate AMI diagnosis. We demonstrate a case of a 79-year-old man that presented to the ED with chest pain. Original Sgarbossa criteria were negative for AMI while SMS criteria were applied showing proportionally excessive discordance between ST-segment and preceding S-wave thus fulfilling diagnostic criterion for AMI. The coronary angiogram showed the total occlusion of the culprit left anterior descending artery. In this case, awareness of SMS criteria aided in the early prehospital diagnosis of AMI in the setting of LBBB and impacted the course of treatment.

Circulating Levels of Dephosphorylated-Uncarboxylated Matrix Gla Protein in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Vascular calcification contributes to the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease while matrix Gla protein (MGP) was recently identified as a potent inhibitor of vascular calcification. MGP fractions, such as dephosphorylated-uncarboxylated MGP (dp-ucMGP), lack post-translational modifications and are less efficient in vascular calcification inhibition. We sought to compare dp-ucMGP levels between patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), stratified by ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) status. Physical examination and clinical data, along with plasma dp-ucMGP levels, were obtained from 90 consecutive ACS patients. We observed that levels of dp-ucMGP were significantly higher in patients with NSTEMI compared to STEMI patients (1063.4 ± 518.6 vs. 742.7 ± 166.6 pmol/L, p < 0.001). NSTEMI status and positive family history of cardiovascular diseases were only independent predictors of the highest tertile of dp-ucMGP levels. Among those with NSTEMI, patients at a high risk of in-hospital mortality (adjudicated by GRACE score) had significantly higher levels of dp-ucMGP compared to non-high-risk patients (1417.8 ± 956.8 vs. 984.6 ± 335.0 pmol/L, p = 0.030). Altogether, our findings suggest that higher dp-ucMGP levels likely reflect higher calcification burden in ACS patients and might aid in the identification of NSTEMI patients at increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Furthermore, observed dp-ucMGP levels might reflect differences in atherosclerotic plaque pathobiology between patients with STEMI and NSTEMI.

Predicting the 1-Year All-Cause Mortality After Hospitalisation for an Acute Heart Failure Event: A Real-World Derivation Cohort for the Development of the S2PLiT-UG Score.

BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a complex syndrome associated with high morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to derive a simple risk score with which to identify AHF patients at high risk for an all-cause death event during the first year after hospital discharge. METHODS: Three hundred AHF patients from the Heart Failure registry were included in the analysis. Cox regression with a forward-conditional algorithm and bootstrapping procedure was used to build the prognostic score, while c-statistic was used to assess the prognostic performance of the score. RESULTS: Seven variables were independently associated with an all-cause mortality event during the 1-year follow-up (FU): estimated glomerular filtration rate of 40-60; estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 mL/min/1.73 m2; uric acid >450 µmol/L; left-ventricular ejection fraction <45%; sodium <136 mmol/L; systolic blood pressure <115 mmHg; and a positive history of previous heart failure-related decompensation event(s). The score derived from significant variables enabled classification of patients into three risk categories: low (0-2 points), intermediate (3 points), and high (4-6 points). Observed all-cause mortality rates during the 1-year FU were 6.1%, 30.5%, and 80.9% across the three risk categories, respectively. The score demonstrated a high level of discrimination for an all-cause death event in the derivation cohort with the c-statistic value of 0.907 (95% CI, 0.867-0.939; p < 0.0001) and adequate calibration. CONCLUSIONS: The S2PLiT-UG score is a simple tool with potential for facilitating risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making during the first year after hospitalisation for an AHF event. Future external validation studies are required to confirm its prognostic performance.

Transient neurological symptoms (TNS) following spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anaesthetics in adult surgical patients: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anaesthesia has been implicated as one of the possible causes of neurological complications following surgical procedures. This painful condition, occurring during the immediate postoperative period, is termed transient neurological symptoms (TNS) and is typically observed after the use of spinal lidocaine. Alternatives to lidocaine that can provide high-quality anaesthesia without TNS development are needed. This review was originally published in 2005, and last updated in 2009. OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of TNS after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine and compare it with other types of local anaesthetics by performing a meta-analysis for all pair-wise comparisons, and conducting network meta-analysis (NMA) to rank interventions. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Elsevier Embase, and LILACS on 25 November 2018. We searched clinical trial registries and handsearched the reference lists of trials and review articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing the frequency of TNS after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine to other local anaesthetics. Studies had to have two or more arms that used distinct local anaesthetics (irrespective of the concentration and baricity of the solution) for spinal anaesthesia in preparation for surgery. We included adults who received spinal anaesthesia and considered all pregnant participants as a subgroup. The follow-up period for TNS was at least 24 hours. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Four review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. Three review authors independently evaluated the quality of the relevant studies and extracted the data from the included studies. We performed meta-analysis for all pair-wise comparisons of local anaesthetics, as well as NMA. We used an inverse variance weighting for summary statistics and a random-effects model as we expected methodological and clinical heterogeneity across the included studies resulting in varying effect sizes between studies of pair-wise comparisons. The NMA used all included studies based on a graph theoretical approach within a frequentist framework. Finally, we ranked the competing treatments by P scores. MAIN RESULTS: The analysis included 24 trials reporting on 2226 participants of whom 239 developed TNS. Two studies are awaiting classification and one is ongoing. Included studies mostly had unclear to high risk of bias. The NMA included 24 studies and eight different local anaesthetics; the number of pair-wise comparisons was 32 and the number of different pair-wise comparisons was 11. This analysis showed that, compared to lidocaine, the risk ratio (RR) of TNS was lower for bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, prilocaine, procaine, and ropivacaine with RRs in the range of 0.10 to 0.23 while 2-chloroprocaine and mepivacaine did not differ in terms of RR of TNS development compared to lidocaine. Pair-wise meta-analysis showed that compared with lidocaine, most local anaesthetics were associated with a reduced risk of TNS development (except 2-chloroprocaine and mepivacaine) (bupivacaine: RR 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 0.28; 12 studies; moderate-quality evidence; 2-chloroprocaine: RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.51; 2 studies; low-quality evidence; levobupivacaine: RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.69; 2 studies; low-quality evidence; mepivacaine: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.18 to 5.82; 4 studies; very low-quality evidence; prilocaine: RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; 4 studies; moderate-quality evidence; procaine: RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.52; 2 studies; moderate-quality evidence; ropivacaine: RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.78; 2 studies; low-quality evidence). We were unable to perform any of our planned subgroup analyses due to the low number of TNS events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Results from both NMA and pair-wise meta-analysis indicate that the risk of developing TNS after spinal anaesthesia is lower when bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, prilocaine, procaine, and ropivacaine are used compared to lidocaine. The use of 2-chloroprocaine and mepivacaine had a similar risk to lidocaine in terms of TNS development after spinal anaesthesia. Patients should be informed of TNS as a possible adverse effect of local anaesthesia with lidocaine and the choice of anaesthetic agent should be based on the specific clinical context and parameters such as the expected duration of the procedure and the quality of anaesthesia. Due to the very low- to moderate-quality evidence (GRADE), future research efforts in this field are required to assess alternatives to lidocaine that would be able to provide high-quality anaesthesia without TNS development. The two studies awaiting classification and one ongoing study may alter the conclusions of the review once assessed.

Catestatin serum levels are increased in male patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a complex sleep disorder associated with autonomic and sympathetic dysregulation. To the contrary, catestatin, an endogenous pleiotropic peptide cleaved from chromogranin A, is known for its inhibitory effects on catecholamine release and sympathetic activity. The aims of the study were to determine catestatin serum levels among male OSA patients compared to healthy control subjects and to explore associations of catestatin with anthropometric, polysomnographic, and lipid profile parameters. METHODS: Seventy-eight male OSA patients aged 50.3 ± 8.8 years and 51 age/sex/BMI-matched control subjects aged 50.4 ± 7.8 years were enrolled in the study. Catestatin serum levels were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Catestatin serum levels were significantly higher among OSA patients compared to control subjects (2.9 ± 1.2 vs. 1.5 ± 1.1 ng/mL, p < 0.001). Serum catestatin levels significantly correlated with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) among non-obese OSA subjects (r = 0.466, p = 0.016; ß = 0.448, p = 0.026), while in whole OSA population, catestatin levels significantly correlated with neck circumference (r = 0.318, p < 0.001; ß = 0.384, p < 0.001) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (r = - 0.320, p < 0.001; ß = - 0.344, p < 0.001). In multivariate-adjusted regression model, serum catestatin was significant and independent predictor of OSA status (OR 4.98, 95% CI 2.17-11.47, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Catestatin serum levels are significantly increased in male OSA population and positively correlate with disease severity in non-obese patients. OSA status is independently predicted by catestatin levels; however, this finding is restricted to patients with moderate-to-severe disease. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the mechanistic role of catestatin in the complex pathophysiology of OSA.

Structural Complications Following ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2020.

ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a life-threatening emergency that can result in cardiac structural complications without timely revascularization. A retrospective study from the National Inpatient Sample included all patients with a diagnosis of STEMI between 2016 and 2020. Primary outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LoS), and healthcare costs for patients with and without structural complications. There were 994,300 hospital admissions included in the analysis (median age 64 years and 32.2% female). Structural complications occurred in 0.78% of patients. There was a three-fold increase in patients with cardiogenic shock (41.6% vs. 13.6%) and in-hospital mortality (30.6% vs. 10.7%) in the group with structural complications. The median LoS was longer (5 days vs. 3 days), and the median cost was significantly greater (USD 32,436 vs. USD 20,241) for patients with structural complications. After adjustments, in-hospital mortality was significantly greater for patients with structural complications (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.73-2.30), and both LoS and costs were greater. There was a significant increase in mortality with ruptured cardiac wall (OR 9.16, 95% CI 5.91-14.20), hemopericardium (OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.91-5.35), and ventricular septal rupture (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.98-3.35) compared with those with no complication. In conclusion, structural complications in STEMI patients are rare but potentially catastrophic events.

The impact of COVID-19 and the COVID-19 pandemic on hospitalized patients with STEMI in the United States: insights from the National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear how COVID-19 pandemic affected care and outcomes among patients who are diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the USA. METHODS: We analyzed the data from National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020 and assessed the impact of COVID-19 infection and the COVID-19 pandemic (year 2020) on in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization costs.P. RESULTS: There were 1 050 905 hospitalizations with STEMI, and there was an 8.2% reduction in admissions in 2020. Patients with COVID-19 versus those without had significantly greater in-hospital mortality (45.2% vs. 10.7%; P < 0.001). In 2020, 3.0% of hospitalizations had a diagnosis of COVID-19, and the mortality was 11.5% compared to 10.7% for patients admitted in 2016-2019 period. There was a significantly increased mortality (OR 6.25, 95% CI 5.42-7.21, P < 0.001), LOS (coefficient 3.47, 95% CI 3.10-3.84, P < 0.001) and cost (coefficient 10.69, 95% CI 8.4-12.55, P < 0.001) with COVID-19 infection compared with no infection. There was a borderline difference in mortality (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00- 1.09, P = 0.050) but LOS (coefficient -0.21, 95% CI-0.28 to -0.14, P < 0.001) and costs (3.14, 95% CI 2.79 to 3.49, P < 0.001) were reduced in 2020 compared to 2016-2019 period. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in patients hospitalized with STEMI, COVID-19 infection was associated with increased mortality, LOS, and cost but during the pandemic year of 2020 there was a small trend for increased mortality for patients with a diagnosis of STEMI.

Coagulation Disorders and Thrombotic Complications in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with multiple cardiovascular and noncardiovascular comorbidities and risk factors which increase the risk of thrombotic complications, such as atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Subsequently, thromboembolic risk stratification in this population poses a great challenge. Since date from the large randomized clinical trials mostly include both patients with truly preserved EF, and those with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction, there is an unmet need to characterize the patients with truly preserved EF. Considering the significant evidence gap in this area, we sought to describe the coagulation disorders and thrombotic complications in patients with HFpEF and discuss the specific thromboembolic risk factors in patients with HFpEF, with the goal to tailor risk stratification to an individual patient.

The impact of concomitant chronic total occlusion on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a large single-center analysis.

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common finding in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the impact on prognosis of chronic total occlusions (CTOs), a drastic expression of CAD, remains unclear. Methods and results: We retrospectively reviewed 1,487 consecutive TAVR cases performed at a single tertiary care medical center. Pre-TAVR angiograms were analyzed for the presence of a CTO. At the time of TAVR, 11.2% (n = 167) patients had a CTO. There was no significant association between the presence of a CTO and in-hospital or 30-day mortality. There was also no difference in long-term survival. LV ejection fraction and mean aortic gradients were lower in the CTO group. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that concomitant CTO lesions in patients undergoing TAVR differ in their risk profile and clinical findings to patients without CTO. CTO lesion per se were not associated with increased mortality, nevertheless CTOs which supply non-viable myocardium in TAVR population were associated with increased risk of death. Additional research is needed to evaluate the prognostic significance of CTO lesions in TAVR patients.

The Impact of the Initial Clinical Presentation of Bladder Cancer on Histopathological and Morphological Tumor Characteristics.

This study investigated the impact of the initial clinical presentation of bladder cancer on tumor characteristics. A cross-sectional, retrospective study was performed, and it involved 515 patients who underwent transurethral bladder cancer resection at the University Hospital Center Split between April 2019 and April 2023, excluding recurrent cases. The association between symptomatic versus asymptomatic presentation and bladder cancer characteristics was analyzed. A subgroup analysis compared tumor characteristics between patients with gross and microscopic hematuria. Multiple regression analyses revealed a significant association between symptomatic presentation and the detection of high-grade bladder cancer (OR 3.43, 95% CI 2.22-5.29, p < 0.001), concomitant CIS (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.31-8.88, p = 0.012), T2 stage bladder cancer (OR 5.79, 95% CI 2.45-13.71, p < 0.001), a higher number of tumors (IRR 1.24, 95% CI 1.07-1.45, p = 0.005), and larger tumor size (B 1.68, 95% CI 1.19-2.18, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, gross hematuria was associated with the detection of high-grade bladder cancer (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.12-3.84, p = 0.020), T2 stage bladder cancer (OR 6.03, 95% CI 1.42-25.49, p = 0.015), and larger tumor size (B 1.8, 95% CI 0.99-2.6, p < 0.001). The identified associations between symptomatic presentation and unfavorable bladder cancer characteristics, likely attributed to early detection in asymptomatic cases, underscore the importance of additional research in the development of bladder cancer screening strategies.

Myocardial work in patients with heart failure and ischemic cardiomyopathy according to the mode of coronary revascularization.

BACKGROUND: The association of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on myocardial function, as reflected in myocardial work (MyW) parameters, in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and heart failure (HF) is unknown. METHODS: We analyzed data from 68 patients who were hospitalized with chronic HF due to ischemic cardiomyopathy and stratified them according to the mode of revascularization. All patients underwent a 2D speckle tracking echocardiography exam performed by the same expert sonographer and had complete MyW data including global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE). RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 70 ± 10 years and 86.8% were men. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in overall cohort was 31.6 ± 9.5%. Both subgroups did not significantly differ in terms of baseline LVEF, comorbidities, and pharmacotherapy. Compared with those who received PCI, patients revascularized with CABG had significantly greater GWI (821 vs. 555 mmHg%, p = 0.002), GCW (1101 vs. 794 mmHg%, p = 0.001), GWE (78 vs. 72.6%, p = 0.025), and global longitudinal strain (-8.7 vs. -6.7%, p = 0.004). Both patient subgroups did not significantly differ with respect to GWW (273 vs. 245 mmHg%, p = 0.410 for CABG and PCI, respectively) and survival during the median follow-up of 18 months (log-rank p = 0.813). CONCLUSION: Patients with HF and ischemic cardiomyopathy revascularized with CABG had greater myocardial work performance when compared with those revascularized with PCI. This might suggest a higher degree of functional myocardial revascularization associated with the CABG procedure.

In-hospital outcomes and conditions in patients with acute coronary syndrome and coronary artery aneurysms who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery aneurysms (CAA) are uncommon, often incidental findings in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that represent a management challenge due to as there is a paucity of literature in this area. METHODS: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 by including all patients with the admission diagnosis of the ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to evaluate the association of CAA with other relevant systemic conditions and determine the impact of CAA on in-hospital outcomes. RESULTS: Among 1,733,655 hospital admission with ACS who underwent PCI, 2675 had CAA. There was a 2-fold increase in odds of CAA if the patient had coronary artery dissection (OR 2.05 95%CI 1.12-3.75, p = 0.020) or extracoronary aneurysm (OR 2.47 95%CI 1.46-4.16, p = 0.001) and a 3-fold increase in odds if they had a systematic inflammatory disorder (OR 3.24 95%CI 2.08-5.07, p < 0.001). CAA was not associated with increased odds of mortality (OR 1.22 95%CI 0.76-1.95, p = 0.42), bleeding (OR 1.29 95%CI 0.86-1.95, p = 0.22), acute stroke (OR 0.91 95%CI 0.40-2.07, p = 0.83), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (OR 1.08 95%CI 0.72-1.61, p = 0.71) or cardiac complications (OR 0.85 95%CI 0.49-1.47, p = 0.55). However, it was significantly associated with increased odds of vascular complications (OR 2.17 95%CI 1.47-3.19, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with ACS who undergo PCI, the presence of CAA is associated with greater odds of vascular complications but after adjustments there was no difference in mortality or other complications. In this population, CAA is more prevalent in patients with coronary dissection, extracoronary aneurysms and systemic inflammatory disorders.

In-Hospital Outcomes and Conditions Associated With Coronary Artery Aneurysms in Chronic Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery aneurysms (CAA) are infrequent findings among patients undergoing coronary angiography and may be associated with systemic diseases. METHODS: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 by including all patients with the admission diagnosis of the chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). We sought to determine the impact of CAA on in-hospital outcomes encompassing all-cause death, bleeding, cardiovascular complications, and stroke. Secondly, we examined the association of CAA with other relevant systemic conditions. RESULTS: The presence of CAA was associated with a 3-fold increase in the odds of cardiovascular complications (OR 3.1, 95 % CI 2.9-3.8), however, it was associated with reduced odds of stroke (OR 0.7, 95 % CI 0.6-0.9). There was no significant impact on all-cause death and overall bleeding complications, although there appeared to be a reduction in the odds of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding associated with CAA (OR 0.6, 95 % CI 0.4-0.8). Patients with CAA vs. those without CAA had a significantly greater prevalence of extracoronary arterial aneurysms (7.9 % vs. 1.4 %), systemic inflammatory disorders (6.5 % vs. 1.1 %), connective tissue disease (1.6 % vs. 0.6 %), coronary artery dissection (1.3 % vs. 0.1 %), bicuspid aortic valve (0.8 % vs. 0.2 %), and extracoronary arterial dissection (0.3 % vs. 0.1 %). In the multivariable regression, systemic inflammatory disorders, extracoronary aneurysms, coronary artery dissection, and connective tissue diseases were independent predictors of CAA. CONCLUSIONS: CAA in patients with CCS is associated with greater odds of cardiovascular complications during hospitalization. These patients also had a substantially greater prevalence of extracardiac vascular and systemic abnormalities.

Predictors of left ventricular thrombus after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a recognized complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) which can cause significant morbidity and mortality from systemic embolism. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of factors that have been shown in studies to be independently predictive of LVT post-AMI. A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria with 1 047 785 patients. The proportion of patients with LVT ranged from 0.2% in the nationwide study in the USA to 36.1% in the cohort of patients with LV aneurysm. Pooled results from nine studies suggest that greater values for left ventricular ejection fraction is associated with reduced odds of LVT formation [odds ratio (OR) 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86-0.93; I2 = 76%]. Left ventricular aneurysm was a significant predictor of LVT formation (OR 6.07; 95% CI, 2.27-16.19; I2 = 91%; seven studies) and anterior location of MI was also a significant predictor (OR 7.72; 95% CI, 2.41-24.74; I2 = 69%; four studies). Three studies suggest that there was an increase in odds of LVT formation with greater values of C-reactive protein (OR 2.06; 95% CI, 1.07-3.97; I2 = 89%; three studies). The use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (OR 2.52; 95% CI, 1.55-4.10; I2 = 0%; two studies) and greater SYNTAX score (OR 1.21; 95% CI, 1.08-1.36; I2 = 46%; two studies) were associated with LVT. In conclusion, patients with reduced ejection fraction, AMI and with left ventricular aneurysm are at risk of LVT formation and careful imaging evaluation should be performed to identify LVT in these patients to prevent stroke or peripheral embolism.

An evidence-based evaluation of left ventricular thrombus treatment, outcomes, and resolution: a systematic review, pooled analysis and meta-analysis.

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a recognized complication of acute myocardial infarction which is associated with stroke. There has yet to be a published systematic review that focuses on outcomes for patients with LVT. We conducted a systematic review on treatments, adverse events and thrombus resolution in patients with LVT. Meta-analysis and numerical pooling were used to evaluate the difference in outcomes based on treatment and the presence or absence of LVT. A total of 39 studies were included (5475 patients with LVT and 356 589 patients with no LVT). The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was associated with reduced mortality [RR, 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-0.97; I2 = 9%] and bleeding (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.85; I2 = 0%) compared to warfarin but there was a nonsignificant reduction in stroke/embolic events (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.76-1.19; I2 = 3%). For patients with any treatment, the rate of stroke/embolic events, bleeding and mortality at follow-up of up to 12 months was 6.4, 3.7 and 7.9%, respectively. Pooled results from six studies that evaluated resolution at 6 months suggest that 80% of LVT were resolved. Apixaban was associated with the highest rate of (93.3%) whereas warfarin exhibited the lowest rate of resolution 73.1%. LVT is best managed with DOAC compared to warfarin therapy. An individualized approach to antithrombotic therapy is warranted as there appears to be no duration of therapy that clearly results in the resolution of all cases of LVT so follow-up imaging after discontinuation of anticoagulant is needed.