Is dependent cannabis use in adult hospitalizations with inflammatory bowel disease associated with major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events? Insights from National Inpatient Sample Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and dependent cannabis use or cannabis use disorder (CUD+) are independent risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Usage of cannabis for pain increased in IBD patients. However, associated cardiovascular safety remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) associated with CUD + in hospitalized IBD patients. METHODS: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample 2020 using ICD-10-CM codes; hospitalized IBD patients were identified and divided based on CUD's presence or absence. Multivariable regression models were performed to evaluate MACCE [in-hospital mortality, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), cardiac arrest (CA), and acute ischemic stroke (AIS)] odds after adjusting for baseline demographics, hospital-level characteristics, and relevant cardiac/extra-cardiac morbidities. RESULTS: Among the 302,770 hospitalized adult IBD patients, 3.1% (9,490) had CUD+. The majority of patients in the CUD + cohort were white (67.7%), male (57.5%), and aged between 18 and 44 years (66.2%). Cardiovascular risk factors like hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and prior myocardial infarction were higher in the CUD - cohort (p <0.001) compared to the CUD + cohort. The CUD + cohort had a lower rate of MACCE (3.1% vs. 5.8%), crude in-hospital mortality (0.7% vs. 2.2%), AMI (1.7% vs. 2.6%), CA (0.3% vs. 0.7%), and AIS (0.6% vs. 1.2%) with statistical significance (p <0.001). However, after adjusting for baseline characteristics and comorbidities, the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) did not show a statistically significant difference for MACCE (aOR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.65-1.25, p = 0.530), CA (aOR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.2-1.47, p = 0.227), and AIS (aOR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.43-1.73, p = 0.669). CONCLUSION: Our study did not find a statistically significant difference in MACCE among hospitalized IBD patients with and without CUD. This emphasizes the need for more extensive prospective studies focusing on the quantity, method, and duration of cannabis use (recreational or medicinal) in patients with IBD.

The efficacy of colchicine in preventing atrial fibrillation recurrence and pericarditis post-catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation - A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Introduction: Catheter ablation (CA) initiates a proinflammatory process responsible for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence (25-40%) and pericarditis (0.8%). Due to its anti-inflammatory properties, colchicine, a microtubule inhibitor, is explored for the prevention of early AF recurrence and pericarditis after pulmonary vein isolation. We performed a pooled analysis to determine the rates of AF recurrence and pericarditis after CA in patients receiving colchicine. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted on PubMed and SCOPUS from inception to December 2023 using medical subject headings and keywords, followed by a citation and reference search. We identified prospective studies reporting recurrent AF and pericarditis outcomes after catheter ablation in patients taking colchicine versus placebo. A binary random effects model was used to estimate pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the leave-one-out method, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Results: Of the 958 identified studies, 4 met our inclusion criteria. A total of 1,619 patients were analyzed; 743 received colchicine, and 875 were in the placebo group. Recurrent AF after CA occurred in 192 (29.0 %) of the colchicine group and 318 (39.5 %) of the placebo group. Post-ablation pericarditis occurred in 34 (5.3 %) of the colchicine group and 128 (16.5 %) of the placebo group. Pooled analysis of prospective studies showed that colchicine decreased the odds of recurrent AF [OR: 0.63 (95 % CI: 0.50-0.78), p < 0.01, I2  = 8 %] and post-ablation pericarditis [OR: 0.34 (95 % CI: 0.16-0.75), p < 0.01, I2  = 57 %]. Odds of GI disturbance were increased with colchicine use in our analysis [OR: 2.77 (95 % CI: 1.17-6.56), p = 0.02, I2  = 84 %]. Conclusion: Colchicine use is associated with decreased odds of recurrent AF and pericarditis post-CA from the analysis of prospective studies. These results underscore the potential for colchicine therapy for future exploration with randomized and controlled research with different dosages.

Rising Trends in Metabolically Healthy Obesity in Cancer Patients and Its Impact on Cardiovascular Events: Insights from a Contemporary Nationwide Analysis in the USA (2016-2020).

Background: Obesity or overweight raises the risk of developing 13 types of cancer, representing 40% of all cancers diagnosed in the United States annually. Given the ongoing debate surrounding the impact of metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) on cardiovascular outcomes, it is crucial to comprehend the incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCEs) and the influence of MHO on these outcomes in cancer patients. Methods: Data of hospitalized cancer patients with and without obesity were analyzed from the National Inpatient Sample 2016-2020. Metabolically healthy patients were identified by excluding diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia using Elixhauser comorbidity software, v.2022.1. After that, we performed a multivariable regression analysis for in-hospital MACCEs and other individual outcomes. Results: We identified 3,111,824 cancer-related hospitalizations between 2016 and 2020. The MHO cohort had 199,580 patients (6.4%), whereas the MHnO (metabolically healthy non-obese) cohort had 2,912,244 patients (93.6%). The MHO cohort had a higher proportion of females, Blacks, and Hispanics. Outcomes including in-hospital MACCEs (7.9% vs. 9.5%; p < 0.001), all-cause mortality (6.1% vs. 7.5%; p < 0.001), and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (1.5% vs. 1.6%; p < 0.001) were lower in the MHO cohort compared to the MHnO cohort. Upon adjusting for the baseline characteristics, the MHO group had lower odds of in-hospital MACCEs [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.93, 95% CI (0.90-0.97), p < 0.001], all-cause mortality [AOR = 0.91, 95% CI (0.87-0.94); p < 0.001], and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) [AOR = 0.76, 95% CI (0.69-0.84); p < 0.001], whereas there were higher odds of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) [AOR = 1.08, 95% CI (1.01-1.16); p < 0.001] and cardiac arrest (CA) [AOR = 1.26, 95% CI (1.01-1.57); p = 0.045] in the MHO cohort compared to the MHnO cohort. Conclusions: Hospitalized cancer patients with MHO exhibited a lower prevalence of in-hospital MACCEs than those with MHnO. Additional prospective studies and randomized clinical trials are imperative to validate these findings, particularly in stratifying MHO across various cancer types and their corresponding risks of in-hospital MACCEs.