Therapeutic management and evolution of chronic hepatitis B: does HIV still have an impact? The EPIB 2012 study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To compare the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and its evolution over time in currently followed HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients. METHODS: A total of 709 consecutive patients with past or present positive HBs antigenemia seen in October 2012 in 19 French participating centres were included. The data were retrospectively collected from the first visit onwards through standardized questionnaires. RESULTS: Chronic hepatitis B was less often assessed in the 299 HIV-positive patients, who were older, more likely to be male, excessive alcohol drinkers and HBe antigen-, HCV- and HDV-positive. They were also followed up for a longer time (11.3 +/-8.8 vs. 8.6 +/-6.9 years, P < 10(-3) ) and were more frequently treated for HBV (95.3% vs. 56.8%, P < 10(-3) ). HBV was undetectable at the last visit in 80.8% of HIV-positive vs. 55.1% of HIV-negative patients (P < 10(-3) ). In multivariate analyses, undetectable HBV was significantly associated with older age, lower baseline HBV DNA, longer HBV therapy and no previous lamivudine monotherapy, but not with HIV. Cirrhosis was associated with age, male gender, Asian origin, alcoholism, HCV, HDV, but not with HIV infection. Hepatocellular carcinoma, less frequently observed in HIV-positive patients (0.7% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.002), was positively associated with age, male gender, cirrhosis and negatively associated with HIV infection (OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.03-0.67, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although the assessment of CHB still has to be improved in HIV-positive patients, the negative impact of HIV on the virological, histological and clinical evolution of CHB seems to be disappearing, probably because of the immunovirological impact of HAART and the more frequent and longer use of HBV therapy.

Complicated atazanavir-associated cholelithiasis: a report of 14 cases.

Fourteen human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients receiving an atazanavir (ATV)-based antiretroviral regimen developed complicated cholelithiasis. ATV was found in biliary calculi in 8 of 11 cases: infrared spectrometry analysis of calculi revealed that ATV made up a median of 89% (range, 10%-100%) of the total calculus composition. Development and management of ATV-associated cholelithiasis are discussed.

Urolithiasis in HIV-positive patients treated with atazanavir.

Among protease inhibitors, atazanavir has not been associated with urolithiasis in clinical studies. We describe 11 cases of atazanavir-associated urolithiasis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Patients with low water intake, high urinary pH, and a prior history of urinary stones may have a higher risk of atazanavir-associated urine crystallization.

HIV-1 resistance genotyping on dried serum spots.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of HIV-1 group M resistance genotyping on dried serum spots, by testing samples from previously untreated patients, patients on treatment, and patients having stopped treatment, representing a wide genetic diversity panel. METHODS: Serum samples from 62 HIV-1-infected Caucasian and African patients, with viral load values from 715 copies/ml to more than 750,000 copies/ml, were deposited on filter paper. After elution and RNA extraction, nested RT-PCR was used to amplify the protease and RT regions of the pol gene. Resistance sequencing was performed on all the protease and RT amplicons. The sequences obtained for resistance genotyping were used for subtyping by phylogenetic analysis. RESULTS: Amplification was successful in the protease region in 53/62 cases (85.5%) and in the RT region in 51/62 cases (82.3%). All samples with viral loads of at least 5 Log (17 of 62) were successfully amplified in both the RT and protease regions. Of the 29 samples with viral loads between 4 Log and 5 Log, 28 (97%) were amplified in the RT region and 25 (86%) in the protease region. The detected mutations were in keeping with the treatment status. Marked natural polymorphism was observed in the protease region, but no major consequences were deduced in terms of resistance. The results showed a broad diversity of the panel, including subtype B (n = 36) and non B or recombinant forms (n = 20). CONCLUSION: Our results show the feasibility of this dried serum spot method for monitoring resistance to antiretroviral drugs and the molecular epidemiology of HIV diversity. The simplicity of sample preparation, storage and transport potentially makes this an importance tool for individual and epidemiological monitoring throughout the world.

Association of dolutegravir and rilpivirine, enhanced by foscarnet induction, in effective salvage antiretroviral therapy.

We report the case of a multi-experienced patient, infected with an HIV-1 strain, with selected multiple resistance mutations. We designed a novel well-tolerated and effective rescue treatment including dolutegravir, rilpivirine, and foscarnet, allowing a 60-week sustained virological response for the first time in 23 years of HIV infection.

Pharmacologic boosting of atazanavir in maintenance HIV-1 therapy: the COREYA propensity-score adjusted study.

BACKGROUND: Among HIV-1 infected patients who achieved virologic suppression, the use of atazanavir without pharmacologic boosting is debated. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerance of maintenance therapy with unboosted atazanavir in clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluated the efficacy of switching HIV-1-infected patients controlled on triple therapy to unboosted (ATV(0), n = 98) versus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r, n = 254) +2 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The primary endpoint was time to virologic failure (VF, >200 copies/mL). ATV groups were compared controlling for potential confounding bias by inverse probability weighted Cox analysis and propensity-score matching. Overall and adjusted VF rates were similar for both strategies. Both strategies improved dyslipidemia and creatininemia, with less jaundice in the ATV(0) group. CONCLUSION: In previously well-suppressed patients, within an observational cohort setting, ATV(0)-based triple-therapy appeared as effective as ATV/r- based triple-therapy to maintain virologic suppression, even if co-administered with TDF, but was better tolerated.