Combining contact force and local impedance to treat idiopathic premature ventricular contractions from the outflow tracts: impact of ablation strategy on outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Contact force (CF)-sensing catheters have not proved superior to standard catheters in the ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) from the right and left ventricular outflow tract (RVOT, LVOT). In this context, the utility of measuring local impedance (LI) is not known. We aimed to ascertain whether the use of a catheter combining LI and CF information was associated with superior outcomes in comparison with other catheter technologies. METHODS: We compared three groups of 40 propensity-matched patients with PVCs from the OTs, ablated by means of different catheter technologies: a CF-plus LI-featured catheter, an LI-featured catheter, and a standard irrigated catheter. RESULTS: The CF + LI group displayed a significantly lower risk of PVC recurrence than the standard ablation group (HR, 0.22; 95%CI, 0.07-0.71; p = 0.01). In the CF + LI group, LI drop and RF time were the only predictors of successful lesions (OR = 1.19, CI: 1.13-1.26, p < 0.001; OR = 1.06 CI: 1.01-1.07, p = 0.044, respectively). In the coronary cusps, unlike the RVOT/LVOT region, CF was not associated with LI drop (p = 0.48), and RF duration showed a linear relationship with LI drop (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ablation catheters that combine CF and LI information is associated with increased success in the RF ablation of PVCs from the OTs. LI drop is the most important predictor of effective lesions, but its behavior depends on the ablation site: in the coronary cusps, unlike the RVOT/LVOT region, longer RF application times are needed in order to achieve LI drops associated with successful outcomes. REGISTRY AND REGISTRATION NO. OF THE STUDY/TRIAL: NCT03793998.

One-year outcomes in patients undergoing very high-power short-duration ablation for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) temperature-controlled ablation (vHPSD) improves the efficiency of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures. We evaluated the procedural and 12-months outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing PVI by means of vHPSD ablation. In patients with AF or atrial tachyarrythmia (AT) recurrence undergoing a redo procedure the durability of the PVI was investigated. METHODS: Consecutive paroxysmal/persistent AF patients undergoing PVI with the vHPSD ablation strategy (90 W, for 4 s) were enrolled. The rate of PVI, first-pass isolation, acute reconnection, and procedural complications were evaluated. Follow-up examinations and EKG were scheduled at 3,6, and 12 months. In case of AF/AT recurrence, patients underwent a redo procedure. RESULTS: Overall, 163 AF patients (29 persistent and 134 paroxysmal) were enrolled. The PVI was reached in 100% of patients (88% at the first pass). The rate of acute reconnection was 2%. The radiofrequency, fluoroscopy and procedural times were respectively 5.5 ± 1 min, 9 ± 1 min and 75 ± 20 min. No death, tamponade nor steam pops occurred; however, 5 patients had vascular complications. The 12-months freedom from AF/AT recurrence was 86% in both paroxysmal and persistent patients. Overall, 9 patients underwent a redo procedure, and in 4 all veins were still isolated, whereas in 5 pulmonary vein reconnections were found. The PVI durability was 78%. No overt clinical complications were observed in the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The vHPSD ablation represents an effective and safe ablation strategy to achieve PVI. The 12-months follow-up showed high freedom from AF/AT recurrence and a good safety profile.

One-year mortality after implantable defibrillator implantation: do risk stratification models help improving clinical practice?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the available mortality risk stratification models for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) patients. METHODS: We conducted a review of mortality risk stratification models and tested their ability to improve prediction of 1-year survival after implant in a database of patients who received a remotely controlled ICD/CRT-D device during routine care and included in the independent Home Monitoring Expert Alliance registry. RESULTS: We identified ten predicting models published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 and 2021 (Parkash, PACE, MADIT, aCCI, CHA2DS2-VASc quartiles, CIDS, FADES, Sjoblom, AAACC, and MADIT-ICD non-arrhythmic mortality score) that could be tested in our database as based on common demographic, clinical, echocardiographic, electrocardiographic, and laboratory variables. Our cohort included 1,911 patients with left ventricular dysfunction (median age 71, 18.3% female) from sites not using any risk stratification score for systematic patient screening. Patients received an ICD (53.8%) or CRT-D (46.2%) between 2011 and 2017, after standard physician evaluation. There were 56 deaths within 1-year post-implant, with an all-cause mortality rate of 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-3.8%). Four predicting models (Parkash, MADIT, AAACC, and MADIT-ICD non-arrhythmic mortality score) were significantly associated with increased risk of 1-year mortality with hazard ratios ranging from 3.75 (CI, 1.31-10.7) to 6.53 (CI 1.52-28.0, p ≤ 0.014 for all four). Positive predictive values of 1-year mortality were below 25% for all models. CONCLUSION: In our analysis, the models we tested conferred modest incremental predicting power to ordinary screening methods.

Remote monitoring for heart failure management during COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pandemic impacted on heart failure patients' lifestyle and quality of life, affecting both physical activity levels and state of health. METHODS: Demographic data and device records were extracted for patients with heart failure in the 16 weeks at the turn of lockdown during pandemic. To explore the variability across the lockdown period, a week-to-week analysis was performed. Patients were interviewed to investigate physical activity and psychological insights. The primary endpoint was the variation in physical activity at the turn of lockdown. RESULTS: At our facility, 2225 patients implanted with a cardiac device were screened and data were collected for 211 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Patients' physical activity significantly decreased in the lockdown period compared with the control period (active time per day 8.0% vs. 10.8%; relative reduction [RRR] 25.9%; p < 0.0001). A small decrease was noted for mean heart rate (70.1 vs. 71.7 beats per minute [bpm]; RRR 2.2%; p < 0.0001), while thoracic impedance slightly increased (82.2 vs. 82.7 ohm; RRR 0.6%; p = 0.001). Patients' physical activity decreased from week 7 to week 11 (10.9% vs. 6.9%; RRR 36.7%; P < 0.0001) with an increase between week 11 and week 16 (6.9% vs. 8.5%; RRR 18.8%; P < 0.0001). Patients' perceptions about physical activity showed a very low correlation with remote monitoring-assessed physical activity levels (r2 = 0.035, p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine and remote monitoring can explore the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on vital signs and physical activity levels of heart failure patients, playing a crucial role in the prediction of heart failure worsening during circumstances discouraging outpatient visits.

Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: Symptoms, Biochemical Markers, and Global Longitudinal Strain.

BACKGROUND: According to the actual guidelines regarding severe aortic valve stenosis (AS), symptoms are the most important trigger for aortic valve replacement (AVR). However, the objective analysis of cardiological clinic can be confused, considering the aging population this disease affects and the comorbidities. OBJECTIVES: Looking for an objective marker of disease, useful for scheduling the correct AVR, we researched the relation between some biochemical markers of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and its global longitudinal strain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 74 consecutive patients (82 ± 4 years) with severe AS. We identified 61 patients with symptoms (angina, dyspnea, and syncope) and 13 asymptomatic patients. The clinical and echocardiographic parameters were compared between these two groups. LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), NT-pro-B-type brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), troponin T (TNT), creatine kinase-MB (CPK-MB), and myoglobin were determined at the time of evaluation. RESULTS: Compared with the asymptomatic group, patients in the symptomatic group had a lower LVGLS (P = 0.002) and an increased pro-BNP (P = 0.0002). LVGLS showed a good correlation with pro-BNP as a marker of myocardial damage, with a linear increase of pro-BNP in patients with a linear decrease of LVGLS (r = 0.43). Despite the normal value of LVEF > 50% in asymptomatic patients, some of them (46%) have an early dysfunction of LVGLS. No other statistically significant difference emerged from the biochemical analysis, in TNT (P = 0.29), CPK-MB (P = 0.36), and myoglobin (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Pro-BNP and LVGLS can be considered an objective marker of clinical severity of AS disease, useful for management and scheduling of AVR, especially in asymptomatic patients.