Safety and efficacy of Surpass Evolve Flow diverter for intracranial aneurysms: A study of 116 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow diverter embolization is a recognized method for treating intracranial aneurysms. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the Surpass Evolve flow diverter in treating intracranial aneurysm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From May 2019 to June 2022, our center prospectively enrolled patients presenting with both ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. We assessed aneurysm occlusion, along with the occurrence of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications, and mortality at 6-months. The 3-month occlusion rate was determined using MR angiography, while the 6-month occlusion rate employed the O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grading scale on DSA. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients with 120 aneurysms received treatment with the Surpass Evolve device. The average aneurysm size was 6.6 mm (range: 2-30 mm). All patients were administered two loading doses of ticagrelor (180 mg) one day before the procedure and 2 h pre-embolization. A procedural complication occurred in one case, involving wire-related perforation of an M3 branch distant from the giant aneurysm; however, this evolved favorably. There were no reported deaths linked to the treatment. Permanent neurological deficits were observed in 3 (2.5%) patients, primarily due to early in-stent thrombosis. MR angiography results at 3 months indicated complete occlusion for 87 out of 115 (75.6%) monitored aneurysms. The 6-month DSA showed neck remnant or complete occlusion (OKM grade C or D) in 86 out of the 107 (80.4%) patients who underwent follow-up. CONCLUSION: The Surpass Evolve stands out as a reliable and effective flow diverter for the management of intracranial aneurysms.

Bifurcation geometry remodelling of vessels in de novo and growing intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Geometrical parameters, including arterial bifurcation angle, tortuosity, and arterial diameters, have been associated with the pathophysiology of intracranial aneurysm (IA) formation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether these parameters were present before or if they resulted from IA formation and growth. METHODS: Patients from nine academic centers were retrospectively identified if they presented with a de novo IA or a significant IA growth on subsequent imaging. For each patient, geometrical parameters were extracted using a semi-automated algorithm and compared between bifurcations with IA formation or growth (aneurysmal group), and their contralateral side without IA (control group). These parameters were compared at two different times using univariable models, multivariable models, and a sensitivity analysis with paired comparison. RESULTS: 46 patients were included with 21 de novo IAs (46%) and 25 significant IA growths (54%). The initial angle was not different between the aneurysmal and control groups (129.7±42.1 vs 119.8±34.3; p=0.264) but was significantly wider at the final stage (140.4±40.9 vs 121.5±34.1; p=0.032), with a more important widening of the aneurysmal angle (10.8±15.8 vs 1.78±7.38; p=0.001). Variations in other parameters were not significant. These results were confirmed by paired comparisons. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that wider bifurcation angles that have long been deemed causal factors for IA formation or growth may be secondary to IA formation at pathologic bifurcation sites. This finding has implications for our understanding of IA formation pathophysiology.