Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 49(3): 315-337, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34140063

RESUMEN

The 2020 update of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations (CSBPR) for the Secondary Prevention of Stroke includes current evidence-based recommendations and expert opinions intended for use by clinicians across a broad range of settings. They provide guidance for the prevention of ischemic stroke recurrence through the identification and management of modifiable vascular risk factors. Recommendations address triage, diagnostic testing, lifestyle behaviors, vaping, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, other cardiac conditions, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies, and carotid and vertebral artery disease. This update of the previous 2017 guideline contains several new or revised recommendations. Recommendations regarding triage and initial assessment of acute transient ischemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke have been simplified, and selected aspects of the etiological stroke workup are revised. Updated treatment recommendations based on new evidence have been made for dual antiplatelet therapy for TIA and minor stroke; anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation; embolic strokes of undetermined source; low-density lipoprotein lowering; hypertriglyceridemia; diabetes treatment; and patent foramen ovale management. A new section has been added to provide practical guidance regarding temporary interruption of antithrombotic therapy for surgical procedures. Cancer-associated ischemic stroke is addressed. A section on virtual care delivery of secondary stroke prevention services in included to highlight a shifting paradigm of care delivery made more urgent by the global pandemic. In addition, where appropriate, sex differences as they pertain to treatments have been addressed. The CSBPR include supporting materials such as implementation resources to facilitate the adoption of evidence into practice and performance measures to enable monitoring of uptake and effectiveness of recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Canadá/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/complicaciones , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/prevención & control , Masculino , Prevención Secundaria , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control
2.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 48(1): 118-121, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32878659

RESUMEN

We reviewed stroke care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic at our stroke center and provincial telestroke system. We counted referrals to our prevention clinic, code strokes, thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomies, and activations of a provincial telestroke system from February to April of 2017-2020. In April 2020, there was 28% reduction in prevention clinic referrals, 32% reduction in code strokes, and 26% reduction in telestroke activations compared to prior years. Thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy rates remained constant. Fewer patients received stroke services across the spectrum from prevention, acute care to telestroke care in Ontario, Canada, during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , COVID-19 , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Humanos , Ontario/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Telemedicina/tendencias , Trombectomía/tendencias , Terapia Trombolítica/tendencias
3.
Stroke ; 51(11): 3371-3374, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32993462

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Research suggests that women and men may present with different transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke symptoms. We aimed to explore symptoms and features associated with a definite TIA/stroke diagnosis and whether those associations differed by sex. METHODS: We completed a retrospective cohort study of patients referred to The Ottawa Hospital Stroke Prevention Clinic in 2015. Exploratory multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate candidate variables associated with diagnosis and patient sex. Backwards elimination of the interaction terms with a significance level for staying in the model of 0.25 was used to arrive at a more parsimonious model. RESULTS: Based on 1770 complete patient records, sex-specific differences were noted in TIA/stroke diagnosis based on features such as duration of event, suddenness of symptom onset, unilateral sensory loss, and pain. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary work identified sex-specific differences in the final diagnosis of TIA/stroke based on common presenting symptoms/features. More research is needed to understand if there are biases or sex-based differences in TIA/stroke manifestations and diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Amaurosis Fugax/fisiopatología , Afasia/fisiopatología , Disartria/fisiopatología , Hemianopsia/fisiopatología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico , Paresia/fisiopatología , Trastornos Somatosensoriales/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis Carotídea/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Fumar/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo
4.
J Vasc Surg ; 72(5): 1728-1734, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32273220

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend carotid revascularization within 14 days for patients with a symptomatic transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke event. However, significant delays in care persist, with only 9% of outpatients and 36% of inpatients in Ontario meeting this target. The study objective was to explore the influence of health system factors on carotid revascularization timelines. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all symptomatic TIA/stroke patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy or stenting at The Ottawa Hospital (2015-2016). The primary outcome was time from TIA/stroke to carotid revascularization. Health system variables of interest included location and timing of patient presentation, timelines to vascular imaging, and same-day collaboration between key services such as emergency, neurology, and surgery. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were used to determine statistically significant differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 228 records met the inclusion criteria. The median time from TIA/stroke to carotid revascularization was 10 days, with 58% of patients meeting the 14-day guideline. Prompt patient presentation to emergency demonstrated significantly shorter timelines to surgery (7 days; P < .001). Early vascular imaging was strongly correlated with early revascularization (4-5 days; P < .001). In addition, collaboration from two or more care services enhanced timelines to surgery ranging from 2.0 to 6.5 days (P < .001-.008). CONCLUSIONS: Early/emergency response to stroke symptoms was pivotal in achieving best practice recommendations for rapid carotid revascularization, emphasizing the need for ongoing public awareness. Emergency and ambulatory strategies to facilitate urgent vascular imaging, as well as mechanisms for same-day communication between teams require optimization to promote early revascularization.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Anciano , Canadá , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia
6.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 43(5): 648-54, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27670208

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For optimal stroke prevention, best practices guidelines recommend carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic patients within two weeks; however, 2013 Ontario data indicated that only 9% of eligible patients from outpatient Stroke Prevention Clinics (SPCs) achieved this target. The goal of our study was to identify modifiable system factors that could enhance the quality and timeliness of care among patients needing urgent CEA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of transient ischemic attack/stroke patients assessed in Champlain Local Health Integrated Network SPCs between 2011 and 2014 who subsequently underwent CEA. Descriptive statistics were used to define patient characteristics, timelines from symptom onset to CEA, and system factors that contributed to delays or improvements in care. Multivariate analysis was used to determine statistically significant variations between groups. RESULTS: Seventy-five records were eligible for study inclusion. Median time from initial symptoms to CEA was 31 days, with 21.3% of patients undergoing surgery within 2 weeks. Significant delays were common in patient presentation and assessment following symptom onset, wait times for vascular imaging and neurological assessment, and time from surgical assessment to CEA completion. Rapid testing and triage, coupled with collaborative initiatives among SPC, surgical, and radiology teams were associated with significantly improved timelines. CONCLUSIONS: Success factors for rapid CEA are multifaceted, including system changes that address public awareness of stroke and 911 response, improvements in vascular imaging access, and redesign of clinical services to promote collaboration and fast-tracking of care. Implementation of performance measures to monitor and guide clinical innovations is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Endarterectomía Carotidea/métodos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/cirugía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/complicaciones , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Factores de Tiempo
7.
Neurohospitalist ; 10(4): 245-249, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32983341

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The diagnosis of transient ischemic attack (TIA) is largely dependent on a process of clinical decision-making that remains poorly characterized in the absence of a validated and accessible biomarker or imaging test. We performed a retrospective chart review to identify variables associated with a final neurologist diagnosis of TIA/stroke. METHODS: Records for all patients seen in The Ottawa Hospital's Stroke Prevention Clinic in 2015 were analyzed for patient and referral characteristics, features of the presenting neurological event, and final diagnosis by a stroke neurologist (classified as definite, possible, or definite not TIA/stroke). Multinomial logistic regression analysis with backward elimination was used to identify variables associated with the final diagnosis. RESULTS: Our inclusion criteria were met by 1894 patients. After backward elimination, 23 potentially important variables were identified, including monocular vision loss (odds ratio [OR]: 30.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.6-63.3), symptoms of sudden onset (OR: 28.3, 95% CI: 14.2-56.2), unilateral weakness affecting 2 or 3 of face, arm, or leg (OR: 17.7, 95% CI: 9.8-31.7), and homonymous hemianopia (OR: 16.6, 95% CI: 8.1-34.0). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate diagnosis of TIA is essential to initiating appropriate secondary stroke prevention therapies. A focus on elements of the patient history most commonly associated with a final diagnosis of TIA/stroke may help to identify patients in greatest need of urgent SPC assessment and allow for the provision of effective and efficient stroke prevention services.

8.
Int J Stroke ; 14(2): 115-124, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30507363

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Identifying and treating patients with transient ischemic attack is an effective means of preventing stroke. However, making this diagnosis can be challenging, and over a third of patients referred to stroke prevention clinic are ultimately found to have alternate diagnoses. AIMS: We performed a systematic review to determine how neurologists diagnose transient ischemic attack. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: A systematic literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. Publications eligible for inclusion were those that included information on the demographic or clinical features neurologists use to diagnose transient ischemic attacks or transient ischemic attack-mimics. Of 1666 citations, 210 abstracts were selected for full-text screening and 80 publications were ultimately deemed eligible for inclusion. Neurologists were more likely to diagnose transient ischemic attack based on clinical features including negative symptoms or speech deficits. Patients with positive symptoms, altered level of consciousness, or the presence of nonfocal symptoms such as confusion or amnesia were more likely to be diagnosed with transient ischemic attack-mimic. Neurologists commonly include mode of onset (i.e. sudden versus gradual), recurrence of attacks, and localizability of symptoms to a distinct vascular territory in the diagnostic decision-making process. Transient ischemic attack diagnosis was more commonly associated with advanced age, preexisting hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and other vascular risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Neurologists rely on certain clinical and demographic features to distinguish transient ischemic attacks from mimics, which are not currently reflected in widely used risk scores. Clarifying how neurologists diagnose transient ischemic attack may help frontline clinicians to better select patients for referral to stroke prevention clinics.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico , Neurólogos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial , Canadá/epidemiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Hipertensión , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
9.
Int J Stroke ; 13(4): 420-443, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29171361

RESUMEN

The 2017 update of The Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations for the Secondary Prevention of Stroke is a collection of current evidence-based recommendations intended for use by clinicians across a wide range of settings. The goal is to provide guidance for the prevention of ischemic stroke recurrence through the identification and management of modifiable vascular risk factors. Recommendations include those related to diagnostic testing, diet and lifestyle, smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies, carotid artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and other cardiac conditions. Notable changes in this sixth edition include the development of core elements for delivering secondary stroke prevention services, the addition of a section on cervical artery dissection, new recommendations regarding the management of patent foramen ovale, and the removal of the recommendations on management of sleep apnea. The Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations include a range of supporting materials such as implementation resources to facilitate the adoption of evidence to practice, and related performance measures to enable monitoring of uptake and effectiveness of the recommendations. The guidelines further emphasize the need for a systems approach to stroke care, involving an interprofessional team, with access to specialists regardless of patient location, and the need to overcome geographic barriers to ensure equity in access within a universal health care system.


Asunto(s)
Práctica Profesional/normas , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/prevención & control , Enfermedades de la Aorta/prevención & control , Fibrilación Atrial/prevención & control , Peso Corporal/fisiología , Estenosis Carotídea/prevención & control , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Anticonceptivos Orales/efectos adversos , Angiopatías Diabéticas/prevención & control , Dieta Saludable , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Foramen Oval Permeable/cirugía , Estilo de Vida Saludable , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/prevención & control , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/prevención & control , Hipertensión/prevención & control , Drogas Ilícitas/efectos adversos , Arteriosclerosis Intracraneal/prevención & control , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/prevención & control , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Imagen Multimodal , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Prevención Secundaria , Fumar/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA