Microvascular inflammation is a risk factor in kidney transplant recipients with very late conversion from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to belatacept.

BACKGROUND: In de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTR) treatment with belatacept has been established as a comparable option as maintenance immunosuppression, preferably as a strategy to convert from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)- to belatacept-based immunosuppression. Switch to belatacept demonstrated improved renal function in patients with CNI-induced nephrotoxicity, but risk of transplant rejection and the development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are still a matter of debate. Only few data are available in patients at increased immunological risk and late after transplantation. METHODS: We analyzed 30 long-term KTR (including 2 combined pancreas-KTR) converted from CNI to belatacept > 60 months after transplantation with moderate to severe graft dysfunction (GFR ≤ 45 mL/min). Biopsies were classified according to the Banff 2015 criteria. Group differences were assessed in a univariate analysis using Mann Whitney U or Chi square test, respectively. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for treatment failure was performed using a binary logistic regression model including significant predictors from univariate analysis. Fifty-six KTR matched for donor and recipient characteristics were used as a control cohort remaining under CNI-treatment. RESULTS: Patient survival in belatacept cohort at 12/24 months was 96.7%/90%, overall graft survival was 76.7 and 60.0%, while graft survival censored for death was 79.3%/66.7%. In patients with functioning grafts, median GFR improved from 22.5 mL/min to 24.5 mL/min at 24 months. Positivity for DSA at conversion was 46.7%. From univariate analysis of risk factors for graft loss, GFR < 25 mL/min (p = 0.042) and Banff microvascular inflammation (MVI) sum score ≥ 2 (p = 0.023) at conversion were significant at 24 months. In the analysis of risk factors for treatment failure, a MVI sum score ≥ 2 was significant univariately (p = 0.023) and in a bivariate (p = 0.037) logistic regression at 12 months. DSA-positivity was neither associated with graft loss nor treatment failure. The control cohort had comparable graft survival outcomes at 24 months, albeit without increase of mean GFR in patients with functioning grafts (ΔGFR of - 3.6 ± 8.5 mL/min). CONCLUSION: Rescue therapy with conversion to belatacept is feasible in patients with worsening renal function, even many years after transplantation. The benefit in patients with MVI and severe GFR impairment remains to be investigated.

A prospective study of daclatasvir and sofosbuvir in chronic HCV-infected kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Only a few prospective trials exist regarding the use of novel direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. METHODS: This prospective single-center trial evaluated treatment with daclatasvir (DCV) and sofosbuvir (SOF) over 12 weeks in 16 adult chronic HCV infected KTR and eGFR > 30 ml/min/1.73m2. Primary endpoint was sustained virological response 12 weeks after end of therapy (SVR12). Beside baseline liver biopsy, hepatic function and glucose metabolism were regularly assessed. RESULTS: Four of 16 study patients had previously failed interferon-based HCV treatment. Liver biopsy showed mostly moderate fibrosis score before therapy with DCV/SOF was initiated at a median of 10.3 years after transplantation. In total, 15 of 16 KTR achieved SVR12. One patient showed early viral relapse because of resistance-associated variants (RAVs) in the HCV NS5A region. Rescue treatment with SOF/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir resulted in SVR12. DAAs treatment led to significant improvement of liver metabolism and glucose tolerance accompanied with no therapy-associated major adverse events and excellent tolerability. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates safety, efficacy and functional benefit of DCV/SOF treatment in KTR with chronic HCV infection. We provide data on rescue strategies for treatment failures due to present RAVs and amelioration of hepatic function and glucose tolerance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry name: European Clinical Trials Register; Trial registry number (Eudra-CT): 2014-004551-32 , Registration date: Aug 28th 2015.

Transmission of breast cancer by a single multiorgan donor to 4 transplant recipients.

We report 4 cases of breast cancer transmission to transplant recipients from a single organ donor that occurred years after donation. The diagnosis of breast cancer was occult at the time of donation. All of the recipients developed a histologically similar type of breast cancer within 16 months to 6 years after transplantation. Three out of 4 recipients died as a result of widely metastasized disease. One of the recipients survived after transplant nephrectomy followed by cessation of immunosuppression and chemotherapy. This extraordinary case points out the often fatal consequences of donor-derived breast cancer and suggests that removal of the donor organ and restoration of immunity can induce complete remission.

Prophylaxis and treatment of Pneumocystis Jirovecii pneumonia after solid organ transplantation.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is an opportunistic infection diagnosed in immunocompromized patients. After solid organ transplantation, early infection has decreased as a result of effective prophylaxis, but late infections and even outbreaks caused by interpatient transmission of pneumocystis by air are present in the SOT community. Different risk factors for PJP have been described and several indications for PJP prophylaxis have to be considered by clinicians in patients even years after transplantation. Diagnosis of PJP is confirmed by microscopy and immunofluorescence staining of bronchial fluid but PCR as well as serum ß-D-Glucan analysis have become increasingly valuable diagnostic tools. Treatment of choice is Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and early treatment improves prognosis. However, mortality of PJP in solid organ transplant patients is still high and many aspects including the optimal management of immunosuppression during PJP treatment require further investigations.

Anti-thymocyte globulins in kidney transplantation: focus on current indications and long-term immunological side effects.

Antithymocyte globulins (ATGs) are part of the immunosuppression arsenal currently used by clinicians to prevent or treat acute rejection in solid organ transplantation. ATG is a mixture of non-specific anti-lymphocyte immunoglobulins targeting not only T cell subsets but also several other immune and non-immune cells, rendering its precise immunoglobulin composition difficult to appreciate or to compare from one preparation to another. Furthermore, several mechanisms of action have been described. Taken together, this probably explains the efficacy and the side effects associated with this drug. Recent data suggest a long-term negative impact on allograft and patient outcomes, pointing out the need to better characterize the potential toxicity and the benefit-risk balance associated to this immunosuppressive therapy within large clinical trials.

Everolimus for renal angiomyolipoma in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex or sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis: extension of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are recommended as first-line treatment of renal angiomyolipoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) or sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis (sporadic LAM), but follow-up is limited. Longer term efficacy and tolerability data from a Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial are presented. METHODS: Following favorable results from the primary analysis (data cutoff 30 June 2011) of the EXIST-2 trial, patients still receiving study treatment were allowed to enter an open-label extension. Everolimus was initiated at 10 mg once daily and titrated based on tolerability. The primary outcome was angiomyolipoma response rate (≥ 50% reduction from baseline in target lesion volumes). Safety was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: As of the cutoff date (1 May 2013), 112 patients had received everolimus, and the response rate in 107 patients with angiomyolipoma (median duration of medication exposure of 28.9 months) was 54%. The proportion of patients achieving angiomyolipoma reductions of ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% increased over time, reaching 81.6% (62/76) and 64.5% (49/76), respectively, by Week 96. No everolimus-treated patients experienced renal bleeding. The long-term safety profile was consistent with previous reports; adverse events (AEs) were mostly Grade 1/2, and there were no new safety issues. The frequency of emerging AEs and severe AEs lessened over time. CONCLUSIONS: Longer term everolimus treatment appeared safe and effective in patients with TSC- or sporadic LAM-associated renal angiomyolipoma not requiring surgical intervention. Continued reduction in angiomyolipoma volume was demonstrated, and there was no angiomyolipoma-related bleeding; AEs were predictable and generally manageable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrialsgov identifier: NCT00790400 (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00790400).

Clinical outcome of norovirus infection in renal transplant patients.

Transplant patients are at increased risk for developing severe norovirus (NoV) infections with secondary complications such as rejection episodes and acute transplant failure. This single-center retrospective study included all kidney transplant patients tested positive for NoV RNA between January 2007 and December 2011. Data were compared to a control group of 528 kidney transplant patients without NoV infection. Sixty-five kidney transplant patients were recorded NoV RNA positive. Of these, 26 patients (40%) presented with acute transplant failure (AKI). In 43 patients (66.2%), dose reduction in immunosuppression was performed, and of 22 patients receiving tacrolimus, four patients (18.2%) showed toxic trough levels above 15 ng/mL at time of diagnosis. In three patients (4.6%), indicated therapeutic procedures had to be postponed due to prolonged severe diarrhea. Ten patients (15.4%) developed chronic NoV infection. One-year patient and graft survival in NoV patients and controls was 92.3% and 96.4%, respectively (n.s.). Compared to controls, eGFR was already significantly lower before NoV infection and loss of eGFR relative to baseline over 12 and 36 months was significantly higher in NoV-infected patients. In particular, patients initially presenting with AKI experienced a long-term loss of transplant function. Risk factors for NoV infection were immunosuppression containing steroids and antirejection therapy.

Experience with belatacept rescue therapy in kidney transplant recipients.

In kidney transplant recipients with chronic graft dysfunction, long-term immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) or mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) can be challenging due to adverse effects, such as nephrotoxicity and proteinuria. Seventy-nine kidney transplant recipients treated with CNI-based or mTORi-based maintenance immunosuppression who had CNI-induced nephrotoxicity or severe adverse events were switched to belatacept. Mean time from transplantation to belatacept conversion was 69.0 months. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ± standard deviation at baseline was 26.1 ± 15.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 , increasing to 34.0 ± 15.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 at 12 months postconversion (P < 0.0005). Renal function improvements were also seen in patients with low eGFR (<25 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) or high proteinuria (>500 mg/l) at conversion. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for patient and graft survival at 12 months were 95.0% and 85.6%, respectively. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events was 7.9%. One case of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder occurred at 17 months postconversion. For comparison, a historical control group of 41 patients converted to mTORi-based immunosuppression because of biopsy-confirmed CNI-induced toxicity was examined; eGFR increased from 27.6 ± 7.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 at baseline to 31.1 ± 11.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 at 12 months (P = 0.018). Belatacept-based immunosuppression may be an alternative regimen for kidney transplant recipients with CNI- or mTORi-induced toxicity.

No relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between pantoprazole and mycophenolate in renal transplant patients: a randomized crossover study.

AIMS: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) suppresses lymphocyte proliferation through inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) inhibition. Two formulations have been approved: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). Pantoprazole (PAN) inhibits gastric acid secretion, which may alter MPA exposure. Data from healthy volunteers suggest a significant drug-drug interaction (DDA) between pantoprazole and MPA. In transplant patients, a decreased MPA area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) may lead to higher IMPDH activity, which may lead to higher acute rejection risk. Therefore this DDA was evaluated in renal transplant patients under maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: In this single-centre, open, randomized, four-sequence, four-treatment crossover study, the influence of PAN 40 mg on MPA pharmacokinetics such as (dose-adjusted) AUC0-12 h (dAUC) was analysed in 20 renal transplant patients (>6 months post-transplantation) receiving MMF (1-2 g day(-1) ) and EC-MPS in combination with ciclosporin. The major metabolite MPA glucuronide (MPAG) and the IMPDH activity were also examined. RESULTS: MMF + PAN intake led to a lowest mean dAUC for MPA of 41.46 ng h ml(-1) mg(-1) [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.38, 50.54], while MPA exposure was highest for EC-MPS + PAN [dAUC: 46.30 ng h ml(-1) mg(-1) (95% CI 37.11, 55.49)]. Differences in dAUC and dose-adjusted maximum concentration (dCmax) were not significant. Only for MMF [dAUC: 41.46 ng h ml(-1) mg(-1) (95% CI 32.38, 50.54)] and EC-MPS [dAUC: 43.39 ng h ml(-1) mg(-1) (95% CI 33.44, 53.34)] bioequivalence was established for dAUC [geometric mean ratio: 101.25% (90% CI 84.60, 121.17)]. Simultaneous EC-MPS + PAN intake led to an earlier time to Cmax (tmax) [median: 2.0 h (min-max: 0.5-10.0)] than EC-MPS intake alone [3 h (1.5-12.0); P = 0.037]. Tmax was not affected for MMF [1.0 h (0.5-5.0)] ± pantoprazole [1.0 h (0.5-6.0), P = 0.928). No impact on MPAG pharmacokinetics or IMPDH activity was found. CONCLUSION: Pantoprazole influences EC-MPS and MMF pharmacokinetics but as it had no impact on MPA pharmacodynamics, the immunosuppressive effect of the drug was not impaired.

The need for minimization strategies: current problems of immunosuppression.

New immunosuppressants and the better use of immunosuppressant combination therapy have led to significant improvements in renal allograft outcomes over the last decades. Yet, despite dramatic reduction in rejection rates and improvement in 1-year graft survival, long-term graft attrition rates remained rather constant. Current immunosuppressant combinations are frequently leading to overimmunosuppression and are increasing cardiovascular risk. Importantly, calcineurin inhibitors are nephrotoxic, contribute to cardiovascular risk and chronic allograft dysfunction. Furthermore, immunosuppressant-associated toxicities aggravate immune-mediated nephron injury and side effects lead to nonadherence, an identified important reason for late acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejections. The frequent development of a chronic humoral response indicates rather insufficient immunosuppression of current combinations than simple under-immunosuppression. While there is no evidence that increasing immunosuppressive doses will improve outcomes or reduce de novo HLA-antibody formation, there is clear evidence that adequate minimization strategies will reduce side effect burden. Because of low rejection risk, but frequent side effects, drug minimization is particularly relevant for the many maintenance patients. In summary, new therapeutic strategies need to be developed from adequately powered clinical trials for reduction of the many side effects of immunosuppressants. Such evidence-based and time-dependent immunosuppressive minimization strategies are needed to achieve better long-term outcomes in the future.

Pretransplant virtual PRA and long-term outcomes of kidney transplant recipients.

Virtual panel-reactive antibodies (vPRA) have been implemented to gauge sensitization worldwide. It is unclear how it associates with long-term outcomes, and its correlation with peak (pPRA) or actual (aPRA) has not been studied. We retrospectively reviewed data from 18- to 65-year-old kidney-only transplant patients during 1.1.1996-31.7.2011 in our center. PRAs were calculated based on solid-phase techniques. Of the 726 qualified cases, regardless of the PRA type, sensitized patients (PRA > 5%) had more females and previous transplant. Highly sensitized (HS, PRA > 50%) had longer waiting time, lower transplant rate, less living donor, more delayed graft function, and acute rejection. The conformity between vPRA and pPRA in HS was 75%, 57% between pPRA and aPRA. Forty-three percent (61/142) patients whose pPRA was >5% had no detectable aPRA and maintained similar outcomes as sensitized patients. Multivariate analysis showed consistently lower death-censored graft survival in HS defined by vPRA [HR 2.086 (95% CI 1.078-4.037), P < 0.05] and pPRA [HR 2.139 (95% CI 1.024-4.487), P < 0.05]. Both vPRA and pPRA provided reliable way estimating sensitization and predicting long-term graft survival, while aPRA might underestimate true sensitization. vPRA might be the most objective parameter to gauge sensitization.

Everolimus for angiomyolipoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex or sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis (EXIST-2): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Angiomyolipomas are slow-growing tumours associated with constitutive activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and are common in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex and sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis. The insidious growth of these tumours predisposes patients to serious complications including retroperitoneal haemorrhage and impaired renal function. Everolimus, a rapamycin derivative, inhibits the mTOR pathway by acting on the mTOR complex 1. We compared the angiomyolipoma response rate on everolimus with placebo in patients with tuberous sclerosis or sporadic lymphanioleiomyomatosis-associated angiomyolipomata. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, patients aged 18 years or older with at least one angiomyolipoma 3 cm or larger in its longest diameter (defined by radiological assessment) and a definite diagnosis of tuberous sclerosis or sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 fashion with the use of an interactive web response system, to receive oral everolimus 10 mg per day or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with confirmed angiomyolipoma response of at least a 50% reduction in total volume of target angiomyolipomas relative to baseline. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00790400. RESULTS: 118 patients (median age 31·0 years; IQR 18·0­61·0) from 24 centres in 11 countries were randomly assigned to receive everolimus (n=79) or placebo (n=39). At the data cutoff, double-blind treatment was ongoing for 98 patients; two main reasons for discontination were disease progression (nine placebo patients) followed by adverse events (two everolimus patients; four placebo patients). The angiomyolipoma response rate was 42% (33 of 79 [95% CI 31­53%]) for everolimus and 0% (0 of 39 [0­9%]) for placebo (response rate difference 42% [24­58%]; one-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test p<0·0001). The most common adverse events in the everolimus and placebo groups were stomatitis (48% [38 of 79], 8% [3 of 39], respectively), nasopharyngitis (24% [19 of 79] and 31% [12 of 39]), and acne-like skin lesions (22% [17 of 79] and 5% [2 of 39]). INTERPRETATION: Everolimus reduced angiomyolipoma volume with an acceptable safety profile, suggesting it could be a potential treatment for angiomyolipomas associated with tuberous sclerosis. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Immune response to an adjuvanted influenza A H1N1 vaccine (Pandemrix(®)) in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: In the course of the influenza A H1N1 pandemic, transplanted patients were recommended to receive vaccination. In the present study, we evaluated the immune response to an adjuvanted influenza A H1N1 vaccine (Pandemrix®) in renal allograft recipients. METHODS: Sixty patients and 22 healthy controls participated in a prospective observational study and received a single dose of Pandemrix®. H1N1 antibody titres as well as anti-HLA antibodies were determined before and after vaccination. In 19 patients, a booster vaccination was performed and the outcome of all vaccinated renal allograft recipients (n = 107) in our clinic was reviewed. RESULTS: Two out of sixty patients had an elevated influenza A H1N1 titre before vaccination. Of the remaining 58 patients, only 20/58 (34.5%) developed a protective immune response in contrast to 20/22 (91%) of the control group. After booster vaccination, a protective titre was present in 8/19 (42%) of patients. Of the 107 patients, 6 (5.6%) developed new donor-specific HLA antibodies after vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that Pandemrix® does not provide a protective immune response in the majority of kidney transplant recipients. Therefore, for new vaccines, efficacy as well as safety profiles should be evaluated in this subgroup of patients.

Influence of lipid profile and statin administration on arterial stiffness in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Hyperlipidemia is one of the major risk factors for developing a cardiovascular disease (CVD) and it is a frequent post-transplant complication, occurring in up to 60% of the renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Lipid lowering therapy with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) is generally recommended and may reduce the overall cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate the lipid profile, statin administration and their relationship with arterial stiffness parameters in RTRs. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-four stable RTRs (62.5% male) transplanted between 1994 and 2018 were randomly enrolled to the study. The following parameters of arterial stiffness was measured in each patient: ankle brachial index, carotid femoral pulse wave velocity (baPWV left and right, cfPWV) and pulse pressure (PP right and left). The study group was divided based on the use statins: 143 (41.6%) and 201 (58.4%). RTRs were qualified to the statin (+) and the statin (-) group, respectively. RESULTS: In the statin (+) as compared to statin (-) group there were more patients with a CVD (32.9% vs. 14.9%) and diabetes (25.2% vs. 14.4%). In the whole study group, CVD was associated with a significant increase of both baPWV and cfPWV as well as PP (8.5 mmHg). There were significant differences in arterial stiffness parameters (baPWV, cfPWV, PP) between the statin (+) and the statin (-) group. CONCLUSIONS: Arterial stiffness was increased in RTRs with CVD and hyperlipidemia. The control of hyperlipidemia was poor in RTRs.

Differential impact of the CYP3A5*1 and CYP3A5*3 alleles on pre-dose concentrations of two tacrolimus formulations.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic implications of conversion from a twice-daily (P-Tac) to a once-daily (A-Tac) tacrolimus (Tac) formulation. METHODS: We analyzed Tac levels in a cohort of 41 renal transplant patients with a stable graft function over a period of 1 year before and after conversion. RESULTS: After conversion, the patients had, on average, significantly lower Tac trough and dose-normalized trough levels (14%, P=0.0004 and 23%, P=0.001, respectively) despite similar doses. CYP3A5*3/*3 patients (n=27) required significantly lower Tac doses with both the formulations to reach Tac target levels (P-Tac 39%, P=0.011; A-Tac 36%, P=0.003) compared with *1/*3 patients (n=13). Interestingly, after the conversion, mean Tac trough levels and dose-normalized trough level remained almost constant in *1/*3 patients, but decreased significantly in *3/*3 patients (16%, P=0.001 and 25%, P=0.006). CONCLUSION: This study provides further evidence that the CYP3A5*1/*3 polymorphism significantly impacts Tac pharmacokinetics. Moreover, we show for the first time a pharmacogenetic effect on two different Tac formulations, as Tac trough levels of *3/*3 patients declined significantly after conversion to identical A-Tac doses.

TFE3 activation in a TSC1-altered malignant PEComa: challenging the dichotomy of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms.

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) form a family of rare mesenchymal neoplasms that typically display myomelanocytic differentiation. Upregulation of mTOR signaling due the inactivation of TSC1/2 (Tuberous Sclerosis 1 and 2) is believed to be a key oncogenic driver in this disease. Recently, a subgroup of PEComas harboring TFE3 (Transcription Factor E3) rearrangements and presenting with a distinctive morphology has been identified. TSC1/2 and TFE3 aberrations are deemed to be mutually exclusive in PEComa, with two different pathogenic mechanisms assumed to lead to tumorigenesis. Here, we challenge this dichotomy by presenting a case of a clinically aggressive TCS1-mutated PEComa displaying a TFE3-altered phenotype. FISH analysis was suggestive of a TFE3 inversion; however, RNA and whole genome sequencing was ultimately unable to identify a fusion involving the gene. However, a copy number increase of the chromosomal region encompassing TFE3 was detected and transcriptome analysis confirmed upregulation of TFE3, which was also seen at the protein level. Therefore, we believe that the TSC1/2-mTOR pathway and TFE3 overexpression can simultaneously contribute to tumorigenesis in PEComa. Our comprehensive genetic analyses add to the understanding of the complex pathogenic mechanisms underlying PEComa and harbor insights for clinical treatment options.

Obesity, Fat Tissue Parameters, and Arterial Stiffness in Renal Transplant Recipients.

OBJECTIVE: Arterial stiffness and altered body composition (increased body fat mass [BFM] and decreased lean body mass) are acknowledged risk factors for adverse outcomes after kidney transplantation related to cardiovascular diseases. The aim of the study was the assessment of the relationship between arterial stiffness and fat tissue parameters in renal transplants recipients (RTrs). METHODS: A group of 344 RTrs with stable disease and a mean age of 52.7 years (62.5% men) who underwent transplantation between 1994 and 2018 were randomly enrolled in the study. The following parameters of arterial stiffness were measured: brachial-ankle and carotid-femoral pulse waves velocities (baPWVs left and right, cfPWVs). The obesity and fat tissue (body mass index [BMI], waist-to-hip ratio [WHR], BFM, fat free mass [FFM], percent body fat [PBF], trunk segmental fat analysis [TSFA], and visceral fat area [VFA]) parameters were assessed with InBody 170. RESULTS: The median time of dialysis and after kidney transplantation was 58.5 and 78 months, respectively. Obesity according BMI, WHR, and VFA was diagnosed in 49.7%, 45.0%, and 44.5% of patients, respectively. The median value of BFM, FFM, VFA, and TSFA and the mean value of PBF were 19.3 kg, 55 kg, 93.2 cm2, 24.9 kg, and 27.3%, respectively. We found significant positive correlations among WHR, VFA, baPWV right, baPWV left, and cfPWV. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity and visceral fat tissue influence on arterial stiffness. The analysis of magnitude of obesity and body fat tissue parameters can be used as an additional cardiovascular risk factor in RTrs.

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade and arterial stiffness in renal transplant recipients - a cross-sectional prospective observational clinical study.

INTRODUCTION: Arterial stiffness parameters can be used as a predictor of cardiovascular events in the general population and renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Additionally, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) blockade mitigates arterial stiffness in the general population. There are no sufficient data concerning the role of the RAAS blockade in reducing arterial stiffness among patients after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of the above blockade on arterial stiffness in RTRs. METHODS: 344 stable RTRs were enrolled in the study. 204 (59.3%) of them received RAAS blockers (angiotensin convertase inhibitors - ACEIs or angiotensin receptor blockers - ARBs): group RAAS (+), and 140 (40.7%) were not treated with such agents: group RAAS (-). RESULTS: In the RAAS (+) group, 55.9% of the patients used ARBs and 44.1% ACEIs. Cardiovascular disease (coronary artery disease and/or peripheral obliterans artery disease) (27.9% vs 14.3%, p<0.05), and heart failure (27.4% vs 24.3%, p<0.05) were significantly more often diagnosed in the RAAS (+) group when compared to the RAAS (-) group. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and all arterial stiffness parameters (baPWV, cfPWV, pulse pressure) did not differ significantly between the RAAS (+) and RAAS (-) groups. The results revealed that cardiovascular disease in patients was associated with a significant increase in both, the PWV and pulse pressure. No difference between the arterial stiffness parameters was observed in patients with a cardiovascular disease, diabetes and heart failure in the RAAS (+) and RAAS (-) groups. Moreover, beta-blockers and diuretics ameliorated the arterial stiffness parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the indication bias of the RAAS prescription, and no conclusion on the influence of RAAS on arterial stiffness can be drawn. The results indicated diuretics and beta-blockers as agents lowering the arterial stiffness in RTRs.

Everolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients participating in the Eurotransplant senior program: Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study (SENATOR).

Early conversion to everolimus was assessed in kidney transplant recipients participating in the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP), a population in whom data are lacking. The SENATOR multicenter study enrolled 207 kidney transplant recipients undergoing steroid withdrawal at week 2 post-transplant (ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00956293]). At week 7, patients were randomized (1:2 ratio) to continue the previous calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimen with mycophenolic acid (MPA) and cyclosporine or switch to a CNI-free regimen with MPA, everolimus (5-10 ng/mL) and basiliximab at weeks 7 and 12, then followed for 18 weeks to month 6 post-transplant. The primary endpoint was estimated GFR (eGFR). At week 7, 77/207 (37.2%) patients were randomized (53 everolimus, 24 control). At month 6, eGFR was comparable: 36.5±10.8ml/min with everolimus versus 42.0±13.0ml/min in the control group (p = 0.784). Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 27.8% of everolimus-treated patients and 0.0% of control patients (p = 0005). Efficacy profiles showed no difference. In conclusion, eGFR, safety and efficacy outcomes at month 6 post-transplant showed no difference between groups. The everolimus group experienced a higher rate of discontinuation due to adverse events. However, the high rate of non-randomization is highly relevant, indicating this to be a somewhat unstable patient population regardless of treatment.

High frequency of valganciclovir underdosing for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The correct valganciclovir dose for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis depends on renal function estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) estimated creatinine clearance (CG-CrCl) formula. Patients with delayed or rapidly changing graft function after transplantation (tx) will need dose adjustments. METHODS: We performed a retrospective investigation of valganciclovir dosing in renal transplant patients receiving CMV prophylaxis between August 2003 and August 2011, and analysed valganciclovir dosing, CG-CrCl, CMV viraemia (CMV-PCR <750 copies/mL), leucopenia (<3500/µL) and neutropenia (<1500/µL) in the first year post-transplant. On Days 30 and 60 post-transplant, dosing pattern in relation to estimated creatinine clearance was analysed regarding CMV viraemia, leucopenia and neutropenia. RESULTS: Six hundred and thirty-five patients received valganciclovir prophylaxis that lasted 129 ± 68 days with a mean dose of 248 ± 152 mg/day of whom 112/635 (17.7%) developed CMV viraemia, 166/635 (26.1%) leucopenia and 48/635 (7.6%) neutropenia. CMV resistance within 1 year post-transplant was detected in three patients. Only 137/609 (22.6%) patients received the recommended dose, while n = 426 (70.3%) were underdosed and n = 43 (7.1%) were overdosed at Day 30 post-tx. Risk factors for CMV viraemia were donor positive D (+)/receptor negative R (-) status and short prophylaxis duration, but not low valganciclovir dose. Risk factors for developing leucopenia were D+/R- status and low renal function. No significant differences in dosing frequency were observed in patients developing neutropenia or not (P = 0.584). CONCLUSION: Most patients do not receive the recommended valganciclovir dose. Despite obvious underdosing in a large proportion of patients, effective prophylaxis was maintained and it was not associated as a risk factor for CMV viraemia or leucopenia.