Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 39(1): 191, 2023 May 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37140693

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Preoperative evaluation of Image Defined Risk Factors (IDRFs) in neuroblastoma (NB) is crucial for determining suitability for upfront resection or tumor biopsy. IDRFs do not all carry the same weighting in predicting tumor complexity and surgical risk. In this study we aimed to assess and categorize a surgical complexity (Surgical Complexity Index, SCI) in NB resection. METHODS: A panel of 15 surgeons was involved in an electronic Delphi consensus survey to identify and score a set of shared items predictive and/or indicative of surgical complexity, including the number of preoperative IDRFs. A shared agreement included the achievement of at least 75% consensus focused on a single or two close risk categories. RESULTS: After 3 Delphi rounds, agreement was established on 25/27 items (92.6%). A severity score was established for each item ranging from 0 to 3 with an overall SCI range varying from a minimum score of zero to a maximum score of 29 points for any given patient. CONCLUSIONS: A consensus on a SCI to stratify the risks related to neuroblastoma tumor resection was established by the panel experts. This index will now be deployed to critically assign a better severity score to IDRFs involved in NB surgery.


Asunto(s)
Neuroblastoma , Humanos , Neuroblastoma/cirugía , Neuroblastoma/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Biopsia
3.
J Pediatr Surg ; 55(10): 2026-2029, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31837839

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ovarian tumors in children are rare, mature teratoma being the most common histological entity. Robust guidelines to aid patient follow-up after resection are distinctly lacking. Although mature teratoma has a very good prognosis following complete resection, small studies have reported the occurrence of metachronous disease and recurrence to a variable degree (2.5-23% of patients). Nevertheless, there are surgeons who recommend no follow-up is required for these children after primary tumor resection. We investigated the incidence of (i) recurrence and (ii) metachronous disease in pediatric patients following ovarian tumor resection. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study amongst UK pediatric surgical oncology centers. Females <16 years with diagnosis of ovarian tumor from 2006 to 2016 were included. Functional/neonatal ovarian cysts were excluded. RESULTS: Three hundred ten patients with ovarian tumors treated at 12 surgical oncology centers were identified. Mean age at surgery was 11 years [IQR 8-14]. Most common diagnosis were mature teratoma (57%, 177 cases), immature teratoma (10.9%, 34 cases) and serous cystadenoma (7.7%, 24 cases). 8.1% (25 cases) of all females were identified with tumor recurrence/ metachronous disease. 5.1% (9 cases) of patients with mature teratoma had recurrent/ metachronous disease. Most of these patients were diagnosed at routine clinic follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our study clearly shows that ovarian tumor recurrence(s) and metachronous disease occur, even in "benign" ovarian tumors. We recommend female pediatric patients should have robust follow-up care plans after primary diagnosis and resection of ovarian tumor(s). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE STATEMENT: This is a level II evidence study. It is a retrospective multicentre collaborative study which summarizes data from a national cohort of children.


Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Teratoma , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Teratoma/epidemiología , Teratoma/patología , Reino Unido
4.
J Pediatr Urol ; 15(3): 252.e1-252.e4, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31005636

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Many urological operations require placement of a urethral Foley catheter. The catheter often needs to remain in situ for a period of time after discharge; and patients subsequently require either a further hospital admission or community nurse review for catheter removal. Parents can easily remove the catheter at home by cutting the balloon port. This disrupts the valve and hence deflates the retaining balloon, thereby facilitating spontaneous passage of the catheter. The authors introduced this practice to their institution. AIM: The aim was to assess safety and success of parental home catheter removal. METHODS: A prospective data study was performed in a large pediatric urology center over a 12-month time period. Patients <16 years after single-stage hypospadias repair or other penile surgery were included on a voluntary basis. Parents of eligible patients were instructed verbally and with an information leaflet, including date for removal. Telephone follow-up after removal was undertaken to assess the outcome. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included over a 12-month time period. Patient age ranged from 9 months to 12 years (median age 2.5 years). The majority (82%) of patients had required a catheter after hypospadias repair. Home catheter removal was successful in 92% cases. Three children required professional support for catheter removal. Median time until catheter passage was 3 h (range 0-24 h). Considering that cost for day case admission for catheter removal averages at 130£ per patient, home catheter removal saved the NHS 4550£ in the time period. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to report the safety and feasibility of parental home catheter removal by cutting the balloon port valve in the pediatric population. It offers a number of distinct advantages compared with traditional methods for removal. These include, namely, (i) positive patient experience: catheter removal in a familiar environment by a relative minimizes stressful experiences for the family; (ii) minimal trauma to healing tissues through spontaneous catheter passage; and (iii) health care-related cost savings. This was an initial benchmarking study, so patient numbers were relatively small. Nevertheless, it shows that the method is safe and received positive parental feedback. CONCLUSION: Parental home removal of a urethral catheter is a feasible and safe alternative to catheter removal by a health-care professional. It minimizes parental anxiety and inconvenience related to the catheter removal appointment and allows for significant cost savings.


Asunto(s)
Benchmarking , Atención Domiciliaria de Salud , Padres , Cuidados Posoperatorios/enfermería , Cateterismo Urinario/enfermería , Cateterismo Urinario/normas , Catéteres Urinarios , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA