Provider Specialization in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Quality of Care and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is complex and variation in care has been well-documented. However, the drivers of practice variation remain unexplored. We examined variation based on the treating gastroenterologist's IBD focus (proportion of outpatient visits for IBD). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort of newly diagnosed patients with IBD using data from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (2000-2020). The exposure variable was whether the treating gastroenterologist had an IBD focus (>90th percentile of IBD visits/total outpatient visits). We used adjusted regression models to evaluate associations between provider IBD focus and process measures (use of mesalamine, corticosteroid, biologic, and narcotic medications and endoscopic or radiographic imaging) and clinical outcomes (time to IBD-related hospitalization and bowel resection surgery). We tested for change in treatment patterns over time by including an interaction term for study era (2004-2012 vs 2013-2020). RESULTS: The study included 772 children treated by 493 providers and 2864 adults treated by 2076 providers. In children, none of the associations between provider focus and process or outcome measures were significant. In adults, care from an IBD-focused provider was associated with more use of biologics, combination therapy, and imaging and endoscopy, and less mesalamine use for Crohn's disease (P < .05 for all comparisons) but not with other process measures. Biologics were prescribed more frequently and narcotics less frequently during the later era (P < .05 for both). Hospitalization and surgery rates were not associated with IBD focus or era. CONCLUSIONS: IBD care for adults varies by provider specialization. Given the evolving complexity, novel methods may be needed to standardize care.

Surgery for Crohn's Disease Is Associated With a Dysbiotic Microbiome and Metabolome: Results From Two Prospective Cohorts.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Crohn's disease is associated with alterations in the gut microbiome and metabolome described as dysbiosis. We characterized the microbial and metabolic consequences of ileal resection, the most common Crohn's disease surgery. METHODS: Patients with and without intestinal resection were identified from the Diet to Induce Remission in Crohn's Disease and Study of a Prospective Adult Research Cohort with Inflammatory Bowel Disease studies. Stool samples were analyzed with shotgun metagenomics sequencing. Fecal butyrate was measured with 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Fecal bile acids and plasma 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) was measured with mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Intestinal resection was associated with reduced alpha diversity and altered beta diversity with increased Proteobacteria and reduced Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. Surgery was associated with higher representation of genes in the KEGG pathway for ABC transporters and reduction in genes related to bacterial metabolism. Surgery was associated with reduced concentration of the But gene but this did not translate to reduced fecal butyrate concentration. Surgery was associated with decreased abundance of bai operon genes, with increased plasma C4 concentration, increased primary bile acids and reduced secondary bile acids, including isoLCA. Additionally, Egerthella lenta, Adlercreutzia equalofaciens, and Gordonibacter pamelaeae were lower in abundance among patients with prior surgery in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In 2 different populations, prior surgery in Crohn's disease is associated with altered fecal microbiome. Patients who had undergone ileal resection had reduction in the potentially beneficial bacteria E lenta and related actinobacteria and secondary bile acids, including isoLCA, suggesting that these could be biomarkers of patients at higher risk for disease progression.

Comparative Risk of Injury with Concurrent Use of Opioids and Skeletal Muscle Relaxants.

Concurrent use of skeletal muscle relaxants (SMRs) and opioids has been linked to an increased risk of injury. However, it remains unclear whether the injury risks differ by specific SMR when combined with opioids. We conducted nine retrospective cohort studies within a US Medicaid population. Each cohort consisted exclusively of person-time exposed to both an SMR and one of the three most dispensed opioids-hydrocodone, oxycodone, and tramadol. Opioid users were further divided into three cohorts based on the initiation order of SMRs and opioids-synchronically triggered, opioid-triggered, and SMR-triggered. Within each cohort, we used Cox proportional hazard models to compare the injury rates for different SMRs compared to methocarbamol, adjusting for covariates. We identified 349,543, 139,458, and 218,967 concurrent users of SMRs with hydrocodone, oxycodone, and tramadol, respectively. In the oxycodone-SMR-triggered cohort, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.86 (95% CI, 1.23-2.82) for carisoprodol and 1.73 (1.09-2.73) for tizanidine. In the tramadol-synchronically triggered cohort, the adjusted HRs were 0.69 (0.49-0.97) for metaxalone and 0.62 (0.42-0.90) for tizanidine. In the tramadol-SMR-triggered cohort, the adjusted HRs were 1.51 (1.01-2.26) for baclofen and 1.48 (1.03-2.11) for cyclobenzaprine. All other HRs were statistically nonsignificant. In conclusion, the relative injury rate associated with different SMRs used concurrently with the three most dispensed opioids appears to vary depending on the specific opioid and the order of combination initiation. If confirmed by future studies, clinicians should consider the varying injury rates when prescribing SMRs to individuals using hydrocodone, oxycodone, and tramadol.